[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2016-11-14 Fedora QA Meeting

Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting again tomorrow. We had to delay the F25 Final release last week, so we'll be mainly on release validation again this week. If you think there is something we need to discuss, please do reply to this mail and we can go ahead and schedule the

[Test-Announce] 2016-11-14 @ 17:00 UTC - Fedora 25 Blocker Review

# F25 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2016-11-14 # Time: 17:00 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net Hi folks! We currently have 2 proposed Final blockers and 4 proposed Final freeze exceptions to review. There are also 6 accepted Final blockers to check in on. If you have

Re: Should we stop stripping static libraries?

On Friday 11 November 2016 12:46 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > We currently call /usr/lib/rpm/brp-strip-static-archive from > %__os_install_post. This removes debugging symbols from static (.a) > libraries. > > Is this really a good idea? Due to this, glibc copies libc.a to > glibc-debuginfo, so

Re: Touchpad data needed - 5 min of effort

Thanks for sending this reminder out, Peter, I meant to do this but completely forgot. Will reply with info from a Thinkpad T450s tomorrow. On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 10:20 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote: > [Disclaimer: sorry if you've seen this one before, I posted it to

Touchpad data needed - 5 min of effort

[Disclaimer: sorry if you've seen this one before, I posted it to desktop@ but I only got one recording. That's not quite enough to call it a dataset, let alone do any analysis on it. Please do consider the minimal effort required on your behalf.] Are you using a touchpad frequently during the

Self Introduction: Ron Olson

Aloha all- I’m Ron Olson, with the nickname tachoknight. I have been using Unix since 1989 and Linux since about 1992, when we somehow got an early version to run on a Gateway2000 machine. I have submitted for review an update to the Nethack RPM to update it from 3.4.3 (where it had been

[Bug 1394592] New: perl-MooseX-App-1.37 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394592 Bug ID: 1394592 Summary: perl-MooseX-App-1.37 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-MooseX-App Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1394519] perl-DateTime-1.40 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394519 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In

pghmcfc pushed to perl-DateTime (perl-DateTime-1.40-1.fc26). "Update to 1.40 (..more)"

From 349a3257ceef8ccae8f056a40ba41afe76459ef5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2016 20:24:16 + Subject: Update to 1.40 - New upstream release 1.40 - Switched from RT to the GitHub issue tracker --- perl-DateTime.spec | 6 +- sources

[Bug 1394519] perl-DateTime-1.40 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394519 --- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- pghmcfc's perl-DateTime-1.40-1.fc26 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=817474 -- You are receiving this mail

pghmcfc pushed to perl-DateTime (master). "Update to 1.40 (..more)"

From 349a3257ceef8ccae8f056a40ba41afe76459ef5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2016 20:24:16 + Subject: Update to 1.40 - New upstream release 1.40 - Switched from RT to the GitHub issue tracker --- perl-DateTime.spec | 6 +- sources

pghmcfc uploaded DateTime-1.40.tar.gz for perl-DateTime

113c8d1dbc9271ce087926494c7e4eb7 DateTime-1.40.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-DateTime/DateTime-1.40.tar.gz/md5/113c8d1dbc9271ce087926494c7e4eb7/DateTime-1.40.tar.gz ___ perl-devel mailing list --

Re: RFC: Change the default hostname for Fedora 26+

On 11/11/16 15:50, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 12:13:48PM -, fred...@rambris.com wrote: I like Fedora- for default hostname. If I don't care to set a hostname it would be an ok hostname for my machine. I would however like if the hostname setting

Re: Fedora on Macs, removing the release criterion

On 11/11/16 14:33, Stephen Gallagher wrote: Just to address this specifically, I am referring to Apple's penchant for stuffing their machines with hardware from vendors that don't play well with open-source (for example, switching to wifi-only devices and shipping Broadcom chipsets with no

Re: RFC (round 2): Change the default hostname for Fedora 26+

On 11/11/16 19:38, Lennart Poettering wrote: I am pretty sure most things should work just fine, at least in the base OS. Sure, some higher level services might be broken still, but I'd suggest to fix that instead of never changing the hostname... Changing the enrolling code to modify the

Re: RFC (round 2): Change the default hostname for Fedora 26+

On 11/11/16 19:23, Stephen Gallagher wrote: I realize that some of this is coming from my old-school sensibilities, but I still remember a time when changing the hostname of a running system caused lots of things to fail, including NFS and sendmail. Well... many times I forget to set

Fedora Rawhide-20161113.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64 Atomic qcow2 x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Kde raw-xz armhfp Failed openQA tests: 61/101 (x86_64), 17/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20161112.n.2): ID: 47963 Test: x86_64

Fedora 25-20161113.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 2/101 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386) New failures (same test did not fail in 25-20161112.n.0): ID: 47749 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/47749 Old failures (same test failed in

No arch broken dependency issue

Hi, I was wondering if any of the RPM guru's know how to fix an issue I'm having. I keep getting this email: >orthorobot has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: >On ppc64le: >orthorobot-1.1-4.fc26.noarch requires love >Please resolve this as soon as possible. This is because it's

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20161113.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20161112.n.1 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20161113.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:22 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 22 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages:0.00

Re: mpg123 buildroot override troubles

On Sun, 13 Nov 2016 08:34:18 -0600, den...@ausil.us wrote: > You have to find the existing buildroot override in bodhi and change it's > expiry date. > That worked: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/overrides/mpg123-1.23.8-3.fc25 Thanks! ___ devel

Broken dependencies: perl-Alien-ROOT

perl-Alien-ROOT has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On aarch64: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-2.fc26.noarch requires root-core On ppc64: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-2.fc26.noarch requires root-core On ppc64le: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-2.fc26.noarch requires root-core

