Didn't cwickert say in January he was no longer able to maintain
packages in Fedora?
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/UMMNNUUMRIZUKBOXCNVKQZVXT4JAW2OG/
In that email he asked for his packages to be mass orphaned or some
other solution to be found
# dnf downgrade fedpkg
Last metadata expiration check: 0:05:17 ago on Sun 20 May 2018 06:55:43 PM
EDT.Package fedpkg of lowest version already installed, cannot downgrade
it.Error: No packages marked for downgrade.
On Saturday, May 19, 2018, 6:28:21 PM EDT, Kevin Fenzi
wrote:
On 05/1
Christian Stadelmann wrote:
> As per step 4 of Policy for nonresponsive package maintainers [
Did you do step 2? It's not obvious to me
"File a bug against the package in Bugzilla asking for the maintainer to
respond. This bug should list the outstanding issues they need to address.
This is a
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 10/137 (x86_64), 3/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180519.n.0):
ID: 239449 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/239449
ID: 239460 Test: x86_64
As per step 4 of Policy for nonresponsive package maintainers [1], I'm asking
here whether anyone knows cwickert (Christoph Wickert), who is maintainer of
the different packages including gtkhash, and has a way of contacting him/her.
This package is quite outdated as it has not seen an update in
On Sat, 19 May 2018 16:24:17 +0530
Manas Mangaonkar wrote:
> For the record,I am going with the kernel Lts given that it has
> patches for meltdown & spectre.
There are recent kernels without the patches? I think they are
standard in all fedora kernels.
To get your feet wet, you could build a
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180519.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180520.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 8
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 209.23 KiB
Size of dropped packages
