Hello,
the fedora-28-ppc64le chroot was no working up until now due to lack of
compose. This was resolved however in issue.
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7357
clime
___
devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
Hi all,
Today’s an important day on the Fedora 28 schedule[1], with several
significant cut-offs. First of all today is the Bodhi activation point [2].
That means that from now all Fedora 28 packages must be submitted to
updates-testing and pass the relevant requirements[3] before they will be
Hello,
the fedora-28-ppc64le chroot was no working up until now due to lack of
compose. This was resolved however in issue.
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7357
clime
___
devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
f28-backgrounds just got packaged and ready for beta release. Please
test and give positive if everything works as intended.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/f28-backgrounds-28.1.0-1.fc28%20desktop-backgrounds-28.0.0-1.fc28
Thanks in advance
--
Luya Tshimbalanga
Graphic & Web Designer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543181
--- Comment #5 from Emmanuel Seyman ---
I'm waiting for the two deps to hit stable (which should be soon).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
On 03/05/2018 05:03 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-03-06 at 00:49 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>> Hi,
>> ATM, Fedora-28-20180303.n.1 , Fedora-28-20180304.n.0 and Fedora-28-
>> 20180305.n.0 still running ,
>>
>> I found one notification in Fedora-28-2018030
On Tue, 2018-03-06 at 00:49 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hi,
> ATM, Fedora-28-20180303.n.1 , Fedora-28-20180304.n.0 and Fedora-28-
> 20180305.n.0 still running ,
>
> I found one notification in Fedora-28-20180303.n.1 [1] that may explain
> why [2] is waiting for a commit sign
I've just bumped php-facedetect to the latest git code on Rawhide and
F28 (to make it build against OpenCV 3.4). This comes with a license
change back from BSD to PHP. Don't think this should affect any
dependencies.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora
Hi,
ATM, Fedora-28-20180303.n.1 , Fedora-28-20180304.n.0 and Fedora-28-
20180305.n.0 still running ,
I found one notification in Fedora-28-20180303.n.1 [1] that may explain
why [2] is waiting for a commit sign for 22 hours.
Cheers,
[1]
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/branched/Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551819
Bug ID: 1551819
Summary: perl-Test2-Suite-0.000104 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Test2-Suite
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
Hi all,
Today’s an important day on the Fedora 28 schedule[1], with several
significant cut-offs. First of all today is the Bodhi activation point [2].
That means that from now all Fedora 28 packages must be submitted to
updates-testing and pass the relevant requirements[3] before they will be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551806
Bug ID: 1551806
Summary: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Authentication-0.23 is
available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 6:28 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 05:16:36PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > > "ZJ" == Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes:
> >
> > ZJ> - various transfiletriggers have been ported from
On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 05:16:36PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > "ZJ" == Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes:
>
> ZJ> - various transfiletriggers have been ported from Mageia, for the
> ZJ> udev hwdb and rules, the journal catalog, sysctl.d, binfmt.d,
> ZJ>
> "ZJ" == Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes:
ZJ> - various transfiletriggers have been ported from Mageia, for the
ZJ> udev hwdb and rules, the journal catalog, sysctl.d, binfmt.d,
ZJ> sysusers.d, and tmpfiles.d. This means that for many packages,
ZJ> which do not
Hi,
systemd 238 has been released [1] and is building in F28 and rawhide.
This release has more bugfixes than new features, but there are some
changes that might be particularly interesting for Fedora:
- cgroups v2 is now supported much better. In particular a long-standing
conflict between
On 03/02/2018 04:04 AM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Also, how would you handle obsolete forgotten stray packages that linger
> in the repo (because they've not been killed properly, or a tool bug
> resulted in their non removal)? Gating gives any such package the power
> to block all updates in more
On Mon, 2018-03-05 at 17:06 -0500, R P Herrold wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Mar 2018, Randy Barlow wrote:
>
> > On 03/03/2018 11:15 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>
> > > * F27 Wine 3.3
>
> > >- "The update can not be pushed: no test results found"
>
> > >-
On Mon, 5 Mar 2018, Randy Barlow wrote:
> On 03/03/2018 11:15 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > * F27 Wine 3.3
> > - "The update can not be pushed: no test results found"
> > - https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-fa6f017315
> > * F26 Wine 3.3
> > - "The update can not be
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Modularity WG (once every two weeks) on 2018-03-06 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00
US/Eastern
At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
Meeting of the Modularity Working Group.
More information available at: [Modularity
On 03/03/2018 11:15 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> * F27 Wine 3.3
> - "The update can not be pushed: no test results found"
> - https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-fa6f017315
> * F26 Wine 3.3
> - "The update can not be pushed: 1 of 2 required tests not found"
> -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550526
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Image-ExifTool-10.80-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-0150540ebe
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550526
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Image-ExifTool-10.80-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL
7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-97782e8897
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550526
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Image-ExifTool-10.80-1.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL
6. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-00e0248288
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550526
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Image-ExifTool-10.80-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-989ad3ad8a
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543181
--- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Any chance you have a look this wek? This is the last missing package I need to
build ravada on EPEL.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 06:45:35PM -, Adam Goode wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Lennart has the flu, so he'll probably wont' reply immediately.
> I'll ping him, but you can expect that he will want to give the
> package away.
>
Thanks, and I hope he feels better soon.
Adam
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551481
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.24-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses for these package
maintainers are no longer valid. I'm starting the unresponsive
maintainer policy to find out if they are still interested in
maintaining their packages (and if so, have them update their email
addresses in FAS).
If they're not
On 02/07/2018 10:27 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses for these package
> maintainers are no longer valid. I'm starting the unresponsive
> maintainer policy to find out if they are still interested in
> maintaining their packages (and if so, have them
On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 06:45:35PM -, Adam Goode wrote:
> I am following the unresponsive maintainer policy:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
>
> Bug:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544608
>
> Does anyone know how to reach the
That sounds perfect! Thank you for volunteering.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551481
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
965 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168
rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6
855 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-e2b4b5b2fb
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el6
826
On Mon, 2018-03-05 at 11:35 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> We do freezes so that people don't suddenly make an unneeded change to
> the base content which causes a new release-blocking bug.
>
> If we don't have freezes, we run the risk of getting to the point where
> we're almost done,
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
1092 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087
dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7
855 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7
437
> It looks like you'll be "it" if the maintainers don't respond. Do you
> want to be a maintainer?
Yes, I can be the maintainer.
I'm currently the main upstream contributor:
https://github.com/lathiat/nss-mdns/graphs/contributors
___
devel mailing list
On Tue, 2017-11-21 at 10:05 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 4:22 AM, Jan Kurik wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 7:45 PM, Stephen John Smoogen
> > wrote:
> > > On 17 November 2017 at 13:30, Randy Barlow
> >
It looks like you'll be "it" if the maintainers don't respond. Do you want to
be a maintainer?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
I am following the unresponsive maintainer policy:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
Bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544608
Does anyone know how to reach the maintainer?
Thanks,
Adam
___
On Sat, 2018-03-03 at 19:32 +, Silvia Sánchez wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've been talking with other people and apparently is quite common to
> have issues with HP laptops. F25 works but F27 doesn't, with an
> extreme case of not booting at all.
> In my case I suspect of Wayland, provided
On Mon, 2018-03-05 at 18:03 +0100, Kalev Lember wrote:
> On 03/05/2018 05:48 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > Short version:
> >
> > $ sudo dnf copr enable ajax/upstream
> > $ sudo dnf upgrade
> >
> > Long version:
> >
> > I've set up a copr containing a rebuild of the X server and drivers for
> >
>
>
> I would say the opposite: land this today so that it can get in F28 Beta
> (tomorrow starts package freeze for the beta release), and don't do a
> post release update that changes the drivers ABI.
>
>
This should have happened via the System Wide Changes proces, isn´t? At
less a Freeze
On 03/05/2018 05:48 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> Short version:
>
> $ sudo dnf copr enable ajax/upstream
> $ sudo dnf upgrade
>
> Long version:
>
> I've set up a copr containing a rebuild of the X server and drivers for
> the upstream 1.20 release candidates. Unfortunately the upstream and
>
On Mon, 2018-01-22 at 16:24 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> ### Disable strict symbol checks in the link editor (ld)
>
> By default, the link editor will refuse to link shared objects which
> contain undefined symbols. In some cases (such as when a DSO is
> loaded as a plugin and is expected to
Short version:
$ sudo dnf copr enable ajax/upstream
$ sudo dnf upgrade
Long version:
I've set up a copr containing a rebuild of the X server and drivers for
the upstream 1.20 release candidates. Unfortunately the upstream and
Fedora schedules didn't line up as well as I'd have liked, so I'm not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551656
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551668
Bug ID: 1551668
Summary: perl-Verilog-Perl-3.448-1.fc29 FTBFS: t/35_sigparser.t
crashes
Product: Fedora
Version: 28
Component: perl-Verilog-Perl
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551284
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551656
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
External
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551656
Bug ID: 1551656
Summary: perl-Unix-Mknod-0.04-9.fc29 FTBFS: Mknod.so: undefined
symbol: minor
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Unix-Mknod
- Original Message -
> From: "Igor Gnatenko"
> To: devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2018 6:09:40 PM
> Subject: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551555
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed
From aa524ded2471f8d694f0048187297a0fd47c2363 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Mar 05 2018 12:57:12 +
Subject: 3.004 bump
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index db7ac91..7fae6ea 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
From aa524ded2471f8d694f0048187297a0fd47c2363 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Mar 05 2018 12:57:12 +
Subject: 3.004 bump
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index db7ac91..7fae6ea 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
On 03/05/2018 12:58 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 12:07:40PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
Should we start compiling Fedora with auto-vectorization, either
using -O3 or -O2 -ftree-loop-vectorize?
What's the performance impact?
You mean, on build time? Difficult to tell.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551554
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551555
Bug ID: 1551555
Summary: perl-Mail-Box-POP3-3.004 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Mail-Box-POP3
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551554
Bug ID: 1551554
Summary: perl-Mail-Box-IMAP4-3.003 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Mail-Box-IMAP4
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551548
Bug ID: 1551548
Summary: perl-Email-Address-1.909 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Email-Address
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 12:07:40PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Should we start compiling Fedora with auto-vectorization, either
> using -O3 or -O2 -ftree-loop-vectorize?
What's the performance impact? What are the risks?
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Project Leader
I missed a license change in perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.06 (2015 year). The
old license was "Artistic 2.0 and (GPL+ or Artistic)", the new one is
"Artistic 2.0". An updated package heads to all Fedoras that will fix
it.
-- Petr
___
devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551481
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.24-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-5eeffd1515
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551480
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551481
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
On 03/05/2018 11:43 AM, Germano Massullo wrote:
Il 05/03/2018 08:25, Florian Weimer ha scritto:
On 03/04/2018 03:02 PM, Germano Massullo wrote:
This tag is wrong and for example on x86_64 CPU architecture systems, it
must be
"path": "/usr/lib64/pkcs11/onepin-opensc-pkcs11.so"
How could I
On 4 March 2018 at 12:25, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> This new opt-in style has never been a good idea. The software features
> an "All" button, which doesn't show all packages, which is misleading.
It's not misleading; gnome-software is an application installed, not a
package
Should we start compiling Fedora with auto-vectorization, either using
-O3 or -O2 -ftree-loop-vectorize?
Downstream experimented with that for POWER 7 (the ppc64p7 packages).
But if auto-vectorization is beneficial on POWER, it likely helps on
other CPUs as well, given that SIMD support is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550520
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed
Il 05/03/2018 08:25, Florian Weimer ha scritto:
> On 03/04/2018 03:02 PM, Germano Massullo wrote:
>> This tag is wrong and for example on x86_64 CPU architecture systems, it
>> must be
>> "path": "/usr/lib64/pkcs11/onepin-opensc-pkcs11.so"
>>
>> How could I patch this file without having to
On 03/05/2018 10:25 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> AppData packaging guidelines [1] requires every package to run
> "appstream-util validate-relax". Does this check fail when the icon has
> not valid size?
No, because the icon comes from the .desktop file and 'appstream-util
validate ... appdata.xml'
Hi all,
A new version fedpkg-1.32 is released.
Changelog
- Add requests-tests-repo command (mvadkert)
- Use PDC instead of Bodhi to get the active release branches - #187 (mprahl)
- fix broken syntax in bash completion (tmz)
- Fix Python 3 incompatible code in tests (cqi)
- Better mocking.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551174
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1548600
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551174
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
On 1 March 2018 at 16:46, Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
> can't install jackson-dataformat-cbor-javadoc-2.7.6-3.fc27.noarch:
> package is obsoleted by jackson-dataformats-binary-javadoc-2.9.4-
> 3.fc28.noarch
> can't install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551481
Bug ID: 1551481
Summary: perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.24 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Test-PostgreSQL
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
Dne 2.3.2018 v 16:13 Kalev Lember napsal(a):
> On 03/02/2018 03:59 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>> El vie, 02-03-2018 a las 11:28 +0100, Kalev Lember escribió:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> hughsie just did a new appstream-data compose for F29 and I noticed
>>> there's quite a large number of packages failing in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551480
Bug ID: 1551480
Summary: perl-Pod-Coverage-TrustPod-0.14 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Pod-Coverage-TrustPod
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Zbyszek,
Next time, could you please include the meeting minutes in the email
body. It would provide more information and save me some clicks.
Thx
Vít
Dne 2.3.2018 v 18:06 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
> Minutes:
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551282
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed
81 matches
Mail list logo