[389-devel] Build failed in Jenkins: NIGHTLY #72

See -- [...truncated 4530 lines...] suites/plugins/accpol_test.py::test_locact_inact PASSED suites/plugins/accpol_test.py::test_locinact_modrdn PASSED

Re: OCaml / aarch64 / binutils / coq mess

On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Nearly done it. Unfortunately I updated ‘why’ to the latest upstream > version (the previous one didn't know about OCaml 4.05), however that > will require updating ‘frama-c’: > > configure: WARNING: bad Frama-c

[Bug 1489202] New: perl-Dist-Zilla-Role-PluginBundle-PluginRemover-0.105 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489202 Bug ID: 1489202 Summary: perl-Dist-Zilla-Role-PluginBundle-PluginRemover-0.105 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component:

[389-devel] Re: Build failed in Jenkins: NIGHTLY #71

On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 09:25 +0200, Ludwig Krispenz wrote: > I think this error > * > **Could not open the LDIF template file > '\''/usr/share/dirsrv/data/template-pampta.ldif'\''. Error: No such file or > directory* > > points to the changes in https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49371 I'll

Re: story of kerberos

On Wed, 06 Sep 2017, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On 09/06/2017 10:05 AM, Simo Sorce wrote: On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 09:51 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: So, they are all tied together via ipsilon (except ssh keys, and wiki login). Once we have a concrete plan for ssh we will be happy to share it. Would you

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 791 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031 python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6 785 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168 rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6 675

[Bug 1486717] abi-compliance-checker-2.2 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1486717 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

Re: story of kerberos

On 09/06/2017 01:37 PM, Ben Rosser wrote: > On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> On 09/06/2017 05:25 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: >>> Hi, >>> What's the story between the recently introduced support of kerberos >>> in koji? My understanding was that

Re: story of kerberos

On 09/06/2017 10:05 AM, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 09:51 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >> So, they are all tied together via ipsilon (except ssh keys, and wiki >> login). >> >> Once we have a concrete plan for ssh we will be happy to share it. > > Would you consider allowing

[389-devel] Please review: Issue 49295 - Fix CI tests

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49295 https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/eca54ddf3248bea2f57e181167546d647bdfb7475a5b910f90ff4e766e066eda-0001-Issue-49295-Fix-CI-tests.patch signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ 389-devel mailing

Re: Should a binary allowed to self-update ?

On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 5:01 PM, DAVID Clément wrote: > Dear packagers, > > On my road to package http://exercism.io CLI, I need to provide a > self-update feature [1] for Golang-coded binaries. After a look at the > packaging guidelines, I am not sure if it is allowed to

Should a binary allowed to self-update ?

Dear packagers, On my road to package http://exercism.io CLI, I need to provide a self-update feature [1] for Golang-coded binaries. After a look at the packaging guidelines, I am not sure if it is allowed to package binaries with such a feature. To me, it should be discarded as the rpm provided

Re: story of kerberos

On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 09/06/2017 05:25 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: >> Hi, >> What's the story between the recently introduced support of kerberos >> in koji? My understanding was that eventually all services of fedora >> would switch to

Need review for f27-backgrounds

Design team recently completed the beta wallpapers and the package is ready for review. The spec is very straightforward and needs for the beta release. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489160 -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic & Web Designer E: l...@fedoraproject.org W:

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 11:12:14AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 09:28 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 10:51 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > > > On 09/06/2017 10:23 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > Is there a fix for this? > > > > > >

Re: OCaml / aarch64 / binutils / coq mess

Nearly done it. Unfortunately I updated ‘why’ to the latest upstream version (the previous one didn't know about OCaml 4.05), however that will require updating ‘frama-c’: configure: WARNING: bad Frama-c version "Silicon-20161101", you need version Phosphorus At that point I stopped. Would

Re: GNOME 3.25.92 megaupdate

On 2017-09-06 13:16, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 14:02 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: >> On 09/06/2017 01:22 PM, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: >>> [tkloczko@domek SPECS.fedora]$ grep filetrigger * | grep icons >>> adwaita-icon-theme.spec:%transfiletriggerin -- >>> %{_datadir}/icons/Adwaita

Re: Confusing SCM package request

On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 1:49 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 13:14 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: >> Taking your follow up of "folks doing the SCM requests" into account, >> I don't think that's what they signed up for? That's the job of a >> sponsor. >>

Re: GNOME 3.25.92 megaupdate

Kalev Lember wrote: > I > can add the triggers to KDE and other themes as well if their > maintainers are fine with it. rdieter? If you don't mind, please do, thanks. -- Rex ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

