eseyman changed perl-sig's 'watchbugzilla' permission on
perl-SQL-SplitStatement (f22) to 'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-SQL-SplitStatement/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
eseyman changed eseyman's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-SQL-SplitStatement
(f22) to 'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-SQL-SplitStatement/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
eseyman set the monitor flag of perl-libintl to True
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
eseyman set the monitor flag of perl-App-Nopaste to True
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
eseyman set the monitor flag of perl-CGI-Ex to True
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276647
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1275854
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
Compose started at Sun Nov 1 05:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[IQmol]
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0
#10: Unretire xerces-c
--+
Reporter: smooge | Owner: epel-wranglers
Type: task | Status: closed
Priority: critical | Milestone:
Component: Package request |Version:
Resolution:
eseyman requested branch f22 for package perl-SQL-SplitStatement
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-SQL-SplitStatement/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
eseyman changed eseyman's 'commit' permission on perl-SQL-SplitStatement (f22)
to 'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-SQL-SplitStatement/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
eseyman changed eseyman's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-SQL-SplitStatement
(f22) to 'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-SQL-SplitStatement/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
eseyman changed eseyman's 'approveacls' permission on perl-SQL-SplitStatement
(f22) to 'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-SQL-SplitStatement/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
eseyman changed perl-sig's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-SQL-SplitStatement
(f22) to 'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-SQL-SplitStatement/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
eseyman created the branch 'f22' for the package 'perl-SQL-SplitStatement'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-SQL-SplitStatement/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Sex, 2015-10-30 at 17:47 +0100, Jan Kurik wrote:
>> At the third round of Fedora 23 Final Go/No-Go Meeting, that just
>> ends, has been Fedora 23 Final-RC10 declared as GOLD.
>> GA of this release is planed on Tuesday
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 10/07/2015 01:37 PM, Randy Barlow wrote:
> I've filed a request to add a new package called ari-backup:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269609
My package reviewer and I had some questions about whether the
permissions I have
Peter Robinson wrote:
> The problem is we have to freeze sometime to ensure stability in the
> installer platform, the live and other images which are static. If not
> it's too much of a moving target to try and QA and ensure everything
> works as expected. To freeze is a fairly standard procedure
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi all,
current WildMagic5 (http://www.geometrictools.com/) libraries, rebuilt
with flags for hardened builds
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Harden_All_Packages), are:
# checksec --dir /usr/lib64 | grep Wm5
Full RELRO No canary found
On 01/11/15 12:06 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Sex, 2015-10-30 at 17:47 +0100, Jan Kurik wrote:
>> At the third round of Fedora 23 Final Go/No-Go Meeting, that just
>> ends, has been Fedora 23 Final-RC10 declared as GOLD.
>> GA of this release is planed on Tuesday 2015-Nov-03.
>>
> Today we got
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 5:56 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 29.10.2015 um 10:09 schrieb Christopher Meng:
>>
>> You have a chance to get your rpmfusion softwares wiped after the sync.
>>
>> [1]---https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263677
>
>
> unacceptable
>
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276648
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-HTML-Scrubber-0.15-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
If you want
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1275854
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-enum-1.11-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
If you want to test
On 10/30/2015 05:36 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 11:50:48 -0400
> Steve Dickson wrote:
>> 2) find and rebuild all the dependencies?
>
> Should be something like:
>
> % sudo dnf repoquery --whatrequires 'libtirpc.so.1()(64bit)'
> Last metadata expiration check
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276933
On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 01:33:49PM -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
> > An initial srpm is here:
> >
> >
429f560410da3fd65c8a750323881fea bugzilla-5.0.1.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/bugzilla/bugzilla-5.0.1.tar.gz/md5/429f560410da3fd65c8a750323881fea/bugzilla-5.0.1.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1275854
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-enum-1.11-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
If you want to test
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1275854
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-enum-1.11-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
If you want to test
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276648
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-HTML-Scrubber-0.15-1.el5.1 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
If you want
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276648
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
On Sex, 2015-10-30 at 17:47 +0100, Jan Kurik wrote:
> At the third round of Fedora 23 Final Go/No-Go Meeting, that just
> ends, has been Fedora 23 Final-RC10 declared as GOLD.
> GA of this release is planed on Tuesday 2015-Nov-03.
>
Today we got 531 updates for F23 , IMO, you should include it on
Both of those issues should be addressed upstream as well. We need to do
new release soon anyway.
Tom
On Sun, Nov 1, 2015, 09:22 Neal Becker wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276933
>
> On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
>
Hi Muayyad,
i have requested to push the build into f22 stable. Still, there is no
influxdb subpackage with binaries. Just curious, what are you using the
package for?
Regards
Jan
On 10/31/2015 05:19 PM, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
but there is an old "stable" one for fedora 21?!
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
237 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087
dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7
133 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-6813
chicken-4.9.0.1-4.el7
41
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272796
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
ctstream-24-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this
On Sun, 2015-11-01 at 17:53 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> The problem is we have to freeze sometime to ensure stability in the
> installer platform, the live and other images which are static. If
> not
> it's too much of a moving target to try and QA and ensure everything
> works as expected. To
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276647
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-HTML-Scrubber-0.15-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
If you want to
On 11/01/2015 09:06 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Today we got 531 updates for F23 , IMO, you should include it on Fedora
> 23 Final before GA , doesn't make sense (to me) after download an ISO
> have 1/2 Giga of updates, but this happens since RedHad 9 at least .
> IMO, testing team should respin
On Mon, 2015-11-02 at 11:02 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-11-01 at 18:48 +0100, Kalev Lember wrote:
> > On 10/30/2015 05:36 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 11:50:48 -0400
> > > Steve Dickson wrote:
> > > > 2) find and rebuild all the dependencies?
> > >
On Sun, 2015-11-01 at 18:48 +0100, Kalev Lember wrote:
> On 10/30/2015 05:36 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 11:50:48 -0400
> > Steve Dickson wrote:
> > > 2) find and rebuild all the dependencies?
> >
> > Should be something like:
> >
> > % sudo dnf repoquery
On Dom, 2015-11-01 at 17:53 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Sex, 2015-10-30 at 17:47 +0100, Jan Kurik wrote:
> >> At the third round of Fedora 23 Final Go/No-Go Meeting, that just
> >> ends, has been Fedora 23 Final-RC10
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276974
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1088422
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1088422=edit
[patch] Update to 1.708 (#1276974)
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276974
Bug ID: 1276974
Summary: perl-Number-Tolerant-1.708 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Number-Tolerant
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276647
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-HTML-Scrubber-0.15-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
If you want to
Hi devel list (and cc'ed eclipse-sig list),
I'm going to orphan the eclipse-jbosstools package in rawhide, as I'm no
longer able to give it the time that it needs. My understanding is that
if nobody takes it, it will be auto-retired after 6 weeks (please
correct me if I'm wrong here).
If you're
On 10/30/2015 10:07 PM, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
hi,
I'm on f22 and have consul and etcd from the repos
ldd /usr/bin/consul
linux-vdso.so.1 (0x7ffc98fa2000)
liblmdb.so.0.0.0 => /lib64/liblmdb.so.0.0.0 (0x7f99bc1b5000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x7f99bbf99000)
On Sun, 2015-11-01 at 20:03 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Peter Robinson wrote:
> > The problem is we have to freeze sometime to ensure stability in
> > the
> > installer platform, the live and other images which are static. If
> > not
> > it's too much of a moving target to try and QA and ensure
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1275092
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1275854
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-enum-1.11-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
If you want to test the
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48329
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48329/0001-Ticket-48329-add-matching-rule-functions-to-schema-m.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276974
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Scratch build completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11667748
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
> Just curious, what are you using the package for?
I was just exploring. and found that it's strange that f21 but not f22 and
asked to see if this was intentional or a slip.
On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Jan Chaloupka wrote:
> Hi Muayyad,
>
> i have requested to push
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272796
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
ctstream-24-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this
Missing expected images:
Cloud disk raw i386
Cloud_atomic disk raw x86_64
Generic boot x86_64
Workstation live x86_64
Workstation live i386
Generic boot i386
Kde disk raw armhfp
Kde live i386
Cloud disk raw x86_64
Kde live x86_64
No images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151031
Images in
Am 01.11.2015 um 23:20 schrieb Michael Catanzaro:
On Sun, 2015-11-01 at 17:53 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
The problem is we have to freeze sometime to ensure stability in the
installer platform, the live and other images which are static. If
not
it's too much of a moving target to try and QA
Am 02.11.2015 um 00:36 schrieb Michael Catanzaro:
*who* if not the package maintainer which hopefully uses his own
packages should have the final say? some group of people not
understanding the issues really?
The counterargument is that we keep seeing major version updates that
violate our
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2015-11-02
# Time: ** 16:00 ** UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
It's QA meeting time again! We've finished up Fedora 23 - big thanks to
everyone for all your
57 matches
Mail list logo