Re: trying to install dictd-server and...

On 12/11/2016 08:54 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: I'd instead suggest taking a look at docs: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/25/html-single/SELinux_Users_and_Administrators_Guide/index.html#sect-Security-Enhanced_Linux-Troubleshooting-Fixing_Problems and then filing a selinux-policy bug

Re: Packagers - Flag day 2016 Important changes

Il 12/12/2016 05:20, Chenxiong Qi ha scritto: hi i get: aesh]$ fedpkg build /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pyrpkg/__init__.py:314: DeprecationWarning: BaseException.message has been deprecated as of Python 2.6 for (_, _, ssl_reason) in error.message: You might want to run

Re: trying to install dictd-server and...

On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 23:03:43 +0100 Kevin Kofler wrote: > stevefoley12...@gmail.com wrote: > > Well, I must say, Fedora is not making it easy! I've used Debian > > for a few years and I really expect to install something and have > > it work. > > > > But...there are

Re: Koji update to Kerberos problem

On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 22:41:19 +0100 Michal Schorm wrote: > > You have two accounts? Or you mean you tested with someone elses > > account and got a Password prompt, but not your own? > > I have only one account. > I used someone else's username to prove, I got right

Re: out of space on some builders

On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 14:55:31 +0100 Igor Gnatenko wrote: > On Dec 11, 2016 2:53 PM, "Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk" < > puiterw...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > Looks like there are problems on some builders: > > Then reporting koji errors, it would be great if you could

Re: Packagers - Flag day 2016 Important changes

On 12/12/2016 08:58 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 7:34 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: Greetings. As previously announced, releng has made a number of changes as part of it's 2016 "flag day". All package maintainers will want to make sure they have updated to the

Re: Packagers - Flag day 2016 Important changes

On 12/12/2016 11:22 AM, gil wrote: Il 12/12/2016 04:07, Mike McLean ha scritto: Success here. Possible gotchas, depending on setup: 1) make sure your krb5.conf has: includedir /etc/krb5.conf.d/ 2) if you have any custom koji config, you might need to adjust that. You need the some of the

Re: Packagers - Flag day 2016 Important changes

On Mon, 12 Dec 2016 09:08:56 +0700 "Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich" wrote: > > * koji and the source lookaside were changed to use kerberos > > authentication > > instead of ssl certificates. All maintainers will need to: > > > > kinit your-fas-accountn...@fedoraaproject.org > > > $

Re: Packagers - Flag day 2016 Important changes

On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 8:35 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Sun, 2016-12-11 at 18:34 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > * koji and the source lookaside were changed to use kerberos > > authentication > > instead of ssl certificates. All maintainers will need to: > > > >

Re: Some preliminary Fedora 25 stats — and future release scheduling

1. I've long been a fan of rolling releases; it's only the fear of having to rebuild my workstation / laptop occasionally that keeps me from running Rawhide by default. 2. I don't think it's the release schedule that impacts Fedora's popularity relative to Ubuntu. Ubuntu is popular because

Re: Packagers - Flag day 2016 Important changes

Il 12/12/2016 04:07, Mike McLean ha scritto: Success here. Possible gotchas, depending on setup: 1) make sure your krb5.conf has: includedir /etc/krb5.conf.d/ 2) if you have any custom koji config, you might need to adjust that. You need the some of the updated settings from koji.conf in

Re: Packagers - Flag day 2016 Important changes

Success here. Possible gotchas, depending on setup: 1) make sure your krb5.conf has: includedir /etc/krb5.conf.d/ 2) if you have any custom koji config, you might need to adjust that. You need the some of the updated settings from koji.conf in the latest koji build. On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at

Re: Packagers - Flag day 2016 Important changes

Well. Somehow it works now. 12.12.2016 09:08, Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich пишет: * koji and the source lookaside were changed to use kerberos authentication instead of ssl certificates. All maintainers will need to: kinit your-fas-accountn...@fedoraaproject.org $ kinit kr...@fedoraproject.org

Re: Packagers - Flag day 2016 Important changes

Il 12/12/2016 03:08, Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich ha scritto: * koji and the source lookaside were changed to use kerberos authentication instead of ssl certificates. All maintainers will need to: kinit your-fas-accountn...@fedoraaproject.org $ kinit kr...@fedoraproject.org kinit: Client

Re: Packagers - Flag day 2016 Important changes

hi, i have the same problem regards Il 12/12/2016 03:18, Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich ha scritto: Here is debug info: $ KRB5_TRACE=/dev/stdout kinit kr...@fedoraproject.org [14820] 1481508960.831584: Getting initial credentials for kr...@fedoraproject.org [14820] 1481508960.831767: Sending

Re: Packagers - Flag day 2016 Important changes

Here is debug info: $ KRB5_TRACE=/dev/stdout kinit kr...@fedoraproject.org [14820] 1481508960.831584: Getting initial credentials for kr...@fedoraproject.org [14820] 1481508960.831767: Sending request (196 bytes) to FEDORAPROJECT.org [14820] 1481508960.834886: Resolving hostname

Re: Two more concrete ideas for what a once-yearly+update schedule would look like

On Dec 11, 2016 9:00 PM, "Chris Murphy" wrote: On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 10:22:44PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:

[Test-Announce] 2016-12-12 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting # Date: 2016-12-12 # Time: 16:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net Greetings testers! It's meeting time again tomorrow! Nothing huge on the agenda, but this might be the last time to

Re: Packagers - Flag day 2016 Important changes

* koji and the source lookaside were changed to use kerberos authentication instead of ssl certificates. All maintainers will need to: kinit your-fas-accountn...@fedoraaproject.org $ kinit kr...@fedoraproject.org kinit: Client 'kr...@fedoraproject.org' not found in Kerberos database while

Re: Two more concrete ideas for what a once-yearly+update schedule would look like

On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Matthew Miller > wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 10:22:44PM +, Peter Robinson wrote: >>> repo data). The full list makes up most of the 40Mb downloaded. The

Re: Packagers - Flag day 2016 Important changes

On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 2:33 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Sun, 2016-12-11 at 18:34 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: >> * koji and the source lookaside were changed to use kerberos >> authentication >> instead of ssl certificates. All maintainers will need to: >> >> kinit

Re: Packagers - Flag day 2016 Important changes

On Sun, 2016-12-11 at 18:34 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > * koji and the source lookaside were changed to use kerberos > authentication > instead of ssl certificates. All maintainers will need to: > > kinit your-fas-accountn...@fedoraaproject.org > > to get a valid kerberos TGT and be able to

[Bug 1403521] perl-Test-Timer-0.15 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403521 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added

Re: Packagers - Flag day 2016 Important changes

On Sun, 2016-12-11 at 18:34 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > Additionally, via GSSAPI many browsers allow you to seamlessly login  > to any of our ipsilon using applications simply by clicking on the > login  > button ( bodhi, fedorahosted trac, elections, fedocal, mailman3, etc) This is fantastic,

Re: Packagers - Flag day 2016 Important changes

On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 7:34 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > Greetings. > > As previously announced, releng has made a number of changes as part of > it's 2016 "flag day". > > All package maintainers will want to make sure they have updated to > the > following package versions (some

[Bug 1403621] New: perl-Math-BigInt-1.999805 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403621 Bug ID: 1403621 Summary: perl-Math-BigInt-1.999805 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Math-BigInt Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

Packagers - Flag day 2016 Important changes

Greetings.  As previously announced, releng has made a number of changes as part of it's 2016 "flag day".  All package maintainers will want to make sure they have updated to the  following package versions (some may be in testing as of this email):  python-cccolutils-1.4-1  

Re: Are MP3 files now permitted in Fedora packages?

On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 3:10 PM, wrote: > I would think that they are now allowed as they should work out of the box. > Maybe we need legal to clarify, then update the guidelines. I would think it would also depend that the actual content in the media is redistributable but

Re: Are MP3 files now permitted in Fedora packages?

