[Bug 1435192] Upgrade perl-Devel-CheckLib to 1.09

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435192 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA

Orphaned Packages in epel6 (2017-03-26)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

Orphaned Packages in epel7 (2017-03-26)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2017-03-26)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

Review swaps

The latest version of the python-ZODB package has a couple of new build dependencies that aren't yet in Fedora. Both of these are very small, very simple packages. I'm happy to swap reviews for these two: python-j1m.sphinxautointerface: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435920

Fedora 26-20170325.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Server dvd i386 Server boot i386 Failed openQA tests: 18/108 (x86_64), 1/2 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in 26-20170323.n.0): ID: 70573 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_graphical URL:

[EPEL-devel] Re: Debian tools on epel7

On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Richard Grainger wrote: > Cool, does it work on CentOS 7? I don't see why it wouldn't work. It's just not built for it. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! ___ epel-devel mailing list --

Modularity and lifecycle [was Re: How attached are we to branch ACLs? -- Should we kill pkgdb?]

On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 01:45:12AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > As I already mentioned in person when this came up in a DevConf talk, I > think that this is a plan that will likely break a lot of things, especially > the expectations all our users rely on (that everything in Everything has a >

Re: Is Pagure slow for you too?

* Kevin Fenzi: > So, we have been talking about how to distribute things more, and we > could also consider just moving it to a more central location. It would be nice to have a URL with truly static content, to mostly rule out application server load issues. For a worst-case connection without

Fedora Rawhide-20170325.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 16/107 (x86_64), 6/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170324.n.0): ID: 70476 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/70476 ID: 70508 Test: x86_64

jpo pushed to perl-Devel-CheckLib (f26). "Update to 1.09"

From 958e025d897cb4df7be34803fd20d76341211294 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jose Pedro Oliveira Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2017 19:16:10 +0100 Subject: Update to 1.09 --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Devel-CheckLib.spec | 15 ++- sources

[Bug 1435834] Package perl-Carton for EPEL

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435834 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jples...@redhat.com,

jpo pushed to perl-Devel-CheckLib (master). "Update to 1.09"

From 958e025d897cb4df7be34803fd20d76341211294 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jose Pedro Oliveira Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2017 19:16:10 +0100 Subject: Update to 1.09 --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Devel-CheckLib.spec | 15 ++- sources

Re: Is Pagure slow for you too?

Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > Am 23.03.2017 um 12:26 schrieb Athos Ribeiro: > > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 11:14:58AM +0100, Jiri Eischmann wrote: > >> I wonder if it's just me or others also have problems with > >> performance of Pagure. Pagure is always slower for me than e.g. > >> Github, but

jpo uploaded Devel-CheckLib-1.09.tar.gz for perl-Devel-CheckLib

e0d7c284bf04af253b2a88caca87751c438c030c807aa068de35d9bab476bbdf9f25a15297e924c62e89ab781a8809750b4ef46e4e8ee6427dc817efbdb1c297 Devel-CheckLib-1.09.tar.gz

Re: Is Pagure slow for you too?

Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 03/23/2017 08:28 AM, Brian Exelbierd wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017, at 11:14 AM, Jiri Eischmann wrote: > >> I wonder if it's just me or others also have problems with > >> performance of Pagure. Pagure is always slower for me than e.g. > >> Github, but it's bearable.

[EPEL-devel] Re: Debian tools on epel7

That's really cool! If you want to add "apt" commands to that list, I contributed to a working apt rpm here: https://gitlab.com/christj/apt-rpmbuild On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 4:13 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > Hi, > I build for epel 7 several Debian tools that may allow build deb

Re: Wifi was broken after latest NM update

On 03/25/2017 05:19 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 11:00 AM, Heiko Adams wrote: ...snip... >> I know we all are humans which are not perfect but this is a a no-go >> that should never happen! > > Sure but software is complex, and human's can also be

