commit c0ebaf1c195219b50fccd0dc11838d431afcdb69
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr
Date: Sun Feb 22 10:32:08 2015 +0100
Update to 0.52
.gitignore| 1 +
perl-GnuPG-Interface.spec | 5 -
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2
commit bc7cbad66fa68b08a53cca703f9067d4dc3df265
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr
Date: Sun Feb 22 11:06:03 2015 +0100
Update to 5.81
.gitignore| 1 +
perl-Mojolicious.spec | 5 -
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
Hi, folks.
I've been asked by Adam Williamson to package a number of Mojolicious-related
plugins and add-ons. Fedora QA is playing with openSUSE's 'OpenQA' test
framework and they'ld like to be able to run it on Fedora.
I'm packaging the following:
* perl-MojoX-JSON-RPC
*
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195013
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
pghmcfc's perl-B-Keywords-1.14-1.fc23 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=614025
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195042
Bug ID: 1195042
Summary: perl-Lingua-EN-Numbers-2.01 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Lingua-EN-Numbers
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Lingua-EN-Numbers:
5f7d7e9abafa6bb90fac132123439007 Lingua-EN-Numbers-2.01.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-IO-Async:
96426bf63e18dfb7212926d08ad31df3 IO-Async-0.65.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Catalyst-Runtime:
4235d92126fedc29c43c6b1b6e7d9004 Catalyst-Runtime-5.90083.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Config-GitLike:
189742f6f2f2bd8eee5d27654e57570e Config-GitLike-1.16.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 48923a5854e243ff4e15cfd7c09dbc6e4ccca2e8
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr
Date: Sun Feb 22 10:43:50 2015 +0100
Update to 0.65
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-IO-Async.spec | 8 +---
sources| 2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
diff
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Mojolicious:
c3dddc5e4fbb4b9a029b742216a8de6b Mojolicious-5.81.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-B-Keywords:
d7845a15def72af92d15c27de48997df B-Keywords-1.14.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-B-Keywords-1.14-1.fc23' was created pointing to:
58c50ef... Update to 1.14
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195013
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In
The lightweight tag 'perl-B-Keywords-1.14-1.fc22' was created pointing to:
58c50ef... Update to 1.14
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195042
Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195042
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
churchyard's perl-Lingua-EN-Numbers-2.01-1.fc23 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=614044
--
You are receiving
Are Fedora packages allowed to have a default configuration in which
the service accepts commands from the network in the default
configuration?
The daemon is not enabled by default, so the administrator has to do a
systemctl enable/start first. This means that just installing the
package does
polymake has broken dependencies in the F-22 tree:
On x86_64:
polymake-2.13-18.git20141013.fc22.x86_64 requires perl = 4:5.20.1
On i386:
polymake-2.13-18.git20141013.fc22.i686 requires perl = 4:5.20.1
On armhfp:
polymake-2.13-18.git20141013.fc22.armv7hl requires perl =
commit 58c50eff74f2c0efa5d15210736d22bdc5452f36
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Sun Feb 22 11:11:34 2015 +
Update to 1.14
- New upstream release 1.14
- Removed err from Barewords (CPAN RT#102259)
- Run the maintainer tests if we're not bootstrapping
-
Summary of changes:
58c50ef... Update to 1.14 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 07:28:50PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 05:21:59PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
I've never argumented against the goal that web browser or all network
aware
services
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195042
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Scratch build succeeded
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9029451
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
Summary of changes:
6beca8a... New version 2.01 (#1195042) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 6beca8a60a968eed053f4cb646dd5ac4ae0f45ae
Author: Miro Hrončok m...@hroncok.cz
Date: Sun Feb 22 14:09:11 2015 +0100
New version 2.01 (#1195042)
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Lingua-EN-Numbers.spec | 5 -
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 6
Am 22.02.2015 um 19:46 schrieb M. Edward (Ed) Borasky:
Yes, I would think:
a) all services should be disabled and their ports closed by default, and
b) the documentation should describe how to enable the service and
open the ports
and then comes the default firewall on F21 workstation with
commit 7d1aff0da602922f941eb1c68d33d9f7d4f2912c
Author: jehane maria...@tuxette.fr
Date: Sun Feb 22 16:21:20 2015 +0100
forgot mail adress
fusioninventory-agent.spec | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
---
diff --git a/fusioninventory-agent.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192728
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
fusioninventory-agent-2.3.15-3.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fusioninventory-agent-2.3.15-3.fc21
--
You are
Am 22.02.2015 um 18:17 schrieb Adam Williamson:
On Sat, 2015-02-21 at 22:21 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
would it make sense to provide these in some common package as
'snippets' that could be included into configuration files? Then we
could have something like:
Directory
On Sun, 2015-02-22 at 18:28 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 22.02.2015 um 18:17 schrieb Adam Williamson:
On Sat, 2015-02-21 at 22:21 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
would it make sense to provide these in some common package as
'snippets' that could be included into configuration files?
This has been brewing in my head for a while so I'll just spill it
Introduce an in-development flag for packages in Fedora.
What is it?:
- A flag in pkgdb - boolean property for a package under the control
of the primary POC for rawhide.
- A rpm flag in the rpm products of a build
How will
Yes, I would think:
a) all services should be disabled and their ports closed by default, and
b) the documentation should describe how to enable the service and
open the ports
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 6:04 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
Are Fedora packages allowed to
On Sat, 2015-02-21 at 22:21 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
would it make sense to provide these in some common package as
'snippets' that could be included into configuration files? Then we
could have something like:
Directory /usr/share/owncloud/
Include auth-local.inc
/Directory
Le 22/02/2015 07:21, Adam Williamson a écrit :
Working on the ownCloud package today, it occurred to me that we
probably have quite a lot of packages carrying Apache access control
snippets around, like these:
This configuration have a big advantage, it can be upstream ;)
Remi.
--
devel
Am 22.02.2015 um 18:45 schrieb Adam Williamson:
On Sun, 2015-02-22 at 18:28 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 22.02.2015 um 18:17 schrieb Adam Williamson:
In fact, if we put the snippets in the Apache package or some
package which is tied to Apache versioning, we can drop all the
IfModule stuff
Summary of changes:
15aae5f... building as noarch (*)
7d1aff0... forgot mail adress (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
On Sun, 2015-02-22 at 18:51 +0100, Remi Collet wrote:
Le 22/02/2015 07:21, Adam Williamson a écrit :
Working on the ownCloud package today, it occurred to me that we
probably have quite a lot of packages carrying Apache access
control snippets around, like these:
This configuration
commit 125508184a8df6c28d23cbbcb4e6c013e24a4ffe
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr
Date: Sun Feb 22 10:24:08 2015 +0100
Update to 1.16
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Config-GitLike.spec | 11 ++-
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6
commit 019d68398a367ab887858b787ef0e122be7dc41b
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr
Date: Sun Feb 22 10:12:58 2015 +0100
Update to 5.90083
.gitignore | 1 +
auto.ini | 12
perl-Catalyst-Runtime.spec | 7 +--
sources
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-GnuPG-Interface:
7de2662f2fb00a89fd0762ca027e80a8 GnuPG-Interface-0.52.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
polymake has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
polymake-2.13-18.git20141013.fc22.x86_64 requires perl = 4:5.20.1
On i386:
polymake-2.13-18.git20141013.fc22.i686 requires perl = 4:5.20.1
On armhfp:
polymake-2.13-18.git20141013.fc22.armv7hl requires perl =
On Sun, 22 Feb 2015 15:04:18 +0100
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
Are Fedora packages allowed to have a default configuration in which
the service accepts commands from the network in the default
configuration?
Commands from the network what sort of commands?
Perhaps
Am 22.02.2015 um 21:41 schrieb مصعب الزعبي:
Hi , I got a message from my friend a programmer.
And he asked me , Is Fedora have a backdoor !!!
