Re: Proposal: delay F31 release to work out infrastructure and lifecycle challenges

On Monday, November 26, 2018, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 09:50:33AM -0500, Paul Frields wrote: > > Here's the summary from the page, which proposes we pause the release > > after F30 for these efforts: > > I know it was a big time-off holiday week in the US, but I expected a

Re: Any plans to support .heic files in Fedora?

On 11/26/18 8:58 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: Looks like there is a new image format in town and we need the libheif and libde265 libraries in order to read it according to the gimp plugin [1]. The plugin docs say it should be included by default now in gimp but the gimp on my f29 system says it can't

Re: Is Fedora 27 EOL?

Okay, all of the eol entries for f27 in pdc should be updated now. Please create a ticket at https://pagure.io/releng if you find any issues. Thanks. On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 7:03 PM Mohan Boddu wrote: > I am still updating the EOL's in pdc, but some of them should be updated. > > I will send

Any plans to support .heic files in Fedora?

Seems like Apple converted their phones over to using a new file format to store pictures. I was copying some pictures from a phone and noticed my linux box couldn't read them and they had an interesting extension .heic. Looks like there is a new image format in town and we need the libheif and

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2018-11-27 - 90% PASS

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2018/11/27/report-389-ds-base-1.4.0.19-20181127git4fd73c5.fc29.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Proposal: Move to an annual platform release starting at F30

On 11/16/18 7:50 AM, Paul Frields wrote: [snip] We should skip the F31 release cycle and leave F30 in place longer in order to focus on improving the tooling and testing changes. These tooling changes will improve the overall reliability of Fedora, and will decrease the manual effort and

Re: Bugzilla outage/upgrade on 2 December 2018

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 5:08 PM Jeff Fearn wrote: > > On 27/11/18 02:06, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: > > * Neal Gompa [26/11/2018 11:01] : > >> > >> Out of curiosity, does anyone know where the source code for Red Hat > >> Bugzilla actually is? I tried to find it a while ago, and even tried > >> to

Re: Fedora 30 System-Wide Change Proposal: GnuPG2 as default GPG implementation

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 04:30:21PM +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote: > On Mon, 2018-11-26 at 09:59 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GnuPG2_as_default_GPG_implemen > > tation > > > > == Summary == > > The /usr/bin/gpg path representing the main GPG implementation will > >

Re: Proposal: delay F31 release to work out infrastructure and lifecycle challenges

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 5:47 PM Dennis Gilmore wrote: > El lun, 26-11-2018 a las 17:14 -0500, Josh Boyer escribió: > > Because the people that would be tasked with doing the development are > > also tasked with cranking out the release. It's a "need more people > > problem". > > This is no

Fedora Rawhide-20181126.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 16/142 (x86_64), 4/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20181125.n.0): ID: 312255 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/312255 ID: 312256 Test: x86_64

Re: Is Fedora 27 EOL?

I am still updating the EOL's in pdc, but some of them should be updated. I will send another email once all of them are updated. On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 11:10 AM Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 10:30:32AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote: > > The policy on the wiki[1] says "one month",

Re: nsswitch.conf: list of module packages that enables themselves

On Mon, 2018-11-26 at 14:38 +0100, Pavel Březina wrote: > On 11/26/18 2:21 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 8:16 AM Pavel Březina wrote: > > > > > > This e-mail is long so I just put the question here before explanation: > > > > > > Do you know about any package that

Re: Last dbus upgrade issues

On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 20:04, Owen Taylor wrote: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 9:59 AM Tomasz Kłoczko > wrote: > > 1) if dbus service crashes/is not availaible temporary IMO it wold be > > good to prepare whole desktop apps code to not crash but handle dbus > > disconnection and maybe display

Re: Proposal: delay F31 release to work out infrastructure and lifecycle challenges

El lun, 26-11-2018 a las 17:14 -0500, Josh Boyer escribió: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 5:01 PM Peter Robinson > wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 9:48 PM Matthew Miller < > > mat...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 08:02:26PM +, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > transactions

Re: Proposal: delay F31 release to work out infrastructure and lifecycle challenges

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 5:01 PM Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 9:48 PM Matthew Miller > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 08:02:26PM +, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > transactions is substantial. This may solve (or greatly reduce) the > > > compose speed problem, TBD."

