Compose started at Thu Jun 26 08:15:02 UTC 2014
New package: libsodium-0.5.0-2.el7
A fork of networking and cryptography library with compatible APIs
New package: mingw-gsm-1.0.13-1.el7
Shared libraries for GSM speech compressor
Removed package: eigen2-2.0.17-6.el7
On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 09:41:32 -0600
Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 June 2014 09:28, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 08:23:24 -0700
Jeff Sheltren j...@tag1consulting.com wrote:
Awesome, thanks!
Is there a plan/schedule for getting epel-7
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 09:18:34AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Hopefully we can get the wiki page with package contents updated soon.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/epel7 is now updated. There is no
notation yet, which tells from which channel the package is coming.
Regards
Till
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 5:57 AM, Felix Miata mrma...@earthlink.net wrote:
But yes, backwards incompatible changes suck, although in this case
setterm has historically done something non-standard.
setterm --foreground white --bold --background blue --blank 59
--store
produces nearly
On 2014-06-26 14:18 (GMT+0800) Christopher Meng composed:
Felix Miata wrote:
setterm --foreground white --bold --background blue --blank 59 --store
produces nearly the same error message:
setterm: argument error: --background
Note that the argument the message
On 06/25/2014 11:52 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
I think what's order dependent is a bug in the rewrite to require the
double hyphen where previously a single did the job. I tried this:
setterm --background blue --foreground white --bold --blank 59 --store
That moved the error:
setterm:
On 2014-06-25 23:54 (GMT-0700) Samuel Sieb composed:
Felix Miata wrote:
I think what's order dependent is a bug in the rewrite to require the
double hyphen where previously a single did the job. I tried this:
setterm --background blue --foreground white --bold --blank 59 --store
Hi Joseph,
On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 22:22 -0400, Joseph Marrero wrote:
Hello,
My FAS is : jmarrero
I can not update any of my packages for the time being, will know If I can
continue contributing in about a month. I can pass the ownership to who ever
wants to maintain the packages I currently
On 06/24/2014 04:23 AM, poma wrote:
One exemplary example of how to or how to not to.
# yum clean all
Loaded plugins: langpacks
Cleaning repos: rawhide
Cleaning up everything
# yum --enablerepo \* clean all
Loaded plugins: langpacks
Cleaning repos: fedora fedora-debuginfo
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:31:18AM +0700, Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich wrote:
Package(co)maintainers
===
NearTree tmatsuu
The following packages
I'd like to claim the ownership of blktap and alliance.
What should I do next? DIrectly request the ACL via bugzilla?
Thanks.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Jun 18, 2014 5:28 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses for three package
maintainers are no longer valid. I'm starting the unresponsive
maintainer policy to find out if they are still interested in
maintaining their packages (and if
On 2014-06-25, Lukas Zapletal l...@redhat.com wrote:
https://github.com/lzap/foreman-dummy-icons
Just a bug report. The
-draw rectangle 0,0,20,20
argument is responsible for the frame at the edge of the picture. So if
you paremetrized:
-size ${SIZE}x${SIZE}
argument, you need to change
+1 from me!
On Jun 26, 2014 5:51 PM, Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
From time to time, I see trivial patches posted in bugzilla which end up
sitting there because the maintainer is too busy / gets bombarded with tons
of bugzilla mails and misses that particular one / whatever
Reposted from http://fedoramagazine.org/5tftw-2014-06-24/.
Fedora is a big project, and it’s hard to follow it all. This series
highlights interesting happenings in five different areas every week.
It isn’t comprehensive news coverage — just quick summaries with links
to each. Here are the five
Hi,
From time to time, I see trivial patches posted in bugzilla which end
up sitting there because the maintainer is too busy / gets bombarded
with tons of bugzilla mails and misses that particular one / whatever
reason. As a packager, sometimes it seems very hard to get such trivial
patches
On 26 June 2014 17:02, Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 from me!
If it's a trivial patch then I think it makes sense to just do it.
From someone that touches hundreds of different projects every month,
I've found it's better to ask forgiveness than permission :)
Richard
--
devel
Il 26/06/2014 18:17, Richard Hughes ha scritto:
On 26 June 2014 17:02, Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 from me!
