[Bug 1611022] perl-App-cpm-0.978 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611022 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2018-08-02 16:00 UTC)

  Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2018-08-02 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net.   Local time information (via. uitime): = Day: Thursday == 2018-08-02 09:00 PDT  US/Pacific

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2018-08-02 - 90% PASS

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2018/08/02/report-389-ds-base-1.4.0.13-20180801gitb14c836.fc28.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[Bug 1611024] New: perl-DateTime-1.50 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611024 Bug ID: 1611024 Summary: perl-DateTime-1.50 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-DateTime Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1611022] New: perl-App-cpm-0.978 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611022 Bug ID: 1611022 Summary: perl-App-cpm-0.978 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-App-cpm Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

Re: binutils 2.31.1-4.fc29 - 2.31.1-7.fc29 produces broken ELF binaries

On 07/31/2018 12:18 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: I'm attaching a list of affected packages in the Fedora rawhide buildroot, as of 2018-07-31 10:00.  This is based on ELF files which have a .gnu.build.attributes section (which is not allocated) between two allocated sections.  (The rawhide compose

Re: Guideline change: glibc malloc as the C/C++/Rust allocator

On 07/27/2018 06:43 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 07/26/2018 06:03 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >>> "FW" == Florian Weimer writes: >> >> FW> I would like to request a change of the Packaging Guidelines, >> FW> advising packagers not to interpose malloc. >> >> How strong of a

[389-devel] please review: PR 49876 - Add password policy functionality to CLI/UI

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49876 ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html

Fedora Rawhide-20180801.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 66/138 (x86_64), 24/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180731.n.0): ID: 262444 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/262444 ID: 262488

[Bug 1610977] New: [abrt] perl-XML-XPath: __libc_sigaction(): perl killed by SIGABRT

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1610977 Bug ID: 1610977 Summary: [abrt] perl-XML-XPath: __libc_sigaction(): perl killed by SIGABRT Product: Fedora Version: 28 Component: perl-XML-XPath Assignee:

Re: [fedora-arm] cmake segfault on 32-bit arches on Rawhide

On Wed, 2018-08-01 at 20:02 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 9:58 PM, Adam Williamson > wrote: > > I just tried a rebuild of a package in Rawhide, it worked on most > > arches, but failed on armv7hl and i686 (our only 32-bit arches). On > > both arches, cmake seems to have

Re: [fedora-arm] cmake segfault on 32-bit arches on Rawhide

On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 9:58 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > I just tried a rebuild of a package in Rawhide, it worked on most > arches, but failed on armv7hl and i686 (our only 32-bit arches). On > both arches, cmake seems to have segfaulted: > >

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 52 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-b6c663378c unrtf-0.21.9-8.el6 20 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-d801e05f92 uwsgi-2.0.17.1-1.el6 13

Fedora testing-20180801.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Fedora updates-20180801.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64) Installed system changes in test x86_64 AtomicHost-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi: System load changed from 0.61 to 0.28 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/262261#downloads Current test data:

[Bug 1606934] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20180720 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1606934 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Module-CoreList-5.20180720-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1599722] perl-Test-mysqld-1.0011 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1599722 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

Fw: Re: [fedora-arm] Resizing the root partition when loading on a Raspberry Pi 3 B+

Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email. ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On August 1, 2018 5:35 PM, BunnyApocalypse wrote: > In my experience on the 3 B+, these were the commands that I needed to run: > > growpart /dev/mmcblk 0 3 > pvresize /dev/mmcblk0p3 > lvextend -l 100%FREE

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20180801.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180731.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180801.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 3 Added packages: 2 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 320 Downgraded packages: 2 Size of added packages: 16.86 MiB Size of dropped packages

[Bug 1609590] perl-Log-Dispatch-FileRotate-1.36 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1609590 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

Re: Fedora Rawhide-20180731.n.0 compose check report

Hi, On 01-08-18 17:33, Adam Williamson wrote: On Tue, 2018-07-31 at 20:29 +, Fedora compose checker wrote: No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 60/138 (x86_64), 23/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180730.n.0): So the big change here is

Re: Welcome Christopher King!

Thank you so much for the warm welcome Rishi! I would also like to thank everyone who has been helping in the review process. I look forward to continuing my contributions to the Fedora project moving forward. -Chris ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On August 1, 2018 3:25 PM, Debarshi Ray

Re: Fedora Rawhide-20180731.n.0 compose check report

On Tue, 2018-07-31 at 20:29 +, Fedora compose checker wrote: > No missing expected images. > > Failed openQA tests: 60/138 (x86_64), 23/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) > > New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180730.n.0): So the big change here is a kernel bug that showed up, which

Welcome Christopher King!

Hello everybody, I have just sponsored Christopher King (IRC, FAS: bunnyapocalypse) into the 'packager' group. He has been doing some great work getting the WPE port of WebKit into Fedora: * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1601058 *

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Params-ValidationCompiler (master). "Update to 0.30 (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2018-08-01 14:59:20 UTC From d0afed733a8a2288ef644937863c819eee7b5163 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Aug 01 2018 14:58:38 + Subject: Update to 0.30 - New upstream release 0.30 - Added a new option for named params, "return_object", which

glibc 2.28 rebase has landed in rawhide

rawhide has been updated to glibc 2.28. I do not expect any issues because we have been importing development snapshots during the past six months, but if there any, please let us know ASAP. Thanks, Florian ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Python Bundled Wheels package

On 1.8.2018 15:11, Petr Viktorin wrote: On 07/22/18 11:49, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hi Pythonistas and Fedora packagers. Recently I've realized we bundle too much wheels with our pythons + virtualenv package. That is unfortunate:   * we don't build those. stricly seeking, it's just a zip with

Re: "TLS reference ... mismatches non-TLS reference"

Vít Ondruch writes: > Dne 1.8.2018 v 13:48 Dave Love napsal(a): >> I've been trying to build a new version of the scorep package with >> %check running make check. A couple of days ago it failed with strange >> link errors concerning symbols not found which are defined in the >> libraries it

Re: Python Bundled Wheels package

On 07/22/18 11:49, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hi Pythonistas and Fedora packagers. Recently I've realized we bundle too much wheels with our pythons + virtualenv package. That is unfortunate:  * we don't build those. stricly seeking, it's just a zip with python files in it, yet this is not

Re: RFC: make $releasever return "rawhide" on Rawhide

Dne 1.8.2018 v 13:09 Kamil Paral napsal(a): > On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 10:36 AM, Vít Ondruch > wrote: > > I'm somehow missing the point probably, but as a rawhide user, > when I want to take some package from F28 (typically kernel), then > I have to do

Re: "TLS reference ... mismatches non-TLS reference"

Dne 1.8.2018 v 13:48 Dave Love napsal(a): > I've been trying to build a new version of the scorep package with > %check running make check. A couple of days ago it failed with strange > link errors concerning symbols not found which are defined in the > libraries it was linking against

"TLS reference ... mismatches non-TLS reference"

I've been trying to build a new version of the scorep package with %check running make check. A couple of days ago it failed with strange link errors concerning symbols not found which are defined in the libraries it was linking against (apparently in the right order). Now it's failing on

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove Excessive Linking

On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 10:21:42AM +0200, Jan Kurik wrote: > Note from Change Wrangler: This Change Proposal requires mass rebuild. > However, two weeks ago (June 19th), we have already passed the > deadline for Change proposals requiring mass rebuild. I will leave the > decision whether this

Re: RFC: make $releasever return "rawhide" on Rawhide

On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 10:36 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > I'm somehow missing the point probably, but as a rawhide user, when I want > to take some package from F28 (typically kernel), then I have to do "sudo > dnf update --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=updates{,-testing} kernel\* > --release 28", i.e.

Re: Review swap, Perl flavored

On Tuesday, 31 July 2018 23.12.22 WEST Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > Hello, > > > Today is my first year anniversary of contributing to Fedora, yay us! Congratulations for all your (hard) work Robert-André. :-) Regards, -- José Abílio ___ devel

Re: Making Fedora secure - Package exit policy for security

On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 10:40:20AM +0530, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote: > On 07/31/2018 08:51 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > > > > Do we have any analysis showing what would be the fallout if we applied > > these purge rules today ? ie what packages would be dropped today due > > to unaddressed

Re: Updates to mathematical software

Hi Jerry, On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 19:09:02 -0600 Jerry James wrote: > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 4:36 AM Paul Howarth > wrote: > > On Mon, 28 May 2018 21:03:34 -0600 > > Jerry James wrote: > > > It looks like the giac, Macaulay2, and sagemath stacks are the > > > only pari consumers. There is

Re: RFC: make $releasever return "rawhide" on Rawhide

I'm somehow missing the point probably, but as a rawhide user, when I want to take some package from F28 (typically kernel), then I have to do "sudo dnf update --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=updates{,-testing} kernel\* --release 28", i.e. the problem is that I have to enable the "updates"

Re: Orphaning winswitch

Is it still maintained by upstream? On 01/08/2018 02:18, Jonathan Underwood wrote: > On 29 July 2018 at 19:14, Jonathan Underwood > wrote: >> Dear All, >> >> I haven't used winswitch for a few years now, and haven't really got >> the bandwidth to maintain the package, and so I plan to orphan it

Re: Making Fedora secure - Package exit policy for security

On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 10:33:11AM +0530, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote: > On 07/31/2018 08:33 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: > > >> 1. If a CRITICAL or IMPORTANT security issue is open against a package > >> in Fedora-X and by the time X is EOL and the issue is not addressed, > >> proactively remove the

Re: Making Fedora secure - Package exit policy for security

On Tue, 2018-07-31 at 09:09 +0530, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote: > Hi All, > > I was asked to bring this issue[1] to the developer community before > FESCO makes a decision. > > In several instances[2] there exists packages in Fedora, in which > package-maintainers did not patch security issues,

Re: Intent to retire python-svgwrite

On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 03:25:49PM -0400, Robert Brown wrote: >Got it. Thanks. I'm not sure what to do at this point. Log out and log back into src.fp.o, groups are synced upon login :) Pierre ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Making Fedora secure - Package exit policy for security

On 07/31/2018 01:19 PM, Pavel Zhukov wrote: >> 1. If a CRITICAL or IMPORTANT security issue is open against a package >> in Fedora-X and by the time X is EOL and the issue is not addressed, >> proactively remove the package from X+1 > By the time FX is EOL'ed it's too late even for FX+2 to drop