Missing expected images:
Docker_base docker x86_64
Server dvd arm
Failed openQA tests: 21/94 (x86_64), 6/19 (i386)
New failures (same test did not fail in 27-20171128.n.1):
ID: 176683 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_btrfs
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/176683
ID: 176689
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Wednesday at 2017-11-29 18:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. uitime):
= Day: Wednesday =
2017-11-29 10:00 PST US/Pacific
2017-11-29
OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171128.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171129.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 3.00 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Hi all,
I'm planning on updating bullet to 2.87 in rawhide over the weekend.
The following packages are affected:
$ dnf repoquery --source --alldeps --whatrequires "bullet*"
Last metadata expiration check: 0:37:51 ago on Tue 28 Nov 2017 07:31:59 PM EST.
bullet-2.83-6.fc27.src.rpm
cyphesis-0.6.2-1
Hello,
*I'd like to remove 'mysql-connector-odbc' package from Fedora.I'm looking
for feedback for such an action.*
For a long time 'mysql-connector-odbc' was the only connector of its kind
in Fedora.
However it is not update for a many releases, because upstream disabled
dynamic linking. It wa
At a guess, and not having looked at the code or logs, I would say it’s
either a virtual destructor defined in a header file (that can cause
problems with the vtable not being generated by any compilation unit)
or it has been built with -fvisibility=hidden and the class is not
marked with visibilit
Greetings.
On December 4th, 2017 and running until December 8th 2017, Fedora
Infrastructure will be moving servers from an existing datacenter
location to another new section of the datacenter.
This move will allow us more space and power and to consolidate and
rewire existing servers.
A schedul
On Tuesday, 28 November 2017 at 20:16, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
[...]
> Microsoft Guidelines Support Library (your package) is the third
> hit. Why don't you just name it 'guideline-support-library'? I
> think it'll be clearer this way.
Seconded, excellent idea.
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora htt
Maybe someone can tell me which forum I can contact to fix this error?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
The license changes from "MIT" to "MIT and BSD" as of the newly released
version 3.0.0, which has been built for rawhide and will make it to f27 and
f26 if no problems with dependent packages (syncthing) arise.
This has no real effect for fedora, since the changed license tag only
arises from a ne
On 11/28/2017 10:23 AM, Vitaly Zaitsev wrote:
I want to add a new package GSL (header-only C++ library:
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FMicrosoft%2FGSL&data=02%7C01%7Cprzemek.klosowski%40nist.gov%7C770bea95b2264237725d08d5367429ca%7C2ab5d82fd8fa4797a
28.11.2017, 15:52, "Eike Rathke" :
> What ABI compat package?
A parallel installable package that would temporarily provide ICU 57 libraries
(but not development headers) so that packages that fail to rebuild with ICU 60
can be fixed gradually and keep on working in the mean time. Otherwise co
Missing expected images:
Docker_base docker x86_64
Server dvd arm
Failed openQA tests: 24/94 (x86_64), 5/19 (i386)
New failures (same test did not fail in 27-20171128.n.0):
ID: 176480 Test: i386 Server-dvd-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/176480
ID: 176484
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 16:37 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> Missing expected images:
>
> Server dvd i386
> Workstation live i386
> Server boot i386
> Kde live i386
>
> Failed openQA tests: 83/128 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
So, all tests run from a Server image (which is a lot of them, as the
'un
Hi,
Many packaging ecosystems use vendor name in package name to disambiguate,
though they are usually prepended
If the vendor didn't want its name associated with the software it could
publish through neutral entities such as Apache, Eclipse, and so on. (never add
a vendor name not pro-eminen
I think that the vendor name should go at the beginning of the package name,
since suffixes are mostly used in Fedora to denote subpackages, like -data,
-docs, -devel, or modules, plugins, and such.
We have a couple of "google-*" font packages, so this usage of the vendor name
should be okay -
OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171128.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171128.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 35
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0.00 B
Size of dropped packages
Missing expected images:
Server dvd i386
Workstation live i386
Server boot i386
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 83/128 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20171127.n.0):
ID: 176197 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedo
=
#fedora-meeting-3: Meeting of the Modularity Working Group (once every two
weeks)
=
Meeting started by nils at 15:01:06 UTC.
Minutes:
Hi, Vitaly.
On Tuesday, 28 November 2017 at 16:23, Vitaly Zaitsev wrote:
> I want to add a new package GSL (header-only C++ library:
> https://github.com/Microsoft/GSL) to repository, but another
> package with the same name (gsl) already exists in Fedora.
> I decided to rename my new package to g
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 9:23 AM, Vitaly Zaitsev
wrote:
> Hello all.
>
> I want to add a new package GSL (header-only C++ library:
> https://github.com/Microsoft/GSL) to repository, but another package with
> the same name (gsl) already exists in Fedora. I decided to rename my new
> package to gsl
Hello all.
I want to add a new package GSL (header-only C++ library:
https://github.com/Microsoft/GSL) to repository, but another package with the
same name (gsl) already exists in Fedora. I decided to rename my new package to
gsl-microsoft. Is it okay to use Microsoft in package name or I need
On 11/28/2017 08:30 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
>
> I've been contacted by Fedora QE about this, and have bz
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518150
>
> I haven't followed (can't follow) Fedora closely enough to know what's
> needed here. Apparently none of my co-maintainers have e
Today we are approximately in the middle of Nomination & Campaign
period and we accept nominations to "steering bodies" of the following
teams:
* FESCo (Engineering) (5 seats) [2]
* Fedora Council (2 seats) [3]
* Mindshare (2 seats) [4]
This period is open until 2017-Dec-04 at 23:59:59 UTC.
The
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 28 Rawhide 20171128.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
I've been contacted by Fedora QE about this, and have bz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518150
I haven't followed (can't follow) Fedora closely enough to know what's
needed here. Apparently none of my co-maintainers have either. ;-)
glusterfs packages are built for f27.
Reading th
Hi Pete,
On Monday, 2017-11-27 21:58:43 +0300, Pete Walter wrote:
> Eike Rathke and I are working on updating ICU from 57.x to 60.x in
> rawhide/F28. It includes a soname bump and has a few API changes. We'll do an
> ABI compat package to avoid breaking the world while rebuilds are ongoing.
Wh
Hello,
we have found out that http://copr.fedoraproject.org was used as default
API endpoint if no copr_url was specified for CoprClient initialization.
This is now fixed in the latest version of python-copr (python-copr-1.84)
and we recommend updating to that version. Also we have decided to revo
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 09:57:50AM +0100, Jan Synacek wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Igor Gnatenko
>> wrote:
>> > snip
>>
>> I kind of wonder... What is so special about them that they deserve a
>> big announcement
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 10:04 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:55:01AM +0100, Brian Exelbierd wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017, at 09:57 AM, Jan Synacek wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Igor G
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:55:01AM +0100, Brian Exelbierd wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017, at 09:57 AM, Jan Synacek wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Igor Gnatenko
> > wrote:
> > > snip
> >
> > I kind of wonder... What is so special about them that they deserve a
> > big announcemen
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:52:46AM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 09:29 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 06:38:50PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 09:57 +0100, Jan Synacek wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Igor Gnatenko
> wrote:
> > snip
>
> I kind of wonder... What is so special about them that they deserve a
> big announcement like this?
As Zbyszek said, this
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017, at 09:57 AM, Jan Synacek wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Igor Gnatenko
> wrote:
> > snip
>
> I kind of wonder... What is so special about them that they deserve a
> big announcement like this?
Actually, I really like this "big announcement." I'd love to see mor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 09:29 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 06:38:50PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA256
> >
> > * base100
> > https://github.com/AdamNiederer/base
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 06:38:50PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> * base100
> https://github.com/AdamNiederer/base100
> Encode things into Emoji.
>
> Base💯 can represent any byte with a unique emoji symbol, therefore it ca
> n represent binary
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 09:57:50AM +0100, Jan Synacek wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Igor Gnatenko
> wrote:
> > snip
>
> I kind of wonder... What is so special about them that they deserve a
> big announcement like this?
It wasn't possible to before. See
https://fedoraproject.org/wik
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
> snip
I kind of wonder... What is so special about them that they deserve a
big announcement like this?
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraprojec
On 11/25/2017 09:21 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Hello,
My attempt at building a wine update today failed for only the ARMv7
(32-bit) builds across F26, F27, and Rawhide. I'm seeing the build
log[1] show the following message:
error: variadic functions must use the base AAPCS variant
I'm
40 matches
Mail list logo
