Research survey: Impact of Microsoft Acquisition of GitHub

Dear Fedora developers,  I am Natnaree Asavaseri and currently undertaking a research internship at Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Japan. Note that we are not biased to either GitHub or Microsoft, and this is purely from an empirical research perspective.  As a part of my research

I orphaned pam_radius. It needs a new maintainer.

I orphaned pam_radius. It needs a new maintainer. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List

Re: Packages which needlessly use %defattr

On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 02:35:39AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > "%defattr(-,root,root,-)" as the initial line in a %files section even > > though this has not been needed for well over a decade now. This > > construct even appears in new specfiles, perhaps because it appears in > > so many

Re: Packages which needlessly use %defattr

On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 2:59 AM, Jonny Heggheim wrote: > Hi Nico. > > > On 07/04/2018 03:58 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >> Yeah, but since it's many thousands of packages, I think maybe you >> didn't have to send the whole list? > I like that he sent the whole list, then I can search for my

Re: Annobin: "causes a section type conflict with..."

On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 8:57 PM Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Annobin is causing so many issues, and its main goal of finding packages > that were not built with the correct linker flags has already been achieved > (bugs have been filed for all of them), so do we really need to keep > dragging this

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2018-07-09 - 88% PASS

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2018/07/09/report-389-ds-base-1.4.0.11-20180708git185963e.fc28.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Annobin: "causes a section type conflict with..."

Annobin is causing so many issues, and its main goal of finding packages that were not built with the correct linker flags has already been achieved (bugs have been filed for all of them), so do we really need to keep dragging this thing along all the time? IMHO, it is causing more problems

Re: Packages which needlessly use %defattr

Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > In a %files section of a specfile, the %defattr directive is used to set > the default file ownership and permissions. RPM has provided a sensible > default since version 4.4 (which predates FC6 and RHEL5), but very many > specfiles still include an initial %defattr

[Bug 1599111] New: perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.72 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1599111 Bug ID: 1599111 Summary: perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.72 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-YAML-LibYAML Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

Re: Change DNF to use Zchunk for F29

Jonathan Dieter wrote: > And, since the patches to librepo all work and are in the review state > right now, I expect that there will be few, if any, further changes to > zchunk's API. I think these: https://github.com/zchunk/zchunk/blob/8818802cbccde20f911ae527d40037e8fbea36bf/src/zck.c#L209

Re: Review swaps

On Sun, 8 Jul 2018, Jerry James wrote: I took care of: - cadical: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1599012 - lfsc: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1599013 - symfpu: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1599014 I would like to give a shout out to Robert-André for

[Bug 1406558] build perl-Coro for EPEL7

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1406558 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Coro-6.514-4.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-0542d369f7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the

Re: Review swaps

On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 9:49 AM Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > I took care of: > > - cadical: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1599012 > - lfsc: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1599013 > - symfpu: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1599014 I would like to give a

[Bug 1590333] Upgrade perl-Image-ExifTool to 11.01

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1590333 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 29 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3835d39d1a unrtf-0.21.9-8.el7 25 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-656b24ec40 chromium-67.0.3396.79-1.el7 23

Re: Self Introduction: Jani Juhani Sinervo

Welcome to Fedora Jani! - Original Message - > From: "Jani Juhani Sinervo" > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Saturday, July 7, 2018 8:23:02 PM > Subject: Self Introduction: Jani Juhani Sinervo > > Hi all! > > I'm a second-year university computer science student (well, the

[HEADS UP] Removal of GCC from the buildroot

As per Changes/Remove GCC from BuildRoot , I'm going to automatically add BuildRequires: gcc and/or BuildRequires: gcc-c++ to packages which fail to build with common messages (like gcc: command not found, also autotools/cmake/meson

Re: Build fails in rawhide only on x86_64 & i686

On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 3:57 PM Alexander Ploumistos < alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 3:31 PM Igor Gnatenko > wrote: > > This is the bug in annobin which is breaking many things. > > Thank you both, after adding "%undefine _annotated_build" to the spec > file, the

Re: Your package requires Python 3.6, rebuild it!

On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 9:44 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hi again, > > this as a reminder that you package still requires Python 3.6. It needs a > rebuild and the build is failing. Please fix it and rebuild your package. I finally got around to fixing python-blockdiag and rebuilding its dependent

Re: Review swaps

I took care of: - cadical: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1599012 - lfsc: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1599013 - symfpu: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1599014 ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20180707.n.2 changes

On Sun, Jul 08, 2018 at 01:48:04PM +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: > = DROPPED PACKAGES = > Package: python37-3.7.0-1.fc29 > Summary: Version 3.7 of the Python interpreter > RPMs:python37 > Size:134.97 MiB > > = UPGRADED PACKAGES = > Package: python3-3.7.0-1.fc29

Re: Build fails in rawhide only on x86_64 & i686

On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 3:31 PM Igor Gnatenko wrote: > This is the bug in annobin which is breaking many things. Thank you both, after adding "%undefine _annotated_build" to the spec file, the builds succeeded. Are we supposed to apply this workaround or do we wait for the issue to be resolved?

Re: Build fails in rawhide only on x86_64 & i686

On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 2:47 PM Alexander Ploumistos < alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I submitted updated builds for scidavis and they failed in rawhide[0] > on x86_64 and i686 with the message: > > src/main.cpp:160:5: error: 'int main(int, char**)' causes a section > type conflict

Re: Build fails in rawhide only on x86_64 & i686

On Sun, Jul 08, 2018 at 02:37:24PM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > Hello, > > I submitted updated builds for scidavis and they failed in rawhide[0] > on x86_64 and i686 with the message: > > src/main.cpp:160:5: error: 'int main(int, char**)' causes a section > type conflict with 'const

Build fails in rawhide only on x86_64 & i686

Hello, I submitted updated builds for scidavis and they failed in rawhide[0] on x86_64 and i686 with the message: src/main.cpp:160:5: error: 'int main(int, char**)' causes a section type conflict with 'const QString operator+(const QString&, const QString&)' The update contained mostly fixes

[Bug 1599060] New: perl-App-Nopaste-1.012 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1599060 Bug ID: 1599060 Summary: perl-App-Nopaste-1.012 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-App-Nopaste Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

Fedora Rawhide-20180707.n.2 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 15/138 (x86_64), 23/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180702.n.0): ID: 255540 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_firewall_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/255540 ID: 255543 Test:

[Test-Announce] Fedora 29 Rawhide 20180707.n.2 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 29 Rawhide 20180707.n.2. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: