[Bug 1424736] New: perl-Digest-CRC-0.22.1 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1424736 Bug ID: 1424736 Summary: perl-Digest-CRC-0.22.1 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Digest-CRC Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

Re: Orphaning ptpd

Hi, Thanks for that. Assigned it over you. When you are OK with things feel free to remove me from the admins. Enjoy Regards, Jon On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 at 22:09 Peter Robinson wrote: > On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Jon Kent wrote: > > Hi, > > >

Re: Orphaning ptpd

On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Jon Kent wrote: > Hi, > > I'm afraid I'm going to have to orphan the ptpd package, as I no longer have > the means to test it. I can take that, feel free to assign it to me (FAS pbrobinson) Peter

Re: GRIPE: A package is not FTBFS if the dependencies can't be installed

On 17/02/17 13:21 -0500, Randy Barlow wrote: On Fri, 2017-02-17 at 05:08 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: Filing bugs for transitive FTBFS during a mass rebuild isn't particularly helpful as it is done now. I think it is helpful, because even if it is not the fault of the package

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 712 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 475 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7 193

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 5 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing: Age URL 832 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3849 sblim-sfcb-1.3.8-2.el5 475 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-edbea40516 mcollective-2.8.4-1.el5 446

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 591 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031 python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6 585 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168 rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6 475

[Bug 1424664] fusioninventory-agent-2.3.19 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1424664 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- fusioninventory-agent-2.3.19-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-ca591f4791 -- You are receiving

[Bug 1424664] fusioninventory-agent-2.3.19 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1424664 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- fusioninventory-agent-2.3.19-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-46d4741bf7 -- You are

[Bug 1424664] fusioninventory-agent-2.3.19 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1424664 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- fusioninventory-agent-2.3.19-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-42d50fef08 -- You are receiving

trasher pushed to fusioninventory-agent (epel7). "Last upstream release"

From 60e78fb4caa685d57557bb2079e3a29d30f074c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Johan Cwiklinski Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2017 18:50:48 +0100 Subject: Last upstream release --- .gitignore| 1 + fusioninventory-agent-useless-module-cleaning | 34

trasher pushed to fusioninventory-agent (f24). "Last upstream release"

From 153a978c521516034b049ae2c101298a2a142b99 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Johan Cwiklinski Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2017 18:50:48 +0100 Subject: Last upstream release --- .gitignore| 1 + fusioninventory-agent-useless-module-cleaning | 34

trasher pushed to fusioninventory-agent (f25). "Last upstream release"

From 5c407c9ffdca89965ff166230050c508093fadd4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Johan Cwiklinski Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2017 18:50:48 +0100 Subject: Last upstream release --- .gitignore| 1 + fusioninventory-agent-useless-module-cleaning | 34

trasher uploaded FusionInventory-Agent-2.3.19.tar.gz for fusioninventory-agent

438b2df00d82ae272106ce5f3bb5006afe58e67651f566e7d1b3c1f4a508f0f523dca7f01dfad73f845b537de7c3a51fdaf09a9d098a955cfce331b2f8d2aaa1 FusionInventory-Agent-2.3.19.tar.gz

trasher pushed to fusioninventory-agent (master). "Last upstream release"

From 8f557ada2f3ebe37384d3348de1ef93aca28cc3f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Johan Cwiklinski Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2017 18:50:48 +0100 Subject: Last upstream release --- .gitignore| 1 + fusioninventory-agent-useless-module-cleaning | 34

pghmcfc uploaded Path-Tiny-0.104.tar.gz for perl-Path-Tiny

6574e48645ebb4f61d45c1365e8b63cfaac6423394ba08363cfd62d3d98d163bd333d997bf5f7fd0e37ff94fcb3a3e19871eb7499b295399f048fd6a4bd3c78c Path-Tiny-0.104.tar.gz

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Path-Tiny (master). "Update to 0.104 (..more)"

From 82be5f2e5f376511006e2bd7b97ea39a18ac383e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2017 16:40:35 + Subject: Update to 0.104 - New upstream release 0.104 - The 'absolute' method now always returns an absolute path, even if a user provided a

[Bug 1424664] fusioninventory-agent-2.3.19 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1424664 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- trasher's fusioninventory-agent-2.3.19-1.fc26 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=860139 -- You are receiving

Re: Emails about new packages

On Fri, 17 Feb 2017 10:34:31 +0100 Mathieu Bridon wrote: > On Thu, 2017-02-16 at 22:48 +, Jeremy Cline wrote: > > On 02/16/2017 09:47 PM, Steve Grubb wrote: > > > The 3.2.1 version is in koji, why was this email sent to bother > > > me? At some time in the past, I

Re: Is there something wrong with the Koji builders?

On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:30:08 +0800 Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote: > A scratch build failed for me, > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17934589 > > This was only a couple of minutes ago. But your build failure wasn't anything to do with this threads build

Re: Is there something wrong with the Koji builders?

A scratch build failed for me, https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17934589 This was only a couple of minutes ago. On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 5:15 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 8:30 AM, Dave Young wrote: > > On

Orphaning ptpd

Hi, I'm afraid I'm going to have to orphan the ptpd package, as I no longer have the means to test it. Regards Jon ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora 26 Mass Rebuild - gnutls, µhttpd users

>> > >> systemd failed to rebuild. There were a couple of issues, but it's the >> > >> last one that's interesting. gnutls and µhttpd dependencies are not >> > >> detected properly: >> > >> >> > >> $ rpm -q gnutls-devel >> > >> gnutls-devel-3.5.9-1.fc26.x86_64 >> > >> $ "/usr/bin/pkg-config"