ppisar uploaded Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ReadmeFromPod-0.33.tar.gz for perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ReadmeFromPod

d7ffb177b7fc727a4e5f3427c0762932 Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ReadmeFromPod-0.33.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ReadmeFromPod/Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ReadmeFromPod-0.33.tar.gz/md5/d7ffb177b7fc727a4e5f3427c0762932/Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ReadmeFromPod-0.33.tar.gz --

ppisar pushed to perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ReadmeFromPod (f23). "0.33 bum"

From 9dbd3254e0c9f4543250e074707a028cafcbad1a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 08:19:03 +0200 Subject: 0.33 bum diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index af11c61..1934387 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -1,3

ppisar pushed to perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ReadmeFromPod (f22). "0.33 bum"

From 51069e05be7f2c7f61c75e94f24851a7a32202c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 08:19:03 +0200 Subject: 0.33 bum diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index af11c61..1934387 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -1,3

[Bug 1261901] perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ReadmeFromPod-0.33 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261901 --- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- ppisar's perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ReadmeFromPod-0.33-1.fc24 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=684134 -- You are

ppisar uploaded ExtUtils-MakeMaker-7.10.tar.gz for perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker

2639a21adee5e0a903730c12dcba08ec ExtUtils-MakeMaker-7.10.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker/ExtUtils-MakeMaker-7.10.tar.gz/md5/2639a21adee5e0a903730c12dcba08ec/ExtUtils-MakeMaker-7.10.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

ppisar pushed to perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker (master). "7.10 bump"

From 580e3643393da1aa90fd5251e690573c036a9d64 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 08:49:09 +0200 Subject: 7.10 bump diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 72015ab..6412b60 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@

ppisar pushed to perl-HTML-HTML5-Entities (master). "Import"

From 442d44eab5fd21ff3b36aa5a1cc81fa42921d8f0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 08:20:44 +0200 Subject: Import diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index e69de29..dd0c7ab 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -0,0

ppisar pushed to perl-HTML-HTML5-Entities (master). "Document licensing"

From fa27d8ec996f5b3710ee439e213e1003c0a1c774 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 08:23:02 +0200 Subject: Document licensing diff --git a/perl-HTML-HTML5-Entities.spec b/perl-HTML-HTML5-Entities.spec index ab816c5..381ba67

[Bug 1262150] perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-7.10 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262150 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1262150] perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-7.10 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262150 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- ppisar's perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-7.10-1.fc24 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=684142 -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1261901] perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ReadmeFromPod-0.33 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261901 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

ppisar pushed to perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ReadmeFromPod (master). "0.33 bum"

From 9dbd3254e0c9f4543250e074707a028cafcbad1a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 08:19:03 +0200 Subject: 0.33 bum diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index af11c61..1934387 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -1,3

[Bug 1261901] perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ReadmeFromPod-0.33 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261901 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ReadmeFromPod-0.33-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-15586 -- You are

[Bug 1261901] perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ReadmeFromPod-0.33 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261901 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ReadmeFromPod-0.33-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-15587 -- You are

ppisar uploaded HTML-HTML5-Entities-0.004.tar.gz for perl-HTML-HTML5-Entities

249cadb36f07432ff6d1b24d3a991bbd HTML-HTML5-Entities-0.004.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-HTML-HTML5-Entities/HTML-HTML5-Entities-0.004.tar.gz/md5/249cadb36f07432ff6d1b24d3a991bbd/HTML-HTML5-Entities-0.004.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

[ANN] Release of Bugzilla 5.0.1, 4.4.10, and 4.2.15

Today we are releasing 5.0.1, 4.4.10, and 4.2.15. All releases fix a security issue found since the last release. Bugzilla 5.0.1 is our latest stable release. It contains several important bug fixes for the 5.0 branch. Bugzilla 4.4.10 and 4.2.15 are bug fix updates for the 4.4 branch and

Security advisory for Bugzilla 5.0, 4.4.9, and 4.2.14

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Summary === Bugzilla is a Web-based bug-tracking system used by a large number of software projects. The following security issue has been discovered in Bugzilla: * Login names longer than 127 characters can be corrupted, which could lead to

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

Dne 11.9.2015 v 18:08 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > Dne 11.9.2015 v 17:21 Matthew Miller napsal(a): >> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 03:51:33PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: * Increases the available pool of software that can be packaged substantially (many modern languages such as Ruby and Go are

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 9:21 AM, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > On 09/10/2015 03:42 PM, Adam Miller wrote: >>> It doesn't matter how rare they are, it'll only take a single bundled >>> library handled incorrectly to completely screw a running OS. I don't >>> think this is something