If it's a trivial patch then I think it makes sense to just do it.
From someone that touches hundreds of different projects every month,
I've found it's better to ask
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 17:17:07 +0100
Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 June 2014 17:02, Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 from me!
If it's a trivial patch then I think it makes sense to just do it.
From someone that touches hundreds of different projects every
On 26.06.2014 18:42, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 17:17:07 +0100
Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 June 2014 17:02, Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 from me!
If it's a trivial patch then I think it makes sense to just do it.
From someone that touches
On 2014-06-26 03:03 (GMT-0400) Felix Miata composed:
On 2014-06-25 23:54 (GMT-0700) Samuel Sieb composed:
Felix Miata wrote:
setterm --background blue --foreground white --bold --blank 59 --store
That moved the error:
setterm: argument error: --blank
Perhaps the on/off
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 10:42:17AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
I'm not sure the entire group of provenpackagers would like to be
notified of such trivial patches waiting. Is there a group of
provenpackagers who would be willing to query for and apply these?
I am.
Another idea that leaps to
On 26.06.2014 19:04, Till Maas wrote:
IMHO there is not a huge group needed to handle on-demand provenpackager
tasks (as long as it is only required to review and apply a patch to
dist-git and potential debugging/scratch building is done before).
Good point, adding to the previous conditions
On 2014-06-26 11:17, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 26 June 2014 17:02, Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 from me!
If it's a trivial patch then I think it makes sense to just do it.
From someone that touches hundreds of different projects every month,
I've found it's better to ask
Once upon a time, Felix Miata mrma...@earthlink.net said:
New problem. Now that the kernel is no longer putting the display to
sleep and I can start X, I find that setterm command no longer
applies only to the vttys. It's now coloring my Konsoles, which I do
not want, and I don't see a way in
On 26.06.2014 09:39, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
Hello,
The globbing mechanism in DNF is still evolving and it is possible you
are running into one of the cases that we omitted to implement. Or
perhaps there is a different problem. Can I ask you to file a bug using
On 2014-06-26 13:24 (GMT-0500) Chris Adams composed:
Felix Miata said:
Now that the kernel is no longer putting the display to
sleep and I can start X, I find that setterm command no longer
applies only to the vttys. It's now coloring my Konsoles, which I do
not want, and I don't see a way
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 10:42:17 -0600,
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
Another idea that leaps to mind is to add more provenpackagers...
have we set the bar too high so no one wants to apply?
Trivial bug fixing across the project seems to be a reasonable justification
for giving out
On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 18:41 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 15:28 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
* ssp - former email address sandm...@redhat.com
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packager/ssp/
Point of contact: 39
Co-maintainer:254
Watched: 0
We're
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 17:17:07 +0100
Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 June 2014 17:02, Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 from me!
If it's a trivial patch then I think it makes sense to just do it.
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 15:42:10 -0400
Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 18:41 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 15:28 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
* ssp - former email address sandm...@redhat.com
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packager/ssp/
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 06:57:29 -0400
Andy Grimm agr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 18, 2014 5:28 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
...snip...
* sadmac - former email address cdah...@redhat.com
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packager/sadmac/
Point of contact: 1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
I think having a trivial patch policy and proven packager route of
implementation is a great idea!
On 06/26/2014 11:42 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
provenpackagers who would be willing to query for and apply these?
Another idea that leaps to mind is
On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 18:19:32 +0200
Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Given that no-one seems to know how to contact deji, I'd like to
request the takeover of scotch.
as a fesco member I can ack this.
We will be orphaning his packages and you can pick up scotch.
kevin
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 13:01:05 -0500
Yaakov Selkowitz yselk...@redhat.com wrote:
On 2014-06-26 11:17, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 26 June 2014 17:02, Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 from me!
If it's a trivial patch then I think it makes sense to just do it.
From someone that
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
I'm not sure the entire group of provenpackagers would like to be
notified of such trivial patches waiting. Is there a group of
provenpackagers who would be willing to query for and apply these?