Re: Bugzilla outage/upgrade on 2 December 2018

On 27/11/18 02:06, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: > * Neal Gompa [26/11/2018 11:01] : >> >> Out of curiosity, does anyone know where the source code for Red Hat >> Bugzilla actually is? I tried to find it a while ago, and even tried >> to send an email asking about it (with no response...). This variant

Re: Proposal: delay F31 release to work out infrastructure and lifecycle challenges

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 9:48 PM Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 08:02:26PM +, Peter Robinson wrote: > > transactions is substantial. This may solve (or greatly reduce) the > > compose speed problem, TBD." but it doesn't report the context of the > > "speed increase for

Re: Proposal: delay F31 release to work out infrastructure and lifecycle challenges

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 08:02:26PM +, Peter Robinson wrote: > transactions is substantial. This may solve (or greatly reduce) the > compose speed problem, TBD." but it doesn't report the context of the > "speed increase for transactions" like which transactions? > There's a lot of I/O

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20181126.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20181125.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20181126.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 30 Downgraded packages: 1 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:44.95 KiB

Re: Proposal: delay F31 release to work out infrastructure and lifecycle challenges

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018, 20:09 Randy Barlow On Mon, 2018-11-26 at 17:23 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > > * really actually for real gated Rawhide > > > > Is the "creating side tag for chain builds or by automated requests" > > is planned here? > > When I deal with rust packages, I often need to

Re: Proposal: delay F31 release to work out infrastructure and lifecycle challenges

On 11/26/18 11:55 AM, Paul Frields wrote: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 2:42 PM Adam Williamson >> >> While we're on the topic of unicorns, if I were the person actually in >> charge of this and had the freedom to do it how I wanted, what I'd >> really want to do is create a much more *modular*

Re: Proposal: delay F31 release to work out infrastructure and lifecycle challenges

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:34 PM Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 8:22 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:03 PM Peter Robinson wrote: > > > There's no facts or details, to quote "The reported speed increase for > > > transactions is substantial. This

Re: Proposal: delay F31 release to work out infrastructure and lifecycle challenges

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 8:22 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:03 PM Peter Robinson wrote: > > There's no facts or details, to quote "The reported speed increase for > > transactions is substantial. This may solve (or greatly reduce) the > > compose speed problem, TBD."

Re: Proposal: delay F31 release to work out infrastructure and lifecycle challenges

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:03 PM Peter Robinson wrote: > There's no facts or details, to quote "The reported speed increase for > transactions is substantial. This may solve (or greatly reduce) the > compose speed problem, TBD." but it doesn't report the context of the > "speed increase for

Re: prevent accidentally creating branches in dist-git

I filed https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/7398 to see if the infrastructure folks (or pingou or whoever) would be willing to turn this on for all existing repositories. - J< ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: Proposal: delay F31 release to work out infrastructure and lifecycle challenges

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 7:52 PM Paul Frields wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 1:59 PM Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 6:53 PM Adam Williamson > > wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 2018-11-26 at 18:44 +, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 4:05 PM Matthew

Re: Proposal: delay F31 release to work out infrastructure and lifecycle challenges

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 11:39:52AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > While we're on the topic of unicorns, if I were the person actually in > charge of this and had the freedom to do it how I wanted, what I'd > really want to do is create a much more *modular* compose process, > where inputs and

Re: Last dbus upgrade issues

Hello , On 26/11/18 15:12 +0100, Tom Gundersen wrote: > On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 11:36 AM Tomasz Kłoczko > wrote: > >> On Sun, 25 Nov 2018 at 11:19, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < >> zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 02:36:31AM +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: After last

Re: Proposal: delay F31 release to work out infrastructure and lifecycle challenges

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 2:42 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2018-11-26 at 11:30 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Yeah, I think our goal should be 1 minute... just as realistic as one > > hour. ;) > > > > I have not looked into things recently. However: > > > > * The mock fsync change

