Re: gnome crashes after today upgrade

On 02/02/2018 12:55 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: Yeah I'm getting a bunch of clutter messages as well as many lines of gnome shell desktop related stack traces. But there is nothing listed by coredumpctl, or abrt. Feb 02 13:51:31 f27h.localdomain org.gnome.Shell.desktop[1612]: == Stack trace for con

Re: Wyland is a disaster

On 02/03/2018 05:58 PM, Howard Howell wrote: Latest finding... running gpartd, which I wanted to use to reformat an SD card for use with a raspberry PI, drops me out to login immediately. attached is the latest journalctl after the third attempt. I clicked on gpartd at 17:36:14, and ended up lo

Re: Wyland is a disaster

On Thu, 2018-02-01 at 09:08 -0800, Howard Howell wrote: > On Wed, 2018-01-31 at 09:43 -0800, Howard Howell wrote: > > On Wed, 2018-01-31 at 14:14 +0100, Olivier Fourdan wrote: > > > Hi > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 1:58 PM, Olivier Fourdan > > .com> wrote: > > > > Jan 31 01:14:08 school gno

Re: gnome crashes after today upgrade

Tomasz Kłoczko writes: On 3 February 2018 at 22:55, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com> wrote: Any news on the cause? I'm waiting to update until this is figured out... Still don't see any update about the issue. It is really pain in the a*s that Linux still ha

Fedora Rawhide-20180203.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Workstation live i386 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 9/129 (x86_64), 4/22 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 190546 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/190546 ID: 190576 Test: i386 Workstation-boot

Re: gnome crashes after today upgrade

On 3 February 2018 at 22:55, Richard Shaw wrote: > Any news on the cause? I'm waiting to update until this is figured out... > Still don't see any update about the issue. It is really pain in the a*s that Linux still has no good support to handle such cases like it is on for example on Solaris w

Re: [Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2018-02-05 blocker review meeting

On Sat, 2018-02-03 at 19:17 +, Silvia Sánchez wrote: > Hi, > > I actually have an issue that could be a Beta blocker but I didn't file the > bug because I don't know where to do so, and there were no meetings so far, > so I hadn't the chance to discuss it. Hi Silvia! Please just file the bug

Re: gnome crashes after today upgrade

Any news on the cause? I'm waiting to update until this is figured out... Thanks, Richard ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2018-02-05 blocker review meeting

Hi, I actually have an issue that could be a Beta blocker but I didn't file the bug because I don't know where to do so, and there were no meetings so far, so I hadn't the chance to discuss it. Regards, Silvia FAS: Lailah On 3 February 2018 at 18:14, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi folks! I'm pr

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2018-02-05 blocker review meeting

Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the blocker review meeting for Monday. There are no proposed blockers for Beta or Final at this time, so nothing to talk about. Thanks! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassass

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2018-02-05 Fedora QA Meeting

Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting on Monday. I'll be traveling again, and I don't think there are any urgent topics at this time. If anyone would like to have a meeting, and is willing to run it in my place, please just go ahead and send an announcement mail (and, of course, show up

Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging

Hi Robert André That's an interesting request I guess you can't figure if the example is for building binaries or Go libs, because there is no hard frontier between both cases in the proposed guidelines In Go, everything is effectively a code library that can be reused elsewhere. So the approa

Re: COPR + pagure + rpkg HOWTO?

Hello Richard, On Sat, Feb 3, 2018 at 3:45 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > I would like to manage a COPR via SCM (in this case pagure) > > I'm assuming using rpkg would be a good way to do this? Or should I forget > that and just use plain git+copr-cli? > > There is OK documentation for the independen

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging

De: "Jakub Cajka" Hi Jakub > I'm strongly against general unrestricted practice of compat packages as > proposed. If you need compat package you > need to work with usptreams on stabilizing the API/project, fork it, or just > use COPR as your projects(or its > dependencies) are not yet mature

ghc 8.2 now in Rawhide

The Haskell SIG is pleased to announce that the ghc Haskell compiler has been updated from 8.0.2 to 8.2.2 in Fedora Rawhide (for more information see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GHC_8.2). Most Haskell packages have already been updated and/or rebuilt. A few remaining excepts are: darc

COPR + pagure + rpkg HOWTO?

I would like to manage a COPR via SCM (in this case pagure) I'm assuming using rpkg would be a good way to do this? Or should I forget that and just use plain git+copr-cli? There is OK documentation for the independent tools but I can't seem to find a HOWTO that ties it all together. I want to u

Re: gobject-introspection broken requires

* Sat Feb 03 2018 Richard Shaw - 1.54.1-4 - Add python2 to configure so shebangs are properly updated by brp-mangle-shebangs. Fixed and rebuilt. Thanks, Richard ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to d

gobject-introspection broken requires

DEPRECATION WARNING: python2 invoked with /usr/bin/python. Use /usr/bin/python3 or /usr/bin/python2 /usr/bin/python will be removed or switched to Python 3 in the future. If you cannot make the switch now, please follow instructions at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Avoid_usr_bi

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: joost

Well I could not find any activity for 2018 so we're well past 3 weeks at this point. I have filed a ticket here: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1838 But I don't want to maintain the packages, I can barely keep up with the ones I already have on here and RPM Fusion. Thanks, Richard __

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: joost

Richard Shaw 于2018年1月26日 周五上午12:57写道： > Per the policy I am asking here if anyone knows how to get in touch with > joost (jo...@cnoc.nl). > > I have bug reports for both fpc and lazarus that have gone for weeks > without any response and it's preventing me from building cqrlog on armv7hl > in rawh

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: joost

Il 03/02/2018 01:05, Artur Iwicki ha scritto: Hi, Richard. What's the status on trying to reach joost? I use Pascal for some of my personal projects, so it's important to me that the Pascal stack in Fedora is operational. Have you began the procedure to take over the packages from joost? I'd