Broken dependencies: perl-Data-Alias

perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.22()(64bit) perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1) On armhfp: perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.armv7hl requires

Re: mpg123 buildroot override troubles

You have to find the existing buildroot override in bodhi and change it's expiry date. Dennis On 13 November 2016 8:27:27 am GMT-06:00, Michael Schwendt wrote: >Hello! > >I'd like to build F25 audacious-plugins with mpg123, but can't because: > >1) There is no active

mpg123 buildroot override troubles

Hello! I'd like to build F25 audacious-plugins with mpg123, but can't because: 1) There is no active buildroot override. 2) I cannot create an own buildroot override, because bodhi doesn't let me. It claims an override exists, but koji list-tagged f25-override disagrees. 3) The bodhi

Fedora 25 compose report: 20161113.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-25-20161112.n.0 NEW: Fedora-25-20161113.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages:0.00 B Size

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Fedora 26 C/C++ Compilation Flags Updates

Dan Horák wrote: > We are going to change the default -mcpu for s390(x) from the current > -mcpu=z9-109 to -mcpu=z10. z10 is the minimum level various projects > require - llvm/clang, OCaml, pypy3, ... Unfortunately we can't go > higher because our community guest VM is still running on a z10

[Bug 1394550] New: perl-XML-XPath-1.40 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394550 Bug ID: 1394550 Summary: perl-XML-XPath-1.40 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-XML-XPath Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

Re: Fedora on Macs, removing the release criterion

On 11/11/16 10:08, Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote: The reason is pretty simple: very few people have a disposable Mac. About 90% of the time, the Mac people want to install Fedora on is their personal laptop. So of course they're not willing to test installing some random pre-Beta nightly

[Bug 1165555] Request to retire perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=116 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Spura --- I plan to retire zeromq2 now next week, see: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/6LNOPHWFIMBMPR62COKIMW7YG2RZFMQT/ -- You are

[Bug 1165555] Request to retire perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=116 Thomas Spura changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |NEW

[Bug 1165554] Request to retire perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1165554 Thomas Spura changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |NEW

Soon retirement of zeromq2 and zeromq3

Hi all, zeromq2 and zeromq3 were additional/compat packages that made it possible to ship multiple versions of zeromq (namely the old versions 2 and 3). These days, they don't get any bugfixes anymore and the version 4 should be used were possible. There should have been enough time to port all

Soon retirement of zeromq2 and zeromq3

Hi all, zeromq2 and zeromq3 were additional/compat packages that made it possible to ship multiple versions of zeromq (namely the old versions 2 and 3). These days, they don't get any bugfixes anymore and the version 4 should be used were possible. There should have been enough time to port all

Fedora Rawhide-20161112.n.2 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64 Atomic qcow2 x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Kde raw-xz armhfp Failed openQA tests: 59/101 (x86_64), 16/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20161112.n.1): ID: 47623 Test: x86_64

[Bug 1392884] perl-Net-FTPSSL-0.35 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392884 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

[Bug 1390400] perl-Moo-2.002005 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390400 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Fedora 26 C/C++ Compilation Flags Updates

On Thu, 10 Nov 2016 11:30:47 +0100 Jan Kurik wrote: > = Proposed System Wide Change: Fedora 26 C/C++ Compilation Flags > Updates = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Fedora26CFlags > > Change owner(s): > * Florian Weimer > > This change updates the default C/C++

Re: Fedora on Macs, removing the release criterion

On 12/11/16 08:13, Kevin Kofler wrote: How is it "at the expense of every other platform we support"? It's not like the fix is going to stop them from working. It is not a catastrophe to ship one week later. I don't use a Mac, I also don't dual-boot, but still I fail to see why this issue

Re: MP3 in Fedora by default?

On 12/11/16 23:47, Jonny Heggheim wrote: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/gstreamer1-plugin-mpg123/ Typo: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/mpg123/ Oh! This makes more sense. Thanks. ___ devel mailing list

eseyman pushed to perl-Net-FTPSSL (master). "Update to 0.35"

From 0169d4c68fae84713fed76908e081ef01ec1d1ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Emmanuel Seyman Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2016 09:41:15 +0100 Subject: Update to 0.35 --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Net-FTPSSL.spec | 5 - sources | 2 +- 3 files changed, 6

Re: MP3 in Fedora by default?

On 12/11/16 20:32, Michael Catanzaro wrote: On Sat, 2016-11-12 at 18:26 +0100, Ms Sanchez wrote: Oh..! Now I see why the new didn't reach me, I'm not in the legal list. So, Fedora 25 will come with MP3 decoders by default, right? That's pretty nice and should be highlighted somewhere... like

eseyman uploaded Net-FTPSSL-0.35.tar.gz for perl-Net-FTPSSL

00c120a06a8a399ce52e5d1f9c7b8f32 Net-FTPSSL-0.35.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Net-FTPSSL/Net-FTPSSL-0.35.tar.gz/md5/00c120a06a8a399ce52e5d1f9c7b8f32/Net-FTPSSL-0.35.tar.gz ___ perl-devel mailing list --

Re: RFC (round 2): Change the default hostname for Fedora 26+

On 12/11/16 20:02, Dennis Gilmore wrote: On Friday, November 11, 2016 11:12:51 AM CST Stephen Gallagher wrote: 3) My original proposal was: change the fallback name to Fedora- by default, while of course retaining the ability to set it manually. I think this is terrible, Just because

eseyman pushed to perl-Moo (master). "Update to 2.002005"

From daaecbcc3207ac5435e14a677c0337c8cba9e594 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Emmanuel Seyman Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2016 09:28:08 +0100 Subject: Update to 2.002005 --- .gitignore| 1 + perl-Moo.spec | 5 - sources | 2 +- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2