Missing expected images:
Server dvd i386
Workstation live i386
Server boot i386
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 85/126 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20171004.n.0):
ID: 152875 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://
Missing expected images:
Atomic qcow2 x86_64
Server dvd i386
Workstation live i386
Server boot i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 12/128 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 153107 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/15310
On 10/06/2017 05:49 AM, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
I am going to retire ghostscript-fonts package in F27 because its fonts
are deprecated and replaced by urw-base35-fonts package. Only package
which depends on ghostscript-fonts seems to be hylafax+ package, I
created bugzilla for it
https://bugzilla.re
On Fri, 6 Oct 2017, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
>
> > I am going to retire ghostscript-fonts package in F27 because its fonts
> > are deprecated and replaced by urw-base35-fonts package.
I don't see a urw-base35-fonts SRPM in my RawHide ... has it
been packaged?
My mirr
On 24/09/17 11:47 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
>
>
> On 24 September 2017 at 16:29, Michael Catanzaro
> mailto:mike.catanz...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 2:09 AM, James Hogarth
> mailto:james.hoga...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Based on the fedora update policy and the ack
On 10/06/2017 06:18 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
> So if the update doesn't use karma autopush, and the maintainer clicks
> "Push to stable", will this go to batched queue or directly stable? And
> if directly stable, is there a way to put it into the batched queue for
> such updates?
Hello Kamil!
A no
Mark, thanks for feedback!
I'll be honest that I left gcc and gdb in there by accident. As Dan said,
we are trying to reduce size of that container so it's easier to use. Who
decides what's in it? This was an internal collaboration with multiple
people -- in the end, everyone can express themselve
FESCo failed to achieve quorum today, as several members were traveling
(enjoy!). Here's this week's logs:
Logs:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2017-10-06/fesco.2017-10-06-16.00.txt
Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2017-10-06/fesco.2017-10-06-16.00.log.html
On 10/06/2017 10:14 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
On Mon, 2017-09-18 at 16:48 +0200, Tomas Tomecek wrote:
we managed to move tools container from Fedora Dockerfiles github
repo to Fedora infra [1]. As a side effects, we put systemtap in a
dedicated container.
We would very much appreciate your feedb
Hi,
systemd 235 was released today. A large number of issues was closed
upstream, including many bug fixes, documentation updates, and
long-standing RFEs. There are some new features, but relatively few
entirely new features or changes in behaviour that impact other
services. There also are no (in
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez
wrote:
> Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
>
> > I am going to retire ghostscript-fonts package in F27 because its fonts
> > are deprecated and replaced by urw-base35-fonts package.
>
> NACK. They are _extra_ fonts:
> http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.gi
Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
> I am going to retire ghostscript-fonts package in F27 because its fonts
> are deprecated and replaced by urw-base35-fonts package.
NACK. They are _extra_ fonts:
http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;a=blob_plain;f=Resource/Init/Fontmap.GS
__
On Mon, 2017-09-18 at 16:48 +0200, Tomas Tomecek wrote:
> we managed to move tools container from Fedora Dockerfiles github
> repo to Fedora infra [1]. As a side effects, we put systemtap in a
> dedicated container.
>
> We would very much appreciate your feedback here
What determines what goes in
Hi,
I am going to retire ghostscript-fonts package in F27 because its fonts
are deprecated and replaced by urw-base35-fonts package. Only package
which depends on ghostscript-fonts seems to be hylafax+ package, I
created bugzilla for it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1499240 . Does an
Thank you for figuring this out!
I fixed in dist-git:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/container/systemtap/c/a8a59cacb440aacc150fad8a94d264d53a341baf?branch=master
Can't build in OSBS, seems like the service is having issues.
Tomas
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 7:50 PM, Jeremy Eder wrote:
> Woops, sor
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 10:14 PM, Randy Barlow
wrote:
> Greetings fellow Fedora friends!
>
> bodhi-2.11.0[0] has been deployed to production, and this release
> introduces a new state for updates where the request can be "batched".
> The purpose of this state is to give updates a place to sit once
On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 01:20:53AM -0400, Digimer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm fairly new to packaging. I helped maintain the 'cluster' package
> some years back, but haven't done packaging since it was retired when
> F16 went EOL.
>
> I'm lead developer of the Anvil! Intelligent Availability plat
On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 04:14:47PM -0400, Randy Barlow wrote:
> Greetings fellow Fedora friends!
>
> bodhi-2.11.0[0] has been deployed to production, and this release
> introduces a new state for updates where the request can be "batched".
> The purpose of this state is to give updates a place to
Hi,
I already reported this bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498207
Regards,
Charles-Antoine Couret
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
19 matches
Mail list logo
