#8: EPEL-latest link rpm
-+
Reporter: smooge | Owner: epel-wranglers
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone:
Component: Policy problem |Version:
Resolution:
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3454/rubygem-httpclient-2.4.0-2.el7
13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3432/drupal7-7.32-1.el7
13
Rex Dieter wrote:
I'd like to be able to conditionalize some package features depending on
if
epel repo is enabled or not. One way to accomplish that goal is if epel-
release defined some macro, say, something like %{epel}, similar to
%{feodra} or %{rhel}
(I don't care what the macro is
Rex Dieter wrote:
Rex Dieter wrote on Oct 16:
I'd like to be able to conditionalize some package features depending on
if
epel repo is enabled or not. One way to accomplish that goal is if epel-
release defined some macro, say, something like %{epel}, similar to
%{feodra} or %{rhel}
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 5:42 AM, Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote:
Rex Dieter wrote:
+%epel %{?rhel}%{!?:rhel:7}
typo alert ^^ (in the second part), but hopefully you get the idea.
Or, if you'd rather not depend on %rhel macro, and just hard-code to 7,
that
would be fine too.
On 10/31/2014 4:44 AM, Juerg Haefliger wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 8:30 PM, Fred Wittekind
r...@twister.dyndns.org mailto:r...@twister.dyndns.org wrote:
On 8/7/2014 1:29 PM, Fred Wittekind wrote:
On 8/5/2014 5:55 PM, Juerg Haefliger wrote:
Hi Fred,
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 10:33
#22: Meeting Agenda for 2014-10-10
--+
Reporter: smooge | Owner: smooge
Type: defect | Status: closed
Priority: major| Milestone:
Component: Package request |Version:
Resolution:
#2: How to handle systemd service activation defaults in EPEL7
-+
Reporter: orion | Owner: epel-wranglers
Type: task| Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: EPEL-7
Component:
#4: Decide on criteria to unretire packages.
-+
Reporter: till| Owner: epel-wranglers
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: Policy problem |Version:
#4: Decide on criteria to unretire packages.
-+
Reporter: till| Owner: epel-wranglers
Type: task| Status: closed
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: Policy problem |
#8: EPEL-latest link rpm
-+
Reporter: smooge | Owner: epel-wranglers
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone:
Component: Policy problem |Version:
Resolution:
#8: EPEL-latest link rpm
-+--
Reporter: smooge | Owner: smooge
Type: enhancement | Status: accepted
Priority: minor | Milestone:
Component: Policy problem |Version:
Resolution: |
Hi,
On 10/30/2014 11:01 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
As a fix for this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046341
The following symbolic link was added to xorg-x11-font-utils:
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 12 Aug 18 23:08 /usr/share/fonts/X11 - ../X11/fonts
This causes fontconfig
Dne 30.10.2014 v 18:57 Matěj Cepl napsal(a):
On 2014-10-30, 14:04 GMT, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com said:
I am pretty sure, that this was already discussed many times, but I
proposed to drop the seemingly last dependency of RPM on Perl in this
[1]
Dne 31.10.2014 v 00:37 Nico Kadel-Garcia napsal(a):
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30 October 2014 14:02, Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:
If you have any comments, please speak up now.
No comment, just lots of thanks!
Richard
I tried
De: Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com
Hi,
On 10/30/2014 11:01 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Can some font experts weigh in on how to properly solve the first issue
without triggering the second?
The first issue can be fixed by patching luit to search under
/usr/share/X11/fonts
rather then
Hi,
On 10/31/2014 10:20 AM, nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote:
De: Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com
Hi,
On 10/30/2014 11:01 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Can some font experts weigh in on how to properly solve the first issue
without triggering the second?