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

Le 11/09/2015 19:17, Zdenek Kabelac a écrit : > Why I cannot use multiple different versions of php on a SINGLE machine ? You can easily with SCL... Oh... wait... SCL are not allowed in Fedora. So use RHEL/CentOS which is a far better environment for such needs. And more: this will be a "huge"

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 11:51 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > 3) Does "package all the things" really make sense, anyway? > > What is the gain from 'conform Chromium to our package regulations' > gain us? > A few people who won't just install Chrome for F/OSS reasons? If > that's the > goal, we

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 10:51:42 -0700 Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 13:35 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > As for which components, it's not about specific examples[1]. It's > > about solving the question in a generic way. We have quite a lot of >

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 07:42 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >> On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 09:02 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> > One can only tilt at windmills for so long before one's horse gives >> > out. This battle

Fedora 23 Branched 20150911 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud atomic Disk x86_64 Cloud base Disk i386 No images in this compose but not 23 Branched 20150910 No images in 23 Branched 20150910 but not this. -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/fedora-qa.git/tree/check-compose -- devel mailing

Fedora Rawhide 20150911 compose check report

Missing expected images: Kde Live i386 Workstation Live i386 Cloud base Disk i386 Cloud base Disk x86_64 Kde Live x86_64 Cloud atomic Disk x86_64 Kde Disk armhfp Workstation Live x86_64 No images in this compose but not Rawhide 20150910 No images in Rawhide 20150910 but not this. -- Mail

spot uploaded Glib-1.313.tar.gz for perl-Glib

d33828aec57018a5923dcf5ed3b81cf9 Glib-1.313.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Glib/Glib-1.313.tar.gz/md5/d33828aec57018a5923dcf5ed3b81cf9/Glib-1.313.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

spot pushed to perl-Glib (f23). "1.313"

From c30f7f2effd0d8f8028b6d1670a9855d0f00866f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom Callaway Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 14:13:41 -0400 Subject: 1.313 diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index bbd0478..a00ffc6 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -8,3 +8,4 @@

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On 09/11/2015 05:51 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 13:35 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: As for which components, it's not about specific examples[1]. It's about solving the question in a generic way. We have quite a lot of software that isn't packaged for Fedora (either

spot pushed to perl-Glib (master). "1.313"

From c30f7f2effd0d8f8028b6d1670a9855d0f00866f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom Callaway Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 14:13:41 -0400 Subject: 1.313 diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index bbd0478..a00ffc6 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -8,3 +8,4 @@

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On 09/11/2015 06:10 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 12:06 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 10:51:42 -0700 Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 13:35 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: As for which components, it's not about

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

Am 11.09.2015 um 18:17 schrieb Zdenek Kabelac: Dne 11.9.2015 v 16:44 Reindl Harald napsal(a): Am 11.09.2015 um 16:31 schrieb Zdenek Kabelac: Dne 11.9.2015 v 15:47 Reindl Harald napsal(a): don't tell me rpmfusion could not easily make that fully automated This Fedora plan simply puts too

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

Dne 11.9.2015 v 18:22 Reindl Harald napsal(a): Am 11.09.2015 um 18:17 schrieb Zdenek Kabelac: Dne 11.9.2015 v 16:44 Reindl Harald napsal(a): Am 11.09.2015 um 16:31 schrieb Zdenek Kabelac: Dne 11.9.2015 v 15:47 Reindl Harald napsal(a): don't tell me rpmfusion could not easily make that

spot uploaded Email-MessageID-1.406.tar.gz for perl-Email-MessageID

e1e235a4a3c64a6c1d07507c7049ff3b Email-MessageID-1.406.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Email-MessageID/Email-MessageID-1.406.tar.gz/md5/e1e235a4a3c64a6c1d07507c7049ff3b/Email-MessageID-1.406.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

spot pushed to perl-Email-MessageID (master). "1.406"

From 7d31aadba021fa7fe96579039a0c048874491267 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom Callaway Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 14:23:08 -0400 Subject: 1.406 diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index e6bb0b3..5d895ed 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 18:27 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: > > I agree that the discussion here needs to be more broad-based; see > > the > > other thread fork. I was just providing support for Stephen's > > contention that this is not some airy-fairy theoretical problem, > > there > > are

[Bug 1258940] perl-Log-Dispatch >= 2.47 causes other modules to fail

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258940 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Log-Dispatch-2.50-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 11:51 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: >> To allow or not allow bundling is the small side point here - the >> questions >> should be more of "Are we a distribution of packages? Are we an OS?

