OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171106.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171106.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0.00 B
Size of dropped packages:
https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/3
https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/raw/files/a1dda5db91e1178d7de4f4761e1a00
5a0e362bd7f1e9528e7d89a4da1c681d0e-0001-Ticket-3-lib389-python-3-
support-ds_logs-tests.patch
--
Sincerely,
William Brown
Software Engineer
Red Hat, Australia/Brisbane
signature.asc
https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/3
https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/raw/files/69df7d4f3a729e560a5fb63072cc57
d3be4c9644846adb7684a61af637dc7485-0001-Ticket-3-lib389-config-
test.patch
--
Sincerely,
William Brown
Software Engineer
Red Hat, Australia/Brisbane
signature.asc
Description: This is a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, 2017-11-07 at 23:58 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-11-08 at 00:32 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > Yesterday we removed following Provides/Obsoletes from coreutils.
> > - fileutils
> > - sh-utils
> > - stat
> > - textutils
> > -
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
975 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087
dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7
737 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7
319
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509722
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Finance-Quote-1.43-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510220
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Finance-Quote-1.43-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1507840
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509722
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Finance-Quote-1.43-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510220
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Finance-Quote-1.43-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510678
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
hotness's scratch build of perl-Finance-Quote-1.44-1.el7.src.rpm for rawhide
completed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510220
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Finance-Quote-1.43-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
853 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031
python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6
847 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168
rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6
737
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509722
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Finance-Quote-1.43-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510678
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1349182
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1349182=edit
[patch] Update to 1.44 (#1510678)
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510678
Bug ID: 1510678
Summary: perl-Finance-Quote-1.44 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Finance-Quote
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510220
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Finance-Quote-1.43-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509722
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Finance-Quote-1.43-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
On Wed, 2017-11-08 at 00:32 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> Yesterday we removed following Provides/Obsoletes from coreutils.
> - fileutils
> - sh-utils
> - stat
> - textutils
> - mktemp
Script of startup of Azureus use mktemp
cat /usr/bin/azureus | grep mktemp
TMP_SCRIPT=$(mktemp)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Yesterday we removed following Provides/Obsoletes from coreutils.
- - fileutils
- - sh-utils
- - stat
- - textutils
- - mktemp
First four never been separate packages (at least from what I can see
in dist-git), last one disappeared in fc10...
I've
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1503228
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510223
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509722
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510220
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
Looks like success to me ...
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=22980259
Is there something I'm missing?
Rich.
- Forwarded message from notificati...@fedoraproject.org -
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 19:05:58 + (UTC)
From: notificati...@fedoraproject.org
To:
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/48393
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/a900cbac9d8d6ed0bd14a424dd966cca4233a1376fb392c2129d5987d3073f90-0001-Issue-48393-Add-a-test-case-for-nsds5ReplicaId-check.patch
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
OLD: Fedora-Modular-Bikeshed-20171026.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Modular-Bikeshed-20171026.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0.00 B
Size of dropped
On Tue, 7 Nov 2017, Mátyás Selmeci wrote:
> This highlights a problem I've occasionally had with EPEL, namely that
> packages I depend on occasionally get removed. This especially causes trouble
> when a package gets removed because it's now in RHEL, because it takes a few
> months for CentOS and
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Committee on 2017-11-08 from 18:00:00 to 19:00:00 GMT
At fedora-meet...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
There is a weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting to go over events, ideas, and
tickets about EPEL.
More
On 11/07/2017 05:51 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 04:47:51PM +0100, Ondrej Kozina wrote:
On 10/30/2017 04:58 PM, Ondrej Kozina wrote:
clevis-udisks2-0:6-3.fc27.x86_64
libblockdev-crypto-0:2.13-1.fc28.x86_64
libluksmeta-0:8-1.fc28.x86_64
luksmeta-0:8-1.fc28.x86_64
On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 04:47:51PM +0100, Ondrej Kozina wrote:
> On 10/30/2017 04:58 PM, Ondrej Kozina wrote:
> >
> >clevis-udisks2-0:6-3.fc27.x86_64
> >libblockdev-crypto-0:2.13-1.fc28.x86_64
> >libluksmeta-0:8-1.fc28.x86_64
> >luksmeta-0:8-1.fc28.x86_64
> >pam_mount-0:2.15-3.fc24.x86_64
>
On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 04:08:18PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 04:47:51PM +0100, Ondrej Kozina wrote:
> > On 10/30/2017 04:58 PM, Ondrej Kozina wrote:
> > >
> > >clevis-udisks2-0:6-3.fc27.x86_64
> > >libblockdev-crypto-0:2.13-1.fc28.x86_64
> >
It's actually cryptsetup:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=996024
A completely new version (2.0.0) was just added to Rawhide ...
This has an SONAME bump (.4 -> .12).
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my
There are a bunch of problems which have just appeared
(literally in the last hour) in Rawhide:
DEBUG util.py:439: Error:
DEBUG util.py:439: Problem 1: package webkitgtk4-2.19.1-2.fc28.x86_64
requires libupower-glib.so.3()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
installed
DEBUG
On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 04:47:51PM +0100, Ondrej Kozina wrote:
> On 10/30/2017 04:58 PM, Ondrej Kozina wrote:
> >
> >clevis-udisks2-0:6-3.fc27.x86_64
> >libblockdev-crypto-0:2.13-1.fc28.x86_64
> >libluksmeta-0:8-1.fc28.x86_64
> >luksmeta-0:8-1.fc28.x86_64
> >pam_mount-0:2.15-3.fc24.x86_64
>
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Another method might be to add an alternate strip binary/script which
> filters based on your preferred criteria.
>
> %global __strip %{_sourcedir}/my-strip.sh
Just marking the relevant files non-executable works in my case, but thanks
for the
On 10/30/2017 04:58 PM, Ondrej Kozina wrote:
clevis-udisks2-0:6-3.fc27.x86_64
libblockdev-crypto-0:2.13-1.fc28.x86_64
libluksmeta-0:8-1.fc28.x86_64
luksmeta-0:8-1.fc28.x86_64
pam_mount-0:2.15-3.fc24.x86_64
systemd-0:235-2.fc28.x86_64
systemd-tests-0:235-2.fc28.x86_64
On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 11:23:33AM +, David Howells wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Is it possible to specify from a specfile an list of files and/or directories
> in the installation output that should be ignored for the purposes of
> debuginfo extraction? If not, can this be added?
>
> I maintain
On 11/07/2017 03:23 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> During a package review rpmlint noted that the package did not own
> /usr/share/metainfo.
>
> A cursory "rpm -q --whatprovides /usr/share/metainfo" returned no results.
>
> I know rpm can handle multiple packages owning a directory these days
> but
During a package review rpmlint noted that the package did not own
/usr/share/metainfo.
A cursory "rpm -q --whatprovides /usr/share/metainfo" returned no results.
I know rpm can handle multiple packages owning a directory these days but I
don't think it is correct for a package only providing an
OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171106.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171106.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0.00 B
Size of dropped packages:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510360
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
On mardi 7 novembre 2017 13:11:36 CET Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 10:43:09PM +0100, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
>
> > │├── 1508060 Review Request: golang-github-kylelemons-godebug -
> > Debugging helper utilities for Go
││
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510360
Bug 1510360 depends on bug 1510373, which changed state.
Bug 1510373 Summary: Upgrade perl-App-CLI to 0.49
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510373
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510373
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510234
--- Comment #5 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
hotness's scratch build of perl-WWW-Splunk-2.08-1.el7.src.rpm for rawhide
failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=22973436
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510234
--- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1348937
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1348937=edit
[patch] Update to 2.08 (#1510234)
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510234
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hi David,
On Tue, 2017-11-07 at 11:23 +, David Howells wrote:
> Is it possible to specify from a specfile an list of files and/or
> directories
> in the installation output that should be ignored for the purposes of
> debuginfo extraction? If not, can this be added?
Debuginfo extraction is
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 10:43:09PM +0100, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> │├── 1508060 Review Request: golang-github-kylelemons-godebug -
> Debugging helper utilities for Go
> ││ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1508060
> ││
> │└──
Hi Mark,
Is it possible to specify from a specfile an list of files and/or directories
in the installation output that should be ignored for the purposes of
debuginfo extraction? If not, can this be added?
I maintain cross-gcc and there are some files that get
installed that must not be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510220
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Finance-Quote-1.43-1.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 6.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-84459b620f
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509722
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Finance-Quote-1.43-1.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 6.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-84459b620f
--
You are
Missing expected images:
Workstation live i386
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 8/135 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in 27 RC 1.3):
ID: 165598 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_cockpit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/165598
ID: 166894
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 3:31 AM Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> On 11/02/2017 06:40 PM, Jonny Heggheim wrote:
> > Hi, I started playing with the pass[1] unix password manager and finally
> > found workflow that makes my Kerberos workflow scriptable :)
>
> Or you can simply create a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510220
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Finance-Quote-1.43-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-967e14970f
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509722
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Finance-Quote-1.43-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e5b17ca891
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509722
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Finance-Quote-1.43-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-967e14970f
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510220
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Finance-Quote-1.43-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-967e14970f
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510220
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Finance-Quote-1.43-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e5b17ca891
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510373
Bug ID: 1510373
Summary: Upgrade perl-App-CLI to 0.49
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-App-CLI
Keywords: FutureFeature
Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510360
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1510373
Referenced
Hi,
i am going to update tomcat-native from 1.1.33 to 1.2.12 in epel7,
given that the actual epel7 tomcat version is 7.0.76 which bundles
tc-native 1.2.12. [1]
I will release the updated tomcat-native this week in the testing repo.
Regards
--
Lorenzo Dalrio
[1]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510220
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Finance-Quote-1.43-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e5b17ca891
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509745
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510220
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Finance-Quote-1.43-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-45a5cb89a1
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510360
Bug ID: 1510360
Summary: perl-Shipwright-2.4.41-7.fc28 FTBFS: Can't use string
("Shipwright::Script") as a HASH ref while "strict
refs" in use at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510220
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509748
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
The following commits were pushed to the repo "rpms/perl-Code-TidyAll" on branch
"f27", which you are following:
28b783a7a04facf21259e572953bab3bf48a625cJitka Plesnikova0.69 bump
To view more about the commits, visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Code-TidyAll/commits/f27
The following commits were pushed to the repo "rpms/perl-Code-TidyAll" on branch
"master", which you are following:
28b783a7a04facf21259e572953bab3bf48a625cJitka Plesnikova0.69 bump
To view more about the commits, visit:
The following commits were pushed to the repo "rpms/perl-List-MoreUtils" on
branch
"master", which you are following:
c164814e80ee7332191d0dc35432920fbe378b4fPaul HowarthUpdate to 0.426
To view more about the commits, visit:
The following commits were pushed to the repo "rpms/perl-List-MoreUtils" on
branch
"f27", which you are following:
c164814e80ee7332191d0dc35432920fbe378b4fPaul HowarthUpdate to 0.426
To view more about the commits, visit:
On 2017-11-07 02:24, David Tardon wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 01:10:15PM -0600, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
>> On 2017-11-06 06:13, David Tardon wrote:
>>> poppler-sharp
>>
>> Are you sure this is necessary? Only libpoppler-glib is mentioned in
>> the .dll.config, and libpoppler doesn't have a C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510223
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-libwww-perl-6.29-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-c7c44f04ce
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510223
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 01:10:15PM -0600, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> On 2017-11-06 06:13, David Tardon wrote:
> > I will build a new release of poppler this week, which includes soname
> > bump. I will take care of rebuilding the affected packages:
>
> While ultimately it would be nice to
On 11/02/2017 06:40 PM, Jonny Heggheim wrote:
> Hi, I started playing with the pass[1] unix password manager and finally
> found workflow that makes my Kerberos workflow scriptable :)
Or you can simply create a keytab (using ktutil) and run "kinit -k"
without typing password.
--
Mikolaj
antlr license was changed from "Public Domain" to "ANTLR-PD"
For justification, see
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/le...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/7JUCBVMP5VG5NEPX4NPQBIHBHH2WORE2/
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
79 matches
Mail list logo