The first issue can be fixed
Compose started at Fri Oct 31 05:15:03 UTC 2014
Broken deps for i386
--
[3Depict]
3Depict-0.0.16-3.fc22.i686 requires libmgl.so.7.2.0
[Sprog]
Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0)
[alienarena]
On 10/31/2014 02:47 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
Oct 30 21:39:47 ubik.home.mkmiller.org systemd[1]: Found ordering cycle on
basic.target/start
Oct 30 21:39:47 ubik.home.mkmiller.org systemd[1]: Breaking ordering cycle by
deleting job sysinit.target/start
Matthew,
are you showing only messages
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 12:33:20PM +0100, Michal Schmidt wrote:
Oct 30 21:39:47 ubik.home.mkmiller.org systemd[1]: Found ordering cycle on
basic.target/start
Oct 30 21:39:47 ubik.home.mkmiller.org systemd[1]: Breaking ordering cycle
by deleting job sysinit.target/start
are you showing
Compose started at Fri Oct 31 07:15:02 UTC 2014
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[PyQuante]
PyQuante-libint-1.6.4-11.fc21.1.armv7hl requires libint(armv7hl-32) =
0:1.1.6-2.fc21
[audtty]
audtty-0.1.12-9.fc20.armv7hl requires
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 07:39:42AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 12:33:20PM +0100, Michal Schmidt wrote:
Oct 30 21:39:47 ubik.home.mkmiller.org systemd[1]: Found ordering cycle
on basic.target/start
Oct 30 21:39:47 ubik.home.mkmiller.org systemd[1]: Breaking
On 2014-10-31, 08:54 GMT, Vít Ondruch wrote:
This is really good point Matěj, thanks for bringing this up!
It’s like alcoholism: once lawyer, always lawyer, I am afraid.
Best,
Matěj
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
By the way,
sudo systemctl start systemd-tmpfiles-setup
sudo rm /var/run/nologin
sudo systemctl restart gdm
got me to a functioning GNOME desktop.
--
Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org
Fedora Project Leader
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 10/31/2014 12:57 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
Oct 31 07:42:29 ubik systemd[1]: Found ordering cycle on basic.target/start
Oct 31 07:42:29 ubik systemd[1]: Found dependency on sysinit.target/start
Oct 31 07:42:29 ubik systemd[1]: Found dependency on
systemd-update-utmp.service/verify-active
On Fri, 31.10.14 07:57, Matthew Miller (mat...@fedoraproject.org) wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 07:39:42AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 12:33:20PM +0100, Michal Schmidt wrote:
Oct 30 21:39:47 ubik.home.mkmiller.org systemd[1]: Found ordering cycle
on
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 01:44:27PM +0100, Michal Schmidt wrote:
This ordering cycle was introduced recently by changes in nfs-utils's
unit files when nfs-client.target got an After dependency on
gssproxy.
Are you sure? Looks like I last updated nfs-utils on Oct 26th, and I've
rebooted several
On Wed, 2014-10-15 at 12:28 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Nevertheless, I am still unsure how to proceed with RubyGems. Should I
ship the bundled certificates again? Or should I wait until somebody
notices?
Sorry for my late reply, because I didn't have a good suggestion
earlier.
We should work
Agenda:
- Status buildrequires cleanup work (davids nils!)
- Update on factory-reset work
- Docker update
- Phil on PTO for 3 weeks
- Open Floor
Thanks regards, Phil
--
Philipp Knirsch | Tel.: +49-711-96437-470
Manager Core Services| Fax.: +49-711-96437-111
Red Hat
On 10/31/2014 02:03 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 01:44:27PM +0100, Michal Schmidt wrote:
This ordering cycle was introduced recently by changes in nfs-utils's
unit files when nfs-client.target got an After dependency on
gssproxy.
Are you sure? Looks like I last updated
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 02:15:45PM +0100, Michal Schmidt wrote:
Maybe you already had an ordering cycle on Oct 26, but different units
were chosen for deletion when breaking the cycle, and by luck it had
fewer directly observable consequences.
Could you check older logs for ordering cycles?
On 10/31/2014 02:30 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
Oct 31 09:19:46 ubik systemd[1]: dev-mqueue.mount: Directory /dev/mqueue to
mount over is not empty, mounting anyway.
Oct 31 09:19:46 ubik mount[4484]: mount: mount point /dev/mqueue does not
exist
Oct 31 09:19:46 ubik systemd[1]:
I see many this messages. But Matthew solution haven't fixed my problem.
-Igor Gnatenko
On Oct 31, 2014 4:42 PM, Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/31/2014 02:30 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
Oct 31 09:19:46 ubik systemd[1]: dev-mqueue.mount: Directory /dev/mqueue
to mount over is
On Fri, 2014-10-31 at 14:05 +0100, Kai Engert wrote:
On Wed, 2014-10-15 at 12:28 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Nevertheless, I am still unsure how to proceed with RubyGems. Should I
ship the bundled certificates again? Or should I wait until somebody
notices?
