[Bug 1467606] CVE-2017-10789 perl-DBD-MySQL: Possible MITM attack when mysql_ssl=1

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1467606 Bug 1467606 depends on bug 1467608, which changed state. Bug 1467608 Summary: CVE-2017-10788 CVE-2017-10789 perl-DBD-MySQL: various flaws [fedora-all] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1467608 What|Removed

[Bug 1467600] CVE-2017-10788 perl-DBD-MySQL: Use-after-free when calling mysql_stmt_error() after mysql_stmt_close()

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1467600 Bug 1467600 depends on bug 1467608, which changed state. Bug 1467608 Summary: CVE-2017-10788 CVE-2017-10789 perl-DBD-MySQL: various flaws [fedora-all] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1467608 What|Removed

[Bug 1467608] CVE-2017-10788 CVE-2017-10789 perl-DBD-MySQL: various flaws [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1467608 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |NEW Resolution|EOL

[EPEL-devel] Re: Package Updates: python-passlib

On 16 July 2018 at 20:15, Alcantar, Miguel wrote: > To reiterate what was said: There will be no further updates to the > python-passlib package which lives in the EPEL repo for EL7. > > Is that correct? Thanks. > The terms 'further updates' can mean different things in this context so I will

Re: Release criteria proposal: installing / removing software

On Thu, 2018-06-14 at 17:31 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2018-06-14 at 19:25 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 03:47:25PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > There's a footnote explaining that already: > > > > Ah, that clears it up. Thanks :) > > > > > as

[Bug 1601648] New: perl-Net-Amazon-S3-0.84 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1601648 Bug ID: 1601648 Summary: perl-Net-Amazon-S3-0.84 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Net-Amazon-S3 Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[EPEL-devel] Re: Package Updates: python-passlib

To reiterate what was said: There will be no further updates to the python-passlib package which lives in the EPEL repo for EL7. Is that correct? Thanks. From: Stephen John Smoogen Sent: Monday, July 16, 2018 5:04:04 PM To: EPEL Development List Subject:

[EPEL-devel] Re: Package Updates: python-passlib

On 16 July 2018 at 19:28, Alcantar, Miguel wrote: > We use RHEL Server and Workstation x86_64 > So in this case the RHEL version would be as new as we are going to move to. The maintainer would need to look at copying the version that was in RHEL-7 and make it with an NVR which is less than

[EPEL-devel] Re: Package Updates: python-passlib

On 16 July 2018 at 19:31, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >> "SJS" == Stephen John Smoogen writes: > > SJS> This looks to be one of those packages which are only in EPEL for > SJS> users of the aarch64 and ppc64 architectures. > > I wonder how you can tell. The specfile doesn't indicate

[EPEL-devel] Re: Package Updates: python-passlib

> "SJS" == Stephen John Smoogen writes: SJS> This looks to be one of those packages which are only in EPEL for SJS> users of the aarch64 and ppc64 architectures. I wonder how you can tell. The specfile doesn't indicate anything about it. - J<

[EPEL-devel] Re: Package Updates: python-passlib

We use RHEL Server and Workstation x86_64 From: Stephen John Smoogen Sent: Monday, July 16, 2018 4:21:10 PM To: EPEL Development List Subject: [EPEL-devel] Re: Package Updates: python-passlib On 16 July 2018 at 18:44, Alcantar, Miguel wrote: > epel-devel, > > >

[EPEL-devel] Re: Package Updates: python-passlib

On 16 July 2018 at 18:44, Alcantar, Miguel wrote: > epel-devel, > > > The following package is included in RHEL Server: > python-passlib-1.6.5-2.el7 > > The current EPEL version is older: python-passlib-1.6.2-2.el7 > > When will this package be updated? > This looks to be one of those packages

[EPEL-devel] Package Updates: python-passlib

epel-devel, The following package is included in RHEL Server: python-passlib-1.6.5-2.el7 The current EPEL version is older: python-passlib-1.6.2-2.el7 When will this package be updated? Thank you, Miguel ___ epel-devel mailing list --

Re: Build failures of packages which use waf as build system

On 16.7.2018 21:54, Guido Aulisi wrote: I fixed some of these audio packages, prefixing waf calls with %{__python2} macro. You have to BR python2-rpm-macros or python2-devel to use it. Or you can just type "python2". However, if you need %{__python2} macro, BR python2-devel, not

