Re: rpmbuild - empty RPMS directory

On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 18:09:44 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 15/09/15 13:58 +0200, arnaud gaboury wrote: > >I have been working on my first rpmbuild since quite a few days now. > > As a more gneral comment, why not try something *much* simpler for > your first rpmbuild? > > Try something

rubygem-maruku license change

With recent update of rubygem-maruku, the license was changed from GPLv2+ to MIT and BSD. Best regards. Vít -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: rpmbuild - empty RPMS directory

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 3:07 AM, Christopher Meng wrote: > Also, when will you stop posting your failures at here? I see most of > failures are caused by yourself. Ha ha, of course ! It is my mistakes thus why I ask for hints. Basically, I'd read docs first. I did read a lot of

Re: rpmbuild - empty RPMS directory

On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 18:31:57 +0200, arnaud gaboury wrote: > >> >> These last lines are part of the %file section, > >> > > >> > Why have you deleted the lines? > >> > What did they tell? > >> > >> I deleted nothing. These last few lines are the end of screen output > >> when running rpmbuild. I

pghmcfc uploaded Net-SSH-Perl-1.39.tar.gz for perl-Net-SSH-Perl

c60f5c0a1a5eb13ff7e839b3dd1c69d8 Net-SSH-Perl-1.39.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Net-SSH-Perl/Net-SSH-Perl-1.39.tar.gz/md5/c60f5c0a1a5eb13ff7e839b3dd1c69d8/Net-SSH-Perl-1.39.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl

Broken dependencies: perl-Devel-BeginLift

perl-Devel-BeginLift has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree: On x86_64: perl-Devel-BeginLift-0.001003-9.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) perl-Devel-BeginLift-0.001003-9.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.20()(64bit) On i386:

Broken dependencies: polymake

polymake has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree: On x86_64: polymake-2.13-22.git20141013.fc23.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.2) polymake-2.13-22.git20141013.fc23.x86_64 requires perl = 4:5.20.2 polymake-2.13-22.git20141013.fc23.x86_64 requires

jplesnik pushed to perl-SVG (master). "2.64 bump; Modernize spec"

From 9313fddb3284845cabebc68046a79db3c7b2a06a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 14:18:11 +0200 Subject: 2.64 bump; Modernize spec diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 100fc51..d6f9bfa 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -1

Broken dependencies: perl-Devel-FindRef

perl-Devel-FindRef has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree: On x86_64: perl-Devel-FindRef-1.44-3.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) perl-Devel-FindRef-1.44-3.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.20()(64bit) On i386: perl-Devel-FindRef-1.44-3.fc22.i686

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Net-SSH-Perl (perl-Net-SSH-Perl-1.39-1.fc23). "Update to 1.39 (..more)"

From e0283313fabe91e113952c4d4ac108059d4aab2f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 11:51:32 +0100 Subject: Update to 1.39 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit - New upstream release 1.39 - Fix

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Net-SSH-Perl (perl-Net-SSH-Perl-1.39-1.fc24). "Update to 1.39 (..more)"

This commit already existed in another branch. http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-Net-SSH-Perl.git/commit/?h=perl-Net-SSH-Perl-1.39-1.fc24=e0283313fabe91e113952c4d4ac108059d4aab2f -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

rawhide report: 20150916 changes

Compose started at Wed Sep 16 05:15:04 UTC 2015 Broken deps for i386 -- [IQmol] IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0 IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0 [apache-scout]

[Bug 1263683] perl-Net-DNS-1.02 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263683 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Failed to kick off scratch build. cmd: sha256sum /var/tmp/thn-qat67j/100.0% return code: 1 stdout: stderr: sha256sum:

[Bug 1263683] New: perl-Net-DNS-1.02 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263683 Bug ID: 1263683 Summary: perl-Net-DNS-1.02 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Net-DNS Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

Broken dependencies: perl-POE-API-Peek

perl-POE-API-Peek has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: 1:perl-POE-API-Peek-2.20-8.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) On i386: 1:perl-POE-API-Peek-2.20-8.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) On armhfp:

Re: Do we need the Fedora 'virt' mailing list?

