SSIA, per release notes on http://xdelta.org/
Pavel
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
From b8e6973736e94578b6d903385f55634b14ed1fc0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Ralf=20Cors=C3=A9pius?=
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 07:10:35 +0100
Subject: Cleanup merger.
---
perl-Plack.spec | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/perl-Plack.spec
From 6b8b72238202ceeaa57f38adc4c502a5d4e6c785 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 04:54:12 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_26_Mass_Rebuild
---
perl-Plack.spec | 5 -
1 file changed, 4
From bd7ec8a24a951903597adea99858096f7241395d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Ralf=20Cors=C3=A9pius?=
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 07:07:38 +0100
Subject: Update to 1.0043. Modernize spec.
---
.gitignore | 2 +-
perl-Plack.spec | 15 +--
sources
On 02/23/2017 02:23 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
On Thursday, 23 February 2017 at 00:08, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2017-02-22 at 22:53 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
Dear Fedora developers,
there have been a number of examples where an update in a stable branch
From bd7ec8a24a951903597adea99858096f7241395d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Ralf=20Cors=C3=A9pius?=
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 07:07:38 +0100
Subject: Update to 1.0043. Modernize spec.
---
.gitignore | 2 +-
perl-Plack.spec | 15 +--
sources
b77f7f1a2a3d2b24f5473af55448ac72d287f34671c9300dc94d5d315aaac9040ec98d498319cfb3877e1cda53f9850ff4548dc46702d722491ad7034d439104
Plack-1.0043.tar.gz
From 934181dfc05956f06b2f8d6231c90d3e44a30083 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Ralf=20Cors=C3=A9pius?=
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 06:26:04 +0100
Subject: Update to 1.15. Modernize spec.
---
.gitignore| 2 +-
perl-Test-Script.spec | 18
From ba97d10c5ba4dba7fd855fe0052528129b504b3e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 05:35:56 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_26_Mass_Rebuild
---
perl-Test-Script.spec | 5 -
1 file
From 2653e51a5a1ab50d20aece746e291feed3aed9f8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Ralf=20Cors=C3=A9pius?=
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 06:30:08 +0100
Subject: Cleanup merger.
---
perl-Test-Script.spec | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git
From 337e23a107cb663f93febf8bf7b8c519e9c1a0d4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Ralf=20Cors=C3=A9pius?=
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 06:26:04 +0100
Subject: Update to 1.15. Modernize spec.
---
.gitignore| 2 +-
perl-Test-Script.spec | 18
From 4c250a87ded4dc6b0439c0e8b4ab29ec9845ad29 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Ralf=20Cors=C3=A9pius?=
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 06:30:08 +0100
Subject: Cleanup merger.
---
perl-Test-Script.spec | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git
From 23b25b8f74cd1e272803c5009a77430f75f6edc5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 05:35:56 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_26_Mass_Rebuild
---
perl-Test-Script.spec | 5 -
1 file
From 337e23a107cb663f93febf8bf7b8c519e9c1a0d4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Ralf=20Cors=C3=A9pius?=
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 06:26:04 +0100
Subject: Update to 1.15. Modernize spec.
---
.gitignore| 2 +-
perl-Test-Script.spec | 18
b692558e0b3545643de7b98e88244ee17f963a6df131089763ae0c4d3e641223925f3af458193299f991dacbf7c0ec0598e4c4c26357515aaacce28920a3d4eb
Test-Script-1.15.tar.gz
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 4:14 PM M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
wrote:
> I'm glad someone brought up Tumbleweed because every so often I build a VM
> of Tumbleweed, a VM of Rawhide and a VM of Debian "sid" just to see if I
> could use any of them as a workstation day-to-day. What I'm
Hi Guys,
I have a source file of 6 GB and i try to create an RPM using the spec file.
