[EPEL-devel] %autosetup for EPEL5

I thought it was impossible. Then I thought it was merely impossible without some terrible hacking. But now, after a bit of inspiration in the shower this morning, I went ahead and implemented the complete %autosetup functionality for EPEL5. Currently built as epel-rpm-macros-5.3 but not yet

[Bug 1323007] perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime-1.67 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323007 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1321485] perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime-1.66 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321485 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1311781] perl-PDF-API2-2.027 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311781 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1322440] Upgrade perl-Email-Valid to 1.200

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1322440 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2016-04-01)

Pungi uses yum still not dnf. Dennis On April 1, 2016 1:58:50 PM CDT, Kalev Lember wrote: >=== >#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2016-04-01) >=== > > >Meeting started by kalev at 17:00:38 UTC. The full logs are

Re: Firefox not working anymore over ssh?

On Fri, 2016-04-01 at 21:30 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 19:22:31 +0200, Tim Landscheidt wrote: > > Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > > Then it was probably broken by this update: > >  > > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-606ca05253 > > 

Fedora 24-20160401.n.2 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Images in this compose but not 24-20160330.n.0: Kde live i386 Xfce live x86_64 Workstation live i386 Kde live x86_64 Astronomy_kde live x86_64 Astronomy_kde live i386 Soas live x86_64 Xfce live i386

[Bug 1322572] Version bump to 1.055 causes warnings on el6

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1322572 --- Comment #5 from Brian Hinz --- Just confirming that your patch does indeed silence the warnings. Thanks for the quick resolution. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora

Fedora 24 compose report: 20160401.n.2 changes

OLD: Fedora-24-20160330.n.0 NEW: Fedora-24-20160401.n.2 = SUMMARY = Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 147 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 678.71 KiB Size of dropped packages:21.75 KiB Size of upgraded packages: 1.14 GiB Size

Broken dependencies: perl-Dumbbench

perl-Dumbbench has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On armhfp: perl-Dumbbench-BoxPlot-0.10-2.fc24.noarch requires perl(SOOT) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[Bug 1314577] perl-LWP-Protocol-PSGI-0.09 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314577 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1306482] perl-Net-Whois-Raw-2.93 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306482 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1313822] perl-Data-Munge-0.096 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1313822 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1312866] perl-CPAN-Reporter-1.2017 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312866 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

Re: Support for PCLMUL, AVX, FMA, etc.

On 04/01/2016 10:32 PM, Jerry James wrote: > Yesterday I sent a patch upstream that uses gcc's indirect function > support together with __attribute__((target ...)) to build vanilla > x86_64, PCLMUL-enabled, AVX-enabled, and FMA-enabled varieties of > several functions. Upstream was initially

Re: No Rich boolean deps in Requires/Recommends for f24

On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 16:11:24 -0400 Carlos O'Donell wrote: > On 04/01/2016 02:51 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Greetings. > > > > Recently FPC oked the use of rich boolean deps. However, we have run > > into an issue where the tools used to push updates are not able to > >

Support for PCLMUL, AVX, FMA, etc.

I am one of the maintainers of the ntl package, which is used by some numeric applications (e.g., Macaulay2 and sagemath). Upstream supports use of the PCLMUL instruction, the AVX instructions, and the FMA instructions to speed up various computations. We can't use any of those in Fedora, since

Re: No Rich boolean deps in Requires/Recommends for f24

On 04/01/2016 02:51 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings. > > Recently FPC oked the use of rich boolean deps. However, we have run > into an issue where the tools used to push updates are not able to > correctly handle these new dependencies. > > At today's FESCo meeting we decided to ask

Re: No Rich boolean deps in Requires/Recommends for f24

On 04/01/2016 02:51 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings. > > Recently FPC oked the use of rich boolean deps. However, we have run > into an issue where the tools used to push updates are not able to > correctly handle these new dependencies. > > At today's FESCo meeting we decided to ask

Re: No Rich boolean deps in Requires/Recommends for f24

On 04/01/2016 02:51 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings. > > Recently FPC oked the use of rich boolean deps. However, we have run > into an issue where the tools used to push updates are not able to > correctly handle these new dependencies. > > At today's FESCo meeting we decided to ask

Re: Firefox not working anymore over ssh?

