Earlier this week on the CentOS devel list I proposed an interim method
to help make it easier for centos contributions to flow into epel.
Essentially the proposal is that CentOS would like a 'curator' group
(name can be determined later) similar to the wrangler's group.
Members of this group
Hi Jim.
On 09/25/2014 04:36 PM, Jim Perrin wrote:
Earlier this week on the CentOS devel list I proposed an interim method
to help make it easier for centos contributions to flow into epel.
Essentially the proposal is that CentOS would like a 'curator' group
(name can be determined later)
On 09/25/2014 10:28 AM, Steve Traylen wrote:
Excerpts from Antonio Trande's message of 2014-09-25 17:15:45 +0200:
Hi Jim.
On 09/25/2014 04:36 PM, Jim Perrin wrote:
Earlier this week on the CentOS devel list I proposed an interim method
to help make it easier for centos contributions to
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 09:36:07AM -0500, Jim Perrin wrote:
Members of this group would be responsible for shepherding packages
designated by the various SIG efforts in CentOS through the process of
getting these packages in epel. This means that rather than having an
individual owner,
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:47:43AM -0500, Jim Perrin wrote:
This would be my take also, getting pkgs into EPEL is a pretty well
defined process as is a becoming a packager. I don't see an extra
step/group
is needed within CentOS is needed.
It is defined. It's also perceived as
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:47:43AM -0500, Jim Perrin wrote:
This would be my take also, getting pkgs into EPEL is a pretty well
defined process as is a becoming a packager. I don't see an extra
step/group
is needed
On 09/25/2014 12:22 PM, Till Maas wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 09:36:07AM -0500, Jim Perrin wrote:
Members of this group would be responsible for shepherding packages
designated by the various SIG efforts in CentOS through the process of
getting these packages in epel. This means that
On 09/25/2014 12:27 PM, Till Maas wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:47:43AM -0500, Jim Perrin wrote:
This would be my take also, getting pkgs into EPEL is a pretty well
defined process as is a becoming a packager. I don't see an extra
step/group
is needed within CentOS is needed.
It
On 24/09/14 19:54, Máirín Duffy wrote:
E.g. in June, flights to Boston are US$ 850 vs US$ 1400 in August. Maybe
it's a good idea to move the conference out of main holiday season?
Are you located in EMEA or APAC? Because Flock alternates between North
America and EMEA I think partially
On 24/09/14 19:01, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
...snip...
Fedora Infrastructure only runs it on RHEL6 currently.
I don't know off hand if it runs on newer django, but can take a look.
It would be nice to get it running on rhel7/epel7.
kevin
Kevin, I totally agree.
askbot upstream
On 09/25/2014 08:22 AM, Matthias Runge wrote:
On 24/09/14 19:54, Máirín Duffy wrote:
E.g. in June, flights to Boston are US$ 850 vs US$ 1400 in August. Maybe
it's a good idea to move the conference out of main holiday season?
Are you located in EMEA or APAC? Because Flock alternates between
Compose started at Thu Sep 25 07:15:02 UTC 2014
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[PyQuante]
PyQuante-libint-1.6.4-11.fc21.1.armv7hl requires libint(armv7hl-32) =
0:1.1.6-2.fc21
[askbot]
askbot-0.7.48-13.fc21.noarch requires
Broken deps for i386
--
[PyQuante]
PyQuante-libint-1.6.4-11.fc22.1.i686 requires libint(x86-32) =
0:1.1.6-2.fc21
[Sprog]
Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0)
[askbot]
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
I noticed that mulitple packages own /etc/bash_completion.d/ [...]
On a side note, that's the legacy location for bash completion
snippets. The modern one from which they're loaded on demand is:
$ pkg-config
Hi guys,
I'm not sure if it's kernel related, but I need some help to investigate
this issue.
There are any procedure that can I follow to collect more information about
it?
It's clear for me that's a regression between Fedora 20 and this first F21
alpha release.
Just a quick reminder that it's virtualization test day today, folks -
hop over to #fedora-test-day to join in the fun!
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2014-09-25_Virtualization
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello all.
I would like to inform everyone about changes I plan to do
in Fedora 20+ due to Bug 1097752 (Support for native PKCS#11
interface - needed by FreeIPA).
Currently there is a bind-pkcs11 package which includes
couple of utilities needed for
One last thing before I sign off - I'm reliably informed the updates
shipped yesterday don't entirely resolve the bash security issues, so
more build(s) can be expected today. if people can stand ready to test
and karma them ASAP, that'd be just awesome. thanks!
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA
I have a package I'd like to get reviewed and will swap a review with
someone else to get it done.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146575
--
Darryl L. Pierce mcpie...@gmail.com
http://mcpierce.blogspot.com/
Famous last words:
I wonder what happens if we do it this way?
2014-09-25 16:36 GMT+02:00 Darryl L. Pierce mcpie...@gmail.com:
I have a package I'd like to get reviewed and will swap a review with
someone else to get it done.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146575
If you can't find anybody to swap with, take *any* pending review and
ping
On Thu, 25 Sep 2014, Tomas Hozza wrote:
I would like to inform everyone about changes I plan to do
in Fedora 20+ due to Bug 1097752 (Support for native PKCS#11
interface - needed by FreeIPA).
