Re: Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F23 tree

2015-10-03 Thread Peter Robinson
On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 4:43 AM, Jerry James wrote: > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Kalev Lember wrote: >> polymakejjames, rmattes > > At long last I have been able to fix this. The polymake maintainers, > based on their experience with some unspecified Linux distributions, > n

Re: Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F23 tree

2015-10-03 Thread Jerry James
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Kalev Lember wrote: > polymakejjames, rmattes At long last I have been able to fix this. The polymake maintainers, based on their experience with some unspecified Linux distributions, not including Fedora but including Ubuntu, assumed that all 32-

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

2015-10-03 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sun, Oct 04, 2015 at 03:29:38AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > I would like to propose that the no-bundled-libraries policy be > > amended as follows: "Any package that has an existing mechanism to > > link against a shared system library and functions correctly when > > doing so must link agai

Re: Heads up: glibmm/gtkmm now requires -std=c++11

2015-10-03 Thread Kevin Kofler
Kalev Lember wrote: > The fix is simple: make sure -std=c++11 is passed to the compiler. The default is gnu++98, so if you were using the default, you probably want gnu++11 instead. c++11 is strict C++11 without GNU extensions. Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproje

Re: bodhi: no email notifications for packages in pending state

2015-10-03 Thread Alexander Ploumistos
On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 7:55 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Almost all notifications from bodhi (with the exception currently of > adding comments on updates) is sent via FMN (the Fedora notification > service): https://apps.fedoraproject.org/notifications/ > > It sounds like you have your notifications

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

2015-10-03 Thread Kevin Kofler
I don't have the time to read the whole thread right now (and I'm not sure I ever will), but I think this is important, so here are my comments to the original proposal (to which I am totally opposed!): Stephen Gallagher wrote: > Right now, we have a policy that essentially forbids source code f

Re: comps packagereq items default to "mandatory"

2015-10-03 Thread Kevin Kofler
Bill Nottingham wrote: > Unless something has changed (possible, haven't been playing close > attention), there's no individual package selection for groups, so there > are no UI effects. There are post-install UI effects, especially since the "groups as objects" misfeature. Yum (and I suppose dn

Fedora 23 Branched 20151003 compose check report

2015-10-03 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. No images in this compose but not 23 Branched 20151002 No images in 23 Branched 20151002 but not this. Failed openQA tests: 9 of 52 ID: 4631Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit ID: 4624Test: i386 kde_live default_install ID: 4623Test:

Fedora Rawhide 20151003 compose check report

2015-10-03 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. No images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151002 No images in Rawhide 20151002 but not this. Failed openQA tests: 47 of 52 ID: 4632Test: i386 universal upgrade_desktop_32bit ID: 4630Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit ID: 4629Test:

Re: bodhi: no email notifications for packages in pending state

2015-10-03 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, 3 Oct 2015 16:46:02 +0300 Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > Hello, > > For the last couple of days I have been submitting updates (with > fedpkg) for some of my packages in all the branches. Currently they > all appear as pending in bodhi and I have not received any messages > about them, ev

bodhi: no email notifications for packages in pending state

2015-10-03 Thread Alexander Ploumistos
Hello, For the last couple of days I have been submitting updates (with fedpkg) for some of my packages in all the branches. Currently they all appear as pending in bodhi and I have not received any messages about them, even for the ones that got positive karma. The wiki reads for the pending stat

F-23 Branched report: 20151003 changes

2015-10-03 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Sat Oct 3 07:15:03 UTC 2015 Broken deps for armhfp -- [CableSwig] CableSwig-3.20.0-13.fc23.armv7hl requires gccxml [apache-scout] apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.juddi:uddi-ws)

rawhide report: 20151003 changes

2015-10-03 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Sat Oct 3 05:15:03 UTC 2015 Broken deps for i386 -- [CableSwig] CableSwig-3.20.0-13.fc23.i686 requires gccxml [IQmol] IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0 IQmol-2.3.0-9.f