Re: LibreOffice packaging is a messy dependency graph

# dnf autoremove On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 8:21 AM Dan Book wrote: > I have run into this before and it was very confusing, it really should be > a separate command from remove for when you actually want to remove what > dnf thinks is now "unused". > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 1:38 AM, Panu Matilaine

Re: LibreOffice packaging is a messy dependency graph

I have run into this before and it was very confusing, it really should be a separate command from remove for when you actually want to remove what dnf thinks is now "unused". On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 1:38 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote: > On 12/01/2015 07:02 AM, Christopher wrote: > >> What's the deal

Re: LibreOffice packaging is a messy dependency graph

On 12/01/2015 07:02 AM, Christopher wrote: What's the deal with libreoffice packages being a dependency for so many system library packages? I try to `sudo dnf remove libreoffice\*` and it grabs a bunch of surprising packages with it, including some fonts and system libraries. Granted, I don't t

Re: Upstream DNF?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com On Tue, Dec 1, 2015, 6:40 AM Christopher wrote: > Where is the upstream DNF issue tracker? I see the project on GitHub: > https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf > > However, there doesn't appear to be a corresponding issue tracker, or > point of contact to req

Upstream DNF?

Where is the upstream DNF issue tracker? I see the project on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf However, there doesn't appear to be a corresponding issue tracker, or point of contact to request access to edit Wiki pages (which are locked down), etc. In fact, there appears to b

LibreOffice packaging is a messy dependency graph

What's the deal with libreoffice packages being a dependency for so many system library packages? I try to `sudo dnf remove libreoffice\*` and it grabs a bunch of surprising packages with it, including some fonts and system libraries. Granted, I don't think I need any of these things, so it's prob

redeclipse

game for a long time is not updated. package maintainer does not respond. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

yarock package maintainer not respoding

I can not Contact as the package maintainer. can somebody take the package -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Freerdp update with bundle in guacamole-server

Simone, Could the old version of FreeRDP be temporarily bundled into guacamole server for F23 so that everything else can be updated and rebuilt? On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: > Good point. > At least for Fedora 24 it will be moved forward now. > Thank you. > > 30.11.2015

Re: Fedora Rawhide 20151130 compose check report

On Mon, 2015-11-30 at 11:37 -0500, Fedora compose checker wrote: > Failed openQA tests: 51 of 52 dracut turns out to have another bug after the one I got fixed last week. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1286866 -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: Adam

Infrastructure Outage: mailman/nagios 2015-12-02 0300 UTC

Planned Outage: Mailman / Nagios - 2015-12-02 03:00 UTC There will be an outage starting at 2015-12-02 03:00 UTC, which will last approximately 1 hour. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2015-12-02 03:00 UTC'

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: (fix typos) Re: Packaging:NamingGuidelines Re: DNF is completly unable to act with local packages

Hi,  On Seg, 2015-11-30 at 12:15 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Tuesday, 24 November 2015 at 14:56, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > Switching to packag...@lists.fedoraproject.org  > [...] > > In this link http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelin > > es#Pre-Release_packages

Re: Freerdp update with bundle in guacamole-server

Good point. At least for Fedora 24 it will be moved forward now. Thank you. 30.11.2015 12:01, Simone Caronni пишет: On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Pavel Alexeev > wrote: And yes, as current version of Remmina has much errors in Fedora 23 I want update it

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

Hello Russell, > On Tuesday, 1 December 2015 12:21 AM, Russell Doty wrote: >> Is DNS by itself sufficient, or should we also address other network > facing capabilities with security impact such as secure time? Yes, we could do that. But that would have to be an independent Change request. ---

Re: Dealing with rolling release versioning

- Original Message - > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Till Maas < opensou...@till.name > wrote: > > > On Mo, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:28:57 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > > > Is there any reason not to use the date as the version? It's in MMDD > > format so there shouldn't be a upgrade

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

On Monday, November 30, 2015 01:50:54 PM Russell Doty wrote: > Is DNS by itself sufficient, or should we also address other network > facing capabilities with security impact such as secure time? The use case for the dnscache_test is to look for evidence of a system trying to reach a known Comman

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

Is DNS by itself sufficient, or should we also address other network facing capabilities with security impact such as secure time? On Mon, 2015-11-30 at 17:14 +0100, Jan Kurik wrote: > = Default Local DNS Resolver = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Default_Local_DNS_Resolver > > Change ow

Re: Package review skipped and straight to repos?

On Mon, 30 Nov 2015 09:53:24 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > Apparently, ABRT reports crashes for packages not part of Fedora. Not only that, but those shortened reports are also submitted for locally modified software. Such as someone hacking the software during development or breaking it during

Re: Dealing with rolling release versioning

On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Till Maas wrote: > On Mo, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:28:57 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > > > Is there any reason not to use the date as the version? It's in MMDD > > format so there shouldn't be a upgrade path issue but this isn't > explicitly > > covered in the packa

Re: Freerdp update with bundle in guacamole-server

On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > No. I want to suggest that continuing to say things like "It is ok to > leave it disabled/Broken in Fedora 24..." is bad. People read text > like that and continue to think Rawhide is a dumping ground. Disabled > is one thing, but broken is

Re: Dealing with rolling release versioning

Am 30.11.2015 um 18:58 schrieb Till Maas: On Mo, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:28:57 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: Is there any reason not to use the date as the version? It's in MMDD format so there shouldn't be a upgrade path issue but this isn't explicitly covered in the packaging guidelines that I c