Sorry for my late reply, because
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 21:47:36 -0400,
Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Updated my rawhide system. Now it doesn't boot cleanly. Will try to
figure out the details in the morning (long week!), but Found ordering
cycle on basic.target/start seems to be part of it, and I wanted to
On Fri, 31 Oct 2014 14:01:12 +0100
Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
So the problem appears to be that gssproxy.service been ordered before
remote-fs-pre.target. That target is ordered before
basic.target. However gssproxy.service also is ordered after
basic.target (simply
On Fri, 2014-10-31 at 15:00 +0100, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
We should work with the upstream OpenSSL and the GnuTLS projects,
and
motivate them to implement more advanced path building. This would
be a
long term project.
Is there some issue with gnutls in F21? As far as I
On Fri, 2014-10-31 at 09:49 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
We should work with the upstream OpenSSL and the GnuTLS projects,
and
motivate them to implement more advanced path building. This would
be a
long term project.
Is there some issue with gnutls in F21? As far as I understand
Am 31.10.2014 um 15:53 schrieb Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos:
On Fri, 2014-10-31 at 09:49 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
We should work with the upstream OpenSSL and the GnuTLS projects,
and
motivate them to implement more advanced path building. This would
be a
long term project.
Is there
On 10/31/2014 03:42 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 31 Oct 2014 14:01:12 +0100
Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
So the problem appears to be that gssproxy.service been ordered before
remote-fs-pre.target. That target is ordered before
basic.target. However gssproxy.service also
I talked to several people over the last couple days about what we can
do to try to avoid the hero testing treadmill that we've been on
during every Freeze in recent memory (specifically that we're usually
fixing Blocker bugs until the day before the Go/No-Go meeting and that
means that our QA
On Fri, 31.10.14 16:13, Michal Schmidt (mschm...@redhat.com) wrote:
On 10/31/2014 03:42 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 31 Oct 2014 14:01:12 +0100
Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
So the problem appears to be that gssproxy.service been ordered before
remote-fs-pre.target.
On Fri, 2014-10-31 at 15:00 +0100, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
Sorry for my late reply, because I didn't have a good suggestion
earlier.
We should work with the upstream OpenSSL and the GnuTLS projects, and
motivate them to implement more advanced path building. This would be a
On Fri, 31.10.14 16:20, Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) wrote:
On Fri, 31.10.14 16:13, Michal Schmidt (mschm...@redhat.com) wrote:
On 10/31/2014 03:42 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 31 Oct 2014 14:01:12 +0100
Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
So the
On Fri, 2014-10-31 at 16:11 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Are you sure that this is the case with the current package? My F21 can
no longer connect to network to test, but gnutls in it should
reconstruct the chain similarly to what nss does (not very similarly to
be precise but the end
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 11:17:39 -0400,
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
The idea here is to ensure that there is a clear engineering deadline in
order to guarantee that the QA team has a reasonable time period in
which to perform validation tests. I think this approach is too
On Fri, 31 Oct 2014 16:30:31 +0100
Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
On Fri, 31.10.14 16:20, Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de)
wrote:
On Fri, 31.10.14 16:13, Michal Schmidt (mschm...@redhat.com) wrote:
On 10/31/2014 03:42 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 31 Oct
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 09:46:13AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
I still see:
Oct 31 09:42:29 voldemort.scrye.com systemd[1]: Cannot add dependency job for
unit nfs.target, ignoring: Unit nfs.target failed to load: No such file or
directory.
Oct 31 09:42:29 voldemort.scrye.com systemd[1]:
On Fri, 31.10.14 16:55, Tomasz Torcz (to...@pipebreaker.pl) wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 09:46:13AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
I still see:
Oct 31 09:42:29 voldemort.scrye.com systemd[1]: Cannot add dependency job
for unit nfs.target, ignoring: Unit nfs.target failed to load: No
Fixes my problem, but black screen instead of gdm
On Oct 31, 2014 7:31 PM, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
On Fri, 31.10.14 16:20, Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) wrote:
On Fri, 31.10.14 16:13, Michal Schmidt (mschm...@redhat.com) wrote:
On 10/31/2014 03:42 PM,
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 09:47:36PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
Oct 30 21:39:37 ubik.home.mkmiller.org systemd[1]: Configuration file
/usr/lib/systemd/system/auditd.service is marked world-inaccessible. This has
no effect as configuration data is accessible via APIs without restrictions.
systemd-logind: failed to get session: PID 879 doesnt belong to any known
session
On Oct 31, 2014 7:31 PM, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
On Fri, 31.10.14 16:20, Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) wrote:
On Fri, 31.10.14 16:13, Michal Schmidt (mschm...@redhat.com)
On 10/31/2014 04:57 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
systemd-logind: failed to get session: PID 879 doesnt belong to any known
session
That's not necessarily related to the problem. I have this message in
the log even when gdm works fine.