Re: GNOME 3.25.92 megaupdate

Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > On 6 September 2017 at 03:16, Rex Dieter wrote: > [..] >>> It would be good to start remove on this cycle execution of all >>> glib-compile-schemas, gtk-update-icon-cache and >>> update-desktop-database from all %post/%postun as all necessary >>>

Re: GNOME 3.25.92 megaupdate

On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 14:02 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: > On 09/06/2017 01:22 PM, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > > [tkloczko@domek SPECS.fedora]$ grep filetrigger * | grep icons > > adwaita-icon-theme.spec:%transfiletriggerin -- > > %{_datadir}/icons/Adwaita > >

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 09:28 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 10:51 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > > On 09/06/2017 10:23 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > Is there a fix for this? > > > > ImageMagick was downgraded from v7 to v6 today. A emacs rebuild will fix > > it.

Re: Confusing SCM package request

On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 13:14 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > Taking your follow up of "folks doing the SCM requests" into account, > I don't think that's what they signed up for? That's the job of a > sponsor. > > However, you're just making cases for the easy to catch things and > didn't address my

[389-devel] Please review: Issue #77 - Refactor docstrings in rST format - part 1

Hi team, please, check out the new docs. https://fedorapeople.org/~spichugi/html/index.html https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/77 https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/raw/files/2e181d5321f194587899b1cbb37455d86d2754daeacb2d02c6de60aa9830b079-0001-Issue-77-Refactor-docstrings-in-rST-format-part-1.patch

Fedora Rawhide-20170906.n.1 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64 Workstation live i386 Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Server boot i386 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 47/137 (x86_64), 1/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170903.n.0): ID: 137942 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso

Re: Confusing SCM package request

On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 12:53 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 12:26 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: >> What you're catching by doing this forced delay is >> rushed reviews or laziness on the part of two people. > > Also *ignorance*, in the case of

Re: story of kerberos

On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 09:51 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > So, they are all tied together via ipsilon (except ssh keys, and wiki > login). > > Once we have a concrete plan for ssh we will be happy to share it. Would you consider allowing SSH+GSSAPI as well ? This way I do not need to care for keys

Re: Confusing SCM package request

On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 09:53 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 12:26 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > > What you're catching by doing this forced delay is > > rushed reviews or laziness on the part of two people. > > Also *ignorance*, in the case of legally-not-allowed things. And it

Re: Confusing SCM package request

On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 12:26 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > What you're catching by doing this forced delay is > rushed reviews or laziness on the part of two people. Also *ignorance*, in the case of legally-not-allowed things. And it also allows the folks doing the package reviews to look for

Re: story of kerberos

On 09/06/2017 05:25 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: > Hi, > What's the story between the recently introduced support of kerberos > in koji? My understanding was that eventually all services of fedora > would switch to kerberos authentication, though information on the > following bugs for

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 10:51 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > On 09/06/2017 10:23 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > Is there a fix for this? > > ImageMagick was downgraded from v7 to v6 today. A emacs rebuild will fix it. > I've > submitted one. I am doing the rebuilds. Unfortunately, the

Re: Confusing SCM package request

On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 12:15 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 09/02/2017 07:09 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 07:48:47AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:36 AM, Björn 'besser82' Esser >>> wrote: Am

Re: Confusing SCM package request

On 09/02/2017 07:09 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 07:48:47AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:36 AM, Björn 'besser82' Esser >> wrote: >>> Am 29.08.2017 um 11:30 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones: I'm trying to import

[Bug 1488690] perl-POE-Component-IRC-6.90 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1488690 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In

story of kerberos

Hi, What's the story between the recently introduced support of kerberos in koji? My understanding was that eventually all services of fedora would switch to kerberos authentication, though information on the following bugs for bodhi seems to contradict that:

ppisar pushed to perl-POE-Component-IRC (master). "Run tests always (..more)"

From b3355ce0ab9f001a829e43e25f4e906f49fe56b7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Sep 06 2017 11:12:01 + Subject: Run tests always The client runs agains a simulated server. --- diff --git a/perl-POE-Component-IRC.spec b/perl-POE-Component-IRC.spec index

what's the story with kerberos

-- Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, PhD, Crypto Tech. Lead, Security Technologies, Red Hat, Inc. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

On 09/06/2017 10:23 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: Is there a fix for this? ImageMagick was downgraded from v7 to v6 today. A emacs rebuild will fix it. I've submitted one. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

Re: GNOME 3.25.92 megaupdate

On 6 September 2017 at 13:02, Kalev Lember wrote: [..] > > Seems like packages installing other themes *already* are doing exactly > > what I've been thinking that they should be doing so updating per icon > > theme strategy should be OK. > > Right, I added file triggers

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

I only skimmed this thread and didn't see any reference to this. Currently emacs is uninstallable in Rawhide, resulting in any Koji build that depends on emacs failing: DEBUG util.py:439:- nothing provides libMagickCore-7.Q16HDRI.so.3()(64bit) needed by emacs-1:25.2-9.fc28.x86_64 Is

Re: OCaml / aarch64 / binutils / coq mess

I believe I have come up with a patch which works well enough that we can push it to Fedora 27+ aarch64: https://pagure.io/fedora-ocaml/c/e7fdaf008e047c445fd7a6acf9362d8b5940bf4b?branch=fedora-27-4.05.0 Note this patch is not upstream but I've brought it to the attention of the upstream

ppisar pushed to perl-POE-Component-IRC (master). "Make optional features build-configurable"

From 370f540eb0e3ae6d3b05ba2c12e2f77b5000cec6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Sep 06 2017 12:19:51 + Subject: Make optional features build-configurable --- diff --git a/perl-POE-Component-IRC.spec b/perl-POE-Component-IRC.spec index 0bb3fc4..0109e3f

ppisar pushed to perl-POE-Component-IRC (master). "6.90 bump"

From 1e8eb2b1ab38b1a67610cf1b0079f9754f3ce871 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Sep 06 2017 10:18:34 + Subject: 6.90 bump --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index cb9e0ee..79552dc 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -14,3 +14,4 @@

Re: GNOME 3.25.92 megaupdate

On 09/06/2017 01:22 PM, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > [tkloczko@domek SPECS.fedora]$ grep filetrigger * | grep icons > adwaita-icon-theme.spec:%transfiletriggerin -- %{_datadir}/icons/Adwaita > adwaita-icon-theme.spec:%transfiletriggerpostun -- %{_datadir}/icons/Adwaita >

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 27 Beta Freeze

Dne 6.9.2017 v 12:39 Igor Gnatenko napsal(a): > On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 12:17 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Dne 5.9.2017 v 16:28 Mohan Boddu napsal(a): > >> Hi all,   > >> Today is an important day on the Fedora 27 schedule[1], with two > >>  significant cut-offs.   > >> Today is the Beta

Re: GNOME 3.25.92 megaupdate

On 6 September 2017 at 09:32, Neal Gompa wrote: [..] > I think we implemented file triggers in Mageia for this, I'll need to > do some checking. I know that we're pretty aggressive on package, > transaction, and file trigger usage compared to Fedora... Heck, we > don't even

Re: GNOME 3.25.92 megaupdate

On 6 September 2017 at 11:43, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: [..] > 3) As long as hicolor theme is default theme updating its cache can > still be in gtk-update-icon-cache package. > > What happens with other directories than /usr/share/icons/hicolor is > in this case secondary

[Bug 1472755] perl-JSON-Path-0.411 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1472755 Bug 1472755 depends on bug 1482867, which changed state. Bug 1482867 Summary: Review Request: perl-JSON-Parse - Read JSON into a Perl variable https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1482867 What|Removed

Re: GNOME 3.25.92 megaupdate

On 6 September 2017 at 09:24, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: [..] > That is NOT true for gtk-update-icon-cache. There is currently no trigger > for it, at least when I look at the recent information on the wiki [1]. OK. Just started working on add this (I see a lot

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 27 Beta Freeze

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 12:17 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 5.9.2017 v 16:28 Mohan Boddu napsal(a): > > Hi all, > > Today is an important day on the Fedora 27 schedule[1], with two > > significant cut-offs. > > Today is the Beta freeze[2].

[Bug 1488269] perl-Mail-Message-3.002 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1488269 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Mail-Message-3.002-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-df61c83293 -- You are receiving this

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 27 Beta Freeze

Dne 5.9.2017 v 16:28 Mohan Boddu napsal(a): > Hi all,   > Today is an important day on the Fedora 27 schedule[1], with two >  significant cut-offs.   > Today is the Beta freeze[2]. This means that only packages which fix > accepted blocker or freeze exception bugs[3][4] will be marked as >

[Bug 1488269] perl-Mail-Message-3.002 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1488269 --- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- jplesnik's perl-Mail-Message-3.002-1.fc27 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=966908 -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1488269] perl-Mail-Message-3.002 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1488269 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED

Re: Package submission question

On 6.9.2017 05:28, Troy Curtis Jr wrote: >>      >     On 09/04/2017 06:21 AM, Troy Curtis Jr wrote: >>      >      > I have a version of the gpsd package which I believe >>     addresses this >>      >      > ticket >>

ppisar uploaded POE-Component-IRC-6.90.tar.gz for perl-POE-Component-IRC

c8106bf740a60dc075f99df40c96f30232f69f1369ea5f68ce10636ab0640536ef2c806d73e721f21c21043ab7c386a1e54e099241bd52070648ffc9fd010750 POE-Component-IRC-6.90.tar.gz

Re: Providing ABI/API assurances for the base runtime in Fedora.

On 2017-09-06, Petr Pisar wrote: > Does it mean that when a need for a new feature arises, e.g. adding > getrandom(3) into glibc > we will produce > a new platform stream distinct from the GA stream? > I will answer to

[Bug 1488274] perl-Protocol-WebSocket-0.21 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1488274 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Protocol-WebSocket-0.21-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-0213746f66 -- You are receiving

[Bug 1488274] perl-Protocol-WebSocket-0.21 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1488274 --- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- jplesnik's perl-Protocol-WebSocket-0.21-1.fc27 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=966822 -- You are receiving

jplesnik pushed to perl-Protocol-WebSocket (f27). "0.21 bump"

From e1020ced4492f1a7533cf25cca932e0c1d23df31 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Sep 06 2017 08:05:34 + Subject: 0.21 bump --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 0843b40..3a141b2 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -2,3 +2,4 @@

Re: GNOME 3.25.92 megaupdate

On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:24 AM, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > Am 06.09.2017 um 09:51 schrieb Tomasz Kłoczko: >> >> On 6 September 2017 at 03:16, Rex Dieter wrote: >> [..] It would be good to start remove on this cycle execution of all

[Bug 1488274] perl-Protocol-WebSocket-0.21 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1488274 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED

Re: GNOME 3.25.92 megaupdate

Am 06.09.2017 um 09:51 schrieb Tomasz Kłoczko: On 6 September 2017 at 03:16, Rex Dieter wrote: [..] It would be good to start remove on this cycle execution of all glib-compile-schemas, gtk-update-icon-cache and update-desktop-database from all %post/%postun as all

[Bug 1487628] perl-Verilog-Perl-3.440 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487628 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |ASSIGNED -- You are

[Bug 1487628] perl-Verilog-Perl-3.440 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487628 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|jples...@redhat.com |ppi...@redhat.com

jplesnik pushed to perl-Protocol-WebSocket (master). "0.21 bump"

From e1020ced4492f1a7533cf25cca932e0c1d23df31 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Sep 06 2017 08:05:34 + Subject: 0.21 bump --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 0843b40..3a141b2 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -2,3 +2,4 @@

jplesnik uploaded Protocol-WebSocket-0.21.tar.gz for perl-Protocol-WebSocket

020c935d83e7eb4e013bbb806dfe49919f7307c889deaa3d87c390b16e8fed2d4b86b305b18d70b02126b09132b3af2b1cf54781e9a3cffa21cc6a44dd4ee282 Protocol-WebSocket-0.21.tar.gz

Re: GNOME 3.25.92 megaupdate

On 6 September 2017 at 03:16, Rex Dieter wrote: [..] >> It would be good to start remove on this cycle execution of all >> glib-compile-schemas, gtk-update-icon-cache and >> update-desktop-database from all %post/%postun as all necessary >> changes are done over rpm

Re: Providing ABI/API assurances for the base runtime in Fedora.

On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 08:57:24AM -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > On 09/04/2017 07:31 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: > > What if there is a bug in the behavior of the frozen base-* packages? Do > > we have to live with the bug for the rest of the life time of the base > > (=platform)? Or do we break this

[Test-Announce] Fedora 27 Beta Freeze

Hi all, Today is an important day on the Fedora 27 schedule[1], with two significant cut-offs. Today is the Beta freeze[2]. This means that only packages which fix accepted blocker or freeze exception bugs[3][4] will be marked as 'stable' and included in the Beta composes. Other builds will

[389-devel] Re: Build failed in Jenkins: NIGHTLY #71

I think this error * **Could not open the LDIF template file '\''/usr/share/dirsrv/data/template-pampta.ldif'\''. Error: No such file or directory* points to the changes in https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49371 On 09/06/2017 06:37 AM, marey...@redhat.com wrote: See