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 12:45:28PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > Crickets ... https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/virt/ > > The virt list has long been in an odd place. Fedora has best in class > virt support, because so many virt developers use it. It also follows > upstream very

[Bug 1180496] perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.106 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180496 Bug 1180496 depends on bug 1119266, which changed state. Bug 1119266 Summary: libstatgrab-0.91 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119266 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1163320] perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.104 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1163320 Bug 1163320 depends on bug 1119266, which changed state. Bug 1119266 Summary: libstatgrab-0.91 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119266 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 839612] perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.04 segfaults with perl 5.16.0

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839612 Bug 839612 depends on bug 1119266, which changed state. Bug 1119266 Summary: libstatgrab-0.91 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119266 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1230809] Upgrade perl-SVG to 2.64

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230809 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

F-23 Branched report: 20150916 changes

Compose started at Wed Sep 16 07:15:03 UTC 2015 Broken deps for armhfp -- [apache-scout] apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.juddi:uddi-ws) apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires

Do we need the Fedora 'virt' mailing list?

Crickets ... https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/virt/ The virt list has long been in an odd place. Fedora has best in class virt support, because so many virt developers use it. It also follows upstream very closely, with upstream packages like libvirt and qemu going straight into

[Bug 1263685] New: perl-Regexp-Grammars-1.042 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263685 Bug ID: 1263685 Summary: perl-Regexp-Grammars-1.042 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Regexp-Grammars Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Broken dependencies: perl-Method-Signatures

perl-Method-Signatures has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Method-Signatures-20141021-1.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.1) On i386: perl-Method-Signatures-20141021-1.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.1) On armhfp:

Broken dependencies: perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV

perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV-0.09-10.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV-0.09-10.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.20()(64bit) On

Broken dependencies: polymake

polymake has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: polymake-2.13-22.git20141013.fc23.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.2) polymake-2.13-22.git20141013.fc23.x86_64 requires perl = 4:5.20.2 polymake-2.13-22.git20141013.fc23.x86_64 requires

Broken dependencies: perl-Devel-BeginLift

perl-Devel-BeginLift has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Devel-BeginLift-0.001003-9.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) perl-Devel-BeginLift-0.001003-9.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.20()(64bit) On i386:

Broken dependencies: perl-Data-Alias

perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Data-Alias-1.18-4.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) perl-Data-Alias-1.18-4.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.20()(64bit) On i386: perl-Data-Alias-1.18-4.fc22.i686 requires

Broken dependencies: perl-Devel-FindRef

perl-Devel-FindRef has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Devel-FindRef-1.44-3.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) perl-Devel-FindRef-1.44-3.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.20()(64bit) On i386: perl-Devel-FindRef-1.44-3.fc22.i686

Broken dependencies: perl-Unix-Statgrab

perl-Unix-Statgrab has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.04-25.1.fc23.x86_64 requires libstatgrab.so.6()(64bit) On i386: perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.04-25.1.fc23.i686 requires libstatgrab.so.6 On armhfp:

Broken dependencies: perl-Data-Dump-Streamer

perl-Data-Dump-Streamer has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Data-Dump-Streamer-2.38-3.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) perl-Data-Dump-Streamer-2.38-3.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.20()(64bit) On i386:

Broken dependencies: perl-Data-Dump-Streamer

perl-Data-Dump-Streamer has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree: On x86_64: perl-Data-Dump-Streamer-2.38-3.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) perl-Data-Dump-Streamer-2.38-3.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.20()(64bit) On i386:

Broken dependencies: perl-POE-API-Peek

perl-POE-API-Peek has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree: On x86_64: 1:perl-POE-API-Peek-2.20-8.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) On i386: 1:perl-POE-API-Peek-2.20-8.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) On armhfp:

Broken dependencies: perl-Method-Signatures

perl-Method-Signatures has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree: On x86_64: perl-Method-Signatures-20141021-1.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.1) On i386: perl-Method-Signatures-20141021-1.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.1) On armhfp:

Broken dependencies: perl-Data-Alias

perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree: On x86_64: perl-Data-Alias-1.18-4.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) perl-Data-Alias-1.18-4.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.20()(64bit) On i386: perl-Data-Alias-1.18-4.fc22.i686 requires

Broken dependencies: perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV

perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree: On x86_64: perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV-0.09-10.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV-0.09-10.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.20()(64bit) On

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Net-SSH-Perl (master). "Update to 1.39 (..more)"

From e0283313fabe91e113952c4d4ac108059d4aab2f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 11:51:32 +0100 Subject: Update to 1.39 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit - New upstream release 1.39 - Fix

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Net-SSH-Perl (f23). "Update to 1.39 (..more)"

From e0283313fabe91e113952c4d4ac108059d4aab2f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 11:51:32 +0100 Subject: Update to 1.39 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit - New upstream release 1.39 - Fix

jplesnik uploaded SVG-2.64.tar.gz for perl-SVG

ba4445ee72e2f3c29da332cb0119a2ad SVG-2.64.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-SVG/SVG-2.64.tar.gz/md5/ba4445ee72e2f3c29da332cb0119a2ad/SVG-2.64.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

Re: Do we need the Fedora 'virt' mailing list?

