https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1626981
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-Git-Contributors-0.035-1.fc29 has been pushed to the
Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it
in this bug report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624947
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624939
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624943
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Locale-Codes-3.58-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624935
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Alien-pkgconf-0.15-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1623848
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1620698
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1623844
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-PathTools-3.75-1.fc30 |perl-PathTools-3.75-1.fc30
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1623429
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1623265
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
mod_perl-2.0.10-13.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1623267
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
mod_perl-2.0.10-13.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1623430
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1622999
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-POE-Component-SSLify-1.012-14.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1622483
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1622484
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1622481
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1622479
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Gearman-2.004.015-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2018/09/21/report-389-ds-base-1.4.0.16-20180920gitb4164cc.fc28.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On 20.9.2018 16:33, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 9/6/18 5:32 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
In Fedora, we advertise "all the Pythons" are available and developers
may use them with venv, virtualenv, tox.
https://developer.fedoraproject.org/tech/languages/python/multiple-pythons.html
Two of the
On 9/20/18 1:56 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> If it's "they'll find out when dnf system-upgrade errors out!", then see
> above. I'm ... not enthused. Something in dnf system-upgrade needs to do it;
> possibly a "dnf system-upgrade prep" step before "download".
I agree. Would it be feasible for the
On 20.9.2018 22:23, Martin Bukatovic wrote:
Dear python devel,
While I was considering packaging of tmuxp tool, I noticed that
dependencies of this package provided by Fedora are bit old. Eg.
python-libtmux is 2 years old, which is old enough to prevent packaging
any reasonable recent version
Dear python devel,
While I was considering packaging of tmuxp tool, I noticed that
dependencies of this package provided by Fedora are bit old. Eg.
python-libtmux is 2 years old, which is old enough to prevent packaging
any reasonable recent version of tmuxp.
Do I read this right that we need to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1630736
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-DateTime-Format-Flexible-0.31-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1630741
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Inline-CPP-0.75-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 at 18:17, Jonathan Underwood
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In the process of orphaning a few packages lately, I noticed that the
> user "cicku" (Christopher Meng) still had commit or admin privelidges
> on the package. That user hasn't been active for a couple of years,
> and I vaguely
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1626981
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-Git-Contributors-0.035-1.fc28 has been pushed to the
Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it
in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
102 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3835d39d1a
unrtf-0.21.9-8.el7
53 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-f9d6ff695a
bibutils-6.6-1.el7 ghc-hs-bibutils-6.6.0.0-1.el7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1630741
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Inline-CPP-0.75-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1630736
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-DateTime-Format-Flexible-0.31-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
On 20/09/18 09:38, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-09-20 at 07:58 +1000, David Timms wrote:
> The conditional is correct but [1] from the previous %endif you leave
> two blanks lines which you can't, one blank line makes terminate the
> ./configure command and so last option "--disable-sse" is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1626981
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-Git-Contributors-0.035-1.fc27 has been pushed to the
Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it
in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
The Fedora 29 Beta RC5 compose [1] is GO and is going to be shipped
live on Tuesday, September 25, 2018.
For more information please check the Go/No-Go meeting minutes [2] or logs [3].
Thank you to everyone who has and still is working on this release!
[1]
The Fedora 29 Beta RC5 compose [1] is GO and is going to be shipped
live on Tuesday, September 25, 2018.
For more information please check the Go/No-Go meeting minutes [2] or logs [3].
Thank you to everyone who has and still is working on this release!
[1]
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 04:20:49PM +0200, Adam Samalik wrote:
> > > And when that module is EOL, what is the user experience?
> > What I described in my reply earlier: the upgrade should not work and
> > the user should be required to switch to a new stream on their current
> > environment first.
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 09:35:41AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > Independently of this, you could also retire 1.7 with the end of F27 if
> > > there was no need to have it in the future releases.
> > Is there a way for users to say "keep me on whatever module is the default"
> > when
Hi,
In the process of orphaning a few packages lately, I noticed that the
user "cicku" (Christopher Meng) still had commit or admin privelidges
on the package. That user hasn't been active for a couple of years,
and I vaguely remember packages that he owned being orphaned. But, it
seems like
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 10:22 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> There was a bug[1] filed recently that indicated that printing was
>> broken on certain printers. As a result of that discussion, it became
>> apparent that there was no criteria for printing to work at all, which
>> seems like an
> There was a bug[1] filed recently that indicated that printing was
> broken on certain printers. As a result of that discussion, it became
> apparent that there was no criteria for printing to work at all, which
> seems like an oversight.
>
> I discussed this briefly with Matthias Clasen this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631115
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1630741
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1630391
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1630736
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
Hi team,
please, review WebUI schema PR:
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49928
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49957
Thanks!
Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi,
as CUPS maintainer, I agree with the idea of working printing as beta
criteria for Fedora.
I have two printers (Canon, HP) at my disposal, which I test cups,
cups-filters and hplip on when they have rebase. IMO it would be perfect
if such tests can be run every time when a component, which
I'm planning to orphan the following packages tomorrow, as I don't use
them any more and don't have time to maintain them properly:
* nodejs-spdx-expression-parse-v2.0.2
* nodejs-aproba-v2.0.0
* nodejs-read-package-tree
* nodejs-less-3.8.1
If anyone would like to pick them up, let me know and
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018, 5:05 AM Vascom wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I have big bug with Fedora 29 Beta Candidate 1.5.
> Live-usb just stuck boot just before start graphical mode. I am can't
> understand what component causes this so can't create bugreport in
> bugzilla.
>
> This happen on my netbook Asus
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 9:12 AM Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 10:48:46AM +0200, Adam Samalik wrote:
> > There is another concept in Modularity we can use here: defaults. You could
> > have both streams 1.7 and 1.8 built for all active (non-EOL) Fedora
> > releases, but have
On 9/6/18 5:32 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
In Fedora, we advertise "all the Pythons" are available and developers
may use them with venv, virtualenv, tox.
https://developer.fedoraproject.org/tech/languages/python/multiple-pythons.html
Two of the interpreters we ship are quite problematic in
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018, 7:50 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 9:47 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 8:33 AM Stephen Gallagher
> wrote:
> > >
> > > I'd like to propose that we add the following criteria to Beta for
> Fedora 30+:
> > > * Printing must work
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 4:17 PM Stephen Gallagher
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 10:16 AM Matthew Miller
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 03:58:20PM +0200, Petr Šabata wrote:
> > > > Is there a way for users to say "keep me on whatever module is the
> default"
> > > > when upgrading?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631113
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 10:16 AM Matthew Miller
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 03:58:20PM +0200, Petr Šabata wrote:
> > > Is there a way for users to say "keep me on whatever module is the
> > > default"
> > > when upgrading?
> > If they enable the module explicitly, they will keep that
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 03:58:20PM +0200, Petr Šabata wrote:
> > Is there a way for users to say "keep me on whatever module is the default"
> > when upgrading?
> If they enable the module explicitly, they will keep that stream,
> regardless of what the current defaults are.
And when that module
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 09:11:57AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 10:48:46AM +0200, Adam Samalik wrote:
> > There is another concept in Modularity we can use here: defaults. You could
> > have both streams 1.7 and 1.8 built for all active (non-EOL) Fedora
> > releases, but
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 9:47 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 8:33 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >
> > I'd like to propose that we add the following criteria to Beta for Fedora
> > 30+:
> > * Printing must work on at least one printer available to Fedora QA.
> > "Work" is
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 8:33 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> I'd like to propose that we add the following criteria to Beta for Fedora 30+:
> * Printing must work on at least one printer available to Fedora QA.
> "Work" is defined as the output from the device matching a preview
> shown on the
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 10:48:46AM +0200, Adam Samalik wrote:
> There is another concept in Modularity we can use here: defaults. You could
> have both streams 1.7 and 1.8 built for all active (non-EOL) Fedora
> releases, but have different default for each. So in your case, F27 could
> have 1.7
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 8:40 AM Stephen Gallagher
wrote:
> I'd like to propose that we add the following criteria to Beta for Fedora
> 30+:
> * Printing must work on at least one printer available to Fedora QA.
>
> and this to Final for Fedora 30+:
> * Printing must work on at least one
DevConf.cz 2019 is the 11th annual, free, Red Hat sponsored community
conference for developers, admins, DevOps engineers, testers,
documentation writers and other contributors to Open Source Linux,
middleware, virtualization, storage, cloud and mobile technologies
where FLOSS communities sync,
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 08:33:05AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> There was a bug[1] filed recently that indicated that printing was
> broken on certain printers. As a result of that discussion, it became
> apparent that there was no criteria for printing to work at all, which
> seems like an
This one is interesting as well, since I was bitten by it:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1614978
V.
Dne 20.9.2018 v 14:33 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a):
> There was a bug[1] filed recently that indicated that printing was
> broken on certain printers. As a result of that
Cloud Base and Atomic Host AMIs are available to test for various regions.
Cloud Base AMIs are here:
Fedora-Cloud-Base-29_Beta-1.5.x86_64 ap-northeast-1
ami-0a24cb0b129391f91 hvm standard
Fedora-Cloud-Base-29_Beta-1.5.x86_64 ap-northeast-2
ami-025a265da1a333635 hvm standard
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631115
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Data-Dumper-2.172-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-12f0dcb753
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631115
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
CC|
There was a bug[1] filed recently that indicated that printing was
broken on certain printers. As a result of that discussion, it became
apparent that there was no criteria for printing to work at all, which
seems like an oversight.
I discussed this briefly with Matthias Clasen this morning and
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
102 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-b6c663378c
unrtf-0.21.9-8.el6
40 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-f21474267b
condor-8.6.11-1.el6
6
Hi all.
I have big bug with Fedora 29 Beta Candidate 1.5.
Live-usb just stuck boot just before start graphical mode. I am can't
understand what component causes this so can't create bugreport in
bugzilla.
This happen on my netbook Asus 1225c with Atom N2800 and gma500
graphics. The same
Hi Adam,
On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 at 20:51, Adam Jackson wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2018-09-19 at 00:02 +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
>
> > I don't have the time to continue maintaining this package,
> > unfortunately. Please get in touch if you want to maintain the
> > package and I'll hand it over to
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/132 (x86_64), 1/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 283213 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/283213
ID: 283219 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631245
Bug ID: 1631245
Summary: perl-Search-Xapian-1.2.25.2 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Search-Xapian
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
Getting much closer to 100% - Thanks for everyone's work to achieve
this :)
On Thu, 2018-09-20 at 03:33 +0200, vashi...@redhat.com wrote:
>
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2018/09/20/report-389-ds-base-1.4.0.16-20180919gitb4164cc.fc28.x86_64.html
>
> On 20 Sep 2018, at 06:47, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
>
> On ke, 19 syys 2018, Björn Persson wrote:
>> Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
>>> Can you provide output from
>>>
>>> export KRB5_TRACE=/dev/stderr
>>> klist -A
>>> kinit
>>> fedpkg build
>>>
>>> ?
>>
>> The log is attached. I tried it twice
According to the schedule [1], Fedora 29 Candidate Beta-1.5 is now
available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
Test coverage information for the
73 matches
Mail list logo
