On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 08:06:14 +0100
Mattia Verga wrote:
> In the latest version of RawTherapee, developers suggest the use of
> -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS="-std=c++11".
>
> I've tried to modify the .spec file with
> -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS -std=c++11" [1], but koji still use
> "-std=c++11 -st
In the latest version of RawTherapee, developers suggest the use of
-DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS="-std=c++11".
I've tried to modify the .spec file with
-DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS -std=c++11" [1], but koji still use
"-std=c++11 -std=gnu++11" [2] and the latter wins (I think).
How can I override t
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Modularity WG on 2017-01-24 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC
At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
Meeting for the Modularity Working Group.
More information available at: [Modularity Working Group wiki
page](https://
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 07:36:22PM +0100, Mattia Verga wrote:
> I need to get lazarus upgraded to 1.6.2, but the maintainer does not
> respond (as usual, this is not the first time I complain about this
> maintainer to not respond) [1]
>
> I can take care of the upgrade, if some provenpackager can
Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> This is a reminder that the webkitgtk and webkitgtk3 packages will be
> retired from rawhide shortly after F26 is branched from rawhide.
There are still several high-profile applications depending on those
libraries, including Gnucash. I don't see how it is practical at
I've had some luck using direct email...
lazarus-ow...@fedoraproject.org
Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Planned Outage: Server reboots / Firmware updates - 2017-01-25 21:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2017-01-25 21:00 UTC, which will
last approximately 4 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run:
date -d '2017-
Hello,
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 1:10 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> On 2017-01-14 06:45, Neal Gompa wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 7:10 AM, Pavel Raiskup
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Friday, January 13, 2017 1:18:34 PM CET Neal Gompa wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Pavel Raiskup
On 2017-01-14 06:45, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 7:10 AM, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
On Friday, January 13, 2017 1:18:34 PM CET Neal Gompa wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
On Friday, January 13, 2017 5:54:41 PM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
Doh I missed this.
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017, at 02:03 PM, Tom Hughes wrote:
> How about you just explain here what it is you want rather than making
> everybody go and read some bug?
OK, here's a copy of the text:
rpm-ostree is a new model for rpm packages on using ostree[0]. In order to
implement atomic upgrades w
On 23/01/17 18:53, Colin Walters wrote:
rpm-ostree is the underlying hybrid image/package system for the Fedora Atomic
Host edition.
The layering functionality however requires some potential changes
in your packages.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1415451
is a recent bug that sh
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 6:17 PM, Theodore Papadopoulo
wrote:
> Then if there is a agreement, I'll need some advice on how to proceed
> next...
That depends on whether you're already a member of the packagers group.
If you are, go here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/New_package_process_for_existi
Hi,
rpm-ostree is the underlying hybrid image/package system for the Fedora Atomic
Host edition.
The layering functionality however requires some potential changes
in your packages.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1415451
is a recent bug that shows one example. You can find more in
I need to get lazarus upgraded to 1.6.2, but the maintainer does not
respond (as usual, this is not the first time I complain about this
maintainer to not respond) [1]
I can take care of the upgrade, if some provenpackager can give me
commit access to lazarus (I already tested in Copr that it
On Mon, 2017-01-23 at 11:10 -0500, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> praiskup wrote:
>
> > [...]
> > Cool. Let's provide 'pkgconf' so we can be also three, too! But
> > at the
> > same time please consider not dropping 'pkgconfig' for no reason.
>
> ... and also let's make sure that the new package doe
On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 11:10:59 -0500
f...@redhat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler) wrote:
> praiskup wrote:
>
> > [...]
> > Cool. Let's provide 'pkgconf' so we can be also three, too! But
> > at the same time please consider not dropping 'pkgconfig' for no
> > reason.
>
> ... and also let's make sure tha
On 01/23/2017 04:51 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> It might feel like I'm splitting hairs, but please bear with me.
No, no it's me that have not understood your previous request. I had not
realized how much the guidelines might have changed these last years,
and I learnt a lot (even though I mi
praiskup wrote:
> [...]
> Cool. Let's provide 'pkgconf' so we can be also three, too! But at the
> same time please consider not dropping 'pkgconfig' for no reason.
... and also let's make sure that the new package does not break builds.
For one of ours, the .spec file contained:
BuildRequire
It might feel like I'm splitting hairs, but please bear with me.
Modify your changelog heading to one of the following formats
* Sun Jan 22 2017 Theodore Papadopoulo - 4.3.1-1
* Sun Jan 22 2017 Theodore Papadopoulo - 4.3.1-1
( http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Changelogs )
and
Start Date: 2017-01-16 10:08:02.518794
End Date: 2017-01-23 10:08:02.518794
Remi Collet : 14
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1414843
php-react-http-client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1414826
php-react-event-loop
https://bugzilla.redhat
Change in package status over the last 168 hours
21 packages were orphaned
-
amarok [el6, epel7] was orphaned by kevin
Media player
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/amarok
apache-log4j-extras [master, f
Hi,
This is a reminder that the webkitgtk and webkitgtk3 packages will be
retired from rawhide shortly after F26 is branched from rawhide. This
is due to numerous security issues affecting those packages (I just
counted 204 CVEs), many of which could allow remote code execution.
Bugs have already
Hi,
On 23-01-17 11:35, Martin Stransky wrote:
On 01/21/2017 04:33 PM, Christian Dersch wrote:
On 01/21/2017 04:15 PM, Kai Engert wrote:
I've disabled autokarma.
Thanks :)
The current Firefox 50.x will go unsupported on Tuesday, replaced by
Firefox 51.
Usually new important security fixes
On ma, 23 tammi 2017, Martin Stransky wrote:
On 01/21/2017 04:33 PM, Christian Dersch wrote:
On 01/21/2017 04:15 PM, Kai Engert wrote:
I've disabled autokarma.
Thanks :)
The current Firefox 50.x will go unsupported on Tuesday, replaced by
Firefox 51.
Usually new important security fixes ar
On 01/23/2017 11:35 AM, Martin Stransky wrote:
We should not break FreeIPA critically with that update (crashes on
start or so) for sure. But don't expect rock solid experience from
Fedora - there are RHEL/CentOS or other enterprise distros for that.
Fedora is focused mainly on new feature
On 01/21/2017 04:33 PM, Christian Dersch wrote:
On 01/21/2017 04:15 PM, Kai Engert wrote:
I've disabled autokarma.
Thanks :)
The current Firefox 50.x will go unsupported on Tuesday, replaced by
Firefox 51.
Usually new important security fixes are contained in the new Firefox
update.
Unless
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 8:30 AM, Dave Young wrote:
> On 01/19/17 at 10:24pm, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> ok. After a bunch of debugging and digging today it sure looks like the
>> underlying problem was squid operating in smp mode.
>>
>> We switched the squid servers back to non smp mode around 00:00 an
On 01/22/2017 08:11 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> Almost there, still some light reading ahead:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Changelogs
>
> You need to amend your changelog entry heading to match one of the
> styles mentioned there, the most common being
>
> * Sun Jan
On 01/19/17 at 10:24pm, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> ok. After a bunch of debugging and digging today it sure looks like the
> underlying problem was squid operating in smp mode.
>
> We switched the squid servers back to non smp mode around 00:00 and I've
> not seen any of these failures since then.
>
29 matches
Mail list logo