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 01:20:49PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 12:45:28PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > Crickets ... https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/virt/ > > > > The virt list has long been in an odd place. Fedora has best in class > > virt

[Bug 1062576] memory leak when including a file with "use utf8"

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062576 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- perl-5.20.3-327.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-15793 -- You are receiving this mail because: You

Re: rpmbuild - empty RPMS directory

arnaud gaboury writes: > I have been working on my first rpmbuild since quite a few days now. > > The rpm is intendeed to install R[0] built with Intel MKL libraries > and Intel compiler. As a base for the spec file, I used the one from > Fedora R package[1]. Why? I

jplesnik pushed to perl (f21). "Don't leak the temp utf8 copy of namepv (bug #1062576)"

From d00ee57841002417845a967afb1197309ae411ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 15:27:09 +0200 Subject: Don't leak the temp utf8 copy of namepv (bug #1062576) diff --git a/perl-123786-don-t-leak-the-temp-utf8-copy-of-n.patch

[Bug 1180496] perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.109 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180496 Petr Šabata changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.106 is

Re: Resources for upstream testing?

Dave Johansen writes: >> For what it's worth, you can use vagrant with the >> kaorimatz/fedora-rawhide-x86_64 box. A search on the hashicorp atlas >> finds it. >> > > Are there any instructions on how to use this for testing? I don't understand. It provides a system in

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

Michael Stahl writes: >> Symbol interposition is used a lot for very useful features, blocking >> interposition would break a lot of stuff. > > really? i've always thought that it was only useful for libc symbols, > but maybe that's because i don't work on base OS stuff. I'd

DNF: no helpful information in case of dependency problems

YUM did show dependency problems down to the "library.so.version", DNF just says "skip" even with the -v flag "-v" is showing another bug, there is no need to mention "deltainfo" when "deltarpm=0" is confirgured and maybe that is why DNF *is so terrible slow* all the time "yum update

Re: DNF: no helpful information in case of dependency problems

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > YUM did show dependency problems down to the "library.so.version", DNF just > says "skip" even with the -v flag > > "-v" is showing another bug, there is no need to mention "deltainfo" when > "deltarpm=0" is

Re: [fedora-virt] Do we need the Fedora 'virt' mailing list?

On 09/16/2015 08:20 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 12:45:28PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> >> Crickets ... https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/virt/ >> >> The virt list has long been in an odd place. Fedora has best in class >> virt support, because so many

Re: openmpi 1.10.0 coming to rawhide soon

On 09/15/2015 09:56 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: I'll be building openmpi 1.10.0 for rawhide soon. This has soname bumps so I'll be rebuilding dependent packages as well: hdf5 build is hanging in a test. I'll try to track that down. If I can't quickly I'll rebuild without the test to build

Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2015-09-16)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2015-09-16 18:00 UTC' Links to all tickets

[Bug 1062576] memory leak when including a file with "use utf8"

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062576 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- perl-5.18.4-309.fc21 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 21. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-16027 -- You are receiving this mail because: You

ppisar uploaded Encode-2.77.tar.gz for perl-Encode

8208b057f4aee0bd1ffc122707bfdc88 Encode-2.77.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Encode/Encode-2.77.tar.gz/md5/8208b057f4aee0bd1ffc122707bfdc88/Encode-2.77.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

ppisar pushed to perl-Encode (f22). "2.77 bump"

From dbcc1895c14fa468aae5dd897ecfd603dfd675ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 17:08:51 +0200 Subject: 2.77 bump diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 9e891a0..e6eea5d 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@

Re: Resources for upstream testing?

