[Bug 1272277] perl-Email-Sender-1.300021 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272277 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

[Bug 1272796] ctstream-24 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272796 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1084199 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1084199=edit [patch] Update to 24 (#1272796) -- You are

[Bug 1269371] Upgrade perl-Struct-Dumb to 0.06

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269371 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

hobbes1069 pushed to abi-compliance-checker (f23). "Update to latest upstream release."

From e6b47813727768f39af6fe931511c6e1f8954526 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Richard M. Shaw" Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 21:00:34 -0500 Subject: Update to latest upstream release. --- .gitignore | 1 + abi-compliance-checker.spec | 13 - sources

hobbes1069 pushed to abi-compliance-checker (f21). "Update to latest upstream release."

From e6b47813727768f39af6fe931511c6e1f8954526 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Richard M. Shaw" Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 21:00:34 -0500 Subject: Update to latest upstream release. --- .gitignore | 1 + abi-compliance-checker.spec | 13 - sources

hobbes1069 pushed to abi-compliance-checker (f22). "Update to latest upstream release."

From e6b47813727768f39af6fe931511c6e1f8954526 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Richard M. Shaw" Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 21:00:34 -0500 Subject: Update to latest upstream release. --- .gitignore | 1 + abi-compliance-checker.spec | 13 - sources

orion pushed to abi-compliance-checker (el6). "Merge branch 'epel7' into el6"

From 91a048f754e7bfeb6bb9fba07605db9f5b5e092e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dennis Gilmore Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 18:58:08 -0500 Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Mass_Rebuild --- abi-compliance-checker.spec | 5 - 1 file changed, 4

orion pushed to abi-compliance-checker (el6). "Update to latest upstream release."

From 189eeab5ae0ad45d720cab7b14e2ba4a42f26c9e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Richard M. Shaw" Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 20:23:25 -0500 Subject: Update to latest upstream release. --- .gitignore | 1 + abi-compliance-checker.spec | 7 +-- sources

orion pushed to abi-compliance-checker (el6). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_23_Mass_Rebuild"

From f41579aa994a4483598ab8cae9cfccc90a98f73e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dennis Gilmore Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 23:32:33 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_23_Mass_Rebuild --- abi-compliance-checker.spec | 5 - 1 file changed, 4

orion pushed to abi-compliance-checker (el6). "Add perl dependency Getopt::Long"

From 0e0d50a3c0f916043c2b3a1d2a4bbe6c4795d761 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Richard M. Shaw" Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 20:30:26 -0500 Subject: Add perl dependency Getopt::Long --- abi-compliance-checker.spec | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git

Re: To someone with power to push packages on Fedora 21

On Sun, 18 Oct 2015 21:14:25 +0200 Jan Kratochvil wrote: > That is a Bug of Bodhi, the URLs should be more descriptive. > (I have not filed it.) I thought it was filed, but I can't seem to find it now. ;( If you could file one that would be great, or I can if you

[Bug 1270191] Upgrade perl-CGI-Ex to 2.44

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270191 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

Fedora 23 Branched 20151018 compose check report

No missing expected images. No images in this compose but not 23 Branched 20151017 Images in 23 Branched 20151017 but not this: Cloud docker x86_64 -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/fedora-qa.git/tree/check-compose -- devel mailing list

[Test-Announce] 2015-10-19 @ 16:00 UTC ** Fedora 23 Blocker Review

# F23 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2015-10-19 # Time: 1600 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net Last week we did an out-of-sync blocker review because bugs were stacking up and Go/No-Go is coming up. Even though we cleaned out the list, we're already back up to 6 proposed

Re: Recommended way of proposing changes in someone else Fedora packages configuration

On 18/10/15 18:46, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sun, 18 Oct 2015 15:36:24 +0200 > Marcin Zajączkowski wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I would like to propose a minor (yet important) change in one of the >> Fedora packages configuration (a SPEC file and/or a patch). Is it >> possible to create

Re: Recommended way of proposing changes in someone else Fedora packages configuration

On Sun, 18 Oct 2015 21:41:41 +0200 Alec Leamas wrote: > Perhaps OT, but I cannot resist: Have you discussed the overall > workflow here? Cloning package, unpack sources, create patches, make > a build, revise patches, finalize the spec, perhaps upstream to > package

[Bug 1270198] perl-MooseX-Role-WithOverloading-0.17 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270198 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

[Bug 1270197] perl-MooseX-Method-Signatures-0.49 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270197 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

eseyman pushed to perl-MooseX-Types-DateTime (master). "Update to 0.13"

