Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2018-05-31 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. uitime):
= Day: Thursday ==
2018-05-31 09:00 PDT US/Pacific
2018-05-31
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1584479
Bug ID: 1584479
Summary: New version is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: slic3r
Assignee: mhron...@redhat.com
Reporter: quantum.anal...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1584474
Bug ID: 1584474
Summary: Need version update for perl-Razor-Agent
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Razor-Agent
Severity: medium
Assignee:
Hi,
the Voting period of the currently running Fedora Elections [0] has
just started. Please vote for your candidates to Council [1] and
Mindshare [2].
You can vote till June 6th, 2018 when the voting ends at 23:59:59 UTC.
On Community blog [3] you can also find interviews with all the
Hi,
the Voting period of the currently running Fedora Elections [0] has
just started. Please vote for your candidates to Council [1] and
Mindshare [2].
You can vote till June 6th, 2018 when the voting ends at 23:59:59 UTC.
On Community blog [3] you can also find interviews with all the
When I try to fork rpms/thrift, I get the error message: Repo
"forks/ctubbsii/thrift" already exists.
However, it clearly does not exist. It is not listed at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/user/ctubbsii , which shows 0 forks.
Perhaps I forked it in the past, and the delete did not get cleaned up
(sorry if this gets posted twice; previous attempt was sent from wrong
address and will hopefully bounce anyway)
Thrift in rawhide is currently 0.10.0. My intention is move to Thrift
0.11.0 in rawhide.
Affected packages seem to be:
accumulo (ctubbsii, mizdebsk, milleruntime)
avro (ricardo, gil,
Thrift in rawhide is currently 0.10.0. My intention is move to Thrift
0.11.0 in rawhide.
Affected packages seem to be:
accumulo (ctubbsii, mizdebsk, milleruntime)
avro (ricardo, gil, lef)
disruptor-thrift-server (trepik)
golang-opencensus (eclipseo, nim, jchaloup)
hive (orphan, pmackinn,
On 30.5.2018 16:48, Todd Zullinger wrote:
This works:
touch /etc/mock/empty
echo "config_opts['nspawn_args'] = ['--bind=/etc/mock/empty:/etc/resolv.conf']"
\
>> /etc/mock/site-defaults.cfg
sh-4.4# time curl http://example.com/
curl: (6) Could not resolve host: example.com
real
On Wed, 2018-05-30 at 14:28 -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
>
> On 05/29/2018 05:00 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2018-05-29 at 16:54 -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I'm trying to update the rpcsvc-proto package.
> > > When I try to create a new update, the system
> >
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49733
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
Michal Schorm wrote:
> So far, on F>=28 the TokuDB was build without jemalloc.
> It may be risky to rely on, yet no one complained.
IMHO, if it works (well enough that nobody is complaining), just keep
shipping it that way. It's better than to break dependencies (if you don't
Obsolete the
Hi Dominik,
do you mean this selection ?
https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/attachments/pagure-acl-selection.png
Martin
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/137 (x86_64), 2/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
Old failures (same test failed in Rawhide-20180529.n.0):
ID: 243536 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/243536
ID: 243537 Test: i386
On 05/29/2018 05:00 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-05-29 at 16:54 -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm trying to update the rpcsvc-proto package.
>> When I try to create a new update, the system
>> only gives me rpcsvc-proto-devel as a choice
>> not rpcsvc-proto.
>>
>>
On 05/29/2018 06:40 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 29 May 2018 16:54:00 -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm trying to update the rpcsvc-proto package.
>> When I try to create a new update, the system
>> only gives me rpcsvc-proto-devel as a choice
>> not rpcsvc-proto.
>>
El mié, 30-05-2018 a las 14:33 +0200, Miro Hrončok escribió:
> On 30.5.2018 14:09, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > So I decided to test this. I've added the following to the spec:
> >
> > time curl http://example.com/
> >
> > Here are the times:
> >
> > * my mock: real 0m56.595s Could not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1583657
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Test-POE-Client-TCP-1.14-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 9:02 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 9:39 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> Related thread when I discovered this issue a couple months ago, and
>> posted to desktop@
>
>
> Might help to include the URL for this...
>
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575520
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|abi-compliance-checker-2.3- |abi-compliance-checker-2.3-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1576567
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|abi-compliance-checker-2.3- |abi-compliance-checker-2.3-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1578364
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|abi-compliance-checker-2.3- |abi-compliance-checker-2.3-
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
52 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-5aca1d385d
remctl-3.14-1.el6
49 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-dd6e4a3f0b
python34-3.4.8-1.el6
7
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 9:39 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Related thread when I discovered this issue a couple months ago, and
> posted to desktop@
Might help to include the URL for this...
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
52 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-2c81054303
remctl-3.14-1.el7
14 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-8b8dc96235
nodejs-deep-extend-0.5.1-1.el7
7
I wrote:
> It should be possible to manually override the resolv.conf
> now by bind mounting an empty file on /etc/resolv.conf in
> the chroot. I've been meaning to play with this, but have
> not made time to do it until just now.
>
> I thought something like this would work:
>
> touch
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1580997
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.58-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail
Rex Dieter wrote:
> Rex Dieter wrote:
>
>> Qt 5.11.0 will be coming to rawhide soon.
>>
>> I'll be importing git sources first starting later today, and then
>> proceed to do requisite builds in a side koji target (
>> https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7516 ). Will get builds moved over to
>>
Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hi, since our Koji builds have disabled internet access, I want to do the
> same, so I have more Koji consistent builds.
>
> I have the following in /etc/mock/site-defaults.cfg:
>
> config_opts['use_host_resolv'] = True # or False, no difference
>
On Tuesday, 29 May 2018 at 23:21, Martin Gansser wrote:
> it didn't help
What ACLs did you grant to the new token? You only need the ticket
creation ACL.
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora https://getfedora.org | RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org
There should be a science of discontent. People need
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1580997
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.58-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1584156
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1584222
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1583657
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
On 30.5.2018 14:09, Miro Hrončok wrote:
So I decided to test this. I've added the following to the spec:
time curl http://example.com/
Here are the times:
* my mock: real 0m56.595s Could not resolve host
* Koji: real 0m0.030s Could not resolve host
And copr: real 0m40.578s
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1584159
Bug ID: 1584159
Summary: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509-1.809 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1584156
Bug ID: 1584156
Summary: perlbrew-0.83 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perlbrew
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
Hi, since our Koji builds have disabled internet access, I want to do
the same, so I have more Koji consistent builds.
I have the following in /etc/mock/site-defaults.cfg:
config_opts['use_host_resolv'] = True # or False, no difference
config_opts['rpmbuild_networking'] = False
The
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1577934
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1579340
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1584109
Bug ID: 1584109
Summary: Upgrade perl-SDL to 2.548
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-SDL
Assignee: hdego...@redhat.com
Reporter: jples...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1584108
Bug ID: 1584108
Summary: Upgrade perl-HTTP-OAI to 4.07
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-HTTP-OAI
Assignee: vano...@gmail.com
Reporter: jples...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1584106
Bug ID: 1584106
Summary: Upgrade perl-Mail-DKIM to 0.53
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Mail-DKIM
Assignee: ky...@kylev.com
Reporter: jples...@redhat.com
= Proposed System Wide Change: Node.js 10.x as default Node.js interpreter =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Nodejs10
Owner(s):
* Stephen Gallagher
A major upgrade to the newest LTS release of Node.js for Fedora 29.
== Detailed description ==
Node.js releases a new LTS version
= Proposed System Wide Change: Node.js 10.x as default Node.js interpreter =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Nodejs10
Owner(s):
* Stephen Gallagher
A major upgrade to the newest LTS release of Node.js for Fedora 29.
== Detailed description ==
Node.js releases a new LTS version
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1583657
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Test-POE-Client-TCP-1.14-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-6c11bd8c32
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1583657
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Test-POE-Client-TCP-1.14-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-46455274cb
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1583657
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 8:23 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>
> Is screen sharing [at least of its own window(s)] supposed to work ?
> If I share the screen with a screen sharing app all I get to send is a
> black background, sometimes with the mouse cursor visibile on it.
>
No, that won't work because
49 matches
Mail list logo