Michal
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Fri, 31 Oct 2014 20:04:24 +0400
Igor Gnatenko i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Probably. How to debug?
On Oct 31, 2014 8:01 PM, Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/31/2014 04:57 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
systemd-logind: failed to get session: PID 879 doesnt belong to
Probably. How to debug?
On Oct 31, 2014 8:01 PM, Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/31/2014 04:57 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
systemd-logind: failed to get session: PID 879 doesnt belong to any
known session
That's not necessarily related to the problem. I have this message in
Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com writes:
Just a quick note - this discussion belongs on the EPEL mailing list.
Apologies. I don't remember seeing that when I read the instructions to
try to get packages into EPEL. I'll check whether it's there/obvious
when I have a chance.
--
devel
I have all packages from koji.
On Oct 31, 2014 8:10 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Fri, 31 Oct 2014 20:04:24 +0400
Igor Gnatenko i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Probably. How to debug?
On Oct 31, 2014 8:01 PM, Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/31/2014 04:57
I filed an FPC ticket: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/467
Thoughts?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Fri, 2014-10-31 at 15:53 +0100, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
Are you sure that this is the case with the current package? My F21
can
no longer connect to network to test, but gnutls in it should
reconstruct the chain similarly to what nss does (not very similarly
to
be precise but the
Once upon a time, Andrew Lutomirski l...@mit.edu said:
I filed an FPC ticket: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/467
Thoughts?
I've filed individual bugs in the past. IMHO every file that is
RPM-installed that is not marked config should be world-readable
(regardless of location). There is
Hello everyone,
I've decided to join the package maintainers and I would like to introduce
myself.
I have been a linux user since 2001 and a Red Hat/Fedora user since 2003.
My main systems run on Fedora (of course) and Gentoo. I have a background
in chemistry, particularly molecular modeling and
On Fri, 2014-10-31 at 16:28 +0100, Kai Engert wrote:
I confirm that using GnuTLS 3.3.9-2.fc21 on Fedora 21 testing,
with ca-certificates-2014.2.1-1.3.fc21,
and ca-legacy set to disabled,
the command
gnutls-cli -p443 www.amazon.com
reports a trusted certificate.
This isn't a recent
- Original Message -
I filed an FPC ticket: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/467
Thoughts?
My intuition is that if an application needs _everything_ in /usr to be
readable then it is likely broken. Something being placed in /usr does _not_
imply that it is supposed to be used by
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Miloslav Trmač m...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
I filed an FPC ticket: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/467
Thoughts?
My intuition is that if an application needs _everything_ in /usr to be
readable then it is likely broken.
On Fri, 2014-10-31 at 10:34 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 11:17:39 -0400,
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
The idea here is to ensure that there is a clear engineering deadline in
order to guarantee that the QA team has a reasonable time period in
- Original Message -
This isn't a recent change, see [1]. I presume Amazon is most likely
still broken in Epiphany (when these roots are removed) as there's been
no action on [1], where we decided that gnutls-cli accepted
www.amazon.com because it uses certs if they're valid for either
On 10/31/2014 11:28 AM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
Hello everyone,
I've decided to join the package maintainers and I would like to introduce
myself.
...
There is also a patched version of libatasmart, that takes care of an issue
with several older Western Digital hard drives, that is
So am I allowed to submit it to bodhi, or does it still need to be approved
beforehand? I'm sorry for the mix-up, but it wasn't clear in the wiki.
2014-10-31 22:09 GMT+02:00 Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com:
On 10/31/2014 11:28 AM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
Hello everyone,
I've
Reposted from http://fedoramagazine.org/5tftw-2014-10-31/.
Fedora is a big project, and it’s hard to keep up with everything that
goes on. This series highlights interesting happenings in five
different areas every week. It isn’t comprehensive news coverage — just
quick summaries with links to
yeah. gnome-shell 3.15.1 fixes problem.
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Fri, 31 Oct 2014 20:04:24 +0400
Igor Gnatenko i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Probably. How to debug?