From b53ac1f42d6f0ffb858c180078cb69e71e38f56d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Emmanuel Seyman Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 23:10:04 +0200 Subject: Update to 0.13 --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-MooseX-Types-DateTime.spec | 6 +- sources |

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2015-10-07)

On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 8:17 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > drago01 wrote: > > They might compile something and send it to someone that happens to > > use a different distro ... > > … which 99% of the time will not work anyway no matter what we do because > glibc has only

Re: Recommended way of proposing changes in someone else Fedora packages configuration

Thanks for your responses, guys! On 2015-10-18 16:57, Christopher wrote: > To support this, I try to keep a mirror in GitHub for my packages... But > it's hard to stay in sync sometimes and nobody really knows it's there. > It'd be nice if this were supported directly, perhaps by automatically >

[Bug 1270188] Upgrade perl-App-Cmd to 0.329

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270188 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

[Bug 1269747] Upgrade perl-Variable-Magic to 0.59

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269747 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

[Bug 1268805] perl-MouseX-App-Cmd-0.30-4.fc24 FTBFS: Failed test 'Internal hashes match' at t/build_emulates_new.t line 18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268805 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added External Bug ID||CPAN 107068 --

Re: Recommended way of proposing changes in someone else Fedora packages configuration

Marcin Zajączkowski wrote: > I would like to propose a minor (yet important) change in one of the > Fedora packages configuration (a SPEC file and/or a patch). Is it > possible to create (something like) a pull request which could be > reviewed by the maintainer in some convenient way (*) and

[Bug 1270199] Upgrade perl-MooseX-Types-DateTime to 0.13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270199 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

hobbes1069 pushed to abi-compliance-checker (master). "Update to latest upstream release."

From e6b47813727768f39af6fe931511c6e1f8954526 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Richard M. Shaw" Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 21:00:34 -0500 Subject: Update to latest upstream release. --- .gitignore | 1 + abi-compliance-checker.spec | 13 - sources

hobbes1069 uploaded abi-compliance-checker-1.99.13.tar.gz for abi-compliance-checker

31389163e3ca06c1f3c9ab8d50b2d8d6 abi-compliance-checker-1.99.13.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/abi-compliance-checker/abi-compliance-checker-1.99.13.tar.gz/md5/31389163e3ca06c1f3c9ab8d50b2d8d6/abi-compliance-checker-1.99.13.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

eseyman pushed to perl-Perl6-Export-Attrs (master). "Update to 0.000004"

From aa4e81637dba47f50dcc5c0240e656806d254bf0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Emmanuel Seyman Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 22:20:45 +0200 Subject: Update to 0.04 --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Perl6-Export-Attrs.spec | 8 ++-- sources | 2

[Bug 1269061] perl-Catalyst-View-TT-0.44 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269061 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

[Bug 1265706] Upgrade perl-EV to 4.21

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265706 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

[Bug 1272796] ctstream-24 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272796 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Scratch build completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11495038 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2015-10-07)

drago01 wrote: > They might compile something and send it to someone that happens to > use a different distro ... … which 99% of the time will not work anyway no matter what we do because glibc has only one-way compatibility and our glibc is newer than almost any other distro's. So trying to

Re: ansible in Fedora 23+ (python3)

Dusty Mabe wrote: > Does anyone have a good solution for this? Obviously it would be nice > if ansible went to python3 but I think they have stated clearly that > they are sticking with python2 for backwards compat with systems that > still need 2.4. I don't understand why still nobody has forked

Fedora Rawhide 20151018 compose check report

No missing expected images. Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151017: Kde disk raw armhfp No images in Rawhide 20151017 but not this. -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/fedora-qa.git/tree/check-compose -- devel mailing list

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2015-10-07)

Bastien Nocera wrote: > That's a problem for OUR users because when they use Fedora, they want to > be able to make a tarball of their software for their friend on Ubuntu to > test. Here, you're making Fedora a bad choice for developers that want to > target more than just Fedora. This already

Re: To someone with power to push packages on Fedora 21

Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Well, we don't know for sure that those updates lost autokarma > (Although it seems likely). It might be the maintainers pushed them > with autokarma disabled. And they should have, in any case, because autokarma is just broken by design. Who is more qualified to decide when

orion pushed to abi-compliance-checker (epel7). "Update to latest upstream release."

From e6b47813727768f39af6fe931511c6e1f8954526 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Richard M. Shaw" Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 21:00:34 -0500 Subject: Update to latest upstream release. --- .gitignore | 1 + abi-compliance-checker.spec | 13 - sources

orion pushed to abi-compliance-checker (epel7). "Update to latest upstream release."