On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 19:22:31 +0200, Tim Landscheidt wrote: > Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > Then it was probably broken by this update: > > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-606ca05253 > > The "LIBGL_DRI3_DISABLE=1" workaround fixed it for me as > well

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2016-04-01)

=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2016-04-01) === Meeting started by kalev at 17:00:38 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2016-04-01/fesco.2016-04-01-17.00.log.html . Meeting summary

No Rich boolean deps in Requires/Recommends for f24

Greetings. Recently FPC oked the use of rich boolean deps. However, we have run into an issue where the tools used to push updates are not able to correctly handle these new dependencies. At today's FESCo meeting we decided to ask maintainers to not use rich boolean Requires/Recommends for the

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #48775: If nsSSL3 is on, even if SSL v3 is not really enabled, a confusing message is logged.

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48775 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48775/0001-Ticket-48775-If-nsSSL3-is-on-even-if-SSL-v3-is-not-r.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@%(host_name)s http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Please review (take 2): [389 Project] #48784: Make the SSL version set to the client library configurable.

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48784 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48784/0001-Ticket-48784-Make-the-SSL-version-set-to-the-client-.patch git patch file (master) -- revised based upon the reviews by William (Thanks!) -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@%(host_name)s

Re: Reviews swap

Antonio Trande writes: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hi all, > > I have three pending reviews: > > - - parmetis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323227 I'm not getting through to that at present, but as far as I can tell, parmetis is

Re: "Unexpected dependencies" from ppc64le build

Orion Poplawski writes: > check-depends.pl appears to be part of libiomp, so I think it's an issue about > what it thinks is an okay dependency. ld64.so.2 may be a ppc64/le specific > library that the libiomp developers haven't encountered before. Thanks. I'm not awake,

Re: Reviews swap

On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 05:52:06PM +0200, Antonio Trande wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hi all, > > I have three pending reviews: > > - - parmetis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323227 > - - GTEngine

Reviews swap

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi all, I have three pending reviews: - - parmetis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323227 - - GTEngine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318381 - - rubygem-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319289 I will

[Bug 1292177] Symbol error loading perl module Authen::Krb5.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292177 --- Comment #10 from Toby Blake --- Hello, The issue is when using PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 and can be replicated on FC23 (on a new install from the live CD, with updates)... [toby@localhost ~]$ cat /etc/redhat-release Fedora

[Bug 1322440] Upgrade perl-Email-Valid to 1.200

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1322440 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Email-Valid-1.200-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-39117253a8 -- You are receiving this

Re: "Unexpected dependencies" from ppc64le build

On 04/01/2016 05:16 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > check-depends.pl appears to be part of libiomp, so I think it's an issue about > what it thinks is an okay dependency. ld64.so.2 may be a ppc64/le specific > library that the libiomp developers haven't encountered before. It's the name of the ELF

Re: "Unexpected dependencies" from ppc64le build

On 04/01/2016 09:04 AM, Dave Love wrote: > I get this causing a failed build on fedora-22-ppc64le but the package > builds OK on x86. Can anyone suggest why and what to do about it? If > it's due to the build procedure, it's buried in cmake, which is pretty > much beyond my ken... > > cd

"Unexpected dependencies" from ppc64le build

I get this causing a failed build on fedora-22-ppc64le but the package builds OK on x86. Can anyone suggest why and what to do about it? If it's due to the build procedure, it's buried in cmake, which is pretty much beyond my ken... cd /builddir/build/BUILD/libomp_oss/src && /usr/bin/perl

Re: Removing perl from build root

On 04/01/2016 03:46 PM, Petr Pisar wrote: On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 12:14:43PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 02:43:41PM +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: Requires: (perl-generators if perl-libs) That's interesting idea. I only worry there could be cases when the perl-generators

Re: Removing perl from build root

On 01/04/16 14:46, Petr Pisar wrote: On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 12:14:43PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 02:43:41PM +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: Requires: (perl-generators if perl-libs) That's interesting idea. I only worry there could be cases when the perl-generators were

Re: Removing perl from build root

On 04/01/2016 03:33 PM, Paul Howarth wrote: I think people doing development work like that are less bothered about pulling in a few deps than the cloud/embedded people, where every megabyte is worth saving. Sizes matter at run-time, but I fail to understand why they would matter much at

spot pushed to perl-Email-Valid (f24). "1.200"

From 787485f7db9648745905cc58c1c4267d39c8ca74 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom Callaway Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 10:30:31 -0400 Subject: 1.200 --- .gitignore| 1 + perl-Email-Valid.spec | 7 +-- sources | 2 +- 3 files changed, 7

spot pushed to perl-Email-Valid (master). "1.200"