After creating the RPMS , i installed on the machines. But i am not able to do
the command :
"rpm -ivh LINSEE_xilinx-sdk_v20164-2016.4-1.src.rpm"
It throws an error as below :
[root@euca-10-254-169-180 SRPMS]#
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2017-02-23 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2017-02-23 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PST
2017-02-23 12:00 Thu
US/Eastern EST
2017-02-23
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 8:55 PM Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> It gets a bit tedious to read all the feigned outrage and the continuous
> aggrandisement of the Fedora Code of Conduct; it shouldn't be used as a
> construct to silence debate.
>
Vague accusations are not a debate.
Rahul
From d2881c283db99b4e89f4c52e7900bffdeee4bb72 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Damian Wrobel
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 09:32:58 +0100
Subject: Initial import (#1418310)
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-SOAP-WSDL-HTTP.pm.patch | 12
From d2881c283db99b4e89f4c52e7900bffdeee4bb72 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Damian Wrobel
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 09:32:58 +0100
Subject: Initial import (#1418310)
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-SOAP-WSDL-HTTP.pm.patch | 12
From 3c0c20bc9a40501c94b1f44fa7d66bcc956d3442 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Damian Wrobel
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 10:42:37 +0100
Subject: Yet another rebuild
---
perl-SOAP-WSDL.spec | 5 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
From f9c7491f94fd72593c4e4819a88e09caab13064b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Damian Wrobel
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 15:50:57 +0100
Subject: Rebuilt for missing BR
---
perl-SOAP-WSDL.spec | 5 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
From f9c7491f94fd72593c4e4819a88e09caab13064b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Damian Wrobel
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 15:50:57 +0100
Subject: Rebuilt for missing BR
---
perl-SOAP-WSDL.spec | 5 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
From 3c0c20bc9a40501c94b1f44fa7d66bcc956d3442 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Damian Wrobel
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 10:42:37 +0100
Subject: Yet another rebuild
---
perl-SOAP-WSDL.spec | 5 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
From d2881c283db99b4e89f4c52e7900bffdeee4bb72 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Damian Wrobel
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 09:32:58 +0100
Subject: Initial import (#1418310)
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-SOAP-WSDL-HTTP.pm.patch | 12
From d2881c283db99b4e89f4c52e7900bffdeee4bb72 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Damian Wrobel
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 09:32:58 +0100
Subject: Initial import (#1418310)
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-SOAP-WSDL-HTTP.pm.patch | 12
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
> What you are doing is filing a bug report with no way for anyone else to
> reproduce it or resolve it and refusing to provide more info when asked.
>
> CLOSED CANTFIX
>
Unfortunately, this is an ongoing, extremely
On Thursday, 23 February 2017 at 00:08, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-02-22 at 22:53 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> wrote:
> > Dear Fedora developers,
> > there have been a number of examples where an update in a stable branch
> > brought in new dependencies and in significant
On 23/02/2017 10:35 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 10:10:27 +1000
> Jeff Fearn wrote:
>
>> Is there a facility to redirect URLs to new sites?
>>
>> e.g. I'd like https://fedorahosted.org/publican/ to redirect to
>> https://sourceware.org/publican/
> Yep. Just file
On Wed, 22 Feb 2017 21:19:52 +0100
Sandro Mani wrote:
> On 22.02.2017 19:36, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Wed, 22 Feb 2017 18:52:35 +0100
> > Sandro Mani wrote:
> >
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> Anyone an idea what's going on here?
> >>
> >> $ fedpkg build
> >>
On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 10:10:27 +1000
Jeff Fearn wrote:
> Is there a facility to redirect URLs to new sites?