He got a two domains without any control of him and without updates
enabled and controlled by NetworkManager , domains are :
vm3.fedora.ibiblio.org
On Sun, 22 Feb 2015 21:25:01 +0100
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
So, my problem is whether the package should go through review in
current state. My gut feeling is that it shouldn't, but I don't want
to overstep my role as a reviewer.
I'd personally agree. Can they not
Thank You for Care .. from everybody for this case ..
I know that talking about Fedora as a backdoor container makes us angry .. But
we must be careful about these sensitive issues.
As a reply :
My friend didn't have enabled auto-update.
He completely Surprised of un-human-authorized
Am 22.02.2015 um 21:59 schrieb مصعب الزعبي:
No it's a real problem .. What the information by 443 port that shared
by NetworkManager !!! to un-local servers .
the problem is that *nobody* knows what you are talking about
THIS IS THE DEFINITION OF BACKDOOR !!!
you first need to define the
* Reindl Harald:
sorry *but* He got a two domains without any control of him does not
make any sense to me, it still does not
The two host names he mentioned are used to host
wildcard.fedoraproject.org. His friend is concerned because he sees
connection attempts to them even though they are
* Reindl Harald:
that has some meaning and in case of taking strong words like
backdoor in my mouth and accuse the distribution that way i expect
Please read the Fesco ticket I referenced. Such concerns are far from
isolated. (I think they are unwarranted, but they neverless exist.)
As to
Even it just a Meta headers , the user approve must be taken. May at Fedora
installation , and a way to stop must be available , too.
These issues must be in control by user .
Kind Regards
Mosaab
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 17:44:59 -0500
From: mat...@fedoraproject.org
To:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 10:59:06PM +0200, مصعب الزعبي wrote:
No it's a real problem .. What the information by 443 port that shared by
NetworkManager !!! to un-local servers .
THIS IS THE DEFINITION OF BACKDOOR !!!
What you probably see is network connectivity check, done by
On Sun, 22 Feb 2015 22:59:06 +0200
مصعب الزعبي moc...@hotmail.com wrote:
No it's a real problem .. What the information by 443 port that
shared by NetworkManager !!! to un-local servers .
THIS IS THE DEFINITION OF BACKDOOR !!!
It's hard to say what you are talking about here, but I suspect
* Reindl Harald:
He got a two domains without any control of him makes no sense
Come on, Harald, please try to be a little bit more constructive.
Mosaab's question is pretty easy to understand, and his concerns
are shared by some Fedora contributors:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 01:55:31PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sun, 22 Feb 2015 21:25:01 +0100
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
So, my problem is whether the package should go through review in
current state. My gut feeling is that it shouldn't, but I don't want
to
* مصعب الزعبي:
Thank You for Care .. from everybody for this case ..
I know that talking about Fedora as a backdoor container makes us angry ..
But we must be careful about these sensitive issues.
As a reply :
My friend didn't have enabled auto-update.
The archive meta-data can be
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 01:08:34PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sun, 22 Feb 2015 15:04:18 +0100
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
Are Fedora packages allowed to have a default configuration in which
the service accepts commands from the network in the default
* مصعب الزعبي:
Hi , I got a message from my friend a programmer.
And he asked me , Is Fedora have a backdoor !!!
He got a two domains without any control of him and without updates enabled
and controlled by NetworkManager , domains are :
vm3.fedora.ibiblio.org
proxy3.fedoraproject.org
Am 22.02.2015 um 22:14 schrieb Florian Weimer:
* Reindl Harald:
He got a two domains without any control of him makes no sense
Come on, Harald, please try to be a little bit more constructive.
Mosaab's question is pretty easy to understand, and his concerns
are shared by some Fedora
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 03:50:16PM -0800, Susi Lehtola wrote:
Hi,
the GNU Scientific Library (GSL) contains some linear algebra
routines that need a CBLAS library to work.
GSL contains a compatibility CBLAS library (gslcblas) that provides
a version of these routines. In 2010, we started
On 02/21/2015 08:07 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:
I'm looking into another issue on F22 but there's no .cfg for that. Is
that still just coming down the pipeline since the branch just recently
happened? Or is there a way I can manually create the .cfg file?