From 787485f7db9648745905cc58c1c4267d39c8ca74 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom Callaway Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 10:30:31 -0400 Subject: 1.200 --- .gitignore| 1 + perl-Email-Valid.spec | 7 +-- sources | 2 +- 3 files changed, 7

spot uploaded Email-Valid-1.200.tar.gz for perl-Email-Valid

59b8ed8b143b9cee2b4e6449bda23492 Email-Valid-1.200.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Email-Valid/Email-Valid-1.200.tar.gz/md5/59b8ed8b143b9cee2b4e6449bda23492/Email-Valid-1.200.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl

Re: Removing perl from build root

On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 12:14:43PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 02:43:41PM +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: > > Requires: (perl-generators if perl-libs) > > > That's interesting idea. I only worry there could be cases when the > perl-generators were unnecessarily installed. E.g.

Re: Removing perl from build root

On 01/04/16 11:14, Petr Pisar wrote: On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 02:43:41PM +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: On 31/03/16 14:10, Petr Pisar wrote: But the compatibility is important. Without perl-generators in a build root no Perl dependencies are generated into binary packages. To fix it, every Perl

Re: Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-04-01)

On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 9:05 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > On Thursday, March 31, 2016 11:29:01 PM CDT Kalev Lember wrote: >> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo >> meeting Friday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. >> >> To convert

Re: Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-04-01)

On Thursday, March 31, 2016 11:29:01 PM CDT Kalev Lember wrote: > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo > meeting Friday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. > > To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at >

[Bug 1287360] perl-Gtk3-0.026 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287360 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

jplesnik pushed to perl-Gtk3 (master). "0.026 bump"

From f433af2b9500d2311d6bd4b7ae6e8b81734a193d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 13:09:58 +0200 Subject: 0.026 bump --- perl-Gtk3.spec | 7 +-- sources| 2 +- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git

jplesnik uploaded Gtk3-0.026.tar.gz for perl-Gtk3

d0de8124000200abeaf753407967a324 Gtk3-0.026.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Gtk3/Gtk3-0.026.tar.gz/md5/d0de8124000200abeaf753407967a324/Gtk3-0.026.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[Bug 1288266] perl-File-Find-Rule-0.34 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288266 --- Comment #10 from Petr Pisar --- I see. I tagged the builds again into their updates-candidate tags. It should be possible to submit them into bodhi as an update for testing now. -- You are receiving this mail because:

Re: Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-04-01)

On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 11:29 PM, Kalev Lember wrote: > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo > meeting Friday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. > > To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at >

Re: Removing perl from build root

On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 02:43:41PM +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: > On 31/03/16 14:10, Petr Pisar wrote: > >But the compatibility is important. Without perl-generators in a build root > >no Perl dependencies are generated into binary packages. To fix it, every > >Perl package must build-require

[Bug 1323007] perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime-1.67 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323007 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime-1.67-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-b82ff7f4f6 -- You are

[Bug 1321485] perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime-1.66 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321485 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime-1.67-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-b82ff7f4f6 -- You are

[Bug 1323007] perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime-1.67 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323007 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime-1.67-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-b82ff7f4f6 -- You are

pghmcfc pushed to perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime (perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime-1.67-1.fc24). "Update to 1.67 (..more)"

From 2fd18d81a2cb1c720912b81c0914a70acf2b6c9f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 10:23:07 +0100 Subject: Update to 1.67 - New upstream release 1.67 - Fixed a regression introduced in 1.60; older versions of this library would match dates

pghmcfc pushed to perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime (perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime-1.67-1.fc25). "Update to 1.67 (..more)"

This commit already existed in another branch. http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime.git/commit/?h=perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime-1.67-1.fc25=2fd18d81a2cb1c720912b81c0914a70acf2b6c9f -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl

pghmcfc pushed to perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime (f24). "Update to 1.67 (..more)"

From 2fd18d81a2cb1c720912b81c0914a70acf2b6c9f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 10:23:07 +0100 Subject: Update to 1.67 - New upstream release 1.67 - Fixed a regression introduced in 1.60; older versions of this library would match dates

pghmcfc pushed to perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime (master). "Update to 1.67 (..more)"

