Fedora Rawhide 20151104 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud disk raw i386 Cloud_atomic disk raw x86_64 Generic boot x86_64 Workstation live x86_64 Workstation live i386 Generic boot i386 Kde live i386 Cloud disk raw x86_64 Kde live x86_64 Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151103: Soas disk raw armhfp Kde disk raw

[Bug 1273864] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20151020 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273864 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Module-CoreList-5.20151020-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You

[Bug 1274108] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.94 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274108 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1273864] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20151020 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273864 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1274108] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.94 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274108 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.94-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1225047] Upgrade perl-Curses

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225047 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

Re: fedora-review --prebuilt still requires mock??

On 11/04/2015 09:00 AM, Neal Becker wrote: > According to fedora-review man page: > > -p, --prebuilt > When using -n , use prebuilt rpms in current directory instead of > building new ones in mock > > But if I try: > > fedora-review --prebuilt -n python-cycler-0.9.0-1.fc23.noarch.rpm > > I

[Bug 1268518] perl-Test-Strict-0.28 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268518 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1274981] perl-Test-Strict-0.30 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274981 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Test-Strict-0.30-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1274981] perl-Test-Strict-0.30 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274981 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1273416] perl-Log-Report-1.09 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273416 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Log-Report-1.09-1.fc24

[Bug 1273416] perl-Log-Report-1.09 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273416 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Log-Report-1.09-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1268704] perl-Coro-6.48 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268704 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Coro-6.49-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving

[Bug 1273416] perl-Log-Report-1.09 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273416 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1272659] perl-Coro-6.49 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272659 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1272659] perl-Coro-6.49 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272659 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Coro-6.49-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving

[Bug 1268704] perl-Coro-6.48 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268704 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1273416] perl-Log-Report-1.09 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273416 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Log-Report-1.09-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1268518] perl-Test-Strict-0.28 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268518 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Test-Strict-0.30-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1273416] perl-Log-Report-1.09 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273416 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Log-Report-1.09-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1274112] perl-Text-Unidecode-1.27 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274112 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Text-Unidecode-1.27-1.

[Bug 1225047] Upgrade perl-Curses

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225047 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Curses-1.32-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving

[Bug 1274108] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.94 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274108 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.94-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1274109] perl-autobox-Core-1.30 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274109 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-autobox-Core-1.30-1.fc

[Bug 1273864] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20151020 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273864 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Module-CoreList-5.2015

[Bug 1274109] perl-autobox-Core-1.30 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274109 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- perl-autobox-Core-1.30-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1273864] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20151020 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273864 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Module-CoreList-5.20151020-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You

[Bug 1274112] perl-Text-Unidecode-1.27 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274112 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Text-Unidecode-1.27-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1273416] perl-Log-Report-1.09 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273416 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Log-Report-1.09-1.fc24

[Bug 1274108] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.94 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274108 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.94

[Bug 1265681] perl-autobox-Core-1.29 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265681 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-autobox-Core-1.30-1.fc

[Bug 1265681] perl-autobox-Core-1.29 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265681 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- perl-autobox-Core-1.30-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

Re: kdbus module being removed from Rawhide

Josh Boyer wrote: > That's fine, but I think we already knew that? I mean, the suggestion > was to disable SELinux entirely (or at least put it in permissive > mode) when we added it to begin with. It is also one of the reasons > we limited it to rawhide only. I wouldn't want to ship it in a >

limb changed ppisar's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Canary-Stability (epel7) to 'Approved'

limb changed ppisar's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Canary-Stability (epel7) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Canary-Stability/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

limb changed ppisar's branch request for perl-Canary-Stability in epel7 from Awaiting Review to Approved

limb changed ppisar's branch request for perl-Canary-Stability in epel7 from Awaiting Review to Approved https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Canary-Stability/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

limb changed ppisar's 'commit' permission on perl-Canary-Stability (el5) to 'Approved'

limb changed ppisar's 'commit' permission on perl-Canary-Stability (el5) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Canary-Stability/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

limb changed ppisar's 'approveacls' permission on perl-Canary-Stability (el5) to 'Approved'

limb changed ppisar's 'approveacls' permission on perl-Canary-Stability (el5) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Canary-Stability/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

Re: kdbus module being removed from Rawhide

On 4 November 2015 at 16:41, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Josh Boyer wrote: >> That's fine, but I think we already knew that? I mean, the suggestion >> was to disable SELinux entirely (or at least put it in permissive >> mode) when we added it to begin with. It is also one of

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 5 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing: Age URL 746 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11893 libguestfs-1.20.12-1.el5 511 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1626 puppet-2.7.26-1.el5 360

Re: Updates (was Fedora 23 Final RC10 status is GO !)