Currently there is a bind-pkcs11 package which includes
couple of utilities needed for working with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/25/2014 05:18 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Thu, 25 Sep 2014, Tomas Hozza wrote:
I would like to inform everyone about changes I plan to do
in Fedora 20+ due to Bug 1097752 (Support for native PKCS#11
interface - needed by FreeIPA).
Excerpts from Antonio Trande's message of 2014-09-25 17:15:45 +0200:
Hi Jim.
On 09/25/2014 04:36 PM, Jim Perrin wrote:
Earlier this week on the CentOS devel list I proposed an interim method
to help make it easier for centos contributions to flow into epel.
Essentially the proposal is
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 7:19 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
I'm snowed under with work at the moment.
These Fedora 21 packages should just need a bump release and rebuild,
if any proven packager wants to give that a go. There are about 10 of them.
Rich.
I did ocaml-ulex
Hi Richard,
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 10:12:14AM +, Fedora Branched Report wrote:
[cduce]
cduce-0.5.5-9.fc21.armv7hl requires ocaml(Camlp4) =
0:ebd368022fd2bc7b305a42902efa4c90
[ocaml-bisect]
Hi Jerry,
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 9:47 PM, Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 7:19 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
I'm snowed under with work at the moment.
These Fedora 21 packages should just need a bump release and rebuild,
if any proven
On Wed, 2014-09-24 at 12:41 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
Again, I'd recommend a renaming here. If we call the Branch freeze
something else then we can simply call those points the Alpha Freeze,
Beta Freeze and Final Freeze, which are the terms used informally in
any case, and would line up
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 09:50:14AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 09/25/2014 08:22 AM, Matthias Runge wrote:
On 24/09/14 19:54, Máirín Duffy wrote:
E.g. in June, flights to Boston are US$ 850 vs US$ 1400 in August. Maybe
it's a good idea to move the conference out of main holiday season?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/25/2014 04:02 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 09:50:14AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 09/25/2014 08:22 AM, Matthias Runge wrote:
On 24/09/14 19:54, Máirín Duffy wrote:
E.g. in June, flights to Boston are US$ 850 vs US$
On Thu, 25 Sep 2014 16:12:30 -0400
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/25/2014 04:02 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 09:50:14AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 09/25/2014 08:22 AM, Matthias Runge wrote:
On
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 04:45:54PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 25 Sep 2014 16:12:30 -0400
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/25/2014 04:02 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 09:50:14AM +0200, Ralf
[plymouth either not installed (Fedora, openSUSE), or disabled via cmdline
option (Mageia)]
Adam Jackson wrote on 2014-09-24 12:28 (UCT-0400):
On Tue, 2014-09-23 at 21:35 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
with neither VGA= nor video= on cmdline, ttys are in a legacy 80x25
video mode that is broken.
I need to give up maintaining pdfbox. Hopefully someone else will pick
it up. Dependent packages are:
# repoquery --whatrequires pdfbox --source | sort -u
jabref-2.9.2-2.fc20.src.rpm
solr-4.10.0-1.fc22.src.rpm
tika-1.5-1.fc21.src.rpm
Let me know if you want to take it.
It currently FTBFS,
Hi, folks. As I hinted a bit, and as some of you might know from IRC,
I've spent the last ~24 hours on something of an epic Wiki revision
spree. I made some fairly major and possibly significant changes, so
under the 'ask forgiveness' principle I thought I'd post a quick summary
here.
* As
On Thu, 25 Sep 2014 19:58:19 -0700
Adam Williamson adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
...snip..
I hope people find these contributions useful and not the contrary!
I'm hoping the Life Cycle page, the Repositories page, and the updated
Package update HOWTO and Package maintenance guide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046006
--- Comment #12 from Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com ---
Created attachment 940992
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=940992action=edit
Fedora 21 slic3r 1.1.7 screenshot
This is what I see in F21. But running from binary
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046006
--- Comment #13 from Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com ---
Nevertheless it solves the problem, right?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046006
--- Comment #14 from Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com ---
lib/Slic3r.pm:$have_threads = $Config{useithreads} eval use threads;
use threads::shared; use Thread::Queue; 1;
I'll check these.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146465
Bug ID: 1146465
Summary: perl-Inline-Struct-0.11 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Inline-Struct
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
perl-Qt has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Qt-0.96.0-11.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.2)
perl-Qt-0.96.0-11.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.18()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-Qt-0.96.0-11.fc22.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.2)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1136269
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Net-GitHub-0.68-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144903
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138971
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Data-Faker-0.10-2.fc21
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138274
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Date-Manip-6.47-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138274
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Date-Manip-6.47-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138971
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Data-Faker-0.10-2.fc20
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046006
--- Comment #15 from Neil Darlow n...@darlow.co.uk ---
That is a pretty big clue to what is happening.
Slic3r-1.1.7 from tarball *does not* exhibit this bug but we cannot exclude a
packaging problem.
