perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.22()(64bit)
perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1)
On i386:
perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.i686 requires
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/397
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/397/0001-Ticket-397-Add-PBKDF2-to-Directory-Server-password-s.patch
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/397/0001-Ticket-397-Implement-scrypt-hashing-mechanism-for-DS.patch
Passes valgrind, and
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 8:56 AM, Solomon Peachy wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 12:15:09AM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> Those do get ported. I didn't mean to be confusing. "buildbot", the
>> Python based build tool, is unlikely to ever be ported. Not that it's
>> a very
On Thu, 4 Aug 2016 12:53:24 -0600
Jerry James wrote:
> That error means that the string
> "/q/zaitcev/rpms/BUILDROOT/openstack-swift-2.9.0-1.z5.x86_64" appears
> in one of the files listed in %files. Grep for BUILDROOT in your
> installed file tree to find the culprit(s).
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
515 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087
dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7
277 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7
40
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360425
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
393 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031
python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6
387 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168
rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6
318
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48949
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48949/0005-Ticket-48949-Fix-ups-for-style-and-correctness.patch
We had a community contribution to lib389 overnight. I have reviewed and
acked the 4 patches they provided. I have provided some small
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831716
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831716
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Moving legacy code out of |Bugzilla requires
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831716
Paul Roubekas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359467
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359467
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-XML-LibXML-2.0128-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359549
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-DateTime-Format-Natural-1.04-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360280
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360279
Bug 1360279 depends on bug 1360280, which changed state.
Bug 1360280 Summary: perl-DBD-MySQL: Use after free when my_login fails
[fedora-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360280
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360296
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-2.88-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360279
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-DBD-MySQL-4.035-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360296
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360280
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-DBD-MySQL-4.035-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358548
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-2.88-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359549
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-DateTime-Format-Natura
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357305
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357305
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-2.88-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358548
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360425
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.22.2-362.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360425
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359549
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359549
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-DateTime-Format-Natural-1.04-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831716
--- Comment #12 from Emmanuel Seyman ---
(In reply to Paul Roubekas from comment #11)
>
> Can't locate JSON/RPC/Legacy/Server/CGI.pm in @INC (you may need to
> install the JSON::RPC::Legacy::Server::CGI module) (@INC
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 4:08 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-08-04 at 21:02 +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
>> On 04/08/16 20:48, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > The page says that Koji will be modified to run all the per-arch build
>> > tasks to completion even
On Thu, 2016-08-04 at 21:02 +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 04/08/16 20:48, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> >
> > The page says that Koji will be modified to run all the per-arch build
> > tasks to completion even if one fails (as opposed to how it behaves
> > now, cancelling all the other arch tasks
On 04/08/16 20:48, Adam Williamson wrote:
The page says that Koji will be modified to run all the per-arch build
tasks to completion even if one fails (as opposed to how it behaves
now, cancelling all the other arch tasks as soon as any one fails), but
a failure of any of them will still
On Thu, 2016-08-04 at 15:56 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 04:07:31PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 04:07:31PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> [1]
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/RedefiningSecondaryArchitectures
>
> I skimmed all this and I'm still a bit confused.
>
> Will
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 04:07:31PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> [1]
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/RedefiningSecondaryArchitectures
I skimmed all this and I'm still a bit confused.
Will there be one Koji instance compiling for every (current primary +
current secondary) arch?
On Thu, 2016-08-04 at 15:44 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> I think the solid way to address this is to make each architecture
> independent and don't stop the build for any arch if any other arch
> fails. The total failure state can be figured out once all the arches
> have completed and based on
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-08-04 at 11:41 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Thu, 2016-08-04 at 16:07 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > We are planning to change the way Alternate Architectures (non
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 04:43:40PM +0200, Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This morning, during the automation workshop, I had the occasion of
> speaking about this with Pingou and Threebean.
> Thanks to Pingou hints, I've created a query to get pending ACL from
> pkgdb.
> What I'd
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 12:24 PM, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> Hi, All:
>
> I'm trying to package something that's written in Go, and as soon as
> I have the compiled binary installed, the rpmbuild blows up like this:
>
> + /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot
> Binary file
>
On Thu, 2016-08-04 at 11:41 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-08-04 at 16:07 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > We are planning to change the way Alternate Architectures (non x86_64)
> > are handled
> > in terms of "primary" vs "secondary". The definition of what is
On Thu, 2016-08-04 at 16:07 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We are planning to change the way Alternate Architectures (non x86_64)
> are handled
> in terms of "primary" vs "secondary". The definition of what is
> primary or secondary
> is already handled more in terms of the build
Hi, All:
I'm trying to package something that's written in Go, and as soon as
I have the compiled binary installed, the rpmbuild blows up like this:
+ /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot
Binary file
/q/zaitcev/rpms/BUILDROOT/openstack-swift-2.9.0-1.z5.x86_64/usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/hummingbird.debug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831716
Paul Roubekas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 4 August 2016 at 11:07, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
>> All the details of the proposal along with FAQ have been put on a wiki
>> page here[1]
>> so please go and read it and ask any questions
From d0f2b241f70c953830bf00a1981f4b3e086d6ea4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 17:37:59 +0200
Subject: Added . to default path in test (CPAN RT#116620)
---
POE-Component-Logger-1.10-Fix-default-path-in-tests.patch | 11 +++
On 4 August 2016 at 11:07, Peter Robinson wrote:
> All the details of the proposal along with FAQ have been put on a wiki
> page here[1]
> so please go and read it and ask any questions that aren't answered in
> the FAQ here.
>
> Regards,
> Peter
>
> [1]
>
From ad4e0a466bed653fb86d2149e5cde62e9ec09408 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 17:27:14 +0200
Subject: Added . to default path in test (CPAN RT#116620)
---
POE-Component-Logger-1.10-Fix-default-path-in-tests.patch | 11 +++
From 4c1a87cc7eb6825ef37af288412a561593d562eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 17:19:20 +0200
Subject: Added . to default path in test (CPAN RT#116620)
---
POE-Component-Logger-1.10-Fix-default-path-in-tests.patch | 11 +++
From 489d53936973450fb2bacd0f2562c2ae8f8cf0ab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 17:19:20 +0200
Subject: Added . to default path in test (CPAN RT#116620)
---
POE-Component-Logger-1.10-Fix-default-path-in-tests.patch | 11 +++
Hi All,
We are planning to change the way Alternate Architectures (non x86_64)
are handled
in terms of "primary" vs "secondary". The definition of what is
primary or secondary
is already handled more in terms of the build artifact outputs (images, LiveCDs,
installers, containers etc) for i686
Hi all,
This morning, during the automation workshop, I had the occasion of
speaking about this with Pingou and Threebean.
Thanks to Pingou hints, I've created a query to get pending ACL from
pkgdb.
What I'd like to share with you all is the list of users that can
approve/deny ACL requests (older
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1362326
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Socket-2.023-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-652edb038f
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1362326
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Socket-2.023-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-d88d6244a8
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364117
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Socket-2.023-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-d88d6244a8
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364117
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Socket-2.023-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-652edb038f
--
You are receiving this mail
Hi Bjorn,
Thanks for the feedback
It will be great if you could share your thoughts on improving the
interface. It will be useful for incorporating that into our survey
which ultimately will benefit the re-design process.
