The lightweight tag 'perl-List-MoreUtils-0.405-1.fc22' was created pointing to:
7397583... Update to 0.405
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-List-MoreUtils-0.405-1.fc23' was created pointing to:
7397583... Update to 0.405
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 739758379ae309bcb2ecbb62934a4643b1840f20
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Sun Feb 15 10:35:02 2015 +
Update to 0.405
- New upstream release 0.405
- Fix CPAN RT#78527 - first_val/last_val in documentation
- Fix CPAN RT#102055 - ExtUtils::MakeMaker
BTW why is the arch order of the branched report and the rawhide report
different?
Compose started at Sun Feb 15 07:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for armhfp
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185331
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192824
Bug ID: 1192824
Summary: F20 PPC64 Perl: Now 5.18.2 but primary is now 5.18.4 -
updated noarch package deps prevent network installs
Product: Fedora
Version: 20
Component:
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2015-02-16
# Time: 16:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
It's QA meeting time again! We have a few miscellaneous topics to
cover, I think - F22 Alpha prep,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192824
--- Comment #1 from Al Dunsmuir al.dunsm...@sympatico.ca ---
Please ignore Last F21 ppc64 - edit leftovers.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Summary of changes:
7397583... Update to 0.405 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192824
--- Comment #3 from Al Dunsmuir al.dunsm...@sympatico.ca ---
For s/390 secondary, I see Dan (sharkcz) has just completed a build of
perl-5.18.4-292.fc20 at 2015-02-15 01:50:38, so I suspect relief for this
problem is on the way.
--
You are
On Sun, 15 Feb 2015 13:32:57 -0600
Jason L Tibbitts III ti...@math.uh.edu wrote:
KF == Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com writes:
...snip...
KF Additionally, FPC folks have done a great job recently (mostly due
KF to Tibbs hard work) in catching up with their backlog. Bundling
KF requests I would
commit 81690888c72f03ce3027ca9c3e8eae24fa360add
Author: Jose Pedro Oliveira jose.p.oliveira@gmail.com
Date: Sun Feb 15 20:18:21 2015 +0100
Update to version 1.19
.gitignore|1 +
perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3:
c1514be966e4db371d9eb5f5e05eac3a ZMQ-LibZMQ3-1.19.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
8169088... Update to version 1.19 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
ff606ee... Perl 5.20 rebuild (*)
80b0b7d... Fix local build from dist-git (*)
6c5008f... Build-require Devel::PPPort (*)
8169088... Update to version 1.19 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192824
--- Comment #2 from Al Dunsmuir al.dunsm...@sympatico.ca ---
I checked if the same issue affects the other secondary archs:
- arm switched to primary at F21.
- The last secondary build was perl-5.18.1-287.fc20 so it will also be
affected
KF == Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com writes:
KF I know in the past the FPC has talked about relaxing the bundling
KF guidelines, perhaps we could get some of them to weigh in here?
Yeah, we had a big discussion about that a while back, where we sort of
agreed on a basic change of philosophy
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-List-MoreUtils:
09337686cf0d4ea1600c8b4d9f98787b List-MoreUtils-0.405.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Dear Kamil,
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 03:41:38AM -0500, Kamil Paral wrote:
[...]
I assume, running rpmgrill in Taskotron could mean, that each rpmgrill
test result translates to an entry in Resultsdb as an outcome (PASSED,
FAILED).
If you are interested, we support more outcome
Summary of changes:
583dbc4... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_22_M (*)
ff606ee... Perl 5.20 rebuild (*)
80b0b7d... Fix local build from dist-git (*)
6c5008f... Build-require Devel::PPPort (*)
8169088... Update to version 1.19 (*)
(*) This commit already existed
Dear Tim,
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:31:23AM +0100, Tim Flink wrote:
[...]
I assume, running rpmgrill in Taskotron could mean, that each rpmgrill
test result translates to an entry in Resultsdb as an outcome (PASSED,
FAILED). Yet the question for the developer as to why it failed is
On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 23:44:18 +0100
gil punto...@libero.it wrote:
a fix for this problem is:
(see
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/java-service-wrapper.git/tree/java-service-wrapper.spec
)
Well, this doesn't seem like a fix, but more of a workaround and a bit
prone to failure if new
On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 21:59:06 +0100
Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com wrote:
Am Freitag, den 13.02.2015, 13:53 -0700 schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 12:47:07 -0800
Susi Lehtola jussileht...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Hi,
as has happened many times before, the GCC bump
On Sun, 15 Feb 2015 07:04:02 -0500 (EST)
Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com wrote:
BTW why is the arch order of the branched report and the rawhide
report different?
No idea at all.
They both call/use repodiff exactly the same way (from the same
function even).
So, perhaps repodiff just
Il 15/02/2015 22:01, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto:
On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 23:44:18 +0100
gil punto...@libero.it wrote:
a fix for this problem is:
(see
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/java-service-wrapper.git/tree/java-service-wrapper.spec
)
Well, this doesn't seem like a fix, but more of a
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 11:08:55PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sun, 8 Feb 2015 18:17:56 +0100, Marek Polacek wrote:
either package bugs, or GCC bugs. As things stand, just about 19 packages
did
not build due to bugs in gcc-5.0.0-0.5.fc22. All GCC bugs except one are
fixed
at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009919
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Summary of changes:
8d491b7... Changes for EPEL6 and EPEL7 branches (*)
b4cb800... Fixes for EPEL6 and EPEL7 branches (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 7:32 PM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
(Logistical note: please keep all replies to this thread on
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org)
[...]
=== Core Packages ===
Any package that is provided on a release-blocking medium (which at
present includes Fedora
On 02/14/2015 04:33 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
IMHO, it is the job of the EPEL package of mock to disable the
config_opts['package_manager'] = 'dnf' option in the shipped version of the
Rawhide configs.
But then you will not be warned that your results may differ from Koji.
--
Miroslav Suchy,
Hi Honza,
Excerpts from Honza Horak's message of 2015-02-13 00:44 +10:00:
Hi Dan,
I missed your workshop at DevConf unfortunately, but as one of the
members of Env Stacks Working Group I'm wondering what is the current
status of beaker instance [1], since the wiki page [2] seems to be
On 02/06/2015 11:41 AM, David Howells wrote:
Can rpmbuild be taught to produce a 'build logs' rpm (or tarball or something)
that isn't automatically added to the installation set by koji/bodhi and that
can get generated even in the event of a build failure?
rpmbuild is very low level tool. I
On 02/13/2015 04:42 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
See also: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Bootstrapping
However I have to note that this is very new guideline and not yet implemented
in neither mock nor koji.
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCE, RHCDS
Red Hat, Senior Software Engineer,
33 matches
Mail list logo