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 12:06 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 10:51:42 -0700 > Adam Williamson wrote: > > > On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 13:35 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > > > As for which components, it's not about specific examples[1]. > > > It's >

Re: Fedora Rawhide 20150911 compose check report

On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 13:00 -0400, Fedora compose checker wrote: > Missing expected images: > > Kde Live i386 > Workstation Live i386 > Cloud base Disk i386 > Cloud base Disk x86_64 > Kde Live x86_64 > Cloud atomic Disk x86_64 > Kde Disk armhfp > Workstation Live x86_64 > > No images in this

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 17:00 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: > > On 09/10/2015 01:53 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > I assume that subject line got your attention. > > > > I know this is a long-standing debate and that this thread is > > likely > > to turn into an incomprehensible flamewar

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

Dne 11.9.2015 v 19:29 Reindl Harald napsal(a): Am 11.09.2015 um 19:17 schrieb Zdenek Kabelac: Dne 11.9.2015 v 18:22 Reindl Harald napsal(a): In non-Fedora 'world' it's the user who picks what he want to use, however in Fedora 'garden' a few people selects what user may use and puts huge

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On 09/10/2015 01:53 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: I assume that subject line got your attention. I know this is a long-standing debate and that this thread is likely to turn into an incomprehensible flamewar filled with the same tired arguments, but I'm going to make a proposal and then

[Bug 1258940] perl-Log-Dispatch >= 2.47 causes other modules to fail

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258940 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 13:35 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > As for which components, it's not about specific examples[1]. It's > about solving the question in a generic way. We have quite a lot of > software that isn't packaged for Fedora (either not started or > aborted > when the package

[Bug 1230070] Upgrade perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-ACL to 0.16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230070 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

ppisar uploaded Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-ACL-0.16.tar.gz for perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-ACL

b47849e930a3d51c6db23028b7cfc05a Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-ACL-0.16.tar.gz

[Bug 1230070] Upgrade perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-ACL to 0.16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230070 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In

jplesnik uploaded Proc-ProcessTable-0.53.tar.gz for perl-Proc-ProcessTable

8cb894f18ba49558683860ae9082ca4a Proc-ProcessTable-0.53.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Proc-ProcessTable/Proc-ProcessTable-0.53.tar.gz/md5/8cb894f18ba49558683860ae9082ca4a/Proc-ProcessTable-0.53.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

[Bug 1221832] perl-Dancer2-0.161000 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221832 --- Comment #13 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- ppisar's perl-Dancer2-0.161000-1.fc24 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=684148 -- You are receiving this mail

ppisar pushed to perl-Authen-Credential (master). "1.1 bump"

From d89cbd07f6b2a024ee4d2e769e94a29720dfdd97 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 10:24:08 +0200 Subject: 1.1 bump diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 82d41ae..2fd9b86 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -1,3

ppisar pushed to perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-ACL (master). "0.16 bump"

From 59f1ead7f9ae429af91e75efb681e377309ac502 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 11:03:19 +0200 Subject: 0.16 bump diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index bb7438f..9831798 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -1

jplesnik pushed to perl-Proc-ProcessTable (master). "0.53 bump"

From c3dc3a9fa5affb47d3e31bb2022c13bc733bc498 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 11:49:44 +0200 Subject: 0.53 bump diff --git a/perl-Proc-ProcessTable.spec b/perl-Proc-ProcessTable.spec index c370fe5..d86e15a 100644 ---

[Bug 1230790] Upgrade perl-Proc-ProcessTable to 0.51

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230790 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Proc-ProcessTable-0.53-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-15592 -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1230051] Upgrade perl-Authen-Credential to 1.1

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230051 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

Re: Orphaning two packages

I'd be happy to take bonesi. -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng http://awk.io -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

ppisar uploaded Authen-Credential-1.1.tar.gz for perl-Authen-Credential

93633c8c7b1d96fbb9f1a94d877936ce Authen-Credential-1.1.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Authen-Credential/Authen-Credential-1.1.tar.gz/md5/93633c8c7b1d96fbb9f1a94d877936ce/Authen-Credential-1.1.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

[Bug 1230051] Upgrade perl-Authen-Credential to 1.1

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230051 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1221832] perl-Dancer2-0.161000 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221832 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1230073] Upgrade perl-Catalyst-View-JSON to 0.35

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230073 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

jplesnik pushed to perl-Proc-ProcessTable (f23). "0.53 bump"

