[389-devel] Re: New DS CLI design

On Thu, 2018-05-24 at 11:11 +0200, Marc Muehlfeld wrote: > Hi Viktor, hi William, > > I recently played with the dscreate command and wanted to share my > thoughts, impressions, and improvement suggestions: > > I really like the tool and the way it works. It's simple to use and > easy > to

[389-devel] Re: Raise MIN TLS to 1.2

> > Hi, > > > > first, I'm all in for increasing the defaults and currently TLSv1.2 > > as a default makes complete sense to me for 1.4 branch. > > Hi, > > I agree it makes sense to provide up to date security level out of > the  > box in a new major version. > Regarding upgrade I think we

[389-devel] Re: New DS CLI design

On Thu, 2018-05-24 at 09:57 +0200, Viktor Ashirov wrote: > Hi William, > On Thu, May 24 2018 at 09:06:14 +1000, William Brown ts.net.au> wrote: > > On Wed, 2018-05-23 at 11:34 +0200, Viktor Ashirov wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I'd like to continue our discussion about feature

[389-devel] Re: Improve the demo objects from install

On Wed, 2018-01-10 at 10:21 -0500, Mark Reynolds wrote: > > On 01/09/2018 07:25 PM, William Brown wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > It's time that I'm looking at: > > https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49425 > > +1 for 1.4.0! Thank you! I'm glad you like this. I'm writing them up now (with test

[389-devel] Re: New DS CLI design

On Thu, 2018-05-24 at 09:57 +0200, Viktor Ashirov wrote: > Hi William, > On Thu, May 24 2018 at 09:06:14 +1000, William Brown ts.net.au> wrote: > > On Wed, 2018-05-23 at 11:34 +0200, Viktor Ashirov wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I'd like to continue our discussion about feature

[389-devel] Re: New DS CLI design

On Thu, 2018-05-24 at 11:11 +0200, Marc Muehlfeld wrote: > Hi Viktor, hi William, > > I recently played with the dscreate command and wanted to share my > thoughts, impressions, and improvement suggestions: > > I really like the tool and the way it works. It's simple to use and > easy > to

[Bug 1582336] New: perl-BSON-v1.6.2 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582336 Bug ID: 1582336 Summary: perl-BSON-v1.6.2 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-BSON Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com

Re: What is the process for requesting an update to a package?

Στις 22/5/2018 15:37, ο Vít Ondruch έγραψε: Dne 22.5.2018 v 12:21 Georgios Petasis napsal(a): Στις 22/5/2018 11:30, ο Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski έγραψε: On Tuesday, 22 May 2018 at 07:35, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 21.5.2018 v 22:59 Petr Šabata napsal(a): On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 11:51:59PM

Re: Heads up: selinux-policy-3.14.1-25.fc28 breaks GDM

I got hit with this too on F28 using negativo17's nvidia driver packages.Downgrading selinux-policy-3.14.1-25 / selinux-policy-targeted-3.14.1-25 clears it up.There's a fedora update to -3.14.1-29 pending: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-a74875b364 Too bad dnf doesn't

Fedora Rawhide-20180524.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 2/137 (x86_64), 2/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180520.n.0): ID: 241245 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/241245 ID: 241273 Test:

Re: Heads up: selinux-policy-3.14.1-25.fc28 breaks GDM

On Wed, 2018-05-23 at 20:13 -0600, Jerry James wrote: > [1] Which is totally useless, by the way. It says "Oh no! Something went > wrong!" (Great. *WHAT* went wrong?) and informs me that I must logout. I > wasn't logged in. There's a nice logout button there, but it can't be > pressed.

Re: Heads up: selinux-policy-3.14.1-25.fc28 breaks GDM

On Thu, 2018-05-24 at 08:09 -0600, Jerry James wrote: > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 12:39 AM, Heiko Adams wrote: > > > I can't confirm that. Maybe because I relabel my system after every > > selinux policy update. > > > > As I said in the original message: > > "I did a full

Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2018-05-25)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Friday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2018-05-25 15:00 UTC' Links to all issues below

Re: F29 System Wide Change: The tzdata transition to 'vanguard' format

On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 3:23 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 05/22/2018 05:06 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > >> The old format was nicely documented in tzfile(5): >> >> http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man5/tzfile.5.html >> >> Through this it kinda has become API. Which

Re: F29 System Wide Change: The tzdata transition to 'vanguard' format

Hi, I agree that the documentation has been very good. From what I've seen, the upstream maintainer continues to update the documentation as needed. Thanks for your input! Patsy On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 11:06 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Di, 22.05.18 16:24, Jan

Re: F29 System Wide Change: The tzdata transition to 'vanguard' format

Hi, Thanks for the question! No, this change should not change the signature at the beginning of the file. My understanding is that it should only impact application provided parsers that read the time zone data files and expect the SAVE/DST values to only be positive. Thanks, Patsy On Tue,

[Bug 1581851] perl-Reply missing dependency on perl-Config-INI-Reader-Ordered

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1581851 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Reply-0.42-5.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Move /usr/bin/python into a separate package

On 05/24/2018 01:26 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > Is it possible to filter only failures out of the results list? Yeah, you can slap =failed on the end: > https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/resultsdb/results?testcases=dist.python-versions.python_usage=failed

Re: F29 System Wide Change: The tzdata transition to 'vanguard' format

Hi, Thank you for your input on this! The concern is that, in some cases, applications that parse the tzdata files were not expecting to find negative DST offsets (negative SAVE values in the data files) despite the fact that POSIX appears to support this. As this is now the default format for

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Move /usr/bin/python into a separate package

> "RB" == Randy Barlow writes: RB> https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/resultsdb/results?testcases=dist.python-versions.python_usage This one seems on-point. rpm 4.14.1-9.fc28 fails: https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/resultsdb/results/21327930 Is it

Re: CPAN Search Going Away

On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 1:03 PM, Petr Šabata wrote: > > > Do we know if files like /modules/02packages.details.txt are > still going to be provided by cpan.org? If not, virtually all > CPAN tools will have to be updated. cpanspec included. > Yes. That file is on all CPAN

Re: CPAN Search Going Away

On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 12:55:27PM -0400, Dan Book wrote: > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 12:34 PM, Petr Pisar wrote: > > > On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 10:55:02AM +0100, Dave Cross wrote: > > > See https://log.perl.org/2018/05/goodbye-search-dot-cpan-dot-org.html > > > > > > This means

Re: CPAN Search Going Away

On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 12:34 PM, Petr Pisar wrote: > On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 10:55:02AM +0100, Dave Cross wrote: > > See https://log.perl.org/2018/05/goodbye-search-dot-cpan-dot-org.html > > > > This means that the URLs included in RPMs of CPAN modules will need to > > change

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Move /usr/bin/python into a separate package

On 05/24/2018 12:45 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > Could you fill us in a bit? The only thing I know about resultsdb is > that there is a thing called resultsdb. I went to > https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/resultsdb/results but I have no idea > how to find, say, all packages which call

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Move /usr/bin/python into a separate package

> "RB" == Randy Barlow writes: RB> I don't disagree, but I will point out that it is possible to find RB> out which packages are using /usr/bin/python by looking at their RB> most recent test results in resultsdb. Could you fill us in a bit? The only thing I

Re: CPAN Search Going Away

On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 10:55:02AM +0100, Dave Cross wrote: > See https://log.perl.org/2018/05/goodbye-search-dot-cpan-dot-org.html > > This means that the URLs included in RPMs of CPAN modules will need to > change to MetaCPAN URLs. > > Please let me know if I can be any help making this

May 2018 Elections: Nomination period for FESCo has been prolonged till May 31st @ 23:59:59 UTC

Hi Fellowship of Fedora, as we have not reach the minimal number of nominees to FESCo required by FESCo election policy [1], to get ready for voting, FESCo has decided to prolong the nomination period for one week. As such, the Nomination period has been re-opened until May 31st @ 23:59:59 UTC.

May 2018 Elections: Nomination period for FESCo has been prolonged till May 31st @ 23:59:59 UTC

Hi Fellowship of Fedora, as we have not reach the minimal number of nominees to FESCo required by FESCo election policy [1], to get ready for voting, FESCo has decided to prolong the nomination period for one week. As such, the Nomination period has been re-opened until May 31st @ 23:59:59 UTC.

Re: Heads up: selinux-policy-3.14.1-25.fc28 breaks GDM

On 2018-05-24 10:09, Jerry James wrote: The problem may be restricted to systems using the Nvidia proprietary driver. I have that driver and was also affected, though am using sddm rather than gdm.  My work around was the following local policy: ~~~ module local_sddm 1.0; require {    

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Move /usr/bin/python into a separate package

On 05/23/2018 01:22 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > it is now easier to see what actually calls "/usr/bin/python" in > contravention of the packaging guidelines. I don't disagree, but I will point out that it is possible to find out which packages are using /usr/bin/python by looking at their

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 46 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-5aca1d385d remctl-3.14-1.el6 43 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-dd6e4a3f0b python34-3.4.8-1.el6 2

Re: I would like to propose that we turn on XFS Reflink in Fedora 29 by default

Late and off-topic by now, but in retrospect my response is closer to stupid than the intended hyperbolic+funny. On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 3:21 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 7:07 AM, Martin Kolman wrote: >> What about putting it on

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 46 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-2c81054303 remctl-3.14-1.el7 8 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-8b8dc96235 nodejs-deep-extend-0.5.1-1.el7 4

[Bug 1574983] perl-Session-Storage-Secure-0.011 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574983 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Session-Storage-Secure

[Test-Announce] Fedora 29 Rawhide 20180524.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 29 Rawhide 20180524.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: Heads up: selinux-policy-3.14.1-25.fc28 breaks GDM

On 05/24/2018 04:09 PM, Jerry James wrote: > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 12:39 AM, Heiko Adams > wrote: > > I can't confirm that. Maybe because I relabel my system after every > selinux policy update. > > > As I said in the original

[Bug 1582003] perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Fedora-0.0.10 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582003 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed

[Bug 1576567] abi-compliance-checker: misses find dependency

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1576567 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|abi-compliance-checker-2.3-

[Bug 1575520] abi-compliance-checker doesn't work under F28

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575520 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|abi-compliance-checker-2.3-

[Bug 1578364] abi-compliance-checker-2.3 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1578364 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|abi-compliance-checker-2.3-

[Bug 1574983] perl-Session-Storage-Secure-0.011 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574983 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Session-Storage-Secure

Re: Heads up: selinux-policy-3.14.1-25.fc28 breaks GDM

On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 12:39 AM, Heiko Adams wrote: > I can't confirm that. Maybe because I relabel my system after every > selinux policy update. > As I said in the original message: "I did a full SELinux relabel immediately afterwards. Nothing relevant changed

[Bug 1576567] abi-compliance-checker: misses find dependency

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1576567 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1578364] abi-compliance-checker-2.3 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1578364 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1574983] perl-Session-Storage-Secure-0.011 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574983 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1575520] abi-compliance-checker doesn't work under F28

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575520 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1574485] perl-IPC-Cmd-1.02 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574485 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-IPC-Cmd-1.02-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving

[Bug 1581851] perl-Reply missing dependency on perl-Config-INI-Reader-Ordered

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1581851 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1582170] New: perl-Plack-Middleware-MethodOverride-0.17 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582170 Bug ID: 1582170 Summary: perl-Plack-Middleware-MethodOverride-0.17 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Plack-Middleware-MethodOverride Keywords:

[Bug 1582164] New: perl-Data-Types-0.11 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582164 Bug ID: 1582164 Summary: perl-Data-Types-0.11 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Data-Types Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[389-devel] Please review: Issue 49717 - Add conftest.py for tests

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49717 https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49718 signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Move /usr/bin/python into a separate package

On 05/24/18 01:01, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 24.5.2018 00:56, Adam Williamson wrote: The thing you're missing - which the Change doesn't explicitly state, so it's understandable - is the effect of having the python2 package Recommend the package with /usr/bin/python in it. For *user* systems

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Move /usr/bin/python into a separate package

On 05/24/18 02:21, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: On 23 May 2018 at 11:30, Brian C. Lane wrote: as a user of python what do you expect /usr/bin/pythong to do? You expect it to run the python2 interpreter. Careful with the generalization. I expect /usr/bin/python to launch python3 and I get surprised

[Bug 1582006] perl-IPC-Run-20180523.0 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582006 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Move /usr/bin/python into a separate package

On Thu, 2018-05-24 at 11:38 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 24.5.2018 11:27, Thomas Haller wrote: > > A sensible approach for a project to solve this problem is to write > > in > > a python2-and-3 compatible subset. But wbyen discouraging > > "#!/usr/bin/python" it's not generally possible to find

[Bug 1582004] perl-File-Find-Object-Rule-0.0307 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582004 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1582001] perl-Error-0.17026 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582001 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Move /usr/bin/python into a separate package

On 24.5.2018 11:27, Thomas Haller wrote: A sensible approach for a project to solve this problem is to write in a python2-and-3 compatible subset. But wbyen discouraging "#!/usr/bin/python" it's not generally possible to find a suitable interpreter. This is true for upstream projects. We are

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Move /usr/bin/python into a separate package

On Wed, 2018-05-23 at 08:30 -0700, Brian C. Lane wrote: > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 02:55:40PM +0200, Jan Kurik wrote: > > = Proposed System Wide Change: Move /usr/bin/python into a separate > > package = > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Move_usr_bin_python_into_sep > > arate_package > >

[Bug 1581851] perl-Reply missing dependency on perl-Config-INI-Reader-Ordered

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1581851 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Reply-0.42-4.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-27d4c3fe04 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1581851] perl-Reply missing dependency on perl-Config-INI-Reader-Ordered

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1581851 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Reply-0.42-5.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-9499fa0582 -- You are receiving this mail

[389-devel] Re: New DS CLI design

Hi Viktor, hi William, I recently played with the dscreate command and wanted to share my thoughts, impressions, and improvement suggestions: I really like the tool and the way it works. It's simple to use and easy to understand. Also from the docs perspective: It's much easier to document

[Bug 1581851] perl-Reply missing dependency on perl-Config-INI-Reader-Ordered

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1581851 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

[Bug 1581851] perl-Reply missing dependency on perl-Config-INI-Reader-Ordered

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1581851 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Move /usr/bin/python into a separate package

On 24.5.2018 04:30, Chris Adams wrote: Once upon a time, Adam Williamson said: The packager could always just add BuildRequires python-unversioned-command to "fix" the problem, which is probably the fix we don't want them to do, but at least then we have a handy way

[389-devel] Re: New DS CLI design

Hi William, On Thu, May 24 2018 at 09:06:14 +1000, William Brown wrote: > On Wed, 2018-05-23 at 11:34 +0200, Viktor Ashirov wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'd like to continue our discussion about feature parity with perl >> tools >> and overall user experience of the new CLI

Re: Heads up: selinux-policy-3.14.1-25.fc28 breaks GDM

I can't confirm that. Maybe because I relabel my system after every selinux policy update. -- Heiko Adams Am 24. Mai 2018 04:13:25 MESZ schrieb Jerry James : >I installed the latest batch of updates for F28 tonight. Since that >included a new kernel (4.16.10-300.fc28), I