Hi,
the Voting period of the Fedora Elections on July 2016 has just
started. Please vote for your candidates to Council [1] and FESCo [2].
You can vote till July 25th, 2016 at 23:59:00 UTC when the voting ends.
[1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/voting/vote/council-july-2016
[2]
On Jul 18, 2016 10:30 PM, "Jeremy Fergason"
wrote:
>
>
> 3) Swift relies on LLDB for it’s REPL functionality on linux. This is
annoying because it creates a custom version of LLDB that conflicts with
the main lldb package. I can’t see anyway around this conflict as
All,
I’m working on a SPEC file for Apple’s swift programming language. I
believe it’s currently working and conforms to the community guidelines but
I have some questions:
1) The swift name conflicts with several existing packages. I’m thinking
swiftlang would be appropriate as this is
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Modularity WG on 2016-07-19 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC
At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
Meeting for the Modularity Working Group.
More information available at: [Modularity Working Group wiki
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357718
Bug ID: 1357718
Summary: perl-Test2-Suite-0.52 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Test2-Suite
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357714
Bug ID: 1357714
Summary: perl-PAR-Packer-1.034 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-PAR-Packer
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357709
Bug ID: 1357709
Summary: perl-MongoDB-v1.4.3 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-MongoDB
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
Hi Jerry,
I'm kind of resurrecting a dead thread here, but maybe a recent change to GCC
has made what you were considering possible. I stumbled upon it when looking
for information about optimized extensions for another package.
Recently, GCC expanded support for multiversioning. It's in GCC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357707
Bug ID: 1357707
Summary: perl-HTML-FormHandler-0.40066 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-HTML-FormHandler
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357706
Bug ID: 1357706
Summary: perl-GraphViz-2.22 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-GraphViz
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354483
--- Comment #24 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Patches were not touched. All were applied properly
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354483
--- Comment #22 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Patching or scratch build for dropbox-api-command-1.17 failed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354483
--- Comment #23 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1181349
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1181349=edit
Rebase-helper rebase-helper-debug.log log file.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354483
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357705
Bug ID: 1357705
Summary: perl-App-Cmd-0.331 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-App-Cmd
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357698
Bug ID: 1357698
Summary: perl-Catalyst-Runtime-5.80033-1.el6.noarch missing
dependencies
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: el6
Component: perl-Catalyst-Runtime
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Nope, nothing on your side. Looks like there was a push late saturday
> and your updates just missed that, and there wasn't one sunday for some
> reason so they went out in the one I started this morning.
>
> It was a little
On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 15:05:56 -0700
"Gerald B. Cox" wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > I could tell you more about your specific updates if you list
> > them...
>
>
>
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
376 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031
python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6
370 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168
rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6
301
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357305
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357304
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.01-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357304
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I could tell you more about your specific updates if you list them...
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-db2fbe6854
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-579b837594
Thanks for the info I
On 07/14/2016 05:15 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> Until the Rust ecosystem becomes more stable, it is better to upgrade
> it regularly than have a stale tool nobody can really use.
> There are even crates that work only with nightlies for now, so trying
> to stay on par is necessary to make it useful.
On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 13:49:23 -0700
"Gerald B. Cox" wrote:
> Is anyone else having this issue? Seems it usually takes 3 or more
> days for me to get something pushed to testing. Is this normal
> behavior? I usually submit on weekends... is it that bodhi
> processing doesn't occur
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Lennart Poettering writes:
>
>> On Fedora, we currently have a "nobody" user that is defined to UID
>> 99. It's defined unconditionally like this. To my knowledge there's no
>> actual use of this user at all in
Lennart Poettering writes:
On Fedora, we currently have a "nobody" user that is defined to UID
99. It's defined unconditionally like this. To my knowledge there's no
actual use of this user at all in Fedora however.
I see distccd running as the nobody user.
I also see dnsmasq running as the
On Seg, 2016-07-18 at 13:49 -0700, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> Is anyone else having this issue? Seems it usually takes 3 or more
> days for me to get something pushed to testing. Is this normal
> behavior? I usually submit on weekends... is it that bodhi
> processing doesn't occur on weekends?
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
497 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087
dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7
260 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7
126
hi
Il 18/07/2016 22:49, Gerald B. Cox ha scritto:
Is anyone else having this issue? Seems it usually takes 3 or more
days for me to get something
in my case 4 days ...
pushed to testing. Is this normal behavior? I usually submit on
weekends... is it that bodhi processing doesn't occur on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1351354
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
amavisd-new-2.11.0-3.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1351354
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353238
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.22.2-353.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353238
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-5.24.0-371.fc25
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354386
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.22.2-353.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this
Is anyone else having this issue? Seems it usually takes 3 or more days
for me to get something pushed to testing. Is this normal behavior? I
usually submit on weekends... is it that bodhi processing doesn't occur on
weekends?
Also, apparently github is the preferred method or reporting bodhi
On Sun, 17 Jul 2016 00:41:40 +
Christopher wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2016, 15:47 Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > In order to prevent these spam wiki edits entirely, we have changed
> > the wiki to require a user to have both signed the FPCA and be in
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353238
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-5.24.0-371.fc25
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354386
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.22.2-361.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353238
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.22.2-361.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 05:00:40PM +0200, Ondřej Vašík wrote:
> Lennart Poettering píše v Po 18. 07. 2016 v 16:28 +0200:
> > On Mon, 18.07.16 15:59, Ondřej Vašík (ova...@redhat.com) wrote:
> >
> > > Lennart Poettering píše v Po 18. 07. 2016 v 14:39 +0200:
> > > > Heya!
> > > >
> > > > I'd like
Change in package status over the last 168 hours
4 packages were orphaned
bcfg2 [f22, el6, epel7] was orphaned by fab
A configuration management system
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/bcfg2
From 059804cb90853bde0d2de05d1c6aedf6d0e2dc4d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 12:14:22 +0200
Subject: 2.82 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases.spec | 5 -
sources | 2 +-
3
From f7c2bf108927d8296383bc2b3795b6da1ea98aa6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 12:10:19 +0200
Subject: 2.82 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases.spec | 5 -
sources | 2 +-
3
fba75bc5c2f38bb5c972802be776dbde CPAN-Perl-Releases-2.82.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases/CPAN-Perl-Releases-2.82.tar.gz/md5/fba75bc5c2f38bb5c972802be776dbde/CPAN-Perl-Releases-2.82.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
From 4e0e86a721268cad2e3a27ea65ccf57f6ff1d7d9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Emmanuel Seyman
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 11:12:02 +0200
Subject: add more build-requires && filter out optional modules
---
bugzilla.spec | 46 ++
1 file
From 2d99c0721fe40655a9113d68f061abd451a2512f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 10:20:26 +0200
Subject: 2.01 bump (2016f Olson database)
---
...etc-localtime-by-DateTime-TimeZone-Tzfile.patch | 78 --
From 80e00b8330c5a55b3a2a521bb32de4464c9808a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 10:14:01 +0200
Subject: 2.01 bump (2016f Olson database)
---
...etc-localtime-by-DateTime-TimeZone-Tzfile.patch | 78 --
From 1b0b92e062bbe78625d88a9f52414a60686cd2a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 10:02:38 +0200
Subject: 2.01 bump (2016f Olson database)
---
...etc-localtime-by-DateTime-TimeZone-Tzfile.patch | 78 --
aedaabaf4e0490c4d8db8720589a5fa8 App-cpm-0.117.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-App-cpm/App-cpm-0.117.tar.gz/md5/aedaabaf4e0490c4d8db8720589a5fa8/App-cpm-0.117.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing
From 59f32187b5be427d38c6c0b1999118cd51b153fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?=
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 09:43:44 +0200
Subject: 1.999726 bump
---
.gitignore| 1 +
perl-Math-BigInt.spec | 5 -
sources | 2 +-
3 files
3e45e459ece367a6b29a79b2f7363ba0 Math-BigInt-1.999726.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Math-BigInt/Math-BigInt-1.999726.tar.gz/md5/3e45e459ece367a6b29a79b2f7363ba0/Math-BigInt-1.999726.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
From 83a234510141f566279255b1a5f1f33473ac96e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 09:18:17 +0200
Subject: 0.117 bump
---
.gitignore| 1 +
perl-App-cpm.spec | 9 +++--
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+),
a9f8a8f3aedef2879b68b773b7e0fa5b DateTime-TimeZone-2.01.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-DateTime-TimeZone/DateTime-TimeZone-2.01.tar.gz/md5/a9f8a8f3aedef2879b68b773b7e0fa5b/DateTime-TimeZone-2.01.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
Lennart Poettering píše v Po 18. 07. 2016 v 16:28 +0200:
> On Mon, 18.07.16 15:59, Ondřej Vašík (ova...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> > Lennart Poettering píše v Po 18. 07. 2016 v 14:39 +0200:
> > > Heya!
> > >
> > > I'd like to start a discussion regarding the "nobody" user on Fedora,
> > > and
Missing expected images:
Kde live i386
Kde live x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Kde raw-xz armhfp
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Failed openQA tests: 28/80 (x86_64), 16/16 (i386)
ID: 25535 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL:
From a7d2da1569333eddb9ecd1121eebd297ce5909da Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 08:55:12 +0200
Subject: 0.08 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Check-ISA.spec | 6 +-
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 7
53740287ca04f3df28d4721ffa1e38cf Check-ISA-0.08.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Check-ISA/Check-ISA-0.08.tar.gz/md5/53740287ca04f3df28d4721ffa1e38cf/Check-ISA-0.08.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
- Original Message -
> I did not have gvfs-gphoto2 installed. After installing it I now see
> the separate mount. Thanks for your help!