From a261510a2cac20e141e25fa2fce92257d457e28c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 12:01:38 +0200 Subject: 0.53 bump diff --git a/perl-Proc-ProcessTable.spec b/perl-Proc-ProcessTable.spec index c370fe5..d86e15a 100644 ---

[Bug 1230790] Upgrade perl-Proc-ProcessTable to 0.51

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230790 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED

ppisar pushed to perl-Dancer2 (master). "0.161000 bump"

From 1988de6f3ad6f6ef88a337905ba950a8c9bd5a25 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 16:37:43 +0200 Subject: 0.161000 bump diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index e7a28b3..196c70c 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@

jplesnik changed jplesnik's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-HTML-HTML5-Entities (master) to 'Obsolete'

jplesnik changed jplesnik's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-HTML-HTML5-Entities (master) to 'Obsolete' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-HTML-HTML5-Entities/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

jplesnik changed jplesnik's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-HTML-HTML5-Entities (master) to 'Obsolete'

jplesnik changed jplesnik's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-HTML-HTML5-Entities (master) to 'Obsolete' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-HTML-HTML5-Entities/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

Orphaning two packages

Hi everyone, I'm going to orphan the following packages, as I haven't really been interested any more in any of them for quite some time, now: * bonesi -- The DDoS Botnet Simulator (master, f23, f22, f21) * libhtp -- Security-aware parser for the HTTP protocol and the

Broken dependencies: polymake

polymake has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree: On x86_64: polymake-2.13-22.git20141013.fc23.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.2) polymake-2.13-22.git20141013.fc23.x86_64 requires perl = 4:5.20.2 polymake-2.13-22.git20141013.fc23.x86_64 requires

Broken dependencies: perl-Test-AutoBuild

perl-Test-AutoBuild has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree: On x86_64: perl-Test-AutoBuild-1.2.4-15.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) On i386: perl-Test-AutoBuild-1.2.4-15.fc22.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) On armhfp:

Broken dependencies: perl-Data-Dump-Streamer

perl-Data-Dump-Streamer has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree: On x86_64: perl-Data-Dump-Streamer-2.38-3.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) perl-Data-Dump-Streamer-2.38-3.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.20()(64bit) On i386:

Broken dependencies: perl-POE-API-Peek

perl-POE-API-Peek has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree: On x86_64: 1:perl-POE-API-Peek-2.20-8.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) On i386: 1:perl-POE-API-Peek-2.20-8.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) On armhfp:

Broken dependencies: perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV

perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree: On x86_64: perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV-0.09-10.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV-0.09-10.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.20()(64bit) On

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 12:59 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > Again, I don't actually think the answer here is "screw it, let's > bundle everything" If we want to talk about the wider issues here, btw, and we want something a bit more ambiguous and nuanced, I can also give you some interesting

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On 09/10/2015 07:10 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote: On 09/10/2015 09:53 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: The point of software is to provide a service to an end-user. Users don't run software because it has good packaging policies, they run software because it meets a need that they have. If they

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

2015-09-10 15:53 GMT+02:00 Stephen Gallagher : > I assume that subject line got your attention. > > I know this is a long-standing debate and that this thread is likely > to turn into an incomprehensible flamewar filled with the same tired > arguments, but I'm going to make a

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On 09/11/2015 07:25 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: In a world where bundling was allowed, the package would likely have been approved on initial review; the only significant issues found in review were bundling-related. There are a couple of trivial issues noted in #c7, but those would have been

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 19:32 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: > > On 09/11/2015 07:25 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > In a world where bundling was allowed, the package would likely > > have > > been approved on initial review; the only significant issues found > > in > > review were

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On 09/11/2015 10:35 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > Actually, the opposite is true. RHEL has fewer limitations in this > space. Red Hat's layered projects ship a fair amount of bundled stuff. > This problem is entirely Fedora's. Fedora has far stricter rules than > RHEL in this regard. It helps

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On 09/11/2015 07:16 PM, Haïkel wrote: 2015-09-11 21:09 GMT+02:00 Josh Stone: >On 09/11/2015 10:35 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >>Actually, the opposite is true. RHEL has fewer limitations in this >>space. Red Hat's layered projects ship a fair amount of bundled stuff.

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 19:19 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: > If you take a closer look at the sample you provided you should have > noticed the submitted date of that review request is 2012-07-01 and > the > last comment in which he finally gave up and moved to do other > things > wason

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On 09/11/2015 07:59 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 19:32 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: On 09/11/2015 07:25 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: In a world where bundling was allowed, the package would likely have been approved on initial review; the only significant issues

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On 09/11/2015 07:51 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: > On 2015-09-11, Zdenek Kabelac wrote: >> My complain here is about packaging libraries. >> And just because a library has been upgraded from version .so.2 to version >> .so.4 and you can't have both (as the new one replaces old one

[Bug 1258940] perl-Log-Dispatch >= 2.47 causes other modules to fail

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258940 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|2.50-1.fc22

[Bug 1258940] perl-Log-Dispatch >= 2.47 causes other modules to fail

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258940 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Log-Dispatch-2.50-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1262316] perl-Dancer-Session-Cookie-0.26 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262316 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 20:20 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: > > Again, I don't actually think the answer here is "screw it, let's > > bundle everything" - but I do believe it's reasonable to say that > > the > > strict no-bundling policy is causing a lot of fairly pointless work > > I hardly

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

2015-09-11 21:09 GMT+02:00 Josh Stone : > On 09/11/2015 10:35 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> Actually, the opposite is true. RHEL has fewer limitations in this >> space. Red Hat's layered projects ship a fair amount of bundled stuff. >> This problem is entirely Fedora's.

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

2015-09-11 21:26 GMT+02:00 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson : > > > Right as well as most issues already have been found and fixed in Fedora > long before those components enter RHEL. > > JBG > Fair point, Fedora brings value to Red Hat and it is acknowledged. -- devel mailing list

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

2015-09-11 20:24 GMT+02:00 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson : > > > The inclusion of what now 15k components in the distribution is a testimony > of success of un-bundling against your testimony of ( few ) failures of > bundling. > > JBG > Say that *after* you properly reviewed the

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On 09/11/2015 06:40 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 18:27 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: I agree that the discussion here needs to be more broad-based; see the other thread fork. I was just providing support for Stephen's contention that this is not some airy-fairy

[Bug 1261901] perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ReadmeFromPod-0.33 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261901 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On 09/11/2015 08:31 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: We certainly agree on that. > which has already been >answered by the board. >( people will first debate where to draw the line if that discussion >wont be killed in birth but in the end they end up with the same >question as has already been

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On 09/11/2015 10:08 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 11.9.2015 v 17:21 Matthew Miller napsal(a): >> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 03:51:33PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: * Increases the available pool of software that can be packaged substantially (many modern languages such as Ruby and Go are

Re: Orphaned packages available for new point of contact

On 09/10/2015 07:09 AM, Christopher Meng wrote: > Should be time to drop istanbul, since it's no longer developed. > Thanks, retired. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

Hi, On Friday, 11 September 2015 at 21:27, Haïkel wrote: [...] > I'll just point out that a non-negligible part of Fedora packages already > bundle libraries. Unless we want to mass-review and ban all those packages, > I consider that Stephen's proposal to be an *improvement* to the current >

Re: Orphaned packages available for new point of contact

On 09/10/2015 05:26 AM, Abdel G. Martínez L. wrote: > I will take care of python-xlib and python-couchdb. > Thanks. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On 09/11/2015 09:09 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: What does Fedora users gain with "dnf install rails" or "dnf install ipython" versus "gem install rails" and "pip install ipython"? This indeed is very good question. I'm not sure how things are elsewhere in the world but in the case of gem's

[Test-Announce] 2015-09-14 @ 1600 UTC ** F23 Blocker Review Meeting

# F23 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2015-09-14 # Time: 1600 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net Earlier this week we knocked out a bunch of blocker proposals, and come Monday we'll need to do the same. Luckily though, there's currently only 1/1 proposed blocker for

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On 09/10/2015 07:53 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > Right now, we have a policy that essentially forbids source code from > being bundled into a package. In technical terms, this means > essentially that the packaging policies mandate that any code that > appears more than once in the repository

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

2015-09-11 23:37 GMT+02:00 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski : > > It's not an improvement as such. We already require the Provides: > bundled(foo) thing, though we rely on the good will of maintainers > (both in Fedora and upstream) because we have practical means of >

ppisar uploaded Web-Paste-Simple-0.002.tar.gz for perl-Web-Paste-Simple

aa7099471de9f6fe6a8e40ecff3f1391 Web-Paste-Simple-0.002.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Web-Paste-Simple/Web-Paste-Simple-0.002.tar.gz/md5/aa7099471de9f6fe6a8e40ecff3f1391/Web-Paste-Simple-0.002.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

[Bug 1230147] Upgrade perl-Compress-Snappy to 0.24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230147 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

  1   2   3   >