Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Modularity WG (once every two weeks) on 2018-06-12 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00
US/Eastern
At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
Meeting of the Modularity Working Group.
More information available at: [Modularity
On 06/11/2018 03:17 PM, Anssi Johansson wrote:
Ken Taylor kirjoitti 11.6.2018 klo 22.00:
The dependency issue is as follows:
Error: Package: atril-1.16.1-1.el7.x86_64 (epel)
Requires: libjavascriptcoregtk-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
Error: Package: atril-1.16.1-1.el7.x86_64 (epel)
Ken Taylor kirjoitti 11.6.2018 klo 22.00:
The dependency issue is as follows:
Error: Package: atril-1.16.1-1.el7.x86_64 (epel)
Requires: libjavascriptcoregtk-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
Error: Package: atril-1.16.1-1.el7.x86_64 (epel)
Requires: libwebkitgtk-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
Thanks for the confirmation Ken! For the benefit of others, the repo
should work with or without epel. If you do have epel, wine32
coexists with wine64. Wine64 has the priority for the wine command
under the "alternatives" system. The i686 dependencies for wine32
coexist fine using the
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 7/137 (x86_64), 9/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180610.n.0):
ID: 248058 Test: i386 Server-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/248058
ID: 248061 Test: x86_64
This afternoon I was building a test machine as follows and experienced
a dependency issue with atril
1 - fresh install CentOS 7.5 - minimal installation
2 - update and reboot
3 - add epel repository and yum-priorities
4 - set CentOS-Base priority=1, epel priority=10
5 - groupinstall "X Window
Thank you Mr. Grainger!!!
I have just conducted a test as follows:
1 - fresh install CentOS 7.5 - minimal installation
2 - update and reboot
3 - add epel repository and yum-priorities
4 - set CentOS-Base priority=1, epel priority=10
5 - groupinstall "X Window system" mate-desktop-environment
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Problem 1: package passivetex-1.25-23.fc28.noarch requires xmltex >=
20020625-10, but none of the providers can be installed
- package texlive-xmltex-7:20170520-29.fc28.noarch obsoletes texlive-
xmltex-bin < 7:20170520 provided by texlive-xmltex-
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49774
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 9:39 AM Haïkel wrote:
>
> 2018-06-10 22:46 GMT+02:00 Sérgio Basto :
> > On Sun, 2018-06-10 at 18:27 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> The "libgda" package is quite broken in fedora, which is impacting
> >> dependent programs.
> >>
> >> - The last successful
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1589473
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-MooX-Struct-0.017-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1589471
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Email-Address-XS-1.04-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
61 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-dd6e4a3f0b
python34-3.4.8-1.el6
14 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-fca9555db1
cobbler-2.6.11-7.git95749a6.el6
10
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
15 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-90002f509e
pdns-recursor-4.1.3-2.el7
14 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-65614e9fc9
thunderbird-enigmail-2.0.6-1.el7
14
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180610.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180611.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 8
Dropped packages:3
Upgraded packages: 21
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 31.77 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 09:58:40AM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 06/11/2018 09:55 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> >Yes at the time I am writing this 2018-06-11T10:54-0400 we are in an
> >unplanned outage on src.fedoraproject.org. [Whether we are still in an
> >outage when you read this
On 6/11/2018 10:42 AM, Tom Callaway wrote:
> Background:
>
> I made the original v8 Fedora package many moons ago, when I was more
> optimistic about the possibility of separating the useful components
> inside of chromium. Since that point, it has become clear that while v8
> is useful software,
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49773
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
On 06/11/2018 09:55 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
Yes at the time I am writing this 2018-06-11T10:54-0400 we are in an
unplanned outage on src.fedoraproject.org. [Whether we are still in an
outage when you read this is another matter.
Should be fixed now. I successfully ran new-sources and a
On 11 June 2018 at 10:55, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> Yes at the time I am writing this 2018-06-11T10:54-0400 we are in an
> unplanned outage on src.fedoraproject.org. [Whether we are still in an
> outage when you read this is another matter.
>
The outage was over by the time I hit send.
> On
Yes at the time I am writing this 2018-06-11T10:54-0400 we are in an
unplanned outage on src.fedoraproject.org. [Whether we are still in an
outage when you read this is another matter.
On 11 June 2018 at 10:43, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> To answer my own question, there's definitely some kind
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1589473
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
Fedora's v8/v8-devel were updated (F28) and the environment is now
incompatible with F28's (already built) plv8.
Honestly, I plan to orphan the package because v8 environment is probably
only supposed to be bundled, and I'm not ready to take the responsibility
for bundling that huge thing... If
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 10:43 AM Tom Callaway wrote:
> Background:
>
> I made the original v8 Fedora package many moons ago, when I was more
> optimistic about the possibility of separating the useful components
> inside of chromium. Since that point, it has become clear that while v8
> is
To answer my own question, there's definitely some kind of problem ...
$ fedpkg new-sources nbdkit-1.3.3.tar.gz nbdkit-1.3.3.tar.gz.sig
Could not execute new_sources: Error occurs inside the server.
$ fedpkg sources
Downloading nbdkit-1.3.3.tar.gz
Background:
I made the original v8 Fedora package many moons ago, when I was more
optimistic about the possibility of separating the useful components
inside of chromium. Since that point, it has become clear that while v8
is useful software, the following facts are also true:
1. The v8 upstream
(Adding virt-tools-list)
On Fri, Jun 08, 2018 at 02:20:22PM +0200, Timothée Floure wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to package virt-bootstrap [0], but various tests fail due to
> SELinux. I know some selinux basics from redhat's selinux manual [1],
> but am unsure about how to approach the issue.
On Sat, 2018-06-09 at 20:49 -0400, John Florian wrote:
> On 06/08/2018 04:07 AM, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> > On Thu, 2018-06-07 at 16:13 -0400, John Florian wrote:
> > > On 06/07/2018 08:44 AM, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2018-06-05 at 16:34 -0400, John Florian wrote:
> > > > > On 06/05/2018 12:25
On 7.6.2018 03:05, Jerry James wrote:
I somehow wound up owning python-sphinx_rtd_theme...
And BTW whatever you do, please don't do it before the Python 3.7
rebuild. python-sphinx_rtd_theme is somewhat critical and if we break it
or add more deps, the entire Python 3.7 think might be stuck.
On 11.6.2018 13:05, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:> I would be way more
interested of real arguments about why someone is
trying to add those $PATH modifications.
So far only "argument is that someone proposed those changes without
justification except that some other people added something like this
to
On Sun, 10 Jun 2018 at 21:02, Sorin Sbarnea wrote:
>
> Well said, there is no catchy name for this (virtual) security threat. We
> will have to let one of those that oppose this proposal to find a caching
> name (PATHEXIT?), maybe even build a paper explaining how to mitigate it.
>
> I am bit
Hi,
On 10-06-18 19:02, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 2:07 AM, Hans de Goede mailto:hdego...@redhat.com>> wrote:
Hi,
On 04-06-18 21:17, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2018-05-31 at 12:43 +0200, Jan Kurik wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Hide the
Hello,
next week's 3.29.3 release of evolution-data-server (on 2018-06-18)
will contain soname version bumps of libcamel and libedata-cal. I
expect that most of the packages can be just rebuilt.
I cannot provide the complete list of affected packages, because dnf is
inaccurate [1].
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1589471
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Email-Address-XS-1.04-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-22fb281193
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
Hi
I'll be retiring compat-giflib in rawhide next weekend if there are no
objections. All packages have since been built against the new giflib-5.1.4.
Sandro
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1589471
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1589402
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
The voting period is still open till Wednesday, June 13th, 2018.
Do not forget to vote [1] for your favourite nominees [2] to FESCo.
[1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/voting/about/fesco-may-2018
[2] https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/2018-may-elections-fesco-interviews/
Jan
On Thu, Jun
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2018/06/11/report-389-ds-base-1.4.0.10-20180611git24c5c00.fc28.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
2018-06-10 22:46 GMT+02:00 Sérgio Basto :
> On Sun, 2018-06-10 at 18:27 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The "libgda" package is quite broken in fedora, which is impacting
>> dependent programs.
>>
>> - The last successful build of libgda was for the fedora 24 (!) mass
>> rebuild. No
Le 28/05/2018 à 13:32, Remi Collet a écrit :
> Soname are bumped
>
> - libbson-1.0.so.0 => libbson-1.0.so.1
> - libmongoc-1.0.so.0 => libmongoc-1.0.so.1
With update to 1.10.2, the soname change was reverted
Everything have been rebuild in rawhide
Perhaps this new version will go in F28 later,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1589473
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-MooX-Struct-0.017-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-e1ee48d624
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1589473
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-MooX-Struct-0.017-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-05e1a54459
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1589401
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1589473
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
45 matches
Mail list logo
