Due to the incompatibly with bpy (Blender as Python module) and Python
3.7, the interface failed to render as seen on this report:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631922
Normal solution would be using Python36. Unfortunately, there is no
python36-devel or modules to properly rebuild B
On 9/28/18 8:03 AM, Brian Clark wrote:
[02:04:21.928] Loading module '/usr/lib64/libweston-5/x11-backend.so'
[02:04:22.373] fatal: failed to create compositor backend
[root@d4895acb1694 /]#
Are programs in the container allowed to contact the X server? Check
for audit messages or try running
I wouldn't use the word useless. Having the packages is just a quality of life
thing. Just like for me as mainly C++ developer; not having Basel or abseil
does not make Fedora useless for me or C++ developers. It doesn't take much
effort to get your environment up and running script the procedur
Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> Users that want to reproduce Ant 1.10.2 build would need to repeat
> series of builds and rely on information stored in Koji to know what
> builds should be ran in what order. Trying to build packages only from
> content released to users would be even more difficult.
The
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018, at 2:42 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> There's a request for the nvme-cli package to generate a unique name
> to use when connecting to NVMe-over-fabrics targets:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1633814
>
> I'm wondering what the right approach is. For the v
I want to address a few comments in particular:
> Kevin Fenzi:
> I'm prefer to add a new milestone of 'day before release' and put it
> there.
The current schedule starts the "create the release announcement" on
the day of the Go/No-Go meeting. I don't think that makes much sense:
the announcemen
I concur the landing page font is large.
I recommend that the link emoji icon utilized in "Fedora Budget" and "Fedora's
Otreachy Docs" is replaces with an image. It differs from platform to platform.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, September 28, 2018 4:00 PM, Richard Shaw
wrote:
> L
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 4/133 (x86_64), 1/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 286561 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso
desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/286561
ID: 286581 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinsta
Looks a touch on the big side fonts wise but looks really nice overall.
Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.
On vendredi 28 septembre 2018 21:15:14 CEST Gwyn Ciesla wrote:
I'd like a swap with:
android-file-transfer - Reliable MTP client with minimalistic UI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1633317
Best regards,
Robert-André
___
devel mailing lis
* Andrew Lutomirski:
> There's a request for the nvme-cli package to generate a unique name
> to use when connecting to NVMe-over-fabrics targets:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1633814
How many bits can the NQN have? Is it long enough that random
generation of IDs is feasible?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1634087
I'll take one of yours, if you like.
Thank you!
--
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital s
Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 28/09/2018 19:42, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>
>> Debian has "purge" for things like this, but I don't think Fedora has
>> any equivalent.
>
> Doesn't generating in %post and owning it as %ghost in the
> files list achieve much the same result of removing it when
> the packa
On 28/09/2018 19:42, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
Debian has "purge" for things like this, but I don't think Fedora has
any equivalent.
Doesn't generating in %post and owning it as %ghost in the
files list achieve much the same result of removing it when
the package is removed?
Tom
--
Tom Hughes
There's a request for the nvme-cli package to generate a unique name
to use when connecting to NVMe-over-fabrics targets:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1633814
I'm wondering what the right approach is. For the various Atomic
variants, ISTM it's not very nice for the package to gene
OLD: Fedora-29-20180926.n.0
NEW: Fedora-29-20180927.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 5
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 83
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 125.29 MiB
Size of dropped packages:47.81 KiB
Siz
Le vendredi 28 septembre 2018 à 10:26 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen a
écrit :
> On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 at 04:21, Nicolas Mailhot
> wrote:
> > Le vendredi 28 septembre 2018 à 10:09 +0200, Mikolaj Izdebski a
> > écrit :
> > > This is already not met for Fedora. Lets look at ant package which
> > > you
>
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 02:02:37PM +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> We have moved packaging guidelines onto docs.fedoraproject.org[0].
> If you find any error or would like to change something, don't hesitate to
> open ticket or submit pull request for packaging committee repo[1].
This is amazing! Th
Hello,
I am trying to put weston in a docker container. I have run into some
issues and have been able to solve them with some trial and error and
research. But, I have hit an error when trying to start weston that there
are no other warning that I can see and I am not sure what else to do.
Here
Hello everyone,
We have moved packaging guidelines onto docs.fedoraproject.org[0].
If you find any error or would like to change something, don't hesitate to
open ticket or submit pull request for packaging committee repo[1].
Thanks for attention!
[0] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packag
On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 at 04:21, Nicolas Mailhot
wrote:
>
> Le vendredi 28 septembre 2018 à 10:09 +0200, Mikolaj Izdebski a écrit :
> >
> > This is already not met for Fedora. Lets look at ant package which you
> > mentioned earlier.
> >
>
> That just shows it is urgent for Fedora to improve its hand
Gerald Henriksen wrote:
> Fedora (rightly)
> as a rule doesn't want multiple versions of libraries.
what rule is that?
-- Rex
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fe
On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 10:15:46 +0200, you wrote:
>Le jeudi 27 septembre 2018 à 19:14 -0400, Gerald Henriksen a écrit :
>>
>> Or, short version, the Java ecosystem is either indifferent or hostile
>> to distribution packages.
>
>Any language ecosystem is initially hostile to distribution packages.
Le vendredi 28 septembre 2018 à 10:09 +0200, Mikolaj Izdebski a écrit :
>
> This is already not met for Fedora. Lets look at ant package which you
> mentioned earlier.
>
That just shows it is urgent for Fedora to improve its handling of
bootstrapping operations, because major languages depend on
Le jeudi 27 septembre 2018 à 19:14 -0400, Gerald Henriksen a écrit :
>
> Or, short version, the Java ecosystem is either indifferent or hostile
> to distribution packages.
Any language ecosystem is initially hostile to distribution packages.
Languages ecosystems are created by devs, that care l
On 09/28/2018 02:50 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
>> Modules with their API specifications at least make it more clear what
>> are expectations about packages. Something user may consider essential
>> is only a build dependency for a packager and the packages won't receive
>> en
26 matches
Mail list logo
