Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On 2018-02-18 09:09 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild without having > gcc and > gcc-c++ in buildroot of all Fedora packages, many of which failed due > to random > reasons and I grepped all logs for some common errors found by analyzing > hundreds of

Re: Goodbye nvr.rsplit('-', 2), hello modularity

Randy Barlow wrote: > It sounds like this breaks a great deal of tooling. Can we reconsider > switching away from - separators in modules? Is allowing streams to have > -'s in them important enough to break so many tools? +1, I think allowing this ambiguity is a very bad idea. Kevin

Re: QMake equivalent of CMake flag -DCMAKE_INSTALL_LIBDIR:PATH=%{_libdir}

Germano Massullo wrote: > upstream made a patch > https://github.com/open-eid/chrome-token-signing/issues/80#issuecomment-373545367 > but it looks like it does not work. > Could you please check if I made any mistake in applying the patch in > the RPM? The patch should be fine, but you also need

Re: Goodbye nvr.rsplit('-', 2), hello modularity

On Thu, 2018-03-15 at 19:57 -0400, langdon wrote: > On 03/15/2018 04:31 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: > > On Thu, 2018-03-15 at 14:06 -0400, Randy Barlow wrote: > > > On 03/15/2018 12:28 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote: > > > > : doesn't work very well in filenames due to it being a pathname > > > > separator

Link error in F28 (but not Rawhide)

I'm seeing a strange error when building wxGTK3 on F28. This only happens on x86_64. The same package built fine on Rawhide. Anyone have any ideas what's going on here? This is the Koji task: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=25734989 Here's the error:

Re: GCC 8.0.1 updates in F28

On Thu, 2018-03-15 at 18:26 +0100, Dan Horák wrote: > On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 17:11:49 + > Peter Robinson wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 6:25 AM, Vascom wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > > > GCC 8.0.1-0.16 in F28 repo is freezed until F28 release? > > > Or

[Bug 1557080] New: perl-Time-HiRes-1.9757 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1557080 Bug ID: 1557080 Summary: perl-Time-HiRes-1.9757 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Time-HiRes Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1557083] New: perl-Test-Inter-1.07 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1557083 Bug ID: 1557083 Summary: perl-Test-Inter-1.07 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Test-Inter Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1557074] New: perl-pmtools-2.2.0 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1557074 Bug ID: 1557074 Summary: perl-pmtools-2.2.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-pmtools Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1557071] New: perl-Email-Address-XS-1.03 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1557071 Bug ID: 1557071 Summary: perl-Email-Address-XS-1.03 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Email-Address-XS Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: new section for 'Join the package collection maintainers'

On 15.03.2018 17:09, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 15/03/18 00:54 +0100, René Genz wrote: >> On 14.03.2018 14:40, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >>> On 14/03/18 01:02 +0100, René Genz wrote: On 13.03.2018 15:13, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 12/03/18 21:02 -0300, Athos Ribeiro wrote: [snip] >> >>

Re: Goodbye nvr.rsplit('-', 2), hello modularity

On 03/15/2018 04:31 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: On Thu, 2018-03-15 at 14:06 -0400, Randy Barlow wrote: On 03/15/2018 12:28 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote: : doesn't work very well in filenames due to it being a pathname separator in some filesystems among other things. It sounds like this breaks a great

Re: QMake equivalent of CMake flag -DCMAKE_INSTALL_LIBDIR:PATH=%{_libdir}

upstream made a patch https://github.com/open-eid/chrome-token-signing/issues/80#issuecomment-373545367 but it looks like it does not work. Could you please check if I made any mistake in applying the patch in the RPM? failed build https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=25733909

Fedora 28-20180315.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 16/137 (x86_64), 5/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 204706 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/204706 ID: 204712 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso

Fedora Rawhide-20180315.n.1 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 84/137 (x86_64), 24/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 204419 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/204419 ID: 204420 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL:

Re: GCC 8.0.1 updates in F28

On Thu, 15 Mar 2018, 10:26 Dan Horák, wrote: > On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 17:11:49 + > Peter Robinson wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 6:25 AM, Vascom wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > > > GCC 8.0.1-0.16 in F28 repo is freezed until F28 release?

Re: Gating packages in Rawhide

On 03/15/2018 04:57 PM, Mohan Boddu wrote: >> As one of the Bodhi contributors, I am inclined to suggest that we could >> use Bodhi on Rawhide, similar to how we use it for our stable/branched >> releases, with more relaxed rules (perhaps 1 day in testing or something >> simple). > We need a

Re: Gating packages in Rawhide

> Greetings fellow Fedorans! > > I would like to kick off a general discussion about how we might gate > packages in Rawhide. I think it would be nice to get something in place > for the Fedora 29 timeframe. > > As one of the Bodhi contributors, I am inclined to suggest that we could > use Bodhi

Re: Goodbye nvr.rsplit('-', 2), hello modularity

On Thu, 2018-03-15 at 14:06 -0400, Randy Barlow wrote: > On 03/15/2018 12:28 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote: > > : doesn't work very well in filenames due to it being a pathname separator > > in some filesystems among other things. > > It sounds like this breaks a great deal of tooling. Can we

Re: f28 and rawhide ignoring static ip settings

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 9:27 PM, Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk < puiterw...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 03/15/2018 01:23 PM, Tomasz Torcz ️ wrote: > > > > It's not. Now it's enp0s3. > > > > And renaming /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-ens3 to ifcfg-enp0s3 > > doesn't do anything. > > Note

Orphaned jemmy

I no longer have the time/resources/interest to maintain jemmy: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/jemmy/ I have orphaned it. If anyone wants to take over maintainership, please do so. Thanks, Omair -- PGP Key: B157A9F0 (http://pgp.mit.edu/) Fingerprint = 9DB5 2F0B FD3E C239 E108 E7BD DF99

Fedora 28 compose report: 20180315.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-28-20180314.n.2 NEW: Fedora-28-20180315.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:121.15 MiB Size

Re: f28 and rawhide ignoring static ip settings

> On 03/15/2018 01:23 PM, Tomasz Torcz ️ wrote: > > It's not. Now it's enp0s3. > > And renaming /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-ens3 to ifcfg-enp0s3 > doesn't do anything. Note that the files themselves also contain a DEVICE= line that would need to be updated for it to apply again.

Re: f28 and rawhide ignoring static ip settings

On Thu, 2018-03-15 at 14:40 -0400, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > On 03/15/2018 01:23 PM, Tomasz Torcz ️ wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 01:13:09PM -0400, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > > > > > > Did I miss something? > > > > > > Both machines were dnf system-upgraded from f27. Static IP settings

Re: f28 and rawhide ignoring static ip settings

On 03/15/2018 01:23 PM, Tomasz Torcz ️ wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 01:13:09PM -0400, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: >> >> Did I miss something? >> >> Both machines were dnf system-upgraded from f27. Static IP settings were >> set at f27 install time and worked before the respective upgrades. >> >>

Re: Goodbye nvr.rsplit('-', 2), hello modularity

On 03/15/2018 12:28 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote: > : doesn't work very well in filenames due to it being a pathname separator in > some filesystems among other things. It sounds like this breaks a great deal of tooling. Can we reconsider switching away from - separators in modules? Is allowing

Re: f28 and rawhide ignoring static ip settings

On Thu, 2018-03-15 at 18:23 +0100, Tomasz Torcz ️ wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 01:13:09PM -0400, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > > > > Did I miss something? > > > > Both machines were dnf system-upgraded from f27. Static IP settings were > > set at f27 install time and worked before the

Re: GCC 8.0.1 updates in F28

On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 17:11:49 + Peter Robinson wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 6:25 AM, Vascom wrote: > > Hi. > > > > GCC 8.0.1-0.16 in F28 repo is freezed until F28 release? > > Or it will be updated soon so we can build some packages failed to > >

Re: new section for 'Join the package collection maintainers'

On 15/03/18 16:24 +, Tom Hughes wrote: On 15/03/18 16:09, Jonathan Wakely wrote: And since you can't write to it, there is not point creating your own fork. You might as well just create the fork somewhere else like pagure.io Explaining that you can't write to your fork is not necessary

Re: f28 and rawhide ignoring static ip settings

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 01:13:09PM -0400, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > > Did I miss something? > > Both machines were dnf system-upgraded from f27. Static IP settings were > set at f27 install time and worked before the respective upgrades. > > f28 was working correctly until a couple of days ago

Re: GCC 8.0.1 updates in F28

OK. It is not so important build, only for clearness. чт, 15 мар. 2018 г., 20:12 Peter Robinson : > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 6:25 AM, Vascom wrote: > > Hi. > > > > GCC 8.0.1-0.16 in F28 repo is freezed until F28 release? > > Or it will be updated soon so

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20180315.n.1 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180314.n.2 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180315.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 6 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 83 Downgraded packages: 1 Size of added packages: 6.45 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B

f28 and rawhide ignoring static ip settings

Did I miss something? Both machines were dnf system-upgraded from f27. Static IP settings were set at f27 install time and worked before the respective upgrades. f28 was working correctly until a couple of days ago to the best of my knowledge. E.g.—— %cat

Re: GCC 8.0.1 updates in F28

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 6:25 AM, Vascom wrote: > Hi. > > GCC 8.0.1-0.16 in F28 repo is freezed until F28 release? > Or it will be updated soon so we can build some packages failed to build > now? > Or better use build override new gcc for this packages? Is there a particular

Re: glibc-headers is missing rpc/rpc.h in rawhide

On Thu, 2018-03-15 at 12:49 +0100, Jan Synacek wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:43 AM, Dan Horák wrote: > > On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 11:30:32 +0100 > > Jan Synacek wrote: > > > > > Did I miss something? The xinetd package cannot be built because > > > of > > >

Re: GCC 8.0.1 updates in F28

On Thu, 2018-03-15 at 06:25 +, Vascom wrote: > Hi. > > GCC 8.0.1-0.16 in F28 repo is freezed until F28 release? > Or it will be updated soon so we can build some packages failed to > build now? > Or better use build override new gcc for this packages? the freeze is only until beta compose is

Re: Goodbye nvr.rsplit('-', 2), hello modularity

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 04:19:46PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 04:14:34PM +0100, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: > > For user consumption, they are Name:Stream:Version:Context, so you may > > need to manually convert between one representation and the other if > > you need

Re: Goodbye nvr.rsplit('-', 2), hello modularity

On Thu, 2018-03-15 at 16:14 +0100, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: > One of the interesting things they wanted to also allow: dashes in streams. > As a consequence, when you get an N-S-V.C as modules are represented > in Koji builds, doing a .rsplit('-', 2) will not give you Name, > Stream,

Re: new section for 'Join the package collection maintainers'

On 15/03/18 16:09, Jonathan Wakely wrote: And since you can't write to it, there is not point creating your own fork. You might as well just create the fork somewhere else like pagure.io Explaining that you can't write to your fork is not necessary if you don't encourage people to create

Re: Goodbye nvr.rsplit('-', 2), hello modularity

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 04:14:34PM +0100, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: > Hi all, > > If you maintain any application in Fedora Infra (or outside) that > tries to parse things out of RPM names, you might be interested in > this. > > For those wondering where I've been spending most of my time the

Re: new section for 'Join the package collection maintainers'

On 15/03/18 00:54 +0100, René Genz wrote: On 14.03.2018 14:40, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 14/03/18 01:02 +0100, René Genz wrote: On 13.03.2018 15:13, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 12/03/18 21:02 -0300, Athos Ribeiro wrote: [snip] You could add a link saying something like "To make a one-off

Re: Goodbye nvr.rsplit('-', 2), hello modularity

> On 15/03/18 15:30, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: > > Well currently at any rate? What's the long term story? > > Only when some module rpms accidentally leaked into rawhide > recently they definitely had the kind of rather unhelpful names > that you described in your post and I got the impression

Re: Goodbye nvr.rsplit('-', 2), hello modularity

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:14 AM, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: > Hi all, > > If you maintain any application in Fedora Infra (or outside) that > tries to parse things out of RPM names, you might be interested in > this. > > For those wondering where I've been spending most of

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 1102 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 864 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7 447

Re: Goodbye nvr.rsplit('-', 2), hello modularity

On 15/03/18 15:30, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: This does not affect traditional RPM/SRPM packages, right? Correct, this only impacts modules. Well currently at any rate? What's the long term story? Only when some module rpms accidentally leaked into rawhide recently they definitely had the

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 974 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168 rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6 864 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-e2b4b5b2fb mcollective-2.8.4-1.el6 836

Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 27.100

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 7:24 PM, wrote: > > A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: > > Version: 27.100 > Commit(x86_64): > 326f62b93a5cc836c97d31e73a71b6b6b6955c0f225f7651b52a693718e6aa91 > Commit(aarch64): >

Re: Goodbye nvr.rsplit('-', 2), hello modularity

> > > This does not affect traditional RPM/SRPM packages, right? Correct, this only impacts modules. > > Thanks, > -Mat > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Goodbye nvr.rsplit('-', 2), hello modularity

On 03/15/2018 10:14 AM, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: Hi all, If you maintain any application in Fedora Infra (or outside) that tries to parse things out of RPM names, you might be interested in this. For those wondering where I've been spending most of my time the last few weeks: I've been deep in

Goodbye nvr.rsplit('-', 2), hello modularity

Hi all, If you maintain any application in Fedora Infra (or outside) that tries to parse things out of RPM names, you might be interested in this. For those wondering where I've been spending most of my time the last few weeks: I've been deep in the internals of Bodhi fixing all kinds of issues

Re: glibc-headers is missing _G_config.h

On 03/15/2018 09:55 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: Is this header deprecated? It's no longer shipped in the Rawhide package. Answering myself: Yes. https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commit;h=48a8f8328122ab8d06b7333cb87be46feeaf7cca ___ devel

Re: glibc-headers is missing _G_config.h

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 09:55:09AM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Is this header deprecated? It's no longer shipped in the Rawhide package. Yes, deprecated in 2.27 and gone in 2.28 https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-announce/2018/msg0.html [quote] * The nonstandard header files and

glibc-headers is missing _G_config.h

Is this header deprecated? It's no longer shipped in the Rawhide package. Thanks, Michael ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1556425] perl-CPAN-Meta-YAML: FTBFS in F28

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1556425 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPAN-Meta-YAML-0.018-397.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-8c39a1d671 -- You are receiving

Re: Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2018-03-15 17:00 UTC)

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 10:55 PM, James Antill wrote: #topic #694 Packaging guidelines for application independence .fpc 694 https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/694 I had been hoping to attend the meeting to discuss this change, but it's been on the meeting

[Bug 1556107] perl-Test-LeakTrace: FTBFS in F28

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1556107 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Test-LeakTrace-0.16-6.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-ce7aa5e68e -- You are receiving this

Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 27.100

A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: Version: 27.100 Commit(x86_64): 326f62b93a5cc836c97d31e73a71b6b6b6955c0f225f7651b52a693718e6aa91 Commit(aarch64): ba2aa19d99466c53e614651f014c8b97ae1940f87885b7c7dfed1fb62ae91567 Commit(ppc64le):

Re: F28 FTBFS bugs?

On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 11:01:00 +0100, Daiki Ueno wrote: > Hello, > > Yesterday I received a couple of new FTBFS bugs, apparently triggered by > the F28 mass rebuild: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1556047 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1556162 > > As the mentioned

[Bug 1556105] perl-MongoDB: FTBFS in F28

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1556105 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1556646] perl-Time-HiRes-1.9755 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1556646 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1555101] perl-MCE-1.835 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1555101 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

Re: F28 FTBFS bugs?

El jue, 15-03-2018 a las 11:01 +0100, Daiki Ueno escribió: > Hello, > > Yesterday I received a couple of new FTBFS bugs, apparently triggered > by > the F28 mass rebuild: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1556047 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1556162 > > As the

Re: glibc-headers is missing rpc/rpc.h in rawhide

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:43 AM, Dan Horák wrote: > On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 11:30:32 +0100 > Jan Synacek wrote: > >> Did I miss something? The xinetd package cannot be built because of >> that. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SunRPCRemoval So I missed

[Bug 1556107] perl-Test-LeakTrace: FTBFS in F28

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1556107 --- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar --- I believe so. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[Bug 1556107] perl-Test-LeakTrace: FTBFS in F28

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1556107 --- Comment #3 from Paul Howarth --- OK, so I expect koji won't allow me to build perl-Test-LeakTrace-0.16-5.fc28 in the f28 branch as there's already a build perl-Test-LeakTrace-0.16-5.fc28 in f29, I guess I need to bump

[Bug 1556107] perl-Test-LeakTrace: FTBFS in F28

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1556107 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com

Re: glibc-headers is missing rpc/rpc.h in rawhide

On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 11:30:32 +0100 Jan Synacek wrote: > Did I miss something? The xinetd package cannot be built because of > that. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SunRPCRemoval Dan ___ devel mailing list

Re: glibc-headers is missing rpc/rpc.h in rawhide

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:30:32AM +0100, Jan Synacek wrote: > Did I miss something? The xinetd package cannot be built because of that. GLibc dropped the RPC functionality. You need to change the code to use tirpc instead. It is API compatible, but your build system will need to know to link the

glibc-headers is missing rpc/rpc.h in rawhide

Did I miss something? The xinetd package cannot be built because of that. Cheers, -- Jan Synacek Software Engineer, Red Hat ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

F28 FTBFS bugs?

Hello, Yesterday I received a couple of new FTBFS bugs, apparently triggered by the F28 mass rebuild: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1556047 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1556162 As the mentioned koji builds are back in February, I am wondering if those are something

[Bug 1556647] perl-Test2-Suite-0.000111 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1556647 --- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar --- Waiting on perl-Test2-Suite-0.000108-1.fc28 to get stable. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___

[Bug 1556647] perl-Test2-Suite-0.000111 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1556647 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

[Bug 1556646] perl-Time-HiRes-1.9755 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1556646 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Time-HiRes-1.9756-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-cd75b181e3 -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1556646] perl-Time-HiRes-1.9755 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1556646 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1556105] perl-MongoDB: FTBFS in F28

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1556105 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-MongoDB-1.8.1-2.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-9812edde45 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1556105] perl-MongoDB: FTBFS in F28

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1556105 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment

[Bug 1556425] perl-CPAN-Meta-YAML: FTBFS in F28

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1556425 --- Comment #1 from Paul Howarth --- perl-CPAN-Meta-YAML-0.018-396.fc28 was built on 20th February, well before the bodhi activation point, and is included in Rawhide but somehow not f28. Any ideas why that is?

[Bug 1556107] perl-Test-LeakTrace: FTBFS in F28

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1556107 --- Comment #1 from Paul Howarth --- perl-Test-LeakTrace-0.16-5.fc28 was built on 20th February, well before the bodhi activation point, and is included in Rawhide but somehow not in f28. Any ideas on why that is?

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Make dbus-broker the default DBus implementation

FTR, patches to convert at-spi2-core to use dbus-broker: https://github.com/GNOME/at-spi2-core/pull/2 https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/at-spi2-core/pull-request/1 Zbyszek On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 05:32:20PM +0100, Jan Kurik wrote: > = Proposed System Wide Change: Make dbus-broker the default

Fedora 28-20180314.n.2 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 17/137 (x86_64), 5/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 203825 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/203825 ID: 203831 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso

Fedora Rawhide-20180314.n.2 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 83/137 (x86_64), 24/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 203982 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/203982 ID: 203983 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL:

Fedora-Atomic 27-20180315.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[Bug 1551668] perl-Verilog-Perl-3.448-1.fc29 FTBFS: t/ 35_sigparser.t crashes

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551668 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1555378

[Bug 1556108] perl-Verilog-Perl: FTBFS in F28

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1556108 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

GCC 8.0.1 updates in F28

Hi. GCC 8.0.1-0.16 in F28 repo is freezed until F28 release? Or it will be updated soon so we can build some packages failed to build now? Or better use build override new gcc for this packages? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To