Dne 6.9.2018 v 01:59 Matthew Miller napsal(a):
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 04:47:32PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
>> I'd be open to a "shortcut" version of the Change process that
>> essentially says "hey, we're doing this again". But this way we'd get
>> visibility across teams and externally. For
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2018-09-06 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. uitime):
= Day: Thursday ==
2018-09-06 09:00 PDT US/Pacific
On 09/05/2018 12:24 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Sep 2018, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> This is a gentle reminder for package maintainers to fix security bugs
>> in the packages they maintain. A complete list of open security flaws
>> against Fedora packages is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1618999
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1620308
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
n Wed, 5 Sep 2018 at 13:42, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
>
> On mercredi 5 septembre 2018 13:05:06 CEST Jan Grulich wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I haven't been using clementine for a long time and don't have really time
> > looking into clementine issues. This is even more complicated given
> > upstream
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624942
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-File-Path-2.16-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624943
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Locale-Codes-3.58-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2018/09/06/report-389-ds-base-1.4.0.16-20180905git8ff8cb8.fc28.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Wed, 2018-09-05 at 12:14 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 9:04 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
>
>
> > Dunno what to do wrt the ongoing freeze and getting final 3.30 in F29
> > Beta, I guess it may be too late for that. Any opinions from QA here?
>
> If 3.29 is not what GNOME
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 04:47:32PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> I'd be open to a "shortcut" version of the Change process that
> essentially says "hey, we're doing this again". But this way we'd get
> visibility across teams and externally. For better or for worse, our
> Change list is a starting
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 31/132 (x86_64), 2/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180903.n.0):
ID: 274863 Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_pata
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/274863
ID: 274919 Test: i386
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1625309
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1625310
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624947
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624943
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624939
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624942
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624935
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> Recent updates on f27 are blocked because openssl-devel (1.1) conflicts
> with compat-openssl10-devel (1.0). A large number of packages depends on
> 1.0, so the only way to upgrade is to --allowerasing, which deletes
> openssl 1.1 devel packages (
>
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 1:50 PM Matthew Miller wrote:
> We used to always have a Change submitted for the GNOME update, but that
> stopped, I assume because it felt like kind of rote bureaucracy rather than
> helpful, since it was basically the same every time. Maybe it's useful after
> all to
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180903.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180904.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 18
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 74
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 9.06 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 11:22 AM, John Florian
wrote:
> On 2018-09-05 13:41, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
>
> I would recommend you check out qmmp. It's light weight, runs with qt5
> and does what it sets out to do, which is be a flexible, lightweight music
> player that runs on qt5, supports skins, has
On 2018-09-05 14:22, John Florian wrote:
I also prefer my "random" music pre-shuffled so I can see what's
coming up and what's behind me. (I honestly own so much music
sometimes I don't know who just played.)
And now that I've posted that, I see there's Edit/Randomize List vs.
On 2018-09-05 13:41, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
I would recommend you check out qmmp. It's light weight, runs with
qt5 and does what it sets out to do, which is be a flexible,
lightweight music player that runs on qt5, supports skins, has many
good plugins for extra features, supports tagged and
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 9:04 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
> Dunno what to do wrt the ongoing freeze and getting final 3.30 in F29
> Beta, I guess it may be too late for that. Any opinions from QA here?
If 3.29 is not what GNOME folks had ever wanted to ship in the Beta,
why are we hearing about it
On 05/09/18, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
>
> A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update:
>
> Version: 28.20180902.0
> Commit(x86_64):
> 24d4ceb612af5abfa84f275ca9d8aff862e69d47aaeb177c0d64f30865fd7a9f
> Commit(aarch64):
>
On 09/05/2018 01:10 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2018-09-05 at 12:17 -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
Recent updates on f27 are blocked because openssl-devel (1.1) conflicts
with compat-openssl10-devel (1.0). [...]
I don't know if it's a real conflict or a packaging artifact that could
be
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 05:04:46PM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> We are quite a bit behind with the builds, like half of GNOME is still
> at 3.28.x or at various stages of 3.29.x snapshots, so there's quite a
> bit of catching up to do.
We used to always have a Change submitted for the GNOME
On mercredi 5 septembre 2018 13:05:06 CEST Jan Grulich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I haven't been using clementine for a long time and don't have really time
> looking into clementine issues. This is even more complicated given
> upstream is more or less dead and latest release is more than 2 years old.
>
I would recommend you check out qmmp. It's light weight, runs with qt5 and
does what it sets out to do, which is be a flexible, lightweight music
player that runs on qt5, supports skins, has many good plugins for extra
features, supports tagged and folder based album covers, etc.
There is a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1625309
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1625310
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
Notification time stamped 2018-09-05 17:28:26 UTC
From 25686f0a5e3cbe6371335831dc1617c063e4d062 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Callaway
Date: Sep 05 2018 17:27:49 +
Subject: 3.007
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 2285281..86f401d 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
Notification time stamped 2018-09-05 17:27:56 UTC
From 25686f0a5e3cbe6371335831dc1617c063e4d062 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Callaway
Date: Sep 05 2018 17:27:49 +
Subject: 3.007
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 2285281..86f401d 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
Notification time stamped 2018-09-05 17:25:35 UTC
From 0ddea0155a0bbe797e2088e45dfc2ff58c6deb96 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Callaway
Date: Sep 05 2018 17:25:06 +
Subject: 3.003
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 8846b49..a586bf5 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
Notification time stamped 2018-09-05 17:25:13 UTC
From 0ddea0155a0bbe797e2088e45dfc2ff58c6deb96 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Callaway
Date: Sep 05 2018 17:25:06 +
Subject: 3.003
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 8846b49..a586bf5 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 12:56 PM Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 10:15:26PM +0530, Parag Nemade wrote:
> > >
> > > I'd be *strongly* disinclined to give a Freeze Exception for a GNOME
> > > mega-update. There's just far too much that could go wrong. Please
> plan to
> > > land the
On Wed, 2018-09-05 at 18:04 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 06:40:47PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > We don't know the exact release version, but given the build-id
> > [0aea4b30d53d7cc6386f1773a8dc8972793def1a] we should be able to
> > match it against an older glibc
On Wed, 2018-09-05 at 11:19 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 11:12 AM Kalev Lember wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > As many of you know, I've been gone half the summer. I'm back now since
> > Monday though and just in time for GNOME 3.30.0 :)
> >
> > We are quite a bit
On Wed, 2018-09-05 at 22:15 +0530, Parag Nemade wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 8:49 PM, Stephen Gallagher
> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 11:12 AM Kalev Lember
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > As many of you know, I've been gone half the summer. I'm back now since
> > >
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 06:04:27PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 06:40:47PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > We don't know the exact release version, but given the build-id
> > [0aea4b30d53d7cc6386f1773a8dc8972793def1a] we should be able to
> > match it against an older
On Wed, 2018-09-05 at 12:17 -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> Recent updates on f27 are blocked because openssl-devel (1.1) conflicts
> with compat-openssl10-devel (1.0). A large number of packages depends on
> 1.0, so the only way to upgrade is to --allowerasing, which deletes
> openssl 1.1
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FreeIPA_Python_2_Removal
== Summary ==
FreeIPA 4.8 will require Python 3.6+ and therefore no longer provide
Python 2 packages on Fedora 30.
== Owner ==
* Name: Christian Heimes (cheimes)
* Email: chei...@redhat.com
== Detailed Description ==
On Fedora 27
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FreeIPA_Python_2_Removal
== Summary ==
FreeIPA 4.8 will require Python 3.6+ and therefore no longer provide
Python 2 packages on Fedora 30.
== Owner ==
* Name: Christian Heimes (cheimes)
* Email: chei...@redhat.com
== Detailed Description ==
On Fedora 27
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 06:40:47PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> We don't know the exact release version, but given the build-id
> [0aea4b30d53d7cc6386f1773a8dc8972793def1a] we should be able to
> match it against an older glibc package.
Here are all the versions of glibc installed on that
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 10:15:26PM +0530, Parag Nemade wrote:
> >
> > I'd be *strongly* disinclined to give a Freeze Exception for a GNOME
> > mega-update. There's just far too much that could go wrong. Please plan to
> > land the mega-update in updates-testing once the Freeze lifts. U-T is
> >
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 8:49 PM, Stephen Gallagher
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 11:12 AM Kalev Lember
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> As many of you know, I've been gone half the summer. I'm back now since
>> Monday though and just in time for GNOME 3.30.0 :)
>>
>> We are quite a bit behind
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 06:40:47PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 04:30:59PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 05:23:45PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2018-09-05 at 13:59 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 04:30:59PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 05:23:45PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > On Wed, 2018-09-05 at 13:59 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 02:27:44PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > > > But which one? For
Recent updates on f27 are blocked because openssl-devel (1.1) conflicts
with compat-openssl10-devel (1.0). A large number of packages depends on
1.0, so the only way to upgrade is to --allowerasing, which deletes
openssl 1.1 devel packages (
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1625440
Jan, as a longtime clementine user, I'm sorry to read this. I had no
idea upstream had gone dormant. It works great for me, but I have no
idea of what pain may have been involved in getting/keeping it in that
form for users like me. Unfortunately, I too am short on time (and I
don't do C).
>> As many of you know, I've been gone half the summer. I'm back now since
>> Monday though and just in time for GNOME 3.30.0 :)
>>
>> We are quite a bit behind with the builds, like half of GNOME is still
>> at 3.28.x or at various stages of 3.29.x snapshots, so there's quite a
>> bit of catching
On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 at 16:19, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> I'd be *strongly* disinclined to give a Freeze Exception for a GNOME
> mega-update.
So you'd rather we ship GA with early pre-release builds of GNOME that
have had little-to-no testing? From a downstream point of view I'm not
going to fix
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 05:23:45PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-09-05 at 13:59 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 02:27:44PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > > But which one? For 2.28-9.fc29 or 2.27.9000-35.fc29? If GDB can't
> > > find the build ID, I'd
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 11:12 AM Kalev Lember wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As many of you know, I've been gone half the summer. I'm back now since
> Monday though and just in time for GNOME 3.30.0 :)
>
> We are quite a bit behind with the builds, like half of GNOME is still
> at 3.28.x or at various
On Wed, 2018-09-05 at 13:59 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 02:27:44PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > But which one? For 2.28-9.fc29 or 2.27.9000-35.fc29? If GDB can't
> > find the build ID, I'd suggest try the other version as well.
>
> Oh I see, good point. I
Hi all,
As many of you know, I've been gone half the summer. I'm back now since
Monday though and just in time for GNOME 3.30.0 :)
We are quite a bit behind with the builds, like half of GNOME is still
at 3.28.x or at various stages of 3.29.x snapshots, so there's quite a
bit of catching up to
Hello All!
With recent erlang-js build there is no more packages dependent on
mozjs24 in F-29 and Rawhide. It wasn't build successfully since Fedora
26 and no longer updated by upstream. Let's retire it.
* https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=17602
*
A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update:
Version: 28.20180902.0
Commit(x86_64): 24d4ceb612af5abfa84f275ca9d8aff862e69d47aaeb177c0d64f30865fd7a9f
Commit(aarch64):
c4deda4174d1a8f92db430c4f9cd39f79976e6e1b220d310a8b4867b7dda4ab3
Commit(ppc64le):
On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 8:36 AM Adam Samalik wrote:
>
> So... any comments to the concept? Any ideas about workflows or processes
> of managing the EOL values?
>
Looking forward to this but I would say the devil is in the details.
Packagers are not necessarily programmers (I include myself in
itamarjp merged a pull-request against the project: `bucardo` that you are
following.
Merged pull-request:
``
drop postgresql-devel BR
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/bucardo/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 02:27:44PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 09/05/2018 02:22 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 02:10:15PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >>On 09/05/2018 02:07 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >>>I just hit a weird bug. When I typed:
> >>>
> >>> $
On 09/05/2018 02:22 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 02:10:15PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 09/05/2018 02:07 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I just hit a weird bug. When I typed:
$ sudo dnf update --best /mntsc
bash exited (and with it, my ssh session) saying:
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 02:10:15PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 09/05/2018 02:07 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >I just hit a weird bug. When I typed:
> >
> > $ sudo dnf update --best /mntsc
> >
> >bash exited (and with it, my ssh session) saying:
> >
> > *** stack smashing detected
On 09/05/2018 02:07 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I just hit a weird bug. When I typed:
$ sudo dnf update --best /mntsc
bash exited (and with it, my ssh session) saying:
*** stack smashing detected ***: terminated
Connection to srv closed.
This was after updating to
I just hit a weird bug. When I typed:
$ sudo dnf update --best /mntsc
bash exited (and with it, my ssh session) saying:
*** stack smashing detected ***: terminated
Connection to srv closed.
This was after updating to glibc-2.28-9.fc29.x86_64.
Unfortunately I cannot seem to reproduce it
Hi All,
I'm Riccardo Schirone, I live in Italy and I've been a Fedora user for many
years. I joined Red Hat less than a year ago and I have been contributing
to radare2 project (https://github.com/radare/radare2.git) for several
years.
My first contribution to the Fedora project is the
On ke, 05 syys 2018, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 09:54:19AM +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Wed, 05 Sep 2018, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote:
>Hi All,
>
>This is a gentle reminder for package maintainers to fix security bugs
>in the packages they maintain. A
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 09:54:19AM +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Sep 2018, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote:
> >Hi All,
> >
> >This is a gentle reminder for package maintainers to fix security bugs
> >in the packages they maintain. A complete list of open security flaws
> >against Fedora
Hi,
I haven't been using clementine for a long time and don't have really time
looking into clementine issues. This is even more complicated given upstream
is more or less dead and latest release is more than 2 years old.
Feel free to take it.
Regards,
Jan
- Original Message -
> From: "Igor Gnatenko"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Cc: developer-por...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Wednesday, September 5, 2018 8:06:50 AM
> Subject: [Developer-portal] Re: New FDP release: Cassandra, Rust and many
> more
Dne 4.9.2018 v 21:46 Rex Dieter napsal(a):
> Ben Rosser wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 2:59 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
>>> Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>>
This is a bit unfortunate considering this is package
every Fedora packager has to have installed
>>> I don't think that's true, can you
On Wed, 05 Sep 2018, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote:
Hi All,
This is a gentle reminder for package maintainers to fix security bugs
in the packages they maintain. A complete list of open security flaws
against Fedora packages is available at:
https://red.ht/2wJ8kLS
Some documentation about this is
On 09/03/2018 02:07 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> The boot menu should show if the previous boot is considered
> unsuccessful I guess that you have left the gnome-initial-setup
> gnome-shell session sit around for more then 2 minutes and then
> the boot is considered successful if you press "ctrl +
On Tue, Sep 4, 2018, 18:00 Pavel Valena wrote:
> Hello,
> new Fedora Developer Portal update is out!
> Website statistics are on the bottom of this email.
>
> Highlights:
> - New Cassandra page [1]
> by Augusto Mecking Caringi(@caringi)
> - Rust pages reworked [2]
> by @msehnout
>
76 matches
Mail list logo