Maybe a simple way to allow
On 26.06.2014 22:47, Jeff Backus wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com
mailto:ke...@scrye.com wrote:
I'm not sure the entire group of provenpackagers would like to be
notified of such trivial patches waiting. Is there a group of
provenpackagers
On 2014-06-26 15:33, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 13:01:05 -0500 Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
This seems to be particularly needed around mass rebuilds, which IMHO
should be an all-hands-on-deck time. For example, I've been going
through the sizable F21FTBFS list[1][2], looking for
On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 00:39:52 +0200
Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com wrote:
So the thing that should be avoided IMO is not defining well enough
how the procedure should work, to avoid getting swamped with patches
which require additional work to apply. The requirement to fill out
post a New
On 27.06.2014 00:55, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 00:39:52 +0200
Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com wrote:
So the thing that should be avoided IMO is not defining well enough
how the procedure should work, to avoid getting swamped with patches
which require additional work to apply.
Welcome on board!
Kenjiro
Dennis Kliban writes:
I have been working with the ImageFactory (www.imgfac.org) team over the last
18 months. During that time we developed a second image building project
called nova-image-builder
(https://github.com/redhat-imaging/novaimagebuilder). At this
This is a really good idea.
On Thu, 2014-06-26 at 16:55 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
- Should this be rawhide only? That would avoid 'trivial' patches that
cause a problem from affecting users that aren't as able to debug
them.
No, since the primary use for this would probably be
Reverted
installonly: kernel-devel should not be installonly.
https://github.com/akozumpl/dnf/commit/e3856e6
# dnf --disablerepo \* --enablerepo rawhide-koji update kernel\* \*perf
Dependencies resolved.
On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 01:27:23 +0200
Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27.06.2014 00:55, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
...snip...
- Not sure 'trivial' really covers the things you list in examples.
FTBFS could be more than trivial depending on the patch. Perhaps
the entire thing could be
Hi!
Package NearTree is going to be dropped as it is not built for F21. Its
maintainer, tmatsuu, was seen on koji in late 2012, September.
I would like to take NearTree as it is reqiured for my rasmol package. I made
a request in PkgDB, but who should I notice to grant the rights?
Dmitrij.
--
On 06/26/2014 11:34 PM, Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich wrote:
Package NearTree is going to be dropped as it is not built for F21. Its
maintainer, tmatsuu, was seen on koji in late 2012, September.
I would like to take NearTree as it is reqiured for my rasmol package. I made
a request in PkgDB, but who
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112571
Thierry Vignaud thierry.vign...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106210
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105167
--- Comment #7 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to lav from comment #6)
perl-Filter.1.50-1.fc19 breaks Switch module:
$ perl -MSwitch
Can't call method filter on unblessed reference at - line 1.
Thanks for the report. I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105167
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112553
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106210
Olivier LAHAYE olivier.laha...@free.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106210
--- Comment #7 from Olivier LAHAYE olivier.laha...@free.fr ---
forgot the version when the problem can be seen:
- perl-Filter-1.50-1.fc20.x86_64
- perl-Switch-2.16-8.fc20.noarch
- perl-5.18.2-289.fc20.x86_64
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112553
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106210
--- Comment #8 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com ---
Nah, I think the patch is fine, I just forgot to submit it upstream. I've just
done that:
https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=96736
I'll go ahead and build for f19/f20.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106210
--- Comment #9 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Olivier LAHAYE from comment #6)
I have the problem on fc20
perl -d
Loading DB routines from perl5db.pl version 1.39_10
Editor support available.
Enter h or 'h h' for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106210
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Switch-2.17-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Switch-2.17-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106210
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Switch-2.17-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Switch-2.17-1.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113638
Bug ID: 1113638
Summary: Can't call method filter on unblessed reference
Product: Fedora
Version: 20
Component: perl-Filter
Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
Reporter:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113638
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106210
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sreekumar@live.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106210
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47763
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47763/0001-Ticket-47763-winsync-plugin-modify-is-broken.2.patch
git patch file (master; take 2) -- Resurrected original attr_compare_equal
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47834
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47834/0001-Ticket-47834-Tombstone_to_glue-if-parents-are-also-c.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
64 matches
Mail list logo