Thanks,
Dave
The just released 1.2.7-1
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 07:51:06PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
and then comes the default firewall on F21 workstation with all
ports 1024 open because things have to work out of the box
Yes, this is the reason why I'm asking. If there was a restrictive
firewall by default, this would not be an
Hi , I got a message from my friend a programmer.
And he asked me , Is Fedora have a backdoor !!!
He got a two domains without any control of him and without updates enabled and
controlled by NetworkManager , domains are :
vm3.fedora.ibiblio.org
proxy3.fedoraproject.org
And both directed to
No it's a real problem .. What the information by 443 port that shared by
NetworkManager !!! to un-local servers .
THIS IS THE DEFINITION OF BACKDOOR !!!
Regards
Mosaab
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 21:48:57 +0100
From: h.rei...@thelounge.net
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: Is Fedora
Am 22.02.2015 um 22:20 schrieb Florian Weimer:
* Reindl Harald:
sorry *but* He got a two domains without any control of him does not
make any sense to me, it still does not
The two host names he mentioned are used to host
wildcard.fedoraproject.org. His friend is concerned because he sees
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 12:37:44AM +0200, مصعب الزعبي wrote:
My friend didn't have enabled auto-update.
There was an earlier discussion here. Even without updates
automatically applied, metadata about potential updates is downloaded
automatically.
He completely Surprised of
I'm orphaning the wiiuse package (for f22+), the last release was almost
2 years ago and I have no time to care for it.
Feel free to grab it if you use it, maintenance burden has not been high
so far.
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
--
devel mailing list
On Mon, 2015-02-23 at 00:11 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
I'm orphaning the wiiuse package (for f22+), the last release was almost
Correction I orphaned for all but f20.
2 years ago and I have no time to care for it.
Feel free to grab it if you use it, maintenance burden has not been high
so
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 5:15 PM, مصعب الزعبي
moc...@hotmail.com wrote:
Even it just a Meta headers , the user approve must be taken. May at
Fedora installation , and a way to stop must be available , too.
These issues must be in control by user .
Kind Regards
Mosaab
Hi,
You can disable
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com
wrote:
On 02/21/2015 08:07 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:
I'm looking into another issue on F22 but there's no .cfg for that. Is
that still just coming down the pipeline since the branch just recently
happened? Or is there a way
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 08:44:28AM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
On 2/23/15, مصعب الزعبي moc...@hotmail.com wrote:
Even it just a Meta headers , the user approve must be taken. May at Fedora
installation , and a way to stop must be available , too.
These issues must be in control by user
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195088
Bug ID: 1195088
Summary: perl-App-grindperl-0.003 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-App-grindperl
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195094
Bug ID: 1195094
Summary: perl-List-Compare-0.47 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-List-Compare
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
On 02/22/2015 01:14 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Reindl Harald:
He got a two domains without any control of him makes no sense
Come on, Harald, please try to be a little bit more constructive.
Mosaab's question is pretty easy to understand, and his concerns
are shared by some Fedora
On 01/23/2015 04:32 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
My experience with the new package process is that the review process in
Step 6 doesn't work. For some of my packages it took 3 months for a
reviewer to appear, some others more, some where reviewed faster. My
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195088
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Scratch build failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9031748
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195094
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Scratch build succeeded
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9032121
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
Elasticsearch was never safe:
http://www.elasticsearch.org/community/security/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124252
So it shouldn't go ahead in current status.
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195096
Bug ID: 1195096
Summary: perl-Pod-Usage-1.66 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Pod-Usage
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
On 01/25/2015 08:19 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 12:32:55AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
My experience with the new package process is that the review process in
Step 6 doesn't work. For some of my packages it took 3 months for a
On 2/23/15, مصعب الزعبي moc...@hotmail.com wrote:
Even it just a Meta headers , the user approve must be taken. May at Fedora
installation , and a way to stop must be available , too.
These issues must be in control by user .
And your friend can freely switch to other distributions as well if
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195096
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Scratch build succeeded
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9032265
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
80 matches
Mail list logo