[EPEL-devel] Debian tools on epel7

Hi,  I build for  epel 7 several Debian tools that may allow build deb packages, now I can build some debs  in epel 7, If someone is interested in testing let me have some feedback . po-debconf-1.0.16-8.nmu3.el7  smokeqt-4.14.3-7.el7  smokegen-4.14.3-6.el7  perl-Qt-4.14.3-5.el7 

Broken dependencies: perl-Alien-ROOT

perl-Alien-ROOT has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On aarch64: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-4.fc26.noarch requires root-core On ppc64: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-4.fc26.noarch requires root-core On ppc64le: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-4.fc26.noarch requires root-core

Broken dependencies: perl-Alien-ROOT

perl-Alien-ROOT has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On ppc64: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-4.fc26.noarch requires root-core On ppc64le: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-4.fc26.noarch requires root-core Please resolve this as soon as possible.

Broken dependencies: perl-Alien-pkgconf

perl-Alien-pkgconf has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Alien-pkgconf-0.10-1.fc27.x86_64 requires libpkgconf-devel(x86-64) = 0:1.3.0 On armhfp: perl-Alien-pkgconf-0.10-1.fc27.armv7hl requires libpkgconf-devel(armv7hl-32) = 0:1.3.0 On ppc64le:

Broken dependencies: perl-Gtk2-WebKit

perl-Gtk2-WebKit has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Gtk2-WebKit-0.09-17.fc26.x86_64 requires libjavascriptcoregtk-1.0.so.0()(64bit) perl-Gtk2-WebKit-0.09-17.fc26.x86_64 requires libwebkitgtk-1.0.so.0()(64bit) On armhfp:

nonresponsive package maintainer

scim-tables package administrator dchen seems nonresponsive. Doesn't seem to be on vacation. Link to the open bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419389 Though sure enough this particular feature request is far from being critical ___

Re: Wifi was broken after latest NM update

>tl;dr: Please test your shit better before pushing updates to the users! So much dissatisfaction for something you're not even paying for!  On Mar 25, 2017 16:32, "Heiko Adams" wrote: > tl;dr: Please test your shit better before pushing updates to the > users! > > Hi

Re: Wifi was broken after latest NM update

On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 11:00 AM, Heiko Adams wrote: > tl;dr: Please test your shit better before pushing updates to the > users! There is absolutely no need to use language like that or refer to people's work as such. > Hi there, > I'm a little bit angry about the latest

Wifi was broken after latest NM update

tl;dr: Please test your shit better before pushing updates to the users! Hi there, I'm a little bit angry about the latest NM update. But from the beginning: My system has been fresh installed from a Fedora 26 Workstation Live-CD two weeks ago and ran without any big issue so far. Today I

Re: How risky is lm_sensors's sensors-detect nowadays?

Friday, 24 March 9:27 a.m. -, Jeff Bastian wrote: > Can Freon check if sensors-detect has been run before, and if not, pop > up a dialog box asking to run it and warn about the risks? Yes, if you haven't run `sensors-detect` yet, Freon says that you need to do so instead of showing the

Re: How attached are we to branch ACLs? -- Should we kill pkgdb?

> As I already mentioned in person when this came up in a DevConf talk, I > think that this is a plan that will likely break a lot of things, especially > the expectations all our users rely on (that everything in Everything has a > consistent guaranteed life time), and that doing away with

Re: How attached are we to branch ACLs? -- Should we kill pkgdb?

On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 01:45:12AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > Of course, EPEL vs Fedora comes to mind here, but I wonder: if the EPEL > > maintainer has also commit on the Fedora branches, is it really that much > > of a big deal? And vice-versa? > > Well, I don't

Re: How attached are we to branch ACLs? -- Should we kill pkgdb?

On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 01:45:12AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > Of course, EPEL vs Fedora comes to mind here, but I wonder: if the EPEL > > maintainer has also commit on the Fedora branches, is it really that much > > of a big deal? And vice-versa? > > Well, I don't