From 2fd18d81a2cb1c720912b81c0914a70acf2b6c9f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 10:23:07 +0100 Subject: Update to 1.67 - New upstream release 1.67 - Fixed a regression introduced in 1.60; older versions of this library would match dates

pghmcfc uploaded DateTime-Format-Strptime-1.67.tar.gz for perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime

d0d2a70ec818dde0690af6f832312e06 DateTime-Format-Strptime-1.67.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime/DateTime-Format-Strptime-1.67.tar.gz/md5/d0d2a70ec818dde0690af6f832312e06/DateTime-Format-Strptime-1.67.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

[Bug 1292177] Symbol error loading perl module Authen::Krb5.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292177 --- Comment #9 from Petr Šabata --- Thanks but this bug was fixed in Fedora already -- by rebuilding the perl-Authen-Krb5 package, as mentioned in comment #2. It works fine for me with perl-Authen-Krb5-1.9-15.fc23.x86_64

[Bug 1292177] Symbol error loading perl module Authen::Krb5.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292177 --- Comment #8 from Toby Blake --- Hi Petr, I built it myself from the SRPM in koji.fedoraproject.org. I'm reporting it against this bug as I imagine the problem will be the same for FC, e.g. for any MakeMaker test suites

[Bug 1319792] Upgrade perl-Term-ANSIColor to 4.05

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319792 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

jplesnik pushed to perl-Term-ANSIColor (master). "4.05 bump"

From eb06b263629062b45a879529a0723b90dcf732b2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 10:15:11 +0200 Subject: 4.05 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Term-ANSIColor.spec | 5 - sources | 2 +- 3 files changed, 6

jplesnik uploaded Term-ANSIColor-4.05.tar.gz for perl-Term-ANSIColor

23be1bae63eb9b2145014b4c81d41d44 Term-ANSIColor-4.05.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Term-ANSIColor/Term-ANSIColor-4.05.tar.gz/md5/23be1bae63eb9b2145014b4c81d41d44/Term-ANSIColor-4.05.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

ppisar changed jplesnik's 'approveacls' permission on perl-RDF-Trine (master) to 'Approved'

ppisar changed jplesnik's 'approveacls' permission on perl-RDF-Trine (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-RDF-Trine/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

ppisar changed jplesnik's 'commit' permission on perl-RDF-Trine (master) to 'Approved'

ppisar changed jplesnik's 'commit' permission on perl-RDF-Trine (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-RDF-Trine/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

ppisar changed perl-sig's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-RDF-Trine (master) to 'Approved'

ppisar changed perl-sig's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-RDF-Trine (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-RDF-Trine/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

ppisar changed perl-sig's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-RDF-Trine (master) to 'Approved'

ppisar changed perl-sig's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-RDF-Trine (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-RDF-Trine/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[Bug 1292177] Symbol error loading perl module Authen::Krb5.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292177 --- Comment #7 from Petr Šabata --- Toby, This module doesn't appear to be a part of neither EL7 nor EPEL7. I guess it comes from SL's own repositories. You should report it to them. -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1311781] perl-PDF-API2-2.027 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311781 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- perl-PDF-API2-2.027-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-a866cb7953 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1311781] perl-PDF-API2-2.027 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311781 --- Comment #7 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- jplesnik's perl-PDF-API2-2.027-1.fc25 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=750293 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1311781] perl-PDF-API2-2.027 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311781 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED

jplesnik pushed to perl-PDF-API2 (f24). "2.027 bump"

From 315a868a228aee70207b232d7f5509831544043e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 09:53:37 +0200 Subject: 2.027 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + font-location.patch | 2 +- perl-PDF-API2.spec | 19 +-- sources

jplesnik pushed to perl-PDF-API2 (master). "2.027 bump"

From e8d4ba112a3f23e4e8c143b9e4031068c4cd727d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 09:52:16 +0200 Subject: 2.027 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + sources| 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/.gitignore

jplesnik pushed to perl-PDF-API2 (master). "2.027 bump"

From 0ca04ed2ebf6978f2190736efbb146dae2dc870e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 09:51:45 +0200 Subject: 2.027 bump --- font-location.patch | 2 +- perl-PDF-API2.spec | 19 +-- 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 11

jplesnik uploaded PDF-API2-2.027.tar.gz for perl-PDF-API2

8a0df7705899a966fb7ad662ebbefcc2 PDF-API2-2.027.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-PDF-API2/PDF-API2-2.027.tar.gz/md5/8a0df7705899a966fb7ad662ebbefcc2/PDF-API2-2.027.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 5 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing: Age URL 894 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11893 libguestfs-1.20.12-1.el5 659 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1626 puppet-2.7.26-1.el5 508