Re: Automating package maintainers responsivity check

> "PO" == Peter Oliver writes: PO> Also, it's hard to volunteer to co-maintain a package which has a PO> non-responsive maintainer, because there is no one to grant you PO> access. Well, certainly there is but the issue is finding the proper way to ask for it. And I don't think we have any

Re: Proposal: delay F31 release to work out infrastructure and lifecycle challenges

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 1:59 PM Peter Robinson wrote: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 6:53 PM Adam Williamson > wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2018-11-26 at 18:44 +, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 4:05 PM Matthew Miller > > > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 09:50:33AM -0500,

Re: Proposal: delay F31 release to work out infrastructure and lifecycle challenges

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 2:42 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2018-11-26 at 11:30 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On 11/26/18 10:58 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 6:53 PM Adam Williamson > > > wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2018-11-26 at 18:44 +, Peter Robinson wrote: > >

Re: Proposal: delay F31 release to work out infrastructure and lifecycle challenges

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 7:47 PM Mohan Boddu wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 2:30 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> >> On 11/26/18 10:58 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: >> > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 6:53 PM Adam Williamson >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> On Mon, 2018-11-26 at 18:44 +, Peter Robinson wrote:

Re: Proposal: delay F31 release to work out infrastructure and lifecycle challenges

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 7:42 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Mon, 2018-11-26 at 11:30 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On 11/26/18 10:58 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 6:53 PM Adam Williamson > > > wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2018-11-26 at 18:44 +, Peter Robinson wrote: > >

Re: Proposal: delay F31 release to work out infrastructure and lifecycle challenges

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 2:30 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 11/26/18 10:58 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 6:53 PM Adam Williamson > > wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, 2018-11-26 at 18:44 +, Peter Robinson wrote: > >>> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 4:05 PM Matthew Miller < >

[EPEL-devel] Re: New developer toolkit beta

Just checking in on this again, still need this update to build Chromium for EPEL7. ~tom On 11/2/18 1:05 PM, Tom Callaway wrote: > > > On 10/30/18 11:19 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 at 10:36, Tom Callaway wrote: >>> >>>

Re: Proposal: delay F31 release to work out infrastructure and lifecycle challenges

On Mon, 2018-11-26 at 11:30 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 11/26/18 10:58 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 6:53 PM Adam Williamson > > wrote: > > > On Mon, 2018-11-26 at 18:44 +, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 4:05 PM Matthew Miller > > > > wrote:

[389-devel] please review: PR 50048 - Remove irrelevant debug-log messages from CLI tools

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50048 ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html

Re: Proposal: delay F31 release to work out infrastructure and lifecycle challenges

On 11/26/18 10:58 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 6:53 PM Adam Williamson > wrote: >> >> On Mon, 2018-11-26 at 18:44 +, Peter Robinson wrote: >>> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 4:05 PM Matthew Miller >>> wrote: On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 09:50:33AM -0500, Paul Frields wrote:

Re: nsswitch.conf: list of module packages that enables themselves

Pavel B™ezina writes: > Do you know about any package that installs an nsswitch.conf module and > automatically enables it in /etc/nsswitch.conf? So far I have two > packages - nss-mdns and systemd. I don't know about enabling, but it's easy to ask the database what packages provide NSS

Re: Release Cadence WAS: Re: Proposal: delay F31 release to work out infrastructure and lifecycle challenges

On 11/26/18 8:21 AM, Brian (bex) Exelbierd wrote: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 5:05 PM Matthew Miller > wrote: >> >> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 09:50:33AM -0500, Paul Frields wrote: >>> Here's the summary from the page, which proposes we pause the release >>> after F30 for these efforts: >> >> I know

Re: Proposal: delay F31 release to work out infrastructure and lifecycle challenges

On Mon, 2018-11-26 at 20:03 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Also, I find it funny that - somehow - tons of resources would be > available for "better CI pipeline tests for everything" (!), but we'd > have to "focus resources" when it comes to the fedora "platform" > itself. These two sort of

Re: Proposal: delay F31 release to work out infrastructure and lifecycle challenges

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 5:05 PM Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 09:50:33AM -0500, Paul Frields wrote: > > Here's the summary from the page, which proposes we pause the release > > after F30 for these efforts: > > I know it was a big time-off holiday week in the US, but I

Re: Proposal: delay F31 release to work out infrastructure and lifecycle challenges

On Mon, 2018-11-26 at 17:23 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > * really actually for real gated Rawhide > > Is the "creating side tag for chain builds or by automated requests" > is planned here? > When I deal with rust packages, I often need to build some update > which will break other packages

Re: Proposal: delay F31 release to work out infrastructure and lifecycle challenges

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 6:53 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Mon, 2018-11-26 at 18:44 +, Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 4:05 PM Matthew Miller > > wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 09:50:33AM -0500, Paul Frields wrote: > > > > Here's the summary from the page, which

Re: Last dbus upgrade issues

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 9:59 AM Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > 1) if dbus service crashes/is not availaible temporary IMO it wold be > good to prepare whole desktop apps code to not crash but handle dbus > disconnection and maybe display centered message that it is not > possible to connect to dbus.

Re: Proposal: delay F31 release to work out infrastructure and lifecycle challenges

On Mon, 2018-11-26 at 18:44 +, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 4:05 PM Matthew Miller > wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 09:50:33AM -0500, Paul Frields wrote: > > > Here's the summary from the page, which proposes we pause the release > > > after F30 for these efforts: > >

Re: Release Cadence WAS: Re: Proposal: delay F31 release to work out infrastructure and lifecycle challenges

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 4:23 PM Brian (bex) Exelbierd wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 5:05 PM Matthew Miller > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 09:50:33AM -0500, Paul Frields wrote: > > > Here's the summary from the page, which proposes we pause the release > > > after F30 for these

Re: Proposal: delay F31 release to work out infrastructure and lifecycle challenges

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 4:05 PM Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 09:50:33AM -0500, Paul Frields wrote: > > Here's the summary from the page, which proposes we pause the release > > after F30 for these efforts: > > I know it was a big time-off holiday week in the US, but I

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-09-07)

On 11. 10. 18 12:00, Fabio Valentini wrote: Are there plans to publish the orphaned packages report regularly? I seem to remember that it was a weekly thing at some point in the past ... Yes, I plan to work on that. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok

Re: Last dbus upgrade issues

On Mon, 2018-11-26 at 15:12 +0100, Tom Gundersen wrote: > Hi Tomasz, > > On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 11:36 AM Tomasz Kłoczko > wrote: > > > On Sun, 25 Nov 2018 at 11:19, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < > > zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 02:36:31AM +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko

Re: Last dbus upgrade issues

On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 17:44, Tomasz Torcz wrote: [..] > Feel free to provide patches. There was 15 years to fix it. > > Alternatively, dbus-broker may store fds in systemd and serialize state > over restarts. So you want to say that in reality it is dbus communication protocol issue?

Re: Last dbus upgrade issues

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 03:57:25PM +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 15:19, Tom Gundersen wrote: > [..] > >>> What Fedora version? Ideally provide specific rpm versions. > >>> dbus-in-F29 != dbus-in-F30 now. > >> > >> I’m talking about F30 recent change in which has been

Tune boinc-client spec file in order to ease debugging process

Hi everybody, I am debugging boinc-manager, and everytime I run $ gdb boincmgr (gdb) run then I trigger the crash, after running (gdb) thread apply all backtrace I obtain stuff like [...] argc= so I need help in tuning the boinc-client spec file[1] in order to avoid that (for example using gcc

Re: Proposal: delay F31 release to work out infrastructure and lifecycle challenges

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 10:03 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: I know it was a big time-off holiday week in the US, but I expected a little more interest in this post. Perhaps it seemed like too much text to digest along with turkey and stuffing. :) I'm highlighting it with a subject reflecting the

Re: Dec 2018 Fedora Elections: Nomination & Campaign period is open

This is your reminder that the nomination period for Fedora elections ends 2018-Nov-28 at 23:59:59 UTC. Submit your nominations for the steering bodies at the wiki links below. * FESCo (Engineering) (5 seats) [1] * Fedora Council (1 seat) [2] * Mindshare (1 seat) [3] [1]

Re: Proposal: delay F31 release to work out infrastructure and lifecycle challenges

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 5:14 PM Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 09:50:33AM -0500, Paul Frields wrote: > > Here's the summary from the page, which proposes we pause the release > > after F30 for these efforts: > > I know it was a big time-off holiday week in the US, but I

[389-devel] please review: PR 50045 - dscreate should correctly handle ports that are within a selinux port range

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50045 ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html

Release Cadence WAS: Re: Proposal: delay F31 release to work out infrastructure and lifecycle challenges

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 5:05 PM Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 09:50:33AM -0500, Paul Frields wrote: > > Here's the summary from the page, which proposes we pause the release > > after F30 for these efforts: > > I know it was a big time-off holiday week in the US, but I

[EPEL-devel] Re: Broken EPEL updates due to Centos 7.6 delay?

On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 11:00, Christopher wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 7:12 AM Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > > On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 01:03, Christopher > > wrote: > > > > > > Anybody know what's going on with Centos 7.6-1810? > > > Some packages in EPEL depend on it, but it is

Re: Broken EPEL updates due to Centos 7.6 delay?

On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 11:00, Christopher wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 7:12 AM Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > > On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 01:03, Christopher > > wrote: > > > > > > Anybody know what's going on with Centos 7.6-1810? > > > Some packages in EPEL depend on it, but it is

Re: Is Fedora 27 EOL?

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 10:30:32AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote: > The policy on the wiki[1] says "one month", which is fairly ambiguous. > I'll update that to say "four weeks", which is what we mean, but is > not the practical interpretation of what we say. Since I dropped the > ball on this, let's do

Re: Fedora 30 System-Wide Change Proposal: GnuPG2 as default GPG implementation

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 09:59:26AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote: > == Upgrade/compatibility impact == > Users will have to adapt to change that gpg is now called gpg1 if > their usage is not compatible with both 1.x and 2.x. What are the actual incompatibilities? I'm in particular interested about

Re: Bugzilla outage/upgrade on 2 December 2018

* Neal Gompa [26/11/2018 11:01] : > > Out of curiosity, does anyone know where the source code for Red Hat > Bugzilla actually is? I tried to find it a while ago, and even tried > to send an email asking about it (with no response...). This variant > of Bugzilla has features that aren't present in

Re: Bugzilla outage/upgrade on 2 December 2018

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 10:59 AM Ben Cotton wrote: > > Hi all, > > If you haven't seen the banner at the top of bugzilla.redhat.com, it > is scheduled to undergo an upgrade from Bugzilla 4 to Bugzilla 5 on > December 2 2018. The outage will begin on 2 December at 0:00 UTC and > end on 2 December

Proposal: delay F31 release to work out infrastructure and lifecycle challenges

On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 09:50:33AM -0500, Paul Frields wrote: > Here's the summary from the page, which proposes we pause the release > after F30 for these efforts: I know it was a big time-off holiday week in the US, but I expected a little more interest in this post. Perhaps it seemed like too

Re: Fedora 30 System-Wide Change Proposal: GnuPG2 as default GPG implementation

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 10:02 AM Ben Cotton wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GnuPG2_as_default_GPG_implementation > > == Summary == > The /usr/bin/gpg path representing the main GPG implementation will > now use GnuPG 2 instead of GnuPG 1. > This is great. This is a change I've

Re: Is Fedora 27 EOL?

I am working on fixing it. It should be fixed soon, I will send an update once its fixed. On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 10:52 AM Florian Weimer wrote: > * Ben Cotton: > > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 10:20 AM Mohan Boddu wrote: > >> > >> The 27 EOL should be tomorrow. > >> > >> The n release gets

Re: Broken EPEL updates due to Centos 7.6 delay?

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 7:12 AM Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 01:03, Christopher wrote: > > > > Anybody know what's going on with Centos 7.6-1810? > > Some packages in EPEL depend on it, but it is apparently not yet available. > > This discrepancy is breaking yum updates

Bugzilla outage/upgrade on 2 December 2018

Hi all, If you haven't seen the banner at the top of bugzilla.redhat.com, it is scheduled to undergo an upgrade from Bugzilla 4 to Bugzilla 5 on December