Looks like you get out ot space un your / , i hace the same issue un the
f25 -> f26 upgrade, removing unused packages should fix these error messages
Maybe a simple
# dnf clean all && dnf autoremove
Can be enougth
--
Enviado desde mi móvil, disculpe la brevedad
William
El 29/9/2017 5:54 p.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1497368
Bug ID: 1497368
Summary: perl-Code-TidyAll-0.68 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Code-TidyAll
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1497364
Bug ID: 1497364
Summary: perl-App-cpm-0.913 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-App-cpm
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
On Fri, 2017-09-29 at 08:41 +0200, Carsten Grzemba wrote:
>
> >
> > As a curious question, does solaris have rustlang support ?
> >
> >
> Not in the moment, but there some issues open for rust related Solaris. So it
> tried somebody already.
OKay, because I (we?) are pursuing
Hi, guys,
Backed up my system and tried the upgrade by clicking on the
software>>upgrade button. It failed.
Here is the output from the notification box:
Detailed errors from the package manager follow:
Error running transaction: installing package glibc-all-langpacks-2.25-
Missing expected images:
Workstation live i386
Kde live x86_64
Server boot i386
Workstation live x86_64
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 7/128 (x86_64), 1/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 148729 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_updates_nfs
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/148729
/*Randy Barlow*/ wrote on Fri, 29 Sep 2017 15:04:07 -0400:
On 09/29/2017 03:54 AM, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
I've recently added 2 new packages, but when I tried to add them to
F27/F26 updates, it doesn't recognize them in the "Packages" box and
says: "Unable to find any packages that match the
I noticed in comps that the group "hardware support" is set to false under
tag. This group is also not shown as "add ons" for minimal
installation in anaconda.
Why is the group hidden? Can we show "hardware support" group in Anaconda
(non-live installers, of course)? Installing this group is
On 09/29/2017 03:54 AM, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
> I've recently added 2 new packages, but when I tried to add them to
> F27/F26 updates, it doesn't recognize them in the "Packages" box and
> says: "Unable to find any packages that match the current query". BTW, I
> can create the desired update,
Missing expected images:
Server dvd i386
Workstation live i386
Server boot i386
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 27/128 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170928.n.1):
ID: 148538 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_database_server
URL:
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2017-09-29)
===
Meeting started by jforbes at 16:00:15 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2017-09-29/fesco.2017-09-29-16.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
Hi,
Build of soundtouch-2.0.0-1.fc28 is completed, we need a provenpackager
to rebuild [1] :
Io-language
ardour2
audacity
gstreamer-plugins-bad-free
gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free
After that, may we also update F27 ? we need one provenpackager take
care of it ...
[1]
dnf repoquery
On 2017-09-29 05:13 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
> On 2017-09-29 03:45, Digimer wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Continuing down by build dependency hole, I ran into another circular
>> dependency. I checked in perl-namespace-autoclean.spec for the bootstrap
>> option, but it didn't seem to exist. I added it,
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49385
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/ee9f6ff34fcd4d54094c8b4883397bd21d2affaaecb3a53c82fe117600b593f2-0001-Ticket-49385-Fix-coverity-warnings.patch
___
389-devel mailing list --
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 12:52:40PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> Good Morning Everyone,
>
> I recently found out that some packages were not correctly migrated from pkgdb
>
> Looking at a couple of ones in pkgdb, it seem the issue is basically that a
> group
> has commit access to the
On 09/29/2017 04:39 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On pe, 29 syys 2017, Lukas Vrabec wrote:
On 09/29/2017 03:57 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On pe, 29 syys 2017, Lukas Vrabec wrote:
I'm planning change the default value of httpd_graceful_shutdown
boolean in Fedora Rawhide because of improving
On pe, 29 syys 2017, Lukas Vrabec wrote:
On 09/29/2017 03:57 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On pe, 29 syys 2017, Lukas Vrabec wrote:
I'm planning change the default value of httpd_graceful_shutdown
boolean in Fedora Rawhide because of improving SELinux
configuration. Rawhide builds with this
Thanks a lot Todd for the reply!
This is useful info. I had no idea that Red Hat had an nginx product.
So I guess that decisions made against that product inform a lot how the EPEL
package is patched as well.
Thanks again (
On 2017/09/29 0:33, "Todd Zullinger"
On 09/29/2017 03:57 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On pe, 29 syys 2017, Lukas Vrabec wrote:
I'm planning change the default value of httpd_graceful_shutdown
boolean in Fedora Rawhide because of improving SELinux configuration.
Rawhide builds with this change will be available in ~5 days.
Hi,
I plan to build PHP 7.2.0RC3 in rawhide next week, so we'll have a lot
of time to ensure everything is ok before F28 is branched.
Scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=22144004
Work done in private branch
On pe, 29 syys 2017, Lukas Vrabec wrote:
I'm planning change the default value of httpd_graceful_shutdown
boolean in Fedora Rawhide because of improving SELinux configuration.
Rawhide builds with this change will be available in ~5 days.
Together with Dan Walsh, we agreed on that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1485309
Xavier Bachelot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
I'm planning change the default value of httpd_graceful_shutdown boolean
in Fedora Rawhide because of improving SELinux configuration. Rawhide
builds with this change will be available in ~5 days.
Together with Dan Walsh, we agreed on that httpd_graceful_shutdown
boolean should be by default
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1497193
Bug ID: 1497193
Summary: perl-Pinto-0.14-1.fc27 FTBFS: Attribute
(target_perl_version) does not pass the type
constraint because: perl version (5.026001) is unknown
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1497190
Bug ID: 1497190
Summary: perl-Test-Deep-JSON-0.04 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Test-Deep-JSON
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1497183
Bug ID: 1497183
Summary: perl-Dancer2-Plugin-DBIC-0.0100 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Dancer2-Plugin-DBIC
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2017-09-29 16:00 UTC'
Links to all issues below
On 28.9.2017 06:12, Troy Curtis Jr wrote:
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 7:01 AM Petr Viktorin > wrote:
It's only automatic for Bugzilla. If upstream is not using the Fedora/RH
bugzilla (which it shouldn't, really), a URL for the upstream
On 2017-09-29 03:45, Digimer wrote:
Hi all,
Continuing down by build dependency hole, I ran into another circular
dependency. I checked in perl-namespace-autoclean.spec for the
bootstrap
option, but it didn't seem to exist. I added it, and it allowed me to
build -> install
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 02:43:50PM +0200, Jan Kurik wrote:
> = Proposed System Wide Change: Annobin =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Annobin
>
> Change owner(s):
> * Nick Clifton
>
> This change causes extra information to be stored in binary files
> compiled by gcc. This information
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1497002
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
From 02a5835ccbcbaa371af8b98a36ab6f7678d67553 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Písař
Date: Sep 29 2017 08:18:14 +
Subject: 1.500 bump
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index f282473..7e99a5b 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
75324a9a7ca2fa5ba7200ed566740218fd6562c93833dd62fbe472612ddb8757afbb83892a8a14a012aafe1763a95799ac40db34bf7a7debb3c70c2c56c05b94
Bencode-1.500.tar.gz
Dear all,
I've recently added 2 new packages, but when I tried to add them to
F27/F26 updates, it doesn't recognize them in the "Packages" box and
says: "Unable to find any packages that match the current query". BTW, I
can create the desired update, the only inconvenience is that Bodhi
>
> As a curious question, does solaris have rustlang support ?
>
>
Not in the moment, but there some issues open for rust related Solaris. So it
tried somebody already.
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
35 matches
Mail list logo