On Oct 31, 2014 8:01 PM, Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com wrote:
On
There's a major bug with fedup to Fedora 21 right at the moment,
discovered this morning by Robin Lee (thanks Robin). We should be able
to deal with it some way or another in time for Beta release day, but
for right now it's not a very good idea *at all* to try and upgrade any
system you care
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 14:44:06 -0400,
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
Well, we learned during those questions that it's a matter of
coordination with the mirrors. They expect to have our master trees
prepared at certain times or they can't be mirrored out in time for the
Tuesday
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Email-Sender:
758b2dcb2ca1dfb6f9c94ddf94aa0a57 Email-Sender-1.300016.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 03f7b37cfa4599bc6add291982c863259a1e7dfb
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Oct 31 11:21:50 2014 +0100
1.300016 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Email-Sender.spec | 39 ---
sources|2 +-
3 files
perl-Qt has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Qt-0.96.0-11.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.2)
perl-Qt-0.96.0-11.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.18()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-Qt-0.96.0-11.fc22.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.2)
commit b222b8a852b633ba269b7641f44a2bdd87a8fe89
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Oct 31 12:16:00 2014 +0100
0.200012 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Throwable.spec | 34 +++---
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 25
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 03:15:00PM +0100, Petr Pisar wrote:
Hello,
as you could read in last (2014-10-29) FESCo meeting minutes
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-October/203801.html,
packages under Iain Arnell's maintence
commit 2760eda5d4a2e8f522756e180dd71bab529605d4
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Oct 31 12:45:45 2014 +0100
0.200012 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Throwable.spec | 34 +++---
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 25
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159047
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|iarn...@gmail.com
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Net-DNS-SEC:
4cd803cf77f853b3079fdf539aa92749 Net-DNS-SEC-0.21.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 8f8d1c603165a34c5086b1d250f80dc99193a09d
Author: Paul Wouters pwout...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Oct 31 11:00:36 2014 -0400
- Updated to 0.21, restores canonicalization of a RRSIG’s Signer Name
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Net-DNS-SEC.spec |7 +--
sources |
commit f4dc437d0055e03948f4530eeed14cae6596002b
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Oct 31 16:00:04 2014 +0100
1.300016 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Email-Sender.spec | 39 ---
sources|2 +-
3 files
Summary of changes:
a76e169... * Sat Aug 16 2014 Paul Wouters pwout...@redhat.com - 0.20 (*)
bc6ab3b... Perl 5.20 rebuild (*)
8f8d1c6... - Updated to 0.21, restores canonicalization of a RRSIG’s (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras
commit ffebbcb585f9c27052f6abbd5dc23365449694e3
Merge: 75f20d1 8f8d1c6
Author: Paul Wouters pwout...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Oct 31 11:10:07 2014 -0400
Merge branch 'master' into f20
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Net-DNS-SEC.spec |8 +++-
sources |2 +-
3
Summary of changes:
bc6ab3b... Perl 5.20 rebuild (*)
8f8d1c6... - Updated to 0.21, restores canonicalization of a RRSIG’s (*)
ffebbcb... Merge branch 'master' into f20
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
commit 9945af6cd0dba15e41455f4b872ed07404d07cf1
Author: Paul Wouters pwout...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Oct 31 11:13:53 2014 -0400
- Updated to 0.21, restores canonicalization of a RRSIG’s Signer Name
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Net-DNS-SEC.spec |5 -
sources |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159047
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Email-Sender-1.300016-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Email-Sender-1.300016-1.fc21
--
You are
commit 9edf3fb8869d7168e382897a6c2c4e1452147cec
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Oct 31 16:32:27 2014 +0100
1.300016 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Email-Sender.spec | 39 ---
sources|2 +-
3 files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159047
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Email-Sender-1.300016-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Email-Sender-1.300016-1.fc20
--
You are
* Petr Šabata [31/10/2014 12:27] :
I'm willing to maintain most of them.
I hope it won't be just me, however :)
I'll be glad to give a hand, especially for all HTML/HTTP-related modules.
Emmanuel
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing
Summary of changes:
3becdbc... Upstream upgrade. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1136340
Chris chrisbu...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chrisbu...@gmail.com
---
Summary of changes:
85c9d7c... Rebased on Qpid 0.22. (*)
fb3b419... Perl Makefile.PL now generates the Swig bindings source. (*)
e88eed1... Updated build to fix dependency issues on qpid-cpp. (*)
11fcf0d... Rebased on Qpid 0.24. (*)
ab54c51... Merge branch 'master' into f19 (*)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1078083
Marianne Feifer mfei...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|mfei...@redhat.com |
Kurt Seifried
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1078083
Kurt Seifried kseifr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1159403
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017972
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1153984
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
97 matches
Mail list logo
