[Bug 1267775] perl-Devel-PPPort-3.32 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267775 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Devel-PPPort-3.32-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1267775] perl-Devel-PPPort-3.32 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267775 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

Re: [EPEL-devel] Centos 7, 32 bits edition

On 17 October 2015 at 16:37, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 16/10/15 02:54, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> On 15 October 2015 at 16:38, Ian Pilcher wrote: >>> On 10/15/2015 07:29 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: And in fact is out now:

Re: [EPEL-devel] Centos 7, 32 bits edition

On 16/10/15 02:54, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 15 October 2015 at 16:38, Ian Pilcher wrote: >> On 10/15/2015 07:29 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: >>> >>> And in fact is out now: >>> >>> http://seven.centos.org/2015/10/centos-linux-7-32-bit-x86-i386-architecture-released/ >>

Fedora 23 Branched 20151017 compose check report

No missing expected images. No images in this compose but not 23 Branched 20151016 No images in 23 Branched 20151016 but not this. -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/fedora-qa.git/tree/check-compose -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1272713] perl-Config-Model-Tester-2.052 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272713 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Scratch build completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11492920 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the

[Bug 1272278] perl-CPANPLUS-0.9156 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272278 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPANPLUS-0.91.56-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to

[Bug 1272713] perl-Config-Model-Tester-2.052 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272713 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1084021 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1084021=edit [patch] Update to 2.052 (#1272713) -- You are

[Bug 1272713] New: perl-Config-Model-Tester-2.052 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272713 Bug ID: 1272713 Summary: perl-Config-Model-Tester-2.052 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Config-Model-Tester Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: [EPEL-devel] Centos 7, 32 bits edition

On 17/10/15 23:45, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > I don't think they would be "Fedora EPEL" then because the packages > wouldn't be built by koji, signed by us etc. I am not saying that such > builds couldn't happen in cbs.. it just wouldn't be EPEL. but you are building for/against a distro

Fedora Rawhide 20151017 compose check report

Missing expected images: Kde disk raw armhfp Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151016: Mate disk raw armhfp Images in Rawhide 20151016 but not this: Kde disk raw armhfp -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/fedora-qa.git/tree/check-compose -- devel

[Bug 1272278] perl-CPANPLUS-0.9156 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272278 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPANPLUS-0.91.56-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 119 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-6828 chicken-4.9.0.1-4.el6 101 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031 python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6 95

Re: unretiring valabind package

Hi gil, >1) maybe you should open a bug for review the package ... ? Yes I did already ... https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270630 You know - chicken egg problem - the procedure says first announce on devel list, then create the review request. >2) you must use %license macro for

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 223 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 119 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-6813 chicken-4.9.0.1-4.el7 27

Re: Packaging of PlayOnLinux

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 10:04:32PM +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: > On Wed, 14 Oct 2015, Sérgio Basto wrote: > >No, so Wine violates: > > > >https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Packages_which_are_not_useful_without_external_bits > It does not, just try notepad.exe, regedit.exe,

Re: Ownership of /usr/lib/rpm/fileattrs

On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 15:06:01 -0600 Orion Poplawski wrote: > Various packages now install files into /usr/lib/rpm/fileattrs for > use when building rpms. Currently that directory is owned by: > > rpm-build-4.13.0-0.rc1.4.fc23.x86_64 > javapackages-tools-4.6.0-6.fc23.noarch

Re: To someone with power to push packages on Fedora 21

On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 18:48:48 +0100 Sérgio Basto wrote: > yes , it is just autokarma thats messed up and push packages is one > way to fix the problem ..., which is easier . Well, we don't know for sure that those updates lost autokarma (Although it seems likely). It might be

Un-retiring tktable package

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi all, I wish take care of tktable package currently retired by Fedora. This package was retired on 2012-02-06 due to lack of a maintainer, also latest release came out in Nov. 2008. However, upstream maintainer says TkTable development is not

Re: Un-retiring tktable package

On 10/17/2015 11:57 AM, Antonio Trande wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hi all, > > I wish take care of tktable package currently retired by Fedora. > This package was retired on 2012-02-06 due to lack of a maintainer, > also latest release came out in Nov. 2008. > >

Re: Ownership of /usr/lib/rpm/fileattrs

On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 03:06:01PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > The simple thing I think would be for rpm to own the > directory. Does that seem reasonable? Your proposed solution sounds good. FWIW another package that installs a file in this directory and thus 'Requires: rpm-build' is

[Bug 1272659] New: perl-Coro-6.49 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272659 Bug ID: 1272659 Summary: perl-Coro-6.49 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Coro Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com

[Bug 1272659] perl-Coro-6.49 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272659 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1083910 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1083910=edit [patch] Update to 6.49 (#1272659) -- You are

[Bug 1272659] perl-Coro-6.49 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272659 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Scratch build completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11490213 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the

rawhide report: 20151017 changes

Compose started at Sat Oct 17 05:15:03 UTC 2015 Broken deps for i386 -- [IQmol] IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0 IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0

F-23 Branched report: 20151017 changes

Compose started at Sat Oct 17 07:15:03 UTC 2015 Broken deps for armhfp -- [openstack-swift] openstack-swift-2.3.0-2.fc23.noarch requires python-pyeclib [python-fiat] python-fiat-1.5.0-2.fc23.noarch requires ScientificPython

Variable expansion in COPR external URL?

How can I do a variable expansion that doesn't have - before and after? I tried "slc${releasever}X" [1] and "slc$releaseverX" [2] but neither worked. Thanks, Dave [1]: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/daveisfera/odb_2.3_cern/epel-5-i386/00128584-odb/root.log.gz [2]: