On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 5:31 PM, Guido Aulisi
wrote:
> Hi,
> I recently posted 2 review requests and a sponsor request for 2 audio
> related packages, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373641
> and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374510 and I am
> seeking for a sponsor.
>
On Tue, 2016-10-18 at 17:08 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> Missing expected images:
>
> Workstation live i386
> Workstation live x86_64
These failed to compose due to libreoffice dependency issues. I see a
libreoffice build completed successfully today, so we'll see how they
go tomorrow.
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 9:49 PM, Peter Robinson
wrote:
> No, it's paused while I've been boot strapping aarch64, it should
> start moving again shortly.
>
Ah ok, thanks.
--Simone
--
You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of
the shore (R. W. Emerson).
http:/
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48978
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48978/0001-Ticket-48978-Fix-logging-format-errors-and-replace-L.patch
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 8:30 PM, Simone Caronni wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've tried to push a couple of new libraries in epel-7, but the update did
> not reach the testing repository in 7 days:
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-e4793acdf5
>
> Is there anything wrong with it?
Hello,
I've tried to push a couple of new libraries in epel-7, but the update did
not reach the testing repository in 7 days:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-e4793acdf5
Is there anything wrong with it? It doesn't seem any different than the
other updates.
Can someone loo
Missing expected images:
Workstation live i386
Workstation live x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 10/92 (x86_64), 3/16 (i386)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20161017.n.0):
ID: 42067 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproje
2016-10-15 14:39 GMT-03:00 Kevin Fenzi :
> On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 17:33:00 +0100
>> If it is true .. maybe can someone help me to understand intention
>> packaging texlive like it is now?
>
> I can try and provide history here. ;)
> Disclaimer: This is just what I remember, it could be wrong.
>
> Tex
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 3/103 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386)
ID: 42159 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso
desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/42159
ID: 42227 Test: x86_64 universal install_iscsi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraprojec
On Tue, 2016-10-18 at 12:30 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote:
> 2016-10-12 10:54 GMT-03:00 Sergio Belkin :
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying to remasterize a Fedora Spin, but keyboard options is not
> > working.
> >
> > I've configured as follows:
> >
> > keyboard --vckeymap=latam --xlayouts='latam'
> >
2016-10-12 10:54 GMT-03:00 Sergio Belkin :
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to remasterize a Fedora Spin, but keyboard options is not
> working.
>
> I've configured as follows:
>
> keyboard --vckeymap=latam --xlayouts='latam'
>
>
> The option " --vckeymap=latam" works fine. But --xlayouts='latam' is
> ignored
OLD: Fedora-25-20161017.n.0
NEW: Fedora-25-20161018.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0.00 B
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size of
OCaml 4.03 has been out for a while.
I'm intending to add it to Fedora Rawhide once a side tag has been
created: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6486
This will require rebuilding every OCaml package, which I normally do
using a script, but probably there will be manual rebuilds necessary
Hi,
I recently posted 2 review requests and a sponsor request for 2 audio
related packages, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373641
and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374510 and I am
seeking for a sponsor.
I also noticed that some audio related packages (lilv, suil, serd,
On 15 October 2016 at 13:21, Gerard Ryan wrote:
>
>
I adopted these guys:
- eclipse-webtools
- uddi4j
- wsil4j
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to de
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Jan Kurik wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>
>>
>> Dne 18.10.2016 v 05:00 jku...@redhat.com napsal(a):
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>>>Modularity WG on 2016-10-18 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC
>>>
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 18.10.2016 v 05:00 jku...@redhat.com napsal(a):
>> Dear all,
>>
>> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>>Modularity WG on 2016-10-18 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC
>>At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net
>>
>> The meeting will
Dne 18.10.2016 v 05:00 jku...@redhat.com napsal(a):
> Dear all,
>
> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>Modularity WG on 2016-10-18 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC
>At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net
>
> The meeting will be about:
> Meeting for the Modularity Working Group.
>
> More i
Dne 17.10.2016 v 17:42 Tim Flink napsal(a):
> On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 11:16:22 +0200
> Pavol Babincak wrote:
>
>> On 10/17/2016 06:46 AM, Tim Flink wrote:
>>> On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 13:50:33 -0600
>>> Tim Flink wrote:
>>>
One of the features for Taskotron that we've been planning since
the
On Tuesday, October 18, 2016 10:01:30 AM CEST Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > I'm not against it, as I'm not going to hack that :) but this is a lot of
> > expensive complexity, when submodules are here clearly for this purpose.
>
> And are you going to hack on submodules? (both as user and to help
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 09:37:45AM +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 5, 2016 11:40:44 AM CEST Tim Flink wrote:
> > I didn't notice that my reply went only to Pavel, resending to devel@
> >
> > On Tue, 04 Oct 2016 10:25:46 +0200
> > Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> >
> > > On Monday, Octo
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If y
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If y
On Wednesday, October 5, 2016 11:40:44 AM CEST Tim Flink wrote:
> I didn't notice that my reply went only to Pavel, resending to devel@
>
> On Tue, 04 Oct 2016 10:25:46 +0200
> Pavel Raiskup wrote:
>
> > On Monday, October 3, 2016 1:50:33 PM CEST Tim Flink wrote:
> > > https://phab.qadevel.cloud
24 matches
Mail list logo