Radhika
On 08/04/2016 04:41 AM, Björn Persson wrote:
rkolathu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364117
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
From 152cf95966a02c3d5590aa98f58b025d64c8f87b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 16:03:41 +0200
Subject: 2.023 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Socket.spec | 7 +--
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3
From e8af9ef4517ee1d72ed446e2e811d74649345849 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 16:03:41 +0200
Subject: 2.023 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Socket.spec | 7 +--
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3
From 414bae69cd5cd934b2c85ac069f61b1f8c5f577d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 16:03:41 +0200
Subject: 2.023 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Socket.spec | 5 -
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2
From b82126eeaddd33221b110d35121066216cb0320a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 16:03:41 +0200
Subject: 2.023 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Socket.spec | 5 -
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2
0f463c50e566919247a53afcc076e26f Socket-2.023.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Socket/Socket-2.023.tar.gz/md5/0f463c50e566919247a53afcc076e26f/Socket-2.023.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364117
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1187521
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1187521=edit
Rebase-helper rebase-helper-debug.log log file.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364117
--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Patches were not touched. All were applied properly
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364117
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Patching or scratch build for perl-Socket-2.022 failed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
jplesnik set the monitor flag of perl-Socket to nobuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364117
Bug ID: 1364117
Summary: perl-Socket-2.023 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Socket
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
Missing expected images:
Workstation live i386
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Workstation live x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 36/81 (x86_64), 5/16 (i386)
ID: 27338 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default
xavierb changed xavierb's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Crypt-SMIME (f25)
to 'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Crypt-SMIME/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
xavierb changed xavierb's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Crypt-SMIME
(master) to 'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Crypt-SMIME/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
xavierb changed xavierb's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Crypt-SMIME (f25)
to 'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Crypt-SMIME/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
xavierb changed xavierb's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Crypt-SMIME (epel7)
to 'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Crypt-SMIME/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
xavierb changed xavierb's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Crypt-SMIME (f24)
to 'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Crypt-SMIME/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
xavierb changed xavierb's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Crypt-SMIME (el6)
to 'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Crypt-SMIME/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
xavierb changed xavierb's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Crypt-SMIME (f23)
to 'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Crypt-SMIME/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
xavierb changed xavierb's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Crypt-SMIME (f23)
to 'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Crypt-SMIME/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
xavierb changed xavierb's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Crypt-SMIME (el5)
to 'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Crypt-SMIME/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
xavierb changed xavierb's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Crypt-SMIME (el5)
to 'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Crypt-SMIME/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
xavierb changed xavierb's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Crypt-SMIME (el6)
to 'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Crypt-SMIME/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
xavierb changed xavierb's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Crypt-SMIME (f24)
to 'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Crypt-SMIME/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
xavierb changed xavierb's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Crypt-SMIME
(master) to 'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Crypt-SMIME/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
xavierb changed xavierb's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Crypt-SMIME
(epel7) to 'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Crypt-SMIME/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Missing expected images:
Workstation live i386
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Kde raw-xz armhfp
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Workstation live x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 32/82 (x86_64), 5/16 (i386)
ID: 27240 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default
perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.22()(64bit)
perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1)
On i386:
perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.i686 requires
perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.22()(64bit)
perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1)
On i386:
perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.i686 requires
rkolathu wrote:
> I have been working on the Bodhi web UI redesign project and would
> require your participation to complete the survey given in this email.
None of the offered choices match my actual thoughts about the displayed
user interface parts. Thus it's impossible for me to give useful
From 1f702d09fc39b497cb58bb264b7b7848889ebdc9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 09:27:37 +0100
Subject: Avoid relying on . being in @INC (CPAN RT#116566)
---
Class-C3-XS-0.13-rt116566.patch | 71 +
From 1f702d09fc39b497cb58bb264b7b7848889ebdc9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 09:27:37 +0100
Subject: Avoid relying on . being in @INC (CPAN RT#116566)
---
Class-C3-XS-0.13-rt116566.patch | 71 +
I've just orphaned pykka (https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package
/rpms/pykka/) as I'm no longer using it.
Jonathan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 08/03/2016 09:57 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 05:02:56 +0100,
Sérgio Basto wrote:
Hi,
From list of koji builds [1] rawhide and F25 uses pre 4.8. My question
is kernel-4.7.0-2 doesn't land on F24 and F23 ? , since kernel 4.6
already have a short live
Il 03/08/2016 17:07, Chris Murphy ha scritto:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 12:43 AM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Mattia Verga wrote:
it seems that the hfsplus-tools package arbitrary renames its executables. This
prevents
Something like this: http://paste.fedoraproject.org/401044/2921051/
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 8:11 AM, Luya Tshimbalanga
wrote:
> I found out embree needed by the latest version of LuxRender is not available
> on the repository meaning getting it available.
> I am not
I found out embree needed by the latest version of LuxRender is not available
on the repository meaning getting it available.
I am not familiar with the cmake scheme so I will need some assistance
building the spec file.
Here is included the spec file:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360425
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.22.2-354.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-6ec2009080
--
You are receiving this mail
95 matches
Mail list logo