[Test-Announce] 2016-09-26 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting # Date: 2016-09-26 # Time: 15:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net Greetings testers! It's meeting time again on Monday! We have some Test Days coming up to check in on, Beta is coming

[Test-Announce] 2016-09-26 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 25 Blocker Review

# F25 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2016-09-26 # Time: 16:00 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net Hi folks! We currently have 2 proposed Beta blockers and 8 proposed Final blockers to review. If you have time this weekend, you can take a look at the proposed or accepted

[Bug 1379025] New: perl-PDF-Reuse-0.37 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379025 Bug ID: 1379025 Summary: perl-PDF-Reuse-0.37 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-PDF-Reuse Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1379025] perl-PDF-Reuse-0.37 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379025 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1204309 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1204309=edit Rebase-helper rebase-helper-debug.log log file.

[Bug 1379025] perl-PDF-Reuse-0.37 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379025 --- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Patches were not touched. All were applied properly -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1379025] perl-PDF-Reuse-0.37 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379025 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Patching or scratch build for perl-PDF-Reuse-0.36 failed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1377907] perl-Mojolicious-7.08 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377907 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1379020] New: perl-HTTP-Tiny-0.068 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379020 Bug ID: 1379020 Summary: perl-HTTP-Tiny-0.068 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-HTTP-Tiny Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

Re: F26 System Wide Change: OpenSSL 1.1.0

On Tue, 2016-09-20 at 11:37 +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote: > Well... we certainly need to port it sooner or later although I > understand that effort will be quite non-trivial. You mean port libp11? That's already working against OpenSSL 1.1, isn't it? We just need to ensure we can ship a version of

Re: HEADS UP: update to podofo-0.9.4

On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 6:05 AM, Sandro Mani wrote: > Hi > > I'll be updating to podofo-0.9.4 in rawhide next weekend. This update > includes a soname bump, and the following packages will need to be rebuilt: > > calibre > fontmatrix > krename > scribus > > I don't have

Re: [important] Need review f25-backgrounds package for beta release

On 23/09/16 12:44 PM, gil wrote: > hi > > Il 23/09/2016 19:49, Luya Tshimbalanga ha scritto: >> Hi team, >> >> Could someone do a review of f25-backgrounds before the beta freeze on >> September 27? >> It is a critical package because it contains the default wallpapers for >> F25 release. >> >>

Re: Intending to retire and/or orphan festival

On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 02:44:31PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > I plan to retire festival before f25 beta unless someone else wants > to take it over. I think you should do it. Updated packages are likely to be so different that they deserve a re-review anyway. -- Matthew Miller

Re: HEADS UP: update to podofo-0.9.4

The rawhide build is now complete. On 18.09.2016 13:05, Sandro Mani wrote: Hi I'll be updating to podofo-0.9.4 in rawhide next weekend. This update includes a soname bump, and the following packages will need to be rebuilt: calibre fontmatrix krename scribus I don't have commit access to

[HEADS UP] Gnome 3.22 update for Fedora 25 is broken!

Hi, after updating to Gnome 3.22 it seems that at least evolution[1] and epiphany[2] are broken but I'm affraid the problem affects any app which deals with html conten. So please unpush that update and fix the problem ASAP. [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378985 [2]

Intending to retire and/or orphan festival

I plan to retire festival before f25 beta unless someone else wants to take it over. It really needs a lot of work to update it to a current version. Also recently outside changes have resulted in it segfaulting (even after a rebuild) and it is currently unusable.

Re: [important] Need review f25-backgrounds package for beta release

hi Il 23/09/2016 19:49, Luya Tshimbalanga ha scritto: Hi team, Could someone do a review of f25-backgrounds before the beta freeze on September 27? It is a critical package because it contains the default wallpapers for F25 release. The link is

Orphaned oflb-riordonfancy-fonts

Hi, I just orphaned oflb-riordonfancy-fonts - it is a FTBFS package I tried to save from retirement a while ago thinking that maintaining a font should not be that hard. However I realized I do not have the time to get to understand why it does not build. Therefore I orphaned it for now and will

[important] Need review f25-backgrounds package for beta release

Hi team, Could someone do a review of f25-backgrounds before the beta freeze on September 27? It is a critical package because it contains the default wallpapers for F25 release. The link is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378971 Thanks in advance. -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic &

[EPEL-devel] Golang 1.7 in el6

Hello, I have updated golang to version go1.7.1 in el6. As there were several outstanding issues with the old version(and it is no longer supported by upstream) and go1.7 brings several improvements(see https://tip.golang.org/doc/go1.7). It is now submitted as update in bodhi(no build-root

spot pushed to perl-Email-Valid (master). "1.201"

From ec3a652e1828a67d952c331ca40efffc3a8d8f1a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom Callaway Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 13:36:57 -0400 Subject: 1.201 --- .gitignore| 1 + perl-Email-Valid.spec | 7 +-- sources | 2 +- 3 files changed, 7

Re: Fedora 25-20160923.n.0 compose check report

On Fri, 2016-09-23 at 15:24 +, Fedora compose checker wrote: > Missing expected images: > > > Xfce raw-xz armhfp > Cloud_base raw-xz i386 > Atomic raw-xz x86_64 > > > Failed openQA tests: 7/98 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm) If anyone's wondering where the nice 'compare to previous

spot uploaded Email-Valid-1.201.tar.gz for perl-Email-Valid

161b0f81fbee4548440e1fd3c234f56e Email-Valid-1.201.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Email-Valid/Email-Valid-1.201.tar.gz/md5/161b0f81fbee4548440e1fd3c234f56e/Email-Valid-1.201.tar.gz ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[Bug 1376269] perl-Perl-Critic-Moose-1.05 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376269 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Perl-Critic-Moose-1.05

Fedora 25-20160923.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Xfce raw-xz armhfp Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 7/98 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 35749 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/35749 ID: 35750 Test:

Re: RFC: URLs for docs and released bits from CI

My reply ended up going only to Martin instead of to the list so I'm re-sending. On Fri, 23 Sep 2016 07:04:37 -0400 (EDT) Martin Krizek wrote: > - Original Message - > > From: "Tim Flink" > > To: qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Sent: Friday,

Re: A tale of systemd and MaxProcs

On 09/22/2016 09:18 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:32:40PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: * IMHO the initial upstream default didn't make sense for Fedora On this specific change, I'm not sure the *updated* default makes sense either. It still is quite constrained. *

Fedora Rawhide-20160923.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Kde live i386 Kde live x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Kde raw-xz armhfp Failed openQA tests: 5/89 (x86_64), 3/16 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 35652 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/35652 ID:

[Bug 1378895] New: 8-bpp TIFF images are broken in the resulting PDF document

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378895 Bug ID: 1378895 Summary: 8-bpp TIFF images are broken in the resulting PDF document Product: Fedora Version: 23 Component: perl-PDF-API2 Assignee:

Broken dependencies: perl-Data-Alias

perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On aarch64: perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.aarch64 requires libperl.so.5.22()(64bit) perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.aarch64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1) On x86_64: perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires

Broken dependencies: perl-Alien-ROOT

perl-Alien-ROOT has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On aarch64: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-1.fc26.noarch requires root-core Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: Python (3) packaging for EPEL 7: hddfancontrol

On 09/23/2016 02:12 AM, Ben Rosser wrote: Hello, I just packaged and built hddfancontrol (https://github.com/desbma/hddfancontrol) for Fedora, which is written in Python 3. I'd like to get this built for EPEL-- the machine that I want to run it on is actually a CentOS 7 box. However, there's a

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 442 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031 python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6 436 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168 rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6 368

Re: duplicate package on fresh install

On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 5:34 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: > Hello, > A user posted some issue on gnutls [0], and it turned out that after a > fresh install of f24 that user had two versions of the library > installed. I have no idea why this can be or whether that should

Re: A tale of systemd and MaxProcs

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:32:40PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> * IMHO the initial upstream default didn't make sense for Fedora > > On this specific change, I'm not sure the *updated* default makes sense >

pkgdb_updater updated: description of perl-Params-ValidationCompiler

pkgdb_updater updated: description of perl-Params-ValidationCompiler https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Params-ValidationCompiler/ ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

pkgdb_updater updated: description of perl-Test2-Plugin-NoWarnings

pkgdb_updater updated: description of perl-Test2-Plugin-NoWarnings https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Test2-Plugin-NoWarnings/ ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[Bug 1378713] [abrt] slic3r: wxTopLevelWindowGTK::RequestUserAttention(): perl killed by SIGSEGV

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378713 --- Comment #14 from Miro Hrončok --- Happened once or every time? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list --

duplicate package on fresh install

Hello,  A user posted some issue on gnutls [0], and it turned out that after a fresh install of f24 that user had two versions of the library installed. I have no idea why this can be or whether that should be expected from the installer/updater. Any insights? regards, Nikos [0].

[389-devel] Re: Please review 48992: Total init may fail if the pushed schema is rejected

Hi Thierry, the description in the commit is now fine, but given that the choice of LDAP_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATION is a bit arbitrary it would be good to have a comment where it is set, explaining why this error code was used. About which error code to choose, if you have to pick one of the errors

Re: Upstream Release Monitoring builds for EL7 instead of Rawhide

I definitely fixed this issue: https://github.com/fedora-infra/the-new-hotness/commit/2eed58c4ea09729f17e8c672196318d7028b0dba On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 15:34:07 -0400 > Avram Lubkin wrote: > >> Seems like

[389-devel] Please review 48992: Total init may fail if the pushed schema is rejected

Thanks Noriko for your review. I updated the patch to give more explanation why the fix is in modify_schema_dse. I pick up LDAP_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATION in replacement of UNWILLING_TO_PERFORM but I have not strong opinion on appropriate value of that returned value. In the logic of that fix, it

[Bug 1378062] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20160920 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378062 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Module-CoreList-5.20160920-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1378713] New: [abrt] slic3r: wxTopLevelWindowGTK:: RequestUserAttention(): perl killed by SIGSEGV

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378713 Bug ID: 1378713 Summary: [abrt] slic3r: wxTopLevelWindowGTK::RequestUserAttention(): perl killed by SIGSEGV Product: Fedora Version: 24 Component:

[Bug 1378062] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20160920 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378062 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Module-CoreList-5.20160920-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See