Re: Intent to orphan Python 2

- Original Message - > From: "R P Herrold" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2018 8:57:11 PM > Subject: Re: Intent to orphan Python 2 > > On Mon, 16 Jul 2018, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > On 23.3.2018 12:23, Petr Viktorin wrote: > > > tl;dr:

Adding pgadmin4 to Fedora repository

Fedora 28 launched with PostgreSQL 10. The PostgreSQL GUI tool in the repository -- pgadmin3 -- only works through version 9.x. Hence, there has been a loss of functionality that I have been trying to get back. All of the prerequisites for pgadmin4 were taken care of here: BUG 1380826 -

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity Office Hours

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Modularity Office Hours on 2018-07-17 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00 US/Eastern At fedora-modular...@chat.freenode.net The meeting will be about: This is where you ask the Fedora Modularity Team questions (and we try to answer them)! Join us on

[Bug 1601289] perl-Mail-JMAPTalk-0.12 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1601289 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Mail-JMAPTalk-0.12-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1601286] perl-DB_File-1.842 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1601286 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-DB_File-1.842-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1601131] perl-Test-POE-Client-TCP-1.22 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1601131 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Test-POE-Client-TCP-1.22-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

Build failures of packages which use waf as build system

Hi all, I found many build failure of packages using waf as build system. This is due to recent move of /usr/bin/python into a separate package https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Move_usr_bin_python_into_separat e_package Many audio related packages have this problem. I fixed some of these

Re: Lots a permission denied activity

On 07/16/2018 11:27 AM, Steve Grubb wrote: > There is a /usr/libexec/tracker-extract process that searches my directories > about every 11 seconds. I can imagine on a laptop that would be a lot of disk > activity. Sometimes I use root in my home directory and accidentally create > files owned

[EPEL-devel] python 2 retirement commo efforts

notwithstanding my post on the f-devel ML, ... Probaby there should some work on communicating the need to turn down EPEL 6 at 2020 11 30, and with it those python 2 modules by that time Smooge, if from the logs you can comb mirroring apart from installlation pulls, having a ranked list of

Re: Lots a permission denied activity

On Mon, 2018-07-16 at 14:27 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote: > Hello, > > I have been testing a new set of audit rules and have run across some > processes that are doing things that might out to be changed. Typically, > audit users expect a normally functioning system to not be noisy. There is a >

Re: Intent to orphan Python 2

On Mon, 16 Jul 2018, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 23.3.2018 12:23, Petr Viktorin wrote: > > tl;dr: Unless someone steps up to maintain Python 2 after 2020, we need > > to start dropping python2 packages now. tl;dr: --- that statement by itself overlooks the obvious. Not ALL packages become

Re: Lots a permission denied activity

On Mon, 2018-07-16 at 14:27 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote: > Hello, > > I have been testing a new set of audit rules and have run across > some > processes that are doing things that might out to be changed. > Typically, > audit users expect a normally functioning system to not be noisy. > There is

Lots a permission denied activity

Hello, I have been testing a new set of audit rules and have run across some processes that are doing things that might out to be changed. Typically, audit users expect a normally functioning system to not be noisy. There is a requirement to audit failed file access due to permission denied.

[Bug 1529797] fusioninventory-agent-2.4.1 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1529797 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[EPEL-devel] Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL biweekly meeting

I am collecting the items for the agenda for Wednesdays meeting. Please email me directly or the list. On 16 July 2018 at 14:00, wrote: > Dear all, > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >EPEL biweekly meeting on 2018-07-18 from 18:00:00 to 19:00:00 US/Eastern >At

Re: Intent to orphan Python 2

On 23.3.2018 12:23, Petr Viktorin wrote: tl;dr: Unless someone steps up to maintain Python 2 after 2020, we need to start dropping python2 packages now. Python 2.7 will reach end of upstream support on 1st of January, 2020, after almost 10 years (!) of volunteer maintenance. Fedora still has

[Bug 1601131] perl-Test-POE-Client-TCP-1.22 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1601131 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from

[Bug 1601286] perl-DB_File-1.842 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1601286 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from

Re: Fedora 29 Mass Rebuild

On Fri, 2018-07-13 at 10:42 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 13.7.2018 10:38, Vascom wrote: > > Hi. > > As I see rebuild failed for all packages use %{__python} macro > > because > > it point to /usr/bin/python that removed from python2 package. > > > > Need MassFix all these packages. Many of

[Bug 1601289] perl-Mail-JMAPTalk-0.12 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1601289 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from