>
> e.g. I'd like https://fedorahosted.org/publican/ to redirect to
> https://sourceware.org/publican/
Yep. Just file an infrastructure ticket with what you want and we
Is there a facility to redirect URLs to new sites?
e.g. I'd like https://fedorahosted.org/publican/ to redirect to
https://sourceware.org/publican/
Cheers, Jeff.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list --
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 5:00 AM Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 02/21/2017 01:02 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 6:42 PM Ralf Corsepius
> >
> >
> > No. Mr. Williamson's attitude towards the Fedora community makes it
> > impossible to answer
> >
> >
> > Without
On Thu, 2017-02-23 at 00:28 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > By that logic:
> >
> > % egrep -i "Source|URL" * | grep googlecode | wc -l
> > 372
> >
> > The Fedora community is NOT ready for googlecode to be shut down?
> > Things go away, it's part of the great internet cycle
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> By that logic:
>
> % egrep -i "Source|URL" * | grep googlecode | wc -l
> 372
>
> The Fedora community is NOT ready for googlecode to be shut down?
> Things go away, it's part of the great internet cycle of life.
It is well known that Google does not give a darn about its
On Thu, 2017-02-23 at 00:22 +0100, Petr Lautrbach wrote:
>
> I have a fix for it in setools-4.1.0-1.fc26.6 -
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/516358/
>
>
> python3-networkx is only required by setools-gui (/usr/bin/apol) and
> setools-console-analyses (/usr/bin/sedta and
On 02/22/2017 07:14 PM, Petr Lautrbach wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 09:05:14AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Wed, 2017-02-22 at 17:30 +0100, Petr Lautrbach wrote:
>>>
Rawhide has been broken since the 15th, First due to nss, then rdma-
core, followed by policycoreutils and
On Wed, 2017-02-22 at 22:53 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
> Dear Fedora developers,
> there have been a number of examples where an update in a stable branch
> brought in new dependencies and in significant numbers. The most recent
> case was discussed on this list even today:
>
> ... is trying to say. The "gen3" family of Intel GPUs (i915, i945, G33)
> are (to put it politely) garbage. Though they claim to support fragment
> shaders, the instruction limit of those shaders is far less than what
> glamor requires.
These GPUs will stop claiming fragment shaders support
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 09:44:32AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 04:51:47PM -0500, Tom Callaway wrote:
> > I don't have an aarch64 setup, but even
> > if I did, this isn't much to go on.
>
> It's a real shame that none of the cheap 64 bit boards work with
> Fedora. I
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
595 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031
python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6
589 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168
rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6
479
On Qua, 2017-02-22 at 15:20 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-02-22 at 02:42 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> >
> > The default of modesetting is enable glamor
>
> Correct.
>
> >
> > and glamor doesn't run on 32-bit archs
>
> Incorrect. Glamor works fine on 32-bit CPUs, and on 64-bit
Dear Fedora developers,
there have been a number of examples where an update in a stable branch
brought in new dependencies and in significant numbers. The most recent
case was discussed on this list even today:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:06 PM, wrote:
> Thank you, but i can with "fedpkg scratch-build --srpm filename.src.rpm" it
> upload to dksoftw...@pks.fedoraproject.org and here is a build ->
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17995140
Scratch builds are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422860
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Net-SMTPS-0.05-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422859
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Net-POP3S-0.06-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1425425
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1425246
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Module-CoreList-5.20170220-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1425251
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-POE-Component-Pluggable-1.28-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1425238
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.10-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1425252
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-POE-Component-Server-SimpleHTTP-2.24-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora
25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in
this bug
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 22/22 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Wed, 2017-02-22 at 02:42 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> The default of modesetting is enable glamor
Correct.
> and glamor doesn't run on 32-bit archs
Incorrect. Glamor works fine on 32-bit CPUs, and on 64-bit CPUs if you
force them to run 32-bit binaries. What it doesn't work on is some of
On 22.02.2017 19:36, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, 22 Feb 2017 18:52:35 +0100
Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
Anyone an idea what's going on here?