On 12/11/2016 07:33 AM, Chris Adams wrote: > I would expect if they are provided by upstream, they should be fine. > However, if they are generated during build from some other source, that > won't be acceptable, as MP3 encoding is still not allowed in Fedora. Note also that if you are generating

Re: Two more concrete ideas for what a once-yearly+update schedule would look like

On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 10:22:44PM +, Peter Robinson wrote: >> repo data). The full list makes up most of the 40Mb downloaded. The >> dnf developers seem to think that everyone has lots of data/bandwidth >> and

Re: trying to install dictd-server and...

stevefoley12...@gmail.com wrote: > Well, I must say, Fedora is not making it easy! I've used Debian for a few > years and I really expect to install something and have it work. > > But...there are selinux issues, I guess. I really don't know about > selinux...now I'm learning a lot. There is a

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2016-12-09)

Chris Adams wrote: > I read email in mutt, a terminal-based mail client. I have it > configured so I can open up URLs in lynx easily. Recently though, I > can't open the agenda or logs from meetings in lynx. I don't know when > this happened (I don't try to pull them up all the time, just when

Re: Two more concrete ideas for what a once-yearly+update schedule would look like

On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 10:58 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 10:22:44PM +, Peter Robinson wrote: >> repo data). The full list makes up most of the 40Mb downloaded. The >> dnf developers seem to think that everyone has lots of data/bandwidth >> and

Re: HEADS UP: eigen-3.3.0 update

Sandro Mani wrote: > Actually, given the dependency on eigen headers in the public avogadro > headers, I suppose the only way forward is indeed to revive eigen2. Hmmm, what will that do to Kalzium, which currently uses both Avogadro and Eigen3? I think that will have to move back to Eigen2 as

Re: Koji update to Kerberos problem

> You have two accounts? Or you mean you tested with someone elses > account and got a Password prompt, but not your own? I have only one account. I used someone else's username to prove, I got right configuration. > In any case, you need to login to fas > (

Re: Koji update to Kerberos problem

On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 18:13:17 +0100 Michal Schorm wrote: > Hi, i need to continue using Koji even tommorow. > I am using Kerberos already, so I just add Fedora config file. > > I believe, everything is set properly, because there exist more than > one login, that let me to

Koji update to Kerberos problem

Hi, i need to continue using Koji even tommorow. I am using Kerberos already, so I just add Fedora config file. I believe, everything is set properly, because there exist more than one login, that let me to the phase of writing down the password. # kinit hho...@fedoraproject.org Password for

[Bug 1403588] /usr/share/bugzilla/assets/.htaccess: Require not allowed here

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403588 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[EPEL-devel] Fwd: Interested in joining EPEL SIG

Hello, I am interested in joining the EPEL SIG. If I am in the wrong place, please inform me. To be more specific, I am interested in helping in any of the following areas: 1. Identify any packages in need of ownership. 2. Volunteer to own orphaned packages and/or take on packages that ought to

Re: HEADS UP: shapelib soname bump

On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 12/11/2016 01:44 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > gpsbabel-0:1.5.3-4.fc24 >> >> + perl xmldoc/makedoc >> /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.rKbJFb: line 62: perl: command not found >> Can you file FTBFS bug? > > Why didn't you try a

Re: future of official optical media support in Fedora

On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 7:48 AM, Ms Sanchez wrote: > > > On 07/12/16 15:05, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 02:05:20PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > It's still a good test to do. For example, Server and netinst ISO > images are used a lot for VMs, but not

Re: HEADS UP: shapelib soname bump

On 12/11/2016 01:44 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: gpsbabel-0:1.5.3-4.fc24 + perl xmldoc/makedoc /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.rKbJFb: line 62: perl: command not found Can you file FTBFS bug? Why didn't you try a scratch-build in advance to a introducing broken builds into git? Anyway, I (gpsbabel maintainer)

Review Swap

Hi all, As Besser82 is still missing in action, could somebody with MPI experience finish this review: I will take another review in exchange. Thanks, Christoph -- Christoph Junghans Web: http://www.compphys.de

[Bug 1403588] New: /usr/share/bugzilla/assets/.htaccess: Require not allowed here

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403588 Bug ID: 1403588 Summary: /usr/share/bugzilla/assets/.htaccess: Require not allowed here Product: Fedora Version: 25 Component: bugzilla Assignee:

[EPEL-devel] Orphaned Packages in epel5 (2016-12-11)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

[EPEL-devel] Orphaned Packages in epel7 (2016-12-11)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

[EPEL-devel] Orphaned Packages in epel6 (2016-12-11)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2016-12-11)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

[Bug 1403559] perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime-1.70 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403559 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In

pghmcfc pushed to perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime (perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime-1.70-1.fc26). "Update to 1.70 (..more)"

From 61510495ef705272bf680aa504b101e5f0b39523 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2016 16:03:05 + Subject: Update to 1.70 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit - New upstream release 1.70 - The

pghmcfc pushed to perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime (master). "Update to 1.70 (..more)"

From 61510495ef705272bf680aa504b101e5f0b39523 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2016 16:03:05 + Subject: Update to 1.70 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit - New upstream release 1.70 - The

pghmcfc uploaded DateTime-Format-Strptime-1.70.tar.gz for perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime

f73adc6d665c9aab46216b30762b9294 DateTime-Format-Strptime-1.70.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime/DateTime-Format-Strptime-1.70.tar.gz/md5/f73adc6d665c9aab46216b30762b9294/DateTime-Format-Strptime-1.70.tar.gz

Fedora Rawhide-20161211.n.0 compose check report

://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/51092#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload: Mount /run/media/test/Fedora-WS-Live-Rawhide-20161211- appeared since previous compose Mount /run/media/test/Fedora-WS-Live-Rawhide-20161210- disappeared since

Re: Are MP3 files now permitted in Fedora packages?

Once upon a time, Till Maas said: > Since Fedora now ships a MP3 decoder, does the Code vs Content section > in the Packaging Guidelines[0] now need a update to allow MP3 file or > are MP3 files still not permitted? I would expect if they are provided by upstream, they

Re: Are MP3 files now permitted in Fedora packages?

I would think that they are now allowed as they should work out of the box. Maybe we need legal to clarify, then update the guidelines. Dennis On 11 December 2016 11:26:38 am GMT+01:00, Till Maas wrote: >Hi, > >Since Fedora now ships a MP3 decoder, does the Code vs

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20161211.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20161210.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20161211.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 75 Downgraded packages: 1 Size of added packages: 161.37 KiB Size of dropped packages

Re: Start packaging/maintaining in Fedora

On Dec 11, 2016 3:46 PM, "Ms Sanchez" wrote: Hello everyone! I want to start packaging and maintaining packages in Fedora, but I'm a bit lost. What should I do first? How can I start maintaining a package? Is there anyone who can guide me a bit, please?

Re: future of official optical media support in Fedora

On 07/12/16 15:05, Matthew Miller wrote: On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 02:05:20PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: It's still a good test to do. For example, Server and netinst ISO images are used a lot for VMs, but not for bare metal. Well, your view - I have been using netinst-ISOs only, in

Start packaging/maintaining in Fedora

Hello everyone! I want to start packaging and maintaining packages in Fedora, but I'm a bit lost. What should I do first? How can I start maintaining a package? Is there anyone who can guide me a bit, please? I know Python and C languages. Thanks in advance! Sylvia

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Test-Vars (perl-Test-Vars-0.012-1.fc26). "Update to 0.012 (..more)"

From d107a6db551f4b2180828ad7ec5f2c8e65996410 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2016 14:37:44 + Subject: Update to 0.012 - New upstream release 0.012 - On Perl 5.22+, variables used in a substitution operator ($foo =~ s/foo/bar/) would be

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Test-Vars (master). "Update to 0.012 (..more)"

From d107a6db551f4b2180828ad7ec5f2c8e65996410 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2016 14:37:44 + Subject: Update to 0.012 - New upstream release 0.012 - On Perl 5.22+, variables used in a substitution operator ($foo =~ s/foo/bar/) would be

pghmcfc uploaded Test-Vars-0.012.tar.gz for perl-Test-Vars

4b63c48f52c8cdff8b2c0e1af8b146d2 Test-Vars-0.012.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Test-Vars/Test-Vars-0.012.tar.gz/md5/4b63c48f52c8cdff8b2c0e1af8b146d2/Test-Vars-0.012.tar.gz ___ perl-devel mailing list --

Broken dependencies: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2

perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2 has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2-1.09-9.fc25.x86_64 requires libzmq.so.1()(64bit) On armhfp: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2-1.09-9.fc25.armv7hl requires libzmq.so.1 On ppc64le: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2-1.09-9.fc25.ppc64le requires

Broken dependencies: perl-Data-Alias

perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.22()(64bit) perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1) On armhfp: perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.armv7hl requires

Broken dependencies: perl-ZeroMQ

perl-ZeroMQ has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-ZeroMQ-0.23-13.fc25.x86_64 requires libzmq.so.1()(64bit) On armhfp: perl-ZeroMQ-0.23-13.fc25.armv7hl requires libzmq.so.1 On ppc64le: perl-ZeroMQ-0.23-13.fc25.ppc64le requires libzmq.so.1()(64bit) On

Broken dependencies: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3

perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3 has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3-1.19-5.fc25.x86_64 requires libzmq.so.3()(64bit) On armhfp: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3-1.19-5.fc25.armv7hl requires libzmq.so.3 On ppc64le: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3-1.19-5.fc25.ppc64le requires

Broken dependencies: perl-Alien-ROOT

perl-Alien-ROOT has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On aarch64: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-2.fc26.noarch requires root-core On ppc64: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-2.fc26.noarch requires root-core On ppc64le: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-2.fc26.noarch requires root-core

Re: Call to retire gstreamer-0.10

I've got a radiotray package which includes patches from a pending pull request to use gstreamer-1 instead of gstreamer: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/heikoada/xfce4-addons/package/radiotray/ Maybe someone wants to grab it and update radiotray to use gstreamer-1 Am 11.12.2016 um 14:43

Re: out of space on some builders

Il 11/12/2016 14:54, gil ha scritto: Il 11/12/2016 13:57, Igor Gnatenko ha scritto: Looks like there are problems on some builders: BuildrootError: could not init mock buildroot, mock exited with status 1; see build.log for more information And there is no build.log. Hi, the only error

Re: out of space on some builders

On Dec 11, 2016 2:53 PM, "Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk" < puiterw...@redhat.com> wrote: > Looks like there are problems on some builders: Then reporting koji errors, it would be great if you could attach the task link so that we can check.

Re: out of space on some builders

Il 11/12/2016 13:57, Igor Gnatenko ha scritto: Looks like there are problems on some builders: BuildrootError: could not init mock buildroot, mock exited with status 1; see build.log for more information And there is no build.log. Hi, the only error reported concerns libuser[1] " invalid

Re: out of space on some builders

> Looks like there are problems on some builders: Then reporting koji errors, it would be great if you could attach the task link so that we can check. > > BuildrootError: could not init mock buildroot, mock exited with status > 1; see build.log for more information > > And there is no

Re: Call to retire gstreamer-0.10

I have checked the git history of exile upstream and did not seem gstreamer1 related work :( El 7/12/2016 10:47 p. m., "Michael Cronenworth" escribió: On 12/07/2016 05:07 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > gstreamermm-1.4.3-1.fc25 looks like already use gstreamer1 >

[Bug 1401740] perl-Text-Reflow-1.17 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401740 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

Re: Call to retire gstreamer-0.10

On 10 Dec 2016 1:45 p.m., "Ralf Corsepius" wrote: On 12/10/2016 02:16 PM, Peter Oliver wrote: > On 9 Dec 2016 5:02 a.m., "Kevin Kofler" > wrote: > > Retiring such a library > is a very long process and not

Orphaning uispec4j

Hi, upstream of uispec4j is dormant [1] since over a year, homepage is down [2]. I don't use this package and builds fail randomly on koschei [3]. R. [1] https://github.com/UISpec4J/UISpec4J/commits/master [2] https://github.com/UISpec4J/UISpec4J/issues/25 [3]

out of space on some builders

Looks like there are problems on some builders: BuildrootError: could not init mock buildroot, mock exited with status 1; see build.log for more information And there is no build.log. -- -Igor Gnatenko ___ devel mailing list --

Re: [HEADS UP] gpgme-1.8.0 comes in Rawhide

On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 7:30 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: >> There is also C++ bindings, but I didn't package it. Do you want me to do it? > > > If you could, I think it'd be appreciated if the C++

Re: HEADS UP: shapelib soname bump

On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: > > > On 11.12.2016 12:54, Igor Gnatenko wrote: >> >> On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Sandro Mani >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi >>> >>> I'm preparing the shapelib-1.4.0 update, which bumped the soname. There

Re: HEADS UP: shapelib soname bump

On 11.12.2016 12:54, Igor Gnatenko wrote: On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Sandro Mani wrote: Hi I'm preparing the shapelib-1.4.0 update, which bumped the soname. There are no API changes, it was just to synchronize with the debian soname. Dependent packages are:

[Bug 1403447] perl-App-cpm-0.293 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403447 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1403559] New: perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime-1.70 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403559 Bug ID: 1403559 Summary: perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime-1.70 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: HEADS UP: shapelib soname bump

On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Sandro Mani wrote: > Hi > > I'm preparing the shapelib-1.4.0 update, which bumped the soname. There are > no API changes, it was just to synchronize with the debian soname. Dependent > packages are: > > gpsbabel-0:1.5.3-4.fc24 >

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 643 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 405 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7 124

[Bug 1297077] RFE: Perl6 for EPEL

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297077 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1297077] RFE: Perl6 for EPEL

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297077 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- moarvm-0.2016.11-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1297077] RFE: Perl6 for EPEL

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297077 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- nqp-0.0.2016.11-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 521 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031 python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6 515 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168 rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6 447

Re: HEADS UP: eigen-3.3.0 update

Actually, given the dependency on eigen headers in the public avogadro headers, I suppose the only way forward is indeed to revive eigen2. Anyone care to swap review with https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403554? Thanks Sandro ___ devel

HEADS UP: shapelib soname bump

Hi I'm preparing the shapelib-1.4.0 update, which bumped the soname. There are no API changes, it was just to synchronize with the debian soname. Dependent packages are: gpsbabel-0:1.5.3-4.fc24 grads-0:2.0.2-18.fc26 librecad-0:2.1.0-1.fc25 marble-widget-qt5-1:16.08.3-1.fc26

Re: Missing heads up for gmsh SONAME bump

On 11.12.2016 11:27, Igor Gnatenko wrote: Looks like there was no announcement nor rebuild of dependent packages. getdp has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: getdp-2.10.0-2.fc26.x86_64 requires libGmsh.so.2.14()(64bit) On armhfp: getdp-2.10.0-2.fc26.armv7hl

Missing heads up for gmsh SONAME bump

Looks like there was no announcement nor rebuild of dependent packages. getdp has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: getdp-2.10.0-2.fc26.x86_64 requires libGmsh.so.2.14()(64bit) On armhfp: getdp-2.10.0-2.fc26.armv7hl requires libGmsh.so.2.14 On ppc64le:

Are MP3 files now permitted in Fedora packages?

Hi, Since Fedora now ships a MP3 decoder, does the Code vs Content section in the Packaging Guidelines[0] now need a update to allow MP3 file or are MP3 files still not permitted? Kind regards Till [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Code_Vs_Content

[Bug 1403404] perl-Moo-2.003000 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403404 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

[Bug 1402618] perl-Net-IDN-Encode-2.303 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1402618 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

[Bug 1403547] perl-MooseX-Types-0.48 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403547 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

eseyman pushed to perl-Moo (master). "Update to 2.003000"

From cbc209c06b36267dee856a41eeae5b29a90a0cdb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Emmanuel Seyman Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2016 11:15:05 +0100 Subject: Update to 2.003000 --- .gitignore| 1 + perl-Moo.spec | 7 ++- sources | 2 +- 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2

eseyman uploaded Moo-2.003000.tar.gz for perl-Moo

db0f5bdca7c3935211ce150bd411cc4c Moo-2.003000.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Moo/Moo-2.003000.tar.gz/md5/db0f5bdca7c3935211ce150bd411cc4c/Moo-2.003000.tar.gz ___ perl-devel mailing list --

eseyman pushed to perl-MooseX-Types (master). "Update to 0.48"

From ac39a9e9a49625554087ff6fdda0a123e63d35a7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Emmanuel Seyman Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2016 10:58:17 +0100 Subject: Update to 0.48 --- perl-MooseX-Types.spec | 9 ++--- sources| 2 +- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4

eseyman uploaded MooseX-Types-0.48.tar.gz for perl-MooseX-Types

c7317f391cb6dad6f93964cbc79ed600 MooseX-Types-0.48.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-MooseX-Types/MooseX-Types-0.48.tar.gz/md5/c7317f391cb6dad6f93964cbc79ed600/MooseX-Types-0.48.tar.gz ___ perl-devel mailing list --

  1   2   >