From 189eeab5ae0ad45d720cab7b14e2ba4a42f26c9e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Richard M. Shaw" Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 20:23:25 -0500 Subject: Update to latest upstream release. --- .gitignore | 1 + abi-compliance-checker.spec | 7 +-- sources

orion pushed to abi-compliance-checker (epel7). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_23_Mass_Rebuild"

From f41579aa994a4483598ab8cae9cfccc90a98f73e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dennis Gilmore Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 23:32:33 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_23_Mass_Rebuild --- abi-compliance-checker.spec | 5 - 1 file changed, 4

orion pushed to abi-compliance-checker (epel7). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Mass_Rebuild"

From 91a048f754e7bfeb6bb9fba07605db9f5b5e092e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dennis Gilmore Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 18:58:08 -0500 Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Mass_Rebuild --- abi-compliance-checker.spec | 5 - 1 file changed, 4

orion pushed to abi-compliance-checker (epel7). "Add perl dependency Getopt::Long"

From 0e0d50a3c0f916043c2b3a1d2a4bbe6c4795d761 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Richard M. Shaw" Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 20:30:26 -0500 Subject: Add perl dependency Getopt::Long --- abi-compliance-checker.spec | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git

[Test-Announce] 2015-10-19 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting # Date: 2015-10-19 # Time: 15:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net Greetings testers! It's QA meeting time again! One of these days I promise I'll get back to doing these things on

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 120 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-6828 chicken-4.9.0.1-4.el6 102 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031 python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6 96

Re: To someone with power to push packages on Fedora 21

> Nb. did bodhi2 stopped sending „your update reached 7 days in testing > and can be pushed to stable” emails? https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/298 Regards, Richard -- Richard Fearn richardfe...@gmail.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1272796] New: ctstream-24 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272796 Bug ID: 1272796 Summary: ctstream-24 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: ctstream Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #548: RFE: Allow AD password sync to update shadowLastChange

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/548 http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/design/shadow-account-support.html design doc https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/548/0001-Ticket-548-RFE-Allow-AD-password-sync-to-update-shad.patch git patch file (master)

Re: Recommended way of proposing changes in someone else Fedora packages configuration

On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Marcin Zajączkowski wrote: > Thanks for your responses, guys! > > On 2015-10-18 16:57, Christopher wrote: > > To support this, I try to keep a mirror in GitHub for my packages... But > > it's hard to stay in sync sometimes and nobody really knows

orion pushed to abi-compliance-checker (el6). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Mass_Rebuild"

From 91a048f754e7bfeb6bb9fba07605db9f5b5e092e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dennis Gilmore Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 18:58:08 -0500 Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Mass_Rebuild --- abi-compliance-checker.spec | 5 - 1 file changed, 4

orion pushed to abi-compliance-checker (el6). "Update to latest upstream release."

From e6b47813727768f39af6fe931511c6e1f8954526 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Richard M. Shaw" Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 21:00:34 -0500 Subject: Update to latest upstream release. --- .gitignore | 1 + abi-compliance-checker.spec | 13 - sources

Re: To someone with power to push packages on Fedora 21

On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 14:56:11 +0200, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 10/15/2015 06:49 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-11787 > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4638 [...] > >

Re: To someone with power to push packages on Fedora 21

Nb. did bodhi2 stopped sending „your update reached 7 days in testing and can be pushed to stable” emails? -- Tomasz Torcz ,,If you try to upissue this patchset I shall be seeking xmpp: zdzich...@chrome.pl an IP-routable hand grenade.'' -- Andrew Morton (LKML) -- devel

Re: [EPEL-devel] EPEL package rebased upon RHEL update?

* Versions lower than 2.8 had been dropped from supported lifecycle for a long time. * Backporting fixes to 2.4 doesn't make too much sense. * Config change is needed (https://raw.githubusercontent.com/antirez/redis/2.6/00-RELEASENOTES). -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng http://awk.io

tktable license clarification

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi all, tktable package is newly under review; can someone clarify to me how to identify its license? (license file attached) In particular, i have a doubt about these "special notes": *

Recommended way of proposing changes in someone else Fedora packages configuration

Hi, I would like to propose a minor (yet important) change in one of the Fedora packages configuration (a SPEC file and/or a patch). Is it possible to create (something like) a pull request which could be reviewed by the maintainer in some convenient way (*) and optionally merged? Or the only way

Re: [EPEL-devel] EPEL package rebased upon RHEL update?