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 6:04 AM, Dave Love wrote: > Dave Johansen writes: > > >> For what it's worth, you can use vagrant with the > >> kaorimatz/fedora-rawhide-x86_64 box. A search on the hashicorp atlas > >> finds it. > >> > > > > Are there any

ppisar pushed to perl-Encode (f23). "2.77 bump"

From cc9b601b097b504eae6c7a0539fe2f45c684f34e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 17:08:51 +0200 Subject: 2.77 bump diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 9e891a0..e6eea5d 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@

[Bug 1263486] perl-Encode-2.77 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263486 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Encode-2.77-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-16029 -- You are receiving this mail because:

ppisar pushed to perl-Encode (master). "2.77 bump"

From cc9b601b097b504eae6c7a0539fe2f45c684f34e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 17:08:51 +0200 Subject: 2.77 bump diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 9e891a0..e6eea5d 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@

[Bug 1263486] perl-Encode-2.77 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263486 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

[Bug 1263486] perl-Encode-2.77 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263486 --- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- ppisar's perl-Encode-2.77-1.fc24 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=685551 -- You are receiving this mail

Re: openmpi 1.10.0 coming to rawhide soon

Orion Poplawski writes: > I'll be building openmpi 1.10.0 for rawhide soon. This has soname bumps so > I'll be rebuilding dependent packages as well: Has the ABI actually changed? What I've seen about it suggested not, and NEWS doesn't say -- just "based on the v1.8.x

ppisar pushed to perl-Encode (f22). "Correct changelog entry"

From 0ac9d886d56334adb891bcb7d9902b5c0013339b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 17:23:15 +0200 Subject: Correct changelog entry diff --git a/perl-Encode.spec b/perl-Encode.spec index 35f3a58..044cced 100644 ---

ppisar pushed to perl-Encode (f21). "2.77 bump"

From 697e54908ba6c8f4c4caca3430189e3c9f5d6ae4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 17:08:51 +0200 Subject: 2.77 bump diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 9e891a0..e6eea5d 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@

[Bug 1263486] perl-Encode-2.77 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263486 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Encode-2.77-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-16030 -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug 1263486] perl-Encode-2.77 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263486 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Encode-2.77-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 21. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-16031 -- You are receiving this mail because:

Re: rpmbuild - empty RPMS directory

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Dave Love wrote: > arnaud gaboury writes: > >> I have been working on my first rpmbuild since quite a few days now. >> >> The rpm is intendeed to install R[0] built with Intel MKL libraries >> and Intel compiler.

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On 09/14/2015 12:04 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Mon, 2015-09-14 at 12:45 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: and much more important: if Fedora changes to more and more recommend "pip", "gem" and "cpan" like installs instead RPM packages it is no longer a distribution over the long because that

Re: [Fedora-packaging] RFC mass bug reporting: checksec failures

Including fedora-devel on this topic. На 12.09.2015 в 08:48, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski написа: Question is how to deal with these because they appear to be in the hundreds ? How many, exactly? We have around 2 SRPMs in the distribution. From today's Rawhide snapshot my script

Re: openmpi 1.10.0 coming to rawhide soon

On 09/16/2015 09:24 AM, Dave Love wrote: > Orion Poplawski writes: > >> I'll be building openmpi 1.10.0 for rawhide soon. This has soname bumps so >> I'll be rebuilding dependent packages as well: > > Has the ABI actually changed? What I've seen about it suggested not, >

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2015-09-16)

=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2015-09-16) === Meeting started by rishi at 18:00:05 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2015-09-16/fesco.2015-09-16-18.00.log.html . Meeting summary

Re: [Fedora-packaging] RFC mass bug reporting: checksec failures

On 16/09/15 18:19, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: Of course, several packages I comaintain are on the list (mainly due to Partial RELRO) and I have zero idea how to fix them. I read about what RELRO means from the blog post but that doesn't tell me what I actually need to do to make the errors go

[Bug 1263486] perl-Encode-2.77 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263486 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

Re: [Fedora-packaging] RFC mass bug reporting: checksec failures

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 07:24:02PM +0300, Alexander Todorov wrote: > Including fedora-devel on this topic. > > На 12.09.2015 в 08:48, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski написа: > >>> > >>>Question is how to deal with these because they appear to be in the > >>>hundreds ? > >> > >>How many, exactly?

Fedora 23 Branched 20150916 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud atomic Disk x86_64 Cloud base Disk i386 No images in this compose but not 23 Branched 20150915 Images in 23 Branched 20150915 but not this: Cloud base Vagrant x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 18 of 24 ID: 2666Test: x86_64 universal server_no_swap ID: 2665

Re: rpmbuild - empty RPMS directory

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 18:09:44 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > >> On 15/09/15 13:58 +0200, arnaud gaboury wrote: >> >I have been working on my first rpmbuild since quite a few days now. >> >> As a more gneral comment,

Call for testing: 32-bit AMD CPU owners

Hi, folks! We've found an issue in Fedora 23 Beta testing which seems to affect AMD CPUs when booting the 32-bit images: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263762 unfortunately, so far all those who've tested have only had 64-bit CPUs. So we know there's a problem booting the 32-bit

[389-devel] Please review (take 2): [389 Project] #48277: Assorted build fixes and make rpms target

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48277 https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48277#comment:4 Special thanks to Simo for his contribution and understanding our needs. I reviewed and tested the patches in #comment:4. I'd like to have another (or more) pair of eyes. Thanks, --noriko --

Additional information in email about Koji garbage collection?

Would it be possible to add more information to the emails sent to notify about Koji Garbage Collection ( http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Koji/GarbageCollection )? I receive these emails and I usually know why I received them (usually an update was obsoleted because of a fix for an issue that was

Fedora Rawhide 20150916 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud atomic Disk x86_64 Cloud base Disk i386 Cloud base Disk x86_64 Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20150915: Kde Live i386 Kde Live x86_64 Scientific_kde Live x86_64 Scientific_kde Live i386 Kde Disk armhfp Images in Rawhide 20150915 but not this: Cloud base

Re: Call for testing: 32-bit AMD CPU owners

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 12:08:15 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: If anyone reading this has an old 32-bit AMD system - the last range of 32-bit AMD CPUs was the Athlon XPs from early 2003, anything 'Athlon 64' or later is 64-bit - and it's not too much trouble, could

Re: [Fedora-packaging] RFC mass bug reporting: checksec failures

On 09/16/2015 11:08 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 09/16/2015 10:24 AM, Alexander Todorov wrote: >> From today's Rawhide snapshot my script counted around 4500 offending >> packages. You can find links to the script and execution log here: >>

Re: [Fedora-packaging] RFC mass bug reporting: checksec failures

On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 18:26 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > What is the proper fix to these issues? Having fixed some myself and > ajax having looked at a bunch of them I don't think it's as simple as > just mass rebuilding the packages. A lot of it is libtool being shit, which is nothing new I

[Bug 1256152] perl-IO-Prompt-0.997003 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256152 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1256187] perl-Object-InsideOut-3.99 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256187 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Object-InsideOut-3.99-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1256187] perl-Object-InsideOut-3.99 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256187 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1257174] perl-Object-InsideOut-4.01 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257174 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Object-InsideOut-4.02-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1256152] perl-IO-Prompt-0.997003 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256152 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- perl-IO-Prompt-0.997.003-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1257174] perl-Object-InsideOut-4.01 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257174 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1256152] perl-IO-Prompt-0.997003 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256152 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.997.003-1.fc22

[Bug 1256187] perl-Object-InsideOut-3.99 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256187 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|3.99-1.fc22

[Bug 1257174] perl-Object-InsideOut-4.01 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257174 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|4.02-1.fc22

[Bug 1256187] perl-Object-InsideOut-3.99 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256187 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Object-InsideOut-3.99-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1257174] perl-Object-InsideOut-4.01 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257174 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Object-InsideOut-4.02-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1256152] perl-IO-Prompt-0.997003 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256152 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- perl-IO-Prompt-0.997.003-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1263486] perl-Encode-2.77 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263486 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Encode-2.77-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.\nIf you want to test

Re: openmpi 1.10.0 coming to rawhide soon

On 09/16/2015 07:35 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 09/15/2015 09:56 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: I'll be building openmpi 1.10.0 for rawhide soon. This has soname bumps so I'll be rebuilding dependent packages as well: hdf5 build is hanging in a test. I'll try to track that down. If I can't

[Bug 1242918] perl-Flickr-API-1.19 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242918 --- Comment #12 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Failed to kick off scratch build. cmd: sha256sum /var/tmp/thn-odn9U0/100.0% return code: 1 stdout: stderr: sha256sum:

[Bug 1242918] perl-Flickr-API-1.19 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242918 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1062576] memory leak when including a file with "use utf8"

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062576 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 308 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3989 cross-binutils-2.23.88.0.1-2.el7.1 192 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 88

  1   2   >