Fedora-Modular 27-20171203.n.0 compose check report

2017-12-02 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Docker_base docker x86_64 Server dvd arm Failed openQA tests: 23/94 (x86_64), 4/19 (i386) New failures (same test did not fail in 27-20171202.n.1): ID: 178556 Test: x86_64 universal install_ext3 URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/178556 ID: 178568

Fedora Modular 27 compose report: 20171203.n.0 changes

2017-12-02 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171202.n.1 NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171203.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Nomination & Campaign period ends

2017-12-02 Thread jkurik
Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Nomination & Campaign period ends on 2017-12-04 from 00:00:00 to 00:00:00 UTC The meeting will be about: The Nomination & Campaign period for the next elections ends tomorrow. These elections will take place on December 2017: - FESCo (Engi

Fedora 27 - bind - DNS request timed out when the bandwidth is fully occupy

2017-12-02 Thread Dario Lesca
I have setup a dns server with named bind-9.11.1-8.P3.fc27.x86_64 on Fedora 27. This is the DNS1 server for my notebook an all local lan (192.168.61.254) The problem is that when bandwidth is fully occupy (download some big data), the DNS cannot resolve new name not in cache [lesca@dodo

Re: Basic package split question

2017-12-02 Thread Philip Kovacs
>> You need to add Obsoletes: foo < 2 >Sorry, hit send too early. You need to add such obsoletes BOTH to foo and foo- >bar. Adding obsoletes foo < 2 on both packages worked.  Thanks much. On Saturday, December 2, 2017 4:28 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Has

Fedora Modular bikeshed compose report: changes

2017-12-02 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora-Modular 27-20171202.n.1 compose check report

2017-12-02 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Docker_base docker x86_64 Server dvd arm Failed openQA tests: 24/94 (x86_64), 4/19 (i386) ID: 178401 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso support_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/178401 ID: 178407 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_default URL:

Fedora Modular 27 compose report: 20171202.n.1 changes

2017-12-02 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171202.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171202.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 4 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages

Fedora Rawhide-20171202.n.0 compose check report

2017-12-02 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Server dvd i386 Workstation live i386 Server boot i386 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 87/128 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20171201.n.0): ID: 178309 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedo

Re: how to replace ssl with ssh2 in kqoauth

2017-12-02 Thread Rex Dieter
Kevin Kofler wrote: > Rex Dieter wrote: >> I can/will step up (for qt v4 which won't be going away any time soon). > > Can't we patch Qt 4 to build with OpenSSL 1.1 instead? > > At least Debian has a patch (which seems to be over a year old): > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-kde/qt/qt4-x11.

Re: Self Introduction: Ryan Breaker

2017-12-02 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 03:46:27PM -0600, Ryan Breaker wrote: > Hello everyone, my name is Ryan and I’m looking to join the Packager group to > revive and update the netatalk package, as well as be available to assist > with anything else I find myself interested in helping with. I’m a huge fan

Re: Basic package split question

2017-12-02 Thread Igor Gnatenko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sat, 2017-12-02 at 10:25 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > On Sat, 2017-12-02 at 09:24 +0100, Mattia Verga wrote: > > Il 01/12/2017 20:20, Philip Kovacs ha scritto: > > > If I have version 1 of package foo, containing items bar, xxx, yyy, > > > zzz,

Re: Basic package split question

2017-12-02 Thread Igor Gnatenko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sat, 2017-12-02 at 09:24 +0100, Mattia Verga wrote: > Il 01/12/2017 20:20, Philip Kovacs ha scritto: > > If I have version 1 of package foo, containing items bar, xxx, yyy, > > zzz, i.e. > > > > foo-1 > > - > > bar > > xxx > > yyy > > zzz >

Re: Basic package split question

2017-12-02 Thread Mattia Verga
Il 01/12/2017 20:20, Philip Kovacs ha scritto: If I have version 1 of package foo, containing items bar, xxx, yyy, zzz, i.e. foo-1 - bar xxx yyy zzz and, for version 2, bar is split off to its own sub-package, foo-bar, so that the desired packaging becomes: foo-2  foo-bar-2 -  -