Re: Dealing with rolling release versioning

On Mo, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:28:57 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > Is there any reason not to use the date as the version? It's in MMDD > format so there shouldn't be a upgrade path issue but this isn't explicitly > covered in the packaging guidelines that I can find. If you make it as a post relea

Dealing with rolling release versioning

I have a project that stopped providing versioned releases and went to a rolling release model using the date. In this case these are not "pre" or "post" releases or snapshot releases. Is there any reason not to use the date as the version? It's in MMDD format so there shouldn't be a upgrade

Fedora Rawhide 20151130 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud disk raw i386 Cloud disk raw x86_64 Cloud_atomic disk raw x86_64 Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151129: Design_suite live x86_64 Workstation live x86_64 Workstation live i386 Cinnamon live i386 Mate live i386 Workstation disk raw armhfp Mate disk raw armh

[POC-change] Fedora packages point of contact updates

Change in package status over the last 168 hours 1 packages were orphaned gstreamer1-vaapi [epel7] was orphaned by moezroy GStreamer plugins to use VA API video acceleration https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/pa

F24 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

= Default Local DNS Resolver = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Default_Local_DNS_Resolver Change owner(s): * P J P * Pavel Šimerda * Tomas Hozza * Petr Špaček Plain DNS protocol is insecure and therefore vulnerable from various attacks (e.g. cache poisoning). A client can never be sure

Re: Freerdp update with bundle in guacamole-server

On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > This whole situation has been absolutely terrible, and you want to > suggest that disabling Guacamole's RDP support temporarily to fix over > half a dozen other applications (all more used than Guacamole) is > bad?! No. I want to suggest that

Re: Freerdp update with bundle in guacamole-server

On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 7:43 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 4:01 AM, Simone Caronni wrote: >> On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Pavel Alexeev >> wrote: >>> >>> And yes, as current version of Remmina has much errors in Fedora 23 I want >>> update it to 1.2.0-rcgit.5 in that branch

Re: wayland in rawhide

On 30 November 2015 at 12:29, Steve Clark wrote: > On 11/26/2015 06:32 AM, Ian Malone wrote: >> >> On 25 November 2015 at 22:01, Adam Williamson >> wrote: >> >>> The wiki page explaining the GNOME-on-Wayland approach to middle-button >>> paste - https://wiki.gnome.org/Initiatives/Wayland/Primar

Re: Package review skipped and straight to repos?

Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Florian Weimer > wrote: >> Apparently, ABRT reports crashes for packages not part of Fedora. > > Thanks, I'd guessed that much, but I wanted some confirmation. > >> A possible fix would be to look at the signing key in the RPM data

Re: Freerdp update with bundle in guacamole-server

On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 4:01 AM, Simone Caronni wrote: > On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Pavel Alexeev > wrote: >> >> And yes, as current version of Remmina has much errors in Fedora 23 I want >> update it to 1.2.0-rcgit.5 in that branch too. > > > Please make sure that for Fedora 23 you are not

Re: wayland in rawhide

On 11/26/2015 06:32 AM, Ian Malone wrote: On 25 November 2015 at 22:01, Adam Williamson wrote: On Wed, 2015-11-25 at 15:40 -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote: On 11/25/2015 03:25 PM, drago01 wrote: On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:17 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2015-11-20 at 14:34 +, Ian Ma

rawhide report: 20151130 changes

Compose started at Mon Nov 30 05:15:02 UTC 2015 Broken deps for i386 -- [IQmol] IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0 IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0 IQmol-2.3.0

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: (fix typos) Re: Packaging:NamingGuidelines Re: DNF is completly unable to act with local packages

On Tuesday, 24 November 2015 at 14:56, Sérgio Basto wrote: > Switching to packag...@lists.fedoraproject.org  [...] > In this link > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages  > where we read : > > Release Tag for Pre-Release Packages:  > > 0.%{X}.%{alphatag}%{

Re: Planned Outage: Copr upgrade - 2015-11-30 08:00 UTC

Dne 26.11.2015 v 12:08 Miroslav Suchý napsal(a): > Planned Outage: Copr upgrade - 2015-11-30 08:00 UTC > > There will be an outage starting at 2015-11-30 08:00 UTC, which will last > approximately 4 hours. This outage have been cancelled. I hit some obstacles in staging environment and was unab

Re: Package review skipped and straight to repos?

On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > Apparently, ABRT reports crashes for packages not part of Fedora. Thanks, I'd guessed that much, but I wanted some confirmation. > A possible fix would be to look at the signing key in the RPM database > and report only packages which are

Re: Freerdp update with bundle in guacamole-server

On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: > And yes, as current version of Remmina has much errors in Fedora 23 I want > update it to 1.2.0-rcgit.5 in that branch too. > Please make sure that for Fedora 23 you are not breaking Guacamole though. It is ok to leave it disabled/Broken in

Re: Package review skipped and straight to repos?

On 11/28/2015 11:53 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 12:21 AM, Till Maas wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 12:10:07AM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: >>> How come datagrepper lists FAF reports for the package from 2015-07-20, >>> when it hadn't been included yet? >> >>

Re: Package review skipped and straight to repos?

On 29 November 2015 at 21:53, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Sáb, 2015-11-28 at 14:56 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Sat, 28 Nov 2015 21:11:48 + > > James Hogarth wrote: > > > > > I was flicking through package review requests to see if anything > > > jumped out as interesting when I saw this: >