I am no Perl expert but:
eval use
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Path-Tiny:
f271c1a0b44b6d4081f84bda05500d91 Path-Tiny-0.058.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 1d73af95dfa253a523ee258e022c0563accc533c
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Thu Sep 25 13:49:41 2014 +0100
Update to 0.058
- New upstream release 0.058
- Added a 'sibling' method as a more efficient form of calling
$path-parent-child(...).
-
user: pghmcfc set for pghmcfc acl: watchbugzilla of package:
perl-Variable-Magic from: to: Awaiting Review on branch: el6
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Variable-Magic
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
user: pghmcfc set for pghmcfc acl: watchbugzilla of package:
perl-Variable-Magic from: to: Awaiting Review on branch: epel7
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Variable-Magic
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
user: pghmcfc set for pghmcfc acl: commit of package: perl-Variable-Magic from:
to: Awaiting Review on branch: epel7
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Variable-Magic
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
Summary of changes:
1d73af9... Update to 0.058 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046006
--- Comment #16 from Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com ---
1 will be evaluated only if all of those modules are loaded without error
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142584
--- Comment #1 from Ruediger Landmann r.landm...@redhat.com ---
Ping?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=29UH9bmHlha=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142586
--- Comment #1 from Ruediger Landmann r.landm...@redhat.com ---
Ping?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=tPSueTaI3da=cc_unsubscribe
Summary of changes:
e493330... Perl 5.20 rebuild (*)
360140b... Update to 0.057 (*)
1d73af9... Update to 0.058 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
The lightweight tag 'perl-Path-Tiny-0.058-1.el7' was created pointing to:
1d73af9... Update to 0.058
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
The lightweight tag 'perl-Path-Tiny-0.058-1.fc21' was created pointing to:
1d73af9... Update to 0.058
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Path-Tiny-0.058-1.fc22' was created pointing to:
1d73af9... Update to 0.058
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1143773
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127475
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1142577
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127474
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127475
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142586
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127474
Bug 1127474 depends on bug 1142586, which changed state.
Bug 1142586 Summary: Open bugs -- please respond
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142586
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127474
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1127475
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127475
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1127474
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127475
Bug 1127475 depends on bug 1142586, which changed state.
Bug 1142586 Summary: Open bugs -- please respond
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142586
What|Removed |Added
commit 6a8b49b319e444168232156ade98ff848f61b4be
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Sep 25 15:57:51 2014 +0200
0.24 bugfix bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Locale-PO.spec | 14 --
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Locale-PO:
b404b546aba4fd3d495948a6c0352b16 Locale-PO-0.24.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
a67f3e5... Perl 5.20 rebuild (*)
6a8b49b... 0.24 bugfix bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Summary of changes:
f62eaad... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Mass (*)
a67f3e5... Perl 5.20 rebuild (*)
6a8b49b... 0.24 bugfix bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
Summary of changes:
2eb6bd5... Perl 5.18 rebuild (*)
6e4c405... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass (*)
f62eaad... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Mass (*)
a67f3e5... Perl 5.20 rebuild (*)
6a8b49b... 0.24 bugfix bump (*)
(*) This commit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127475
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Locale-PO-0.24-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Locale-PO-0.24-1.fc21
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127475
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Locale-PO-0.24-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Locale-PO-0.24-1.fc19
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127475
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Locale-PO-0.24-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Locale-PO-0.24-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this
user: limb set for dfateyev acl: watchbugzilla of package: perl-IO-Pipely from:
to: Approved on branch: epel7
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-IO-Pipely
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
user: limb set for dfateyev acl: watchcommits of package: perl-IO-Pipely from:
to: Approved on branch: epel7
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-IO-Pipely
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
user: limb created branch epel7 on package perl-IO-Pipely
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-IO-Pipely
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
user: limb set for dfateyev acl: approveacls of package: perl-IO-Pipely from:
to: Approved on branch: epel7
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-IO-Pipely
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
user: limb set for dfateyev acl: commit of package: perl-IO-Pipely from: to:
Approved on branch: epel7
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-IO-Pipely
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046006
--- Comment #17 from Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com ---
Thread::Queue it is, when installed, it adds the option. And the crash is still
there :(
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146704
Bug ID: 1146704
Summary: [abrt] slic3r: free(): perl killed by SIGABRT
Product: Fedora
Version: 21
Component: slic3r
Assignee: mhron...@redhat.com
Reporter:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146704
Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046006
--- Comment #18 from Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com ---
*** Bug 1146704 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
commit fe278c2eaf6b0c4b20d007d27887e9024833c8f5
Author: Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com
Date: Fri Sep 26 03:17:28 2014 +0600
perl-IO-Pipely: epel7 branch
perl-IO-Pipely.spec |9 +++--
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-IO-Pipely.spec
On 09/25/2014 04:32 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 09/24/2014 04:33 AM, thierry bordaz wrote:
Hello,
I was investigating the alternative/impacts of a new plugin and I
would like to share some thoughts and check I did not miss
something important.
Here is the description of the
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47838
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47838/0001-Ticket-47838-harden-the-list-of-ciphers-available-by.9.patch
git patch file (master) -- phase 2 with the fix for enabled
message is logged even for a cipher preceded by - and it's not
89 matches
Mail list logo