>
> Let me try to summarize. Can you please correct me if I'm wrong:
>
> - Before (Fedora 22) I didn't need this because a "generic mount" of the
>
=
#fedora-meeting-1: fedora-qadevel
=
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2016-07-18/fedora-qadevel.2016-07-18-14.03.html
Minutes (text):
On Mon, 18.07.16 15:59, Ondřej Vašík (ova...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Lennart Poettering píše v Po 18. 07. 2016 v 14:39 +0200:
> > Heya!
> >
> > I'd like to start a discussion regarding the "nobody" user on Fedora,
> > and propose that we change its definition sooner or later. I am not
> > proposing
On 18 July 2016 at 08:39, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Heya!
>
> I'd like to start a discussion regarding the "nobody" user on Fedora,
> and propose that we change its definition sooner or later. I am not
> proposing a feature according to the feature process for this yet,
Lennart Poettering píše v Po 18. 07. 2016 v 14:39 +0200:
> Heya!
>
> I'd like to start a discussion regarding the "nobody" user on Fedora,
> and propose that we change its definition sooner or later. I am not
> proposing a feature according to the feature process for this yet, but
> my hope is
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 8:39 AM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> Heya!
>
> I'd like to start a discussion regarding the "nobody" user on Fedora,
> and propose that we change its definition sooner or later. I am not
> proposing a feature according to the feature process for this
Hello all,
Python is updated to 2.7.12 for Rawhide and F24.
Release notes: https://hg.python.org/cpython/raw-file/v2.7.12/Misc/NEWS
Bodhi update: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-0decbba312
For people who prefer copr for early testing you can enable this repo: dnf copr
On 07/16/2016 05:33 AM, Björn Persson wrote:
> Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
>> On 07/15/2016 05:19 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>
>>>* AGREED: FESCo approves KillUserProcess=yes by default with the
>>> steps sgallagh has proposed in the ticket (+7, 0, 0) (jwb,
>>> 17:04:58)
>>
>> "Tier 1 packages
Heya!
I'd like to start a discussion regarding the "nobody" user on Fedora,
and propose that we change its definition sooner or later. I am not
proposing a feature according to the feature process for this yet, but
my hope is that these discussions will lead to one eventually.
Most distributions
perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.22()(64bit)
perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1)
On i386:
perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.i686 requires
perl-Algorithm-Permute has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Algorithm-Permute-0.12-21.fc24.x86_64 requires
libperl.so.5.22()(64bit)
perl-Algorithm-Permute-0.12-21.fc24.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1)
On i386:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241821
--- Comment #6 from Emmanuel Seyman ---
Okay, that was too much effort...
It turns out Bugzilla 5.0 requires perl-DateTime-TimeZone 1.64 but we only have
1.63 in RHEL/Centos (and, because this is in RHEL/Centos, we can't
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158860
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Hi all,
One of the changes in PHP7 (which is of course a Fedora 25 Feature Change)
is an alteration to the assert() behaviour.
The default default behaviour (ie no ini file changes) is to have assert()
work as it did in PHP5.
The recommended php.ini for production is to have zend.assertions=-1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357305
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-2.82-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-752e808395
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357305
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Hi Fedora people,
on July 19th at 00:00:00 UTC we are going to start the Voting period
of Council and FESCo elections [1]. The Voting period will end on July
25th, 2016 at 23:59:00 UTC.
If you are around during this period of time, please go to the Voting
machine [2] and provide your votes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338720
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
External Bug ID||Debian BTS 825011
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357304
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.01-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-26b4741302
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357304
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.01-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-472bccdde0
--
You are receiving
On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 02:45:48PM +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> Unless someone speaks up, I'll be retiring 2 packages next week:
>
> * perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-Bootstrap3
>
> This is obsolete, now that perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-AssetPack 1.xx
> has been released. Given that this package contains
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338720
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppi...@redhat.com
a9f8a8f3aedef2879b68b773b7e0fa5b DateTime-TimeZone-2.01.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-DateTime-TimeZone/DateTime-TimeZone-2.01.tar.gz/md5/a9f8a8f3aedef2879b68b773b7e0fa5b/DateTime-TimeZone-2.01.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357304
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356323
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
From 83a234510141f566279255b1a5f1f33473ac96e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 09:18:17 +0200
Subject: 0.117 bump
---
.gitignore| 1 +
perl-App-cpm.spec | 9 +++--
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+),
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357302
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356980
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed
86 matches
Mail list logo