$ fedpkg build
Building mingw-eigen3-3.3.3-1.fc26 for rawhide
Created task: 17994713
Task info:
Am 22. Februar 2017 um 20:27:34 +01:00, hat Kevin Fenzi
geschrieben:
> On Wed, 22 Feb 2017 19:59:09 +0100
> <> wrote:
>
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > I have genarte few hours a SSH Key and i can't connect to my
> > pkgs.fedoraproject.org-account
> >
> > Error
https://github.com/metsma/libdigidocpp/blob/openssl11/xml-security-c-1.7.3_openssl1.1.patch
There is even some opensslv1.1 patch.
Still hoping that someone will take over :)
On E, veebr 20, 2017 at 8:58 , mih...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Hey.
I'm looking volunteers for maintaining
On Wed, 22 Feb 2017 19:59:09 +0100
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have genarte few hours a SSH Key and i can't connect to my
> pkgs.fedoraproject.org-account
>
> Error i become is: Perimiision denied (puplickey).
> ssh -i /path/to/key/id_rsa is
On Wed, 2017-02-22 at 09:36 -0800, Brian C. Lane wrote:
>
> > Because the entire installer environment is loaded into RAM during
> > install, we try quite hard to keep the installer environment *small*.
>
> Not anymore (that was a F17 experiment that didn't go well). We run from
> the boot media
Hi!
I have genarte few hours a SSH Key and i can't connect to my
pkgs.fedoraproject.org-account
Error i become is: Perimiision denied (puplickey).
ssh -i /path/to/key/id_rsa is the same
error.
I have upload the id_rsa.pub key to FAS Account.
--
Dominik
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422860
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422859
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1425252
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1425246
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1425238
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1425251
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
On Wed, 22 Feb 2017 18:52:35 +0100
Sandro Mani wrote:
> Hi
>
> Anyone an idea what's going on here?
>
> $ fedpkg build
> Building mingw-eigen3-3.3.3-1.fc26 for rawhide
> Created task: 17994713
> Task info:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17994713
On Wed, 22 Feb 2017 17:22:05 +0100
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > fedorahosted is getting retired soon (next week!).
> >
> > A quick grep of spec files shows a lot of packages still using
> > fedorahosted.org in their URL and/or Source file lines.
>
>
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
716 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087
dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7
479 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7
197
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 09:05:14AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-02-22 at 17:30 +0100, Petr Lautrbach wrote:
> >
> > > Rawhide has been broken since the 15th, First due to nss, then rdma-
> > > core, followed by policycoreutils and setools breakages.
> >
> > Could you please
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
836 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3849
sblim-sfcb-1.3.8-2.el5
479 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-edbea40516
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el5
450
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421884
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|ctstream-26-1.fc26
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421321
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Text-Levenshtein-Damer
Hi
Anyone an idea what's going on here?
$ fedpkg build
Building mingw-eigen3-3.3.3-1.fc26 for rawhide
Created task: 17994713
Task info: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17994713
Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)...
17994713 build (rawhide,
The 4.10 kernel was released on Sunday, and built into rawhide on
Monday. We plan to rebase Fedora 25 once we feel that 4.10 has
stabilized enough. With history as an indicator, that should be the
4.10.2 stable release, but this is not set in stone. We will be
monitoring closely. Fedora 24 will
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 09:05:14AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-02-22 at 17:30 +0100, Petr Lautrbach wrote:
> >
> > > Rawhide has been broken since the 15th, First due to nss, then rdma-
> > > core, followed by policycoreutils and setools breakages.
> >
> > Could you please
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1420957
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421884
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418125
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421321
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 06:24:21PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> I for one don't actually want Rawhide to be gated because it makes
> things much harder in terms of properly developing new features. We're
> simply not capable of being as good as OpenSUSE in terms of automation
> to be able to pull
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 01:17:02AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >No. Mr. Williamson's attitude towards the Fedora community makes it
> >impossible to answer
> >Without details, a vague discussion adds nothing meaningful to the
> >conversation.
> Yes, and? It's Mr. Williamson's
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 09:28:51AM -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Rex Dieter wrote:
>
> > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >
> >>> Let's not overreact, even though I agree Ralf was out of line.
> >>>
> >>> https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct
> >>>
On Wed, 2017-02-22 at 17:30 +0100, Petr Lautrbach wrote:
>
> > Rawhide has been broken since the 15th, First due to nss, then rdma-
> > core, followed by policycoreutils and setools breakages.
>
> Could you please share more information about policycoreutils and
> setools breakages? I haven't
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64
Atomic qcow2 x86_64
Server dvd i386
Workstation live i386
Kde live x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Server boot i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Workstation live x86_64
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 60/85 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
ID:
On 02/21/2017 03:33 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> El mar, 21-02-2017 a las 01:56 +0100, Ralf Corsepius escribió:
>> On 02/21/2017 01:48 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>> On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 00:14:56 +
>>> "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" wrote:
>>> ...snip...
>>>
Rawhide as it
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 8:12 AM, Przemek Klosowski
wrote:
> On 02/22/2017 09:37 AM, Vratislav Podzimek wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2017-02-21 at 14:29 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> Tested Fedora 24 and Fedora 23, there's no notification with either
> one of those. I have no
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> fedorahosted is getting retired soon (next week!).
>
> A quick grep of spec files shows a lot of packages still using
> fedorahosted.org in their URL and/or Source file lines.
That tells me that the Fedora community is NOT ready for fedorahosted.org
getting shut down and
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> If we move back to having a rawhide/devel/master repo the problem
> becomes "which rawhide" ? if you build something in that branch a year
> ago, what are the chances it will still work?
I have packages built in 2007 that still work (in the CalcForge repository).
Rex Dieter wrote:
> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>
>>> Let's not overreact, even though I agree Ralf was out of line.
>>>
>>> https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct
>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Community_working_group
>>
>> Well, what exactly are you suggesting with those links? The
On 02/22/2017 09:37 AM, Vratislav Podzimek wrote:
On Tue, 2017-02-21 at 14:29 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
Tested Fedora 24 and Fedora 23, there's no notification with either
one of those. I have no idea if this is a VM thing. Or if it's a
regression.
Maybe the notification was depending on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1415159
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
7dce6efb369f897ed95202a04863da7018434f7ce9a3b40d135b846177ca02c76c824e95999db0c7fd991df0f46beb9e905db3b39d06486662cf0e357858d0e5
HTTP-OAI-4.04.tar.gz
From e5a277e374ce13be095bb256be9c49308e015a5e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 15:59:16 +0100
Subject: 4.04 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-HTTP-OAI.spec | 52 +---
sources
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1417720
Bug 1417720 depends on bug 918630, which changed state.
Bug 918630 Summary: Review Request: perl-lib-abs - Module lib that makes
relative path absolute to caller
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918630
What|Removed
On Tue, 2017-02-21 at 12:32 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 6:34 AM, Vratislav Podzimek
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2017-02-01 at 12:25 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > >
> > > Actually, I've got a concern about this feature.
> > >
> > > I'm not sure what
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 12:09 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 09:29:33AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 07:48:27 +0100
>> Tomasz Torcz wrote:
>>
>> > I have:
>> > page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(1 &&
On Tue, 2017-02-21 at 14:29 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Tested Fedora 24 and Fedora 23, there's no notification with either
> one of those. I have no idea if this is a VM thing. Or if it's a
> regression.
>
> Maybe the notification was depending on smartd rather than mdadm.
> Kinda need someone
perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3 has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3-1.19-5.fc25.x86_64 requires libzmq.so.3()(64bit)
On armhfp:
perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3-1.19-5.fc25.armv7hl requires libzmq.so.3
On ppc64le:
perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3-1.19-5.fc25.ppc64le requires
perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2 has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2-1.09-9.fc25.x86_64 requires libzmq.so.1()(64bit)
On armhfp:
perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2-1.09-9.fc25.armv7hl requires libzmq.so.1
On ppc64le:
perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2-1.09-9.fc25.ppc64le requires
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo