Fedora Modular 27 compose report: 20171026.n.3 changes

OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171026.n.3 NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171026.n.3 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages

Fedora-Modular 27-20171026.n.3 compose check report

Missing expected images: Docker_base docker x86_64 Server dvd arm Failed openQA tests: 69/94 (x86_64), 19/19 (i386) ID: 162227 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/162227 ID: 162228 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default

Re: Packaging Question

On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 9:12 PM Kevin Kofler wrote: > William Moreno wrote: > > Provides: libnfsidmap-devel%{_isa} = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release} > > > > Move this line under > > > > %package -n libnfsidmap-devel > > > > And you should get a clean update path > > As

Re: Packaging Question

William Moreno wrote: > Provides: libnfsidmap-devel%{_isa} = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release} > > Move this line under > > %package -n libnfsidmap-devel > > And you should get a clean update path As Hedayat Vatankhah pointed out, if the package is called libnfsidmap- devel, it does not actually

Re: hp-plugin doesn't work in hplip-3.17.9 - move to 3.17.10 if you need

Zdenek Dohnal wrote: > Issue is that plugin is proprietary (owned by HP) and it contains > precompiled data, so it cannot be packaged. Upstream doesn't reply on > most issues. But this plugin is needed by group of printers, so there > needs to be a way to download it (if we want to support these

[389-devel] Re: csiphash on Sparc

On Thu, 2017-10-26 at 12:47 +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: > On (13/10/17 20:35), William Brown wrote: > > On Wed, 2017-10-11 at 13:36 +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: > > > But following code should work. Please correct me if I am wrong. > > > I didn't test. > > >   char *str =

Re: Trying to contact developer Axel Thimm

On Fri, 27 Oct 2017, Michael Schwendt wrote: > twitter users could try @athimm I already sent a .@ message to that account -- Russ herrold ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Trying to contact developer Axel Thimm

On Thu, 26 Oct 2017 18:16:00 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > We have been getting bounced emails from Axel Thimm for a while and I > don't have any other way to contact him. He was an early maintainer of > packages but has not been seen in fas since 2013. > If anyone has had contact with

Fedora 27-20171026.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Workstation live i386 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 11/137 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in 27-20171023.n.0): ID: 162096 Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/162096 ID: 162125

Fedora Rawhide-20171026.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Server dvd i386 Workstation live i386 Server boot i386 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 19/128 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20171024.n.0): ID: 161922 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical URL:

planning to orphan 4 packages

I am planning to orphan the four packages (list below) in a few days. If anyone is interested in maintaining these packages, I can make you the person admin instead of orphaning. These are the packages - autodocksuite gaussum qmforge webcpp These packages have very little to no development

Network interface regression on F26 VM after 4.13/4.12 kernel update

I was running F25 (4.10) on a VM inside KVM/Qemu/libvirt on CentOS 7.3 (updated). Then I upgraded it (via dnf system-upgrade) to F26 and 4.11 and it was still working well, as I recall. Then I upgraded it again to 4.13 and now I’m seeing flakiness in the network: the NIC will randomly come up

Trying to contact developer Axel Thimm

We have been getting bounced emails from Axel Thimm for a while and I don't have any other way to contact him. He was an early maintainer of packages but has not been seen in fas since 2013. He is the co-maintainer of the following packages: rpms/apt -- Debian's Advanced Packaging Tool with RPM

common location of spec files in upstream sources

From a survey of about 1700 .spec files in my current working collection, the overwhelmingly common place to ** install ** such is in a: %doc directory Most simply place them in the top directory, at a depth even with where a V[ersioned] tarball is unpacked by the %setup stanza.

Re: common location of spec files in upstream sources

2017-10-26 15:02 GMT-06:00 Mátyás Selmeci > For upstream projects that provide spec files in their > repositories, do y'all tend to see a common location for the spec > files? Like dist/.spec or rpm/.spec, etc. My > organization is trying to standardize on

Re: common location of spec files in upstream sources

On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 5:39 PM, William Moreno wrote: > > 2017-10-26 15:02 GMT-06:00 Mátyás Selmeci : >> >> Hi, >> >> For upstream projects that provide spec files in their repositories, do >> y'all tend to see a common location for the

Re: common location of spec files in upstream sources

On 2017-10-26 5:39 PM, William Moreno wrote: 2017-10-26 15:02 GMT-06:00 Mátyás Selmeci >: Hi, For upstream projects that provide spec files in their repositories, do y'all tend to see a common location for the spec files?

Re: common location of spec files in upstream sources

2017-10-26 15:02 GMT-06:00 Mátyás Selmeci : > Hi, > > For upstream projects that provide spec files in their repositories, do > y'all tend to see a common location for the spec files? Like > dist/.spec or rpm/.spec, etc. My organization is trying to > standardize on a

plan to update F27 to systemd-235 cancelled

Hi, two weeks ago I signalled a plan to update systemd to v235 in F27. I have now given up on this. Reasons: there were some issues in the implementation of the DynamicUser feature. Handling this took some time and F27 entered the final freeze, and it seems to late to do update the version now.

Fedora Modular 27 compose report: 20171026.n.3 changes

OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171026.n.1 NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171026.n.3 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 530.16 KiB Size of dropped packages

Re: Accidentally disabling units with systemd scriptlets

On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 08:46:50PM +, Jeremy Cline wrote: > Hey folks, > > I recently did a large re-write of a specfile in order to provide a > Python 3 version and to make it easier to maintain. > > Prior to this re-write the specfile produced a number of subpackages > that each provided a

common location of spec files in upstream sources

Hi, For upstream projects that provide spec files in their repositories, do y'all tend to see a common location for the spec files? Like dist/.spec or rpm/.spec, etc. My organization is trying to standardize on a location for the software we maintain, and it would be better to use something

Fedora 27 Server Beta status (3rd round) is NO-GO

Release status of the Fedora 27 Server Beta is NO-GO. The next Go/No-Go meeting is planned on Thursday, November 2nd together with second round of F27 Final Go/No-Go meeting. The F27 Server Beta release slips for one week. The slip also affects the F27 Server GA, it moves to 2017-Dec-19 having

Fedora 27 Final status is NO-GO

Release status of the Fedora 27 Final is NO-GO. The next Go/No-Go meeting is planned on Thursday, November 2nd. The GA date for the F27 Final release moves from Target date to Rain date, which is 2017-Nov-07. For more details please check the Go/No-Go meeting minutes[1]. [1]

Fedora 27 Server Beta status (3rd round) is NO-GO

Release status of the Fedora 27 Server Beta is NO-GO. The next Go/No-Go meeting is planned on Thursday, November 2nd together with second round of F27 Final Go/No-Go meeting. The F27 Server Beta release slips for one week. The slip also affects the F27 Server GA, it moves to 2017-Dec-19 having

Fedora Modular 27 compose report: 20171026.n.2 changes

OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171025.n.2 NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171026.n.2 = SUMMARY = Added images:22 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 6 Dropped packages:15 Upgraded packages: 12 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 20.97 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: Packaging Question

*William Moreno Reyes* Colaborador Proyecto Fedora | Nicaragua IRC: williamjmorenor Canales: #fedora-latam ; #fedora-ni https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Williamjmorenor 2017-10-26 12:10 GMT-06:00 Steve Dickson : > Hello, > > On 10/26/2017 09:57 AM, Steve Dickson wrote: > >

[389-devel] Re: bug in 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-91.el6_9.x86_64 with large paged searches

On 10/26/2017 02:49 PM, Jeffrey Eaton wrote: > I can try to build out a RHEL7 system with 1.3 and see if I can > reproduce it there with my data set as well.  I'll let you know what I > find. Great! > > I created issue 49429 with more or less the same details as below. Thank you! > > -jeaton >

Re: Packaging Question

Hi, That's probably due to the Provides: libnfsidmap%{_isa} = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release} Provides: libnfsidmap-devel%{_isa} = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release} (not the energy to actually check) From: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrade_paths_%E2%80%94_renaming_or_splitting_packages (did

[389-devel] Re: bug in 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-91.el6_9.x86_64 with large paged searches

I can try to build out a RHEL7 system with 1.3 and see if I can reproduce it there with my data set as well. I'll let you know what I find. I created issue 49429 with more or less the same details as below. -jeaton On Oct 26, 2017, at 12:50 PM, Mark Reynolds

Re: Packaging Question

Hi, /*Steve Dickson*/ wrote on Thu, 26 Oct 2017 14:10:49 -0400: Hello, On 10/26/2017 09:57 AM, Steve Dickson wrote: Hello, In an upcoming release the libnfsdimap library will be rolled into the nfs-utils package. Meaning nfs-utils will be install libnfsidmap instead of the libnfsidmap

Fedora Modular bikeshed compose report: 20171026.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Modular-Bikeshed-20171026.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Modular-Bikeshed-20171026.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped

Re: Packaging Question

Hello, On 10/26/2017 09:57 AM, Steve Dickson wrote: > Hello, > > In an upcoming release the libnfsdimap library > will be rolled into the nfs-utils package. > Meaning nfs-utils will be install libnfsidmap > instead of the libnfsidmap package. > > The libnfsidmap name will stay the same > so

Fedora Modular 27 compose report: 20171026.n.1 changes

OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171025.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171026.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:23 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 7 Dropped packages:16 Upgraded packages: 117 Downgraded packages: 3 Size of added packages: 21.42 MiB Size of dropped

Fedora Modular 27 compose report: 20171026.n.1 changes

OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171025.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171026.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:23 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 7 Dropped packages:16 Upgraded packages: 117 Downgraded packages: 3 Size of added packages: 21.42 MiB Size of dropped

Re: Heads Up - openssl makefile and scripts for creating self signed certificates

> "TM" == Tomas Mraz writes: TM> Although it is much easier now to set up proper certificates for TM> your servers with Let's Encrypt, it is still not fully automatable TM> process (it needs at least some set up at the beginning for the TM> first issued certificate). Thus

[389-devel] Re: bug in 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-91.el6_9.x86_64 with large paged searches

On 10/26/2017 12:16 PM, Jeffrey Eaton wrote: > I recently updated to 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-91.el6_9.x86_64 (from > 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-50.el6_6.x86_64) and have uncovered a bug with > large paged searches blocking all other searches on the server.  I > tried to access 

F28 System Wide Change: NSS Default File Format SQL

= System Wide Change: NSS Default File Format SQL = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NSSDefaultFileFormatSql Change owner(s): * Kai Engert Change the NSS library default to use the sqlite based data storage, when applications don't specify their preferred storage file

F28 System Wide Change: NSS Default File Format SQL

= System Wide Change: NSS Default File Format SQL = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NSSDefaultFileFormatSql Change owner(s): * Kai Engert Change the NSS library default to use the sqlite based data storage, when applications don't specify their preferred storage file

Fedora Modular 27 compose report: 20171025.n.3 changes

OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171025.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171025.n.3 = SUMMARY = Added images:21 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 6 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 111 Downgraded packages: 3 Size of added packages: 21.28 MiB Size of dropped

[389-devel] bug in 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-91.el6_9.x86_64 with large paged searches

I recently updated to 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-91.el6_9.x86_64 (from 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-50.el6_6.x86_64) and have uncovered a bug with large paged searches blocking all other searches on the server. I tried to access https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/new_issue to open a bug there, but its giving a

Re: Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2017-10-27)

On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 11:36 AM Igor Gnatenko < ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On Thu, 2017-10-26 at 14:55 +, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the > > FESCo meeting Friday

Fedora Modular 27 compose report: 20171025.n.3 changes

OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171025.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171025.n.3 = SUMMARY = Added images:21 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 6 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 111 Downgraded packages: 3 Size of added packages: 21.28 MiB Size of dropped

Re: Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2017-10-27)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Thu, 2017-10-26 at 14:55 +, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the > FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting > onirc.freenode.net. > > To convert UTC to your local time, take a

Re: Packaging Question

On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:00 AM Steve Dickson wrote: > Hello, > > In an upcoming release the libnfsdimap library > will be rolled into the nfs-utils package. > Meaning nfs-utils will be install libnfsidmap > instead of the libnfsidmap package. > > The libnfsidmap name will

Fedora Modular bikeshed compose report: 20171026.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Modular-Bikeshed-20171024.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Modular-Bikeshed-20171026.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 2 Dropped packages:18 Upgraded packages: 3 Downgraded packages: 112 Size of added packages: 7.96 MiB Size

Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2017-10-27)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting onirc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d

Re: packaging ruby dependencies

Dne 25.10.2017 v 16:54 Jason Brooks napsal(a): > getting the package into Fedora. Along the way[2], I encountered a > bunch of required, unpackaged dependencies, which would also have to > be added to Fedora. BTW we have Copr repository with 45 000 ruby gems packaged as RPM:

Re: Packaging Question

On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 08:09:00AM -0600, William Moreno wrote: > *William Moreno Reyes* > Colaborador Proyecto Fedora | Nicaragua > IRC: williamjmorenor Canales: #fedora-latam ; #fedora-ni > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Williamjmorenor > > 2017-10-26 7:57 GMT-06:00 Steve Dickson

Re: Packaging Question

*William Moreno Reyes* Colaborador Proyecto Fedora | Nicaragua IRC: williamjmorenor Canales: #fedora-latam ; #fedora-ni https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Williamjmorenor 2017-10-26 7:57 GMT-06:00 Steve Dickson : > Hello, > > In an upcoming release the libnfsdimap library >

Fedora Modular 27 compose report: 20171025.n.2 changes

OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171025.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171025.n.2 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 105 Downgraded packages: 9 Size of added packages: 454.67 KiB Size of dropped

Packaging Question

Hello, In an upcoming release the libnfsdimap library will be rolled into the nfs-utils package. Meaning nfs-utils will be install libnfsidmap instead of the libnfsidmap package. The libnfsidmap name will stay the same so I'm hoping there will not be any problems. Just the owner of the

Re: hp-plugin doesn't work in hplip-3.17.9 - move to 3.17.10 if you need

On 10/26/2017 01:50 PM, R P Herrold wrote: > On Thu, 26 Oct 2017, Zdenek Dohnal wrote: > >> HP changed website this week, which has consequences for getting hp >> proprietary plugin - it cannot be downloaded anymore for hplip-3.17.9, >> which is in stable Fedoras (f25 and f26) and Fedora 27. ...

Re: BuildError: src.fedoraproject.org:/git/rpms/mingw-gdal is not in the list of allowed SCMs

On 26.10.2017 14:02, Ondřej Lysoněk wrote: So this was caused by an update of fedpkg available in updates-testing. See: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-9cac2b8b4a https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188634 Downgrading fedpkg should fix the problem. Indeed, thanks!

Re: BuildError: src.fedoraproject.org:/git/rpms/mingw-gdal is not in the list of allowed SCMs

On 24.10.2017 18:38, Sandro Mani wrote: > Any ideas about this one? > > $ fedpkg build > Building mingw-gdal-2.2.2-3.fc28 for rawhide > Created task: 22673795 > Task info: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=22673795 > Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... > 22673795

hp-plugin doesn't work in hplip-3.17.9 - move to 3.17.10 if you need

On Thu, 26 Oct 2017, Zdenek Dohnal wrote: > HP changed website this week, which has consequences for getting hp > proprietary plugin - it cannot be downloaded anymore for hplip-3.17.9, > which is in stable Fedoras (f25 and f26) and Fedora 27. ... > upstream several times about uploading plugin

Re: BuildError: src.fedoraproject.org:/git/rpms/mingw-gdal is not in the list of allowed SCMs

On 24.10.2017 18:38, Sandro Mani wrote: > Any ideas about this one? > > $ fedpkg build > Building mingw-gdal-2.2.2-3.fc28 for rawhide > Created task: 22673795 > Task info: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=22673795 > Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... > 22673795

[Bug 1506493] perl-Shell-Config-Generate-0.31 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506493 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[389-devel] Re: csiphash on Sparc

On (13/10/17 20:35), William Brown wrote: >On Wed, 2017-10-11 at 13:36 +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >> But following code should work. Please correct me if I am wrong. I didn't >> test. >> char *str = strdup("ABCDEFGH12345678"); >> char *key = malloc(16); >> >> yes, function sds_siphash13

Re: hp-plugin doesn't work in hplip-3.17.9 - move to 3.17.10 if you need

If plugin download doesn't work even after update, please try uninstalling hplip and reinstalling it again from updates-testing repository. On 10/26/2017 12:25 PM, Zdenek Dohnal wrote: > Hi, > > HP changed website this week, which has consequences for getting hp > proprietary plugin - it cannot

hp-plugin doesn't work in hplip-3.17.9 - move to 3.17.10 if you need

Hi, HP changed website this week, which has consequences for getting hp proprietary plugin - it cannot be downloaded anymore for hplip-3.17.9, which is in stable Fedoras (f25 and f26) and Fedora 27. It means anyone, who has printer, which needs this proprietary plugin (there is the list, where

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 840 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031 python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6 834 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168 rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6 724

Re: NSS Default File Format SQL in Fedora 28

On 25 October 2017 at 16:16, Kai Engert wrote: > On 25.10.2017 15:22, James Hogarth wrote: >> There's always process if something is high enough level to be >> considered a "Change" >> >> Please follow the appropriate process to have this included as a >> system level change for

[Bug 1506491] perl-FFI-CheckLib-0.18 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506491 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

Re: packaging ruby dependencies

> De: "Rich Megginson" Hi, > I can't argue with that. > What I can do is present my painful experience. > I want to use fluentd (a medium sized ruby application) + a half dozen > or so plugins packaged as separate gems. > This puts me on the hook to be the maintainer in perpetuity of 90+

Flock Bidding still open - don't forget

Flock bidding for Europe is still open. The new easier bid process is described here: https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/flock-2018-bidding-open/ The process is lightweight and designed to help you move forward with a proposal quickly. You start by answering some basic questions about

major elpa update (API and ABI incompatible)

Hi, I intend to update elpa to the latest version (2017.05.002) in rawhide. This is a major change from currently packaged 2015.11.001. It comes with a new API and is ABI-incompatible. Old APIs, especially some private functions which were exposed but not meant for public use by upstream have been

[Bug 1506493] New: perl-Shell-Config-Generate-0.31 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506493 Bug ID: 1506493 Summary: perl-Shell-Config-Generate-0.31 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Shell-Config-Generate Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1506491] New: perl-FFI-CheckLib-0.18 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506491 Bug ID: 1506491 Summary: perl-FFI-CheckLib-0.18 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-FFI-CheckLib Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

Fedora Modular 27 compose report: 20171025.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171025.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171025.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages:

Re: Re: packaging ruby dependencies

Hi, > I've done the "build the dependency chain" work myself with various > projects I publish to github. The current problem I have is that for > recent Fedora releases, I've not worked out how to add the local yum > or dnf repositories to the "mock" configurations I've been working > with for

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Final Release Readiness Meeting

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Final Release Readiness Meeting on 2017-10-26 from 19:00:00 to 21:00:00 UTC At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-1 for the Fedora 27 Final Release Readiness Meeting

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2017-10-26 16:00 UTC)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Wed, 2017-10-25 at 22:37 -0400, James Antill wrote: > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC > meeting Thursday at 2017-10-26 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on > irc.freenode.net. > > Local time information (via.

Re: packaging ruby dependencies

On 26/10/17 04:52, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: I've done the "build the dependency chain" work myself with various projects I publish to github. The current problem I have is that for recent Fedora releases, I've not worked out how to add the local yum or dnf repositories to the "mock"