Considering EPEL update policy, there's no argument not to skip 2.8 and upgrade to 3.0. 2.8 will be dropped when 3.2 will be released (WiP), and migrating from 2.4 to 2.8 is not easier than 2.4 to 3.0 Regards, H. ___ epel-devel mailing list

F-23 Branched report: 20151018 changes

Compose started at Sun Oct 18 07:15:03 UTC 2015 Broken deps for armhfp -- [openstack-swift] openstack-swift-2.3.0-2.fc23.noarch requires python-pyeclib Broken deps for i386 --

rawhide report: 20151018 changes

Compose started at Sun Oct 18 05:15:03 UTC 2015 Broken deps for i386 -- [IQmol] IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0 IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0

Re: Recommended way of proposing changes in someone else Fedora packages configuration

To support this, I try to keep a mirror in GitHub for my packages... But it's hard to stay in sync sometimes and nobody really knows it's there. It'd be nice if this were supported directly, perhaps by automatically mirroring all packages in GitHub, like the ASF does, and emailing maintainers when

Re: Recommended way of proposing changes in someone else Fedora packages configuration

On Sun, 18 Oct 2015 15:36:24 +0200 Marcin Zajączkowski wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to propose a minor (yet important) change in one of the > Fedora packages configuration (a SPEC file and/or a patch). Is it > possible to create (something like) a pull request which could be >

eseyman uploaded EV-4.21.tar.gz for perl-EV

4f80209cce5f32d0e49d145096f205c1 EV-4.21.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-EV/EV-4.21.tar.gz/md5/4f80209cce5f32d0e49d145096f205c1/EV-4.21.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

eseyman pushed to perl-EV (master). "Update to 4.21"

From 6198f1c56662b17c746e593f4010f8f91b007eec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Emmanuel Seyman Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 19:28:18 +0200 Subject: Update to 4.21 --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-EV.spec | 10 +++--- sources | 2 +- 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4

eseyman uploaded Email-Sender-1.300021.tar.gz for perl-Email-Sender

f997c6f152ec0bd5725c9468ce25439c Email-Sender-1.300021.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Email-Sender/Email-Sender-1.300021.tar.gz/md5/f997c6f152ec0bd5725c9468ce25439c/Email-Sender-1.300021.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

[Bug 1272277] perl-Email-Sender-1.300021 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272277 --- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- eseyman's perl-Email-Sender-1.300021-1.fc24 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=692727 -- You are receiving this

eseyman uploaded Mojolicious-6.24.tar.gz for perl-Mojolicious

407adbd3d3b06695d11bb1f00251c1e5 Mojolicious-6.24.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Mojolicious/Mojolicious-6.24.tar.gz/md5/407adbd3d3b06695d11bb1f00251c1e5/Mojolicious-6.24.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl

Re: Announcing the release of Fedora 23 Beta!

2015-10-02 21:20 GMT+02:00 Gerard Ryan : > On 10/02/2015 07:11 PM, Andreas Tunek wrote: >> 2015-09-26 0:10 GMT+02:00 Thomas Daede : >>> On 09/25/2015 02:18 PM, Andreas Tunek wrote: >>> Removed librtmp (what could go wrong?), now I get the

eseyman uploaded Perl6-Export-Attrs-0.000004.tar.gz for perl-Perl6-Export-Attrs

e65c7eece62f9892a79ad6ce00aa95bd Perl6-Export-Attrs-0.04.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Perl6-Export-Attrs/Perl6-Export-Attrs-0.04.tar.gz/md5/e65c7eece62f9892a79ad6ce00aa95bd/Perl6-Export-Attrs-0.04.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

eseyman pushed to perl-Mojolicious (master). "Update to 6.24"

From 1f8e490fe88ee81b6cf3ab59143578ce9a307c76 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Emmanuel Seyman Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 19:52:46 +0200 Subject: Update to 6.24 --- .gitignore| 1 + perl-Mojolicious.spec | 5 - sources | 2 +- 3 files changed, 6

Re: Recommended way of proposing changes in someone else Fedora packages configuration

On Sun, 2015-10-18 at 15:36 +0200, Marcin Zajączkowski wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to propose a minor (yet important) change in one of the > Fedora packages configuration (a SPEC file and/or a patch). Is it > possible to create (something like) a pull request which could be > reviewed by the

eseyman pushed to perl-Email-Sender (master). "Update to 1.300021"

From 381da7d61dcc66c2e113f91e9d9b722840972e93 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Emmanuel Seyman Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 19:40:14 +0200 Subject: Update to 1.300021 --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Email-Sender.spec | 5 - sources| 2 +- 3 files changed,