[EPEL-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL biweekly meeting

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: EPEL biweekly meeting on 2018-07-18 from 18:00:00 to 19:00:00 US/Eastern At fedora-meet...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: This is the bi-weekly meeting for EPEL. Items for the meeting agenda should be emailed to

Re: Fedora 29 Mass Rebuild

Hi All, The F29 Mass Rebuild has been done and is being tagged back into f29 in koji, so it will land in the buildroots shortly and in rawhide tomorrow. Please check and fix any of your packages that failed to build. they can be found at

Re: Fedora 29 Mass Rebuild

On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 3:59 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 6.7.2018 15:29, Mohan Boddu wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Per the Fedora 29 schedule[1] we will be starting a mass rebuild for > > Fedora 29 very shortly. We are doing a mass rebuild for Fedora 29 for > > all the changes listed in > > > >

Re: [HEADS UP] Removal of GCC from the buildroot

On Fri, 2018-07-13 at 12:39 +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > On Fri, Jul 13, 2018, 11:19 Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 8.7.2018 20:46, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > > As per Changes/Remove GCC from BuildRoot > > > > >, I'm > > > going to

[Bug 1537217] perl-gettext: Obsoletes work by package name, not by provides

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1537217 Ralf Corsepius changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

The Actual Url On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 12:01 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 10:09 AM, Manas Mangaonkar > wrote: > > Rpm Generation Done, Sorry for the really long delay. Request

tickets resolved by voting on the issue tracker

The following tickets were resolved by voting in the issue tracker without disagreement: #1941 F29 System Wide Change: OpenLDAP without Non-threaded Libraries - Change is approved (+7, 0, 0) #1938 F29 System Wide Change: Discontinue PPC64 as Alternative Architecture - Change is approved (+6, 0,

Re: Fedora c++ default build flags

On 16/07/18 18:24 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: On 07/16/2018 05:25 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 12/07/18 20:49 +0200, mskal...@redhat.com wrote: Dan Horák píše v St 11. 07. 2018 v 14:12 +0200: On Wed, 11 Jul 2018 14:00:40 +0200 mskal...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, during a discussion with

Re: Fedora c++ default build flags

On 07/16/2018 05:25 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 12/07/18 20:49 +0200, mskal...@redhat.com wrote: Dan Horák píše v St 11. 07. 2018 v 14:12 +0200: On Wed, 11 Jul 2018 14:00:40 +0200 mskal...@redhat.com wrote: > Hi, > during a discussion with upstream (MongoDB) they asked me about > default

Re: [HEADS UP] Removal of GCC from the buildroot

On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 09:17:41PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 02:10:37PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote: > > On 07/11/2018 04:37 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > On 07/11/2018 12:57 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > > >> On 07/11/2018 09:26 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > >>> I

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2018-07-16)

Meeting started by zbyszek at 15:04:59 UTC. Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-07-16/fesco.2018-07-16-15.04.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-07-16/fesco.2018-07-16-15.04.txt Log:

[Bug 1601443] perl-libwww-perl-6.35 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1601443 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

Re: [HEADS UP] Removal of GCC from the buildroot

On Mon, 2018-07-16 at 09:27 -0400, Cole Robinson wrote: > On 07/15/2018 11:47 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 04:05:42PM +0200, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > > > On 07/12/2018 10:17 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > Does each build start with its own fresh VM? Do you

Re: Annobin: "causes a section type conflict with..."

On 07/07/18 16:21 -0600, Jerry James wrote: On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 2:14 PM Jonathan Wakely wrote: I'm seeing this in Boost too, and given my schedule I'm going to abandon the Boost update for f29. Ugh, that's unfortunate. I wonder if we should perhaps postpone the mass rebuild until this

Re: Fedora c++ default build flags

On 12/07/18 20:49 +0200, mskal...@redhat.com wrote: Dan Horák píše v St 11. 07. 2018 v 14:12 +0200: On Wed, 11 Jul 2018 14:00:40 +0200 mskal...@redhat.com wrote: > Hi, > during a discussion with upstream (MongoDB) they asked me about > default Fedora C/C++ build flags. And I don't remember all

Re: [HEADS UP] Removal of GCC from the buildroot

On 10/07/18 08:42 +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: Do you see whole context now? No, because I stopped reading. Too longwinded, too much rambling. Try to express yourself more concisely. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: sip-related build failures in rawhide

On 16.7.2018 16:43, Rex Dieter wrote: Rex Dieter wrote: Rex Dieter wrote: Scott Talbert wrote: On Mon, 16 Jul 2018, Miro Hrončok wrote: A few days ago scidavis builds started failing in rawhide. Someone mentioned here that sip was to blame for a number of such failures and according to

Schedule for today's FESCo Meeting (2018-07-16)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2018-07-16 15:00 UTC' Links to all issues to be

Re: sip-related build failures in rawhide

Scott Talbert wrote: >> Seems a lot of software expects that, so I'll (re)add the dependency >> Requires: python3-sip >> to python3-sip-devel > > Also, since you're now only packaging the one 'sip' binary, does it make > sense to move it out of the 'python2-sip-devel' package to a >

Re: sip-related build failures in rawhide

On Mon, 16 Jul 2018, Miro Hrončok wrote: A few days ago scidavis builds started failing in rawhide. Someone mentioned here that sip was to blame for a number of such failures and according to koschei they started to happen after the update from sip-4.19.9-0.2.dev1805261119.fc29 to

Re: sip-related build failures in rawhide

On 16.7.2018 16:49, Scott Talbert wrote: On Mon, 16 Jul 2018, Rex Dieter wrote: A few days ago scidavis builds started failing in rawhide. Someone mentioned here that sip was to blame for a number of such failures and according to koschei they started to happen after the update from

Re: sip-related build failures in rawhide

On Mon, 16 Jul 2018, Rex Dieter wrote: A few days ago scidavis builds started failing in rawhide. Someone mentioned here that sip was to blame for a number of such failures and according to koschei they started to happen after the update from sip-4.19.9-0.2.dev1805261119.fc29 to

Re: sip-related build failures in rawhide

Rex Dieter wrote: > Rex Dieter wrote: > >> Scott Talbert wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 16 Jul 2018, Miro Hrončok wrote: >>> > A few days ago scidavis builds started failing in rawhide. Someone > mentioned here that sip was to blame for a number of such failures and > according to koschei

Re: sip-related build failures in rawhide

Rex Dieter wrote: > Scott Talbert wrote: > >> On Mon, 16 Jul 2018, Miro Hrončok wrote: >> A few days ago scidavis builds started failing in rawhide. Someone mentioned here that sip was to blame for a number of such failures and according to koschei they started to happen after

Re: sip-related build failures in rawhide

Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 16.7.2018 16:30, Rex Dieter wrote: >>> On this last one at least - it appears that the python3-sip executable >>> was >>> removed in the packaging. I've got a query into Rex about whether what >>> was intentional or not. >> >> The removal was intentional, but as I see

Re: sip-related build failures in rawhide

On 16.7.2018 16:30, Rex Dieter wrote: On this last one at least - it appears that the python3-sip executable was removed in the packaging. I've got a query into Rex about whether what was intentional or not. The removal was intentional, but as I see it was used in more places, can put back a

Re: sip-related build failures in rawhide

Scott Talbert wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jul 2018, Miro Hrončok wrote: > >>> A few days ago scidavis builds started failing in rawhide. Someone >>> mentioned here that sip was to blame for a number of such failures and >>> according to koschei they started to happen after the update from >>>

Re: [HEADS UP] Removal of GCC from the buildroot

On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 12:39:55PM +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > Yes, I've pushed over 2k commits adding those, however regexp might have > not catched all possible cases. Would appreciate if you would link such > packages so that I can fix them. Or maintainers can do it themselves. > > [1]

Re: [HEADS UP] Removal of GCC from the buildroot

On 07/15/2018 11:47 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 04:05:42PM +0200, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: >> On 07/12/2018 10:17 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >>> Does each build start with its own fresh VM? Do you care about the >>> data in that build VM if either qemu or the host

Re: sip-related build failures in rawhide

On Mon, 16 Jul 2018, Miro Hrončok wrote: A few days ago scidavis builds started failing in rawhide. Someone mentioned here that sip was to blame for a number of such failures and according to koschei they started to happen after the update from sip-4.19.9-0.2.dev1805261119.fc29 to

Re: F29 Self Contained Change: Deprecate YUM 3

On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 8:01 AM Tom Hughes wrote: > > On 12/07/18 09:15, Daniel Mach wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 9:45 PM, Kevin Fenzi > > wrote: > > > > koji is kinda important. I think this is meaning python2-koji? > > I would hope python3-koji/koji stays

[Bug 1601452] New: perl-Net-DNS-1.16 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1601452 Bug ID: 1601452 Summary: perl-Net-DNS-1.16 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Net-DNS Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1601289] perl-Mail-JMAPTalk-0.12 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1601289 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Mail-JMAPTalk-0.12-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-6bd39a6fe9 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the

[Bug 1601443] New: perl-libwww-perl-6.35 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1601443 Bug ID: 1601443 Summary: perl-libwww-perl-6.35 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-libwww-perl Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1601289] perl-Mail-JMAPTalk-0.12 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1601289 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Mail-JMAPTalk-0.12-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-133b3f2950 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the

[Bug 1601289] perl-Mail-JMAPTalk-0.12 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1601289 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1601286] perl-DB_File-1.842 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1601286 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-DB_File-1.842-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-e840a1ac40 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug 1601286] perl-DB_File-1.842 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1601286 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-DB_File-1.842-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-584af79991 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug 1601286] perl-DB_File-1.842 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1601286 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-DB_File-1.842-1.fc29 --- Comment

[Bug 1601131] perl-Test-POE-Client-TCP-1.22 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1601131 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Test-POE-Client-TCP-1.22-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-174f525e37 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Bug 1601131] perl-Test-POE-Client-TCP-1.22 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1601131 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Test-POE-Client-TCP-1.22-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-72f67df677 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

Re: transfig license change

On 07/16/2018 09:59 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 15-07-18 09:11, Honza Horak wrote: License of transfig package was changed from: MIT to: MIT and GPLv3+ https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/transfig.git/commit/?id=fe80b4977bc3a9a3c47497a0042a2ca4a5001ba8 The fig2dev/lib/.c files are

[Bug 1601131] perl-Test-POE-Client-TCP-1.22 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1601131 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

Re: xfig license change

On 07/16/2018 09:54 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 15-07-18 09:25, Honza Horak wrote: License of xfig package was changed from: MIT to: MIT and GPLv3+ and LGPLv2+ PR submitted, not yet merged: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xfig/pull-request/3 Hans or Steve, please, merge. The lib/.c

Re: sip-related build failures in rawhide

Hi all. On 16/07/2018 10:04, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 15.7.2018 13:24, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: >> Hello, >> >> A few days ago scidavis builds started failing in rawhide. Someone >> mentioned here that sip was to blame for a number of such failures and >> according to koschei they started to

Re: [HEADS UP] Removal of GCC from the buildroot

On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 7:29 AM Federico Bruni wrote: > > > Il giorno ven 13 lug 2018 alle 12:39, Igor Gnatenko > ha scritto: > > On Fri, Jul 13, 2018, 11:19 Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> On 8.7.2018 20:46, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > >> > As per Changes/Remove GCC from BuildRoot > >> > > >>

[Bug 1584479] Slic3r 1.3.0 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1584479 Miro Hrončok changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

Re: sip-related build failures in rawhide

On 15.7.2018 13:24, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: Hello, A few days ago scidavis builds started failing in rawhide. Someone mentioned here that sip was to blame for a number of such failures and according to koschei they started to happen after the update from sip-4.19.9-0.2.dev1805261119.fc29 to

[Bug 1601285] perl-App-cpm-0.975 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1601285 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

Re: xfig license change

Hi, On 15-07-18 09:25, Honza Horak wrote: License of xfig package was changed from: MIT to: MIT and GPLv3+ and LGPLv2+ PR submitted, not yet merged: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xfig/pull-request/3 Hans or Steve, please, merge. The lib/.c files are not used when building on Linux,

Re: transfig license change

Hi, On 15-07-18 09:11, Honza Horak wrote: License of transfig package was changed from: MIT to: MIT and GPLv3+ https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/transfig.git/commit/?id=fe80b4977bc3a9a3c47497a0042a2ca4a5001ba8 The fig2dev/lib/.c files are not used when building on Linux, after adding:

Re: Fedora 29 Mass Rebuild

On 6.7.2018 15:29, Mohan Boddu wrote: Hi all, Per the Fedora 29 schedule[1] we will be starting a mass rebuild for Fedora 29 very shortly. We are doing a mass rebuild for Fedora 29 for all the changes listed in https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7480 we will start the mass rebuild on

[Bug 1601132] perl-Statistics-Descriptive-3.0701 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1601132 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED

perl-File-MMagic license corrected

I corrected a license tag at the perl-File-MMagic-1.30-16.fc29 package from "ASL 1.0 and BSD" to "App-s2p and ASL 1.0 and BSD". -- Petr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to