On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 02:16 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > 1) More time to catch regressions > > In theory. In practice, it mostly means more wasted time until a > regression > is FIXED, i.e., it is entirely counterproductive. Many regressions > are only > noticed

limb changed ppisar's 'commit' permission on perl-Canary-Stability (el6) to 'Approved'

limb changed ppisar's 'commit' permission on perl-Canary-Stability (el6) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Canary-Stability/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

limb changed ppisar's 'commit' permission on perl-Canary-Stability (epel7) to 'Approved'

limb changed ppisar's 'commit' permission on perl-Canary-Stability (epel7) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Canary-Stability/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

limb changed ppisar's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Canary-Stability (epel7) to 'Approved'

limb changed ppisar's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Canary-Stability (epel7) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Canary-Stability/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

limb created the branch 'epel7' for the package 'perl-Canary-Stability'

limb created the branch 'epel7' for the package 'perl-Canary-Stability' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Canary-Stability/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

limb changed ppisar's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Canary-Stability (el6) to 'Approved'

limb changed ppisar's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Canary-Stability (el6) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Canary-Stability/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

limb changed ppisar's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Canary-Stability (el5) to 'Approved'

limb changed ppisar's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Canary-Stability (el5) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Canary-Stability/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

limb changed ppisar's branch request for perl-Canary-Stability in el6 from Awaiting Review to Approved

limb changed ppisar's branch request for perl-Canary-Stability in el6 from Awaiting Review to Approved https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Canary-Stability/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

limb created the branch 'el5' for the package 'perl-Canary-Stability'

limb created the branch 'el5' for the package 'perl-Canary-Stability' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Canary-Stability/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

limb created the branch 'el6' for the package 'perl-Canary-Stability'

limb created the branch 'el6' for the package 'perl-Canary-Stability' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Canary-Stability/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

limb changed ppisar's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Canary-Stability (el5) to 'Approved'

limb changed ppisar's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Canary-Stability (el5) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Canary-Stability/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

limb changed ppisar's branch request for perl-Canary-Stability in el5 from Awaiting Review to Approved

limb changed ppisar's branch request for perl-Canary-Stability in el5 from Awaiting Review to Approved https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Canary-Stability/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

limb changed ppisar's 'approveacls' permission on perl-Canary-Stability (el6) to 'Approved'

limb changed ppisar's 'approveacls' permission on perl-Canary-Stability (el6) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Canary-Stability/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

limb changed ppisar's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Canary-Stability (el6) to 'Approved'

limb changed ppisar's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Canary-Stability (el6) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Canary-Stability/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

limb changed ppisar's 'approveacls' permission on perl-Canary-Stability (epel7) to 'Approved'

limb changed ppisar's 'approveacls' permission on perl-Canary-Stability (epel7) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Canary-Stability/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

Re: Updates (was Fedora 23 Final RC10 status is GO !)

Michael Catanzaro wrote: > 1) More time to catch regressions In theory. In practice, it mostly means more wasted time until a regression is FIXED, i.e., it is entirely counterproductive. Many regressions are only noticed once the update goes stable, because that's when most users start trying

Re: Updates (was Fedora 23 Final RC10 status is GO !)

On Wed, 2015-11-04 at 20:03 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 02:16 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > > 1) More time to catch regressions > > > > In theory. In practice, it mostly means more wasted time until a > > regression > > is FIXED, i.e., it

ppisar changed jplesnik's 'approveacls' permission on perl-Math-BigInt (master) to 'Approved'

ppisar changed jplesnik's 'approveacls' permission on perl-Math-BigInt (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Math-BigInt/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

ppisar uploaded Math-BigInt-1.999708.tar.gz for perl-Math-BigInt

3a3956a19af7bd165ca9ea2421ab0215 Math-BigInt-1.999708.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Math-BigInt/Math-BigInt-1.999708.tar.gz/md5/3a3956a19af7bd165ca9ea2421ab0215/Math-BigInt-1.999708.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

ppisar changed jplesnik's 'commit' permission on perl-Math-BigInt (master) to 'Approved'

ppisar changed jplesnik's 'commit' permission on perl-Math-BigInt (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Math-BigInt/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

ppisar changed perl-sig's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Math-BigInt (master) to 'Approved'

ppisar changed perl-sig's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Math-BigInt (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Math-BigInt/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

ppisar changed psabata's 'approveacls' permission on perl-Math-BigInt (master) to 'Approved'

ppisar changed psabata's 'approveacls' permission on perl-Math-BigInt (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Math-BigInt/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

ppisar changed psabata's 'commit' permission on perl-Math-BigInt (master) to 'Approved'

ppisar changed psabata's 'commit' permission on perl-Math-BigInt (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Math-BigInt/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

ppisar changed perl-sig's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Math-BigInt (master) to 'Approved'

ppisar changed perl-sig's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Math-BigInt (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Math-BigInt/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[Bug 1265957] perl-Math-BigInt-GMP-1.44 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265957 Bug 1265957 depends on bug 1277203, which changed state. Bug 1277203 Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-BigInt - Arbitrary-size integer and float mathematics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277203 What|Removed

ppisar pushed to perl-Math-BigInt (master). "1.999708 bump"

From 8c33bc12e6ad8ce0cad65daa7f142a9adc03c755 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 08:55:03 +0100 Subject: 1.999708 bump --- .gitignore| 1 + perl-Math-BigInt.spec | 7 +-- sources | 2 +- 3

[HEADS UP] Ongoing rebuild of Python3.5 in Rawhide

There is ongoing rebuild of Python3.5 in rawhide's side-tag f24-python3. I would like to ask all maintainers to rebuild their packages (which depend on python3) within the f24-python3 side-tag. To rebuild your package simply run: `fedpkg build --target f24-python3` You can find all packages

Re: STOP messing with nfs-utls... PLEASE!!!

On 11/04/2015 12:37 PM, Ian Kent wrote: > Looks like the compose went ok too, based on the mail I saw. Yes, looks like everything is properly rebuilt now. Thanks! -- Kalev -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of

[Bug 129724] can`t been install mode one rpm at transaction

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=129724 --- Comment #9 from Fedora End Of Life --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 21 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 21.

Re: Fedora 23 Final RC10 status is GO !

On Tue, 3 Nov 2015 09:23:49 +0100 Petr Spacek wrote: > On 3.11.2015 01:56, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > And with my proposed change to the release > > policy (slip = unfreeze, sync all updates, refreeze), you could > > also use the time to get fixes/improvements in that would

Re: [389-devel] Please review ticket 47976: deadlock in mep delete post op

Hi Ludwig, Rich, you were right (as usual !), dblayer_get_pvt_txn/dblayer_push_pvt_txn are doing the magic. Now the fix is a oneline fix ! https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47976/0001-Ticket-47976-2-deadlock-in-mep-delete-post-op.patch thanks thierry On 11/03/2015 06:01 PM,

Re: Cloning bugs: Just Don't Do It

On Tue, 3 Nov 2015 18:25:32 + Jonathan Underwood wrote: > Mostly agreed. The one legit use-case though is when someone wants to > to continue a package submission after a review has gone dead due to > the original submitter vanishing. There's often useful

Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2015-11-04)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at   http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run:   date -d '2015-11-04 18:00 UTC' Links to all tickets

Re: Fedora IPv6 testing and improvements - request for ideas

On 4 November 2015 at 02:20, Toby Goodwin wrote: > As well as Fedora itself, we need to get the infrastructure IPv6 ready. > My company has developed an IPv6 health checker. Given a domain, it > tests its nameservers, webservers, and mailservers for IPv6 readiness. > > Currently

Re: Fedora IPv6 testing and improvements - request for ideas

- Original Message - > From: "Zdenek Kabelac" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Wednesday, November 4, 2015 1:43:12 PM > Subject: Re: Fedora IPv6 testing and improvements - request for ideas > > Dne 4.11.2015

Re: Fedora IPv6 testing and improvements - request for ideas

- Original Message - > From: "Toby Goodwin" > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Wednesday, November 4, 2015 10:20:00 AM > Subject: Re: Fedora IPv6 testing and improvements - request for ideas > > As well as Fedora itself, we need to get the infrastructure IPv6

Re: Cloning bugs: Just Don't Do It

On 4 November 2015 at 14:31, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, 3 Nov 2015 18:25:32 + > Jonathan Underwood wrote: > >> Mostly agreed. The one legit use-case though is when someone wants to >> to continue a package submission after a review has gone

Re: Fedora IPv6 testing and improvements - request for ideas

On 3.11.2015 18:50, Moez Roy wrote: > Hi Pavel Simerda, > > The IPv6 updates are breaking stuff (and probably increasing the > attack surface): > > Bug 1231946 - unbound-anchor ignores net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6=1 > in /etc/sysctl.conf > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231946 >

[Bug 1200306] Dependency problem with perl-libs

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200306 --- Comment #7 from Fedora End Of Life --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 21 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora

[Bug 1188109] [abrt] perl-Padre: S_sv_unmagicext_flags(): perl killed by SIGSEGV

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188109 --- Comment #12 from Fedora End Of Life --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 21 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora

[Bug 997645] gtk colored buttons

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997645 --- Comment #16 from Fedora End Of Life --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 21 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora

Re: STOP messing with nfs-utls... PLEASE!!!

On Wed, 2015-11-04 at 06:28 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: > Hey, > > On 11/04/2015 01:35 AM, Ian Kent wrote: > > > I feel this is a better way to handle these issues > > > > than the bootstrapping option (which will be > > > > reverted from nfs-utils). > > I think I've addressed these. > > > > But

[Bug 1003631] Long regular expression back-reference number wraps to negative value and causes a segmantion fault

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003631 --- Comment #6 from Fedora End Of Life --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 21 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora

[Bug 1210614] Shell command injection in c2ph tool

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210614 --- Comment #1 from Fedora End Of Life --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 21 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora

[Bug 1210614] Shell command injection in c2ph tool

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210614 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Version|21 |22 --- Comment #2

[Bug 1187151] CVE-2013-7422 perl: segmentation fault in S_regmatch on negative backreference [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187151 --- Comment #2 from Fedora End Of Life --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 21 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora

[HEADS UP] Ongoing rebuild of Python3.5 in Rawhide

There is ongoing rebuild of Python3.5 in rawhide's side-tag f24-python3. I would like to ask all maintainers to rebuild their packages (which depend on python3) within the f24-python3 side-tag. To rebuild your package simply run: `fedpkg build --target f24-python3` You can find all packages

Re: STOP messing with nfs-utls... PLEASE!!!

Hey, On 11/04/2015 01:35 AM, Ian Kent wrote: >> I feel this is a better way to handle these issues >> > than the bootstrapping option (which will be >> > reverted from nfs-utils). > I think I've addressed these. > > But we probably should do one last version bump in fedfs-utils and > autofs to

[Bug 1231299] Not a CODE reference at /usr/lib/perl5/DynaLoader.pm line 213.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231299 --- Comment #1 from Fedora End Of Life --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 21 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora

[Bug 1006931] perl-Filesys-SmbClient missing flag compatibility with samba4

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006931 --- Comment #8 from Fedora End Of Life --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 21 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora

Re: Fedora IPv6 testing and improvements - request for ideas

Dne 4.11.2015 v 13:24 Petr Spacek napsal(a): On 3.11.2015 18:50, Moez Roy wrote: Hi Pavel Simerda, The IPv6 updates are breaking stuff (and probably increasing the attack surface): Bug 1231946 - unbound-anchor ignores net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6=1 in /etc/sysctl.conf

Re: STOP messing with nfs-utls... PLEASE!!!

On 11/04/2015 06:37 AM, Ian Kent wrote: > On Wed, 2015-11-04 at 06:28 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: >> Hey, >> >> On 11/04/2015 01:35 AM, Ian Kent wrote: I feel this is a better way to handle these issues > than the bootstrapping option (which will be > reverted from nfs-utils). >>> I

[Bug 1212345] Slic3r won't start (subroutine error)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212345 --- Comment #5 from Fedora End Of Life --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 21 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora

jcapik pushed to perl (f21). "Adding STAGE2 bootstrap recipe"

From 045fd7c385bb5c63ac5e0a94d9a0a0d83ae55861 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jaromir Capik Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 16:25:33 +0100 Subject: Adding STAGE2 bootstrap recipe --- STAGE2-perl | 29 + 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+) create mode 100644

Re: Fedora IPv6 testing and improvements - request for ideas

On 04.11.2015 15:22, Pavel Simerda wrote: > - Original Message - > > From: "Zdenek Kabelac" > > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 4, 2015 1:43:12 PM > > Subject: Re: Fedora IPv6 testing

fedora-review --prebuilt still requires mock??

According to fedora-review man page: -p, --prebuilt When using -n , use prebuilt rpms in current directory instead of building new ones in mock But if I try: fedora-review --prebuilt -n python-cycler-0.9.0-1.fc23.noarch.rpm I get this dialog: You are attempting to run "mock" which

[Bug 1060360] Request branch

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060360 Nathanael Noblet changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[Bug 1239335] perl-version rebuild attempts to change files outside of build directory

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1239335 --- Comment #2 from Fedora End Of Life --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 21 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora

[Bug 1107543] Perl core-dumps if a hash is tied to SDBM_File before spawning a thread

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1107543 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED

jcapik pushed to perl (master). "Adding STAGE2 bootstrap recipe"

From 43ea5a4eb8378e11bc4fb94a409200f71702f4cf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jaromir Capik Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 16:25:33 +0100 Subject: Adding STAGE2 bootstrap recipe --- STAGE2-perl | 29 + 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+) create mode 100644

jcapik pushed to perl (f22). "Adding STAGE2 bootstrap recipe"

From db5670e254895a019601c12b46add3543aef2699 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jaromir Capik Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 16:25:33 +0100 Subject: Adding STAGE2 bootstrap recipe --- STAGE2-perl | 29 + 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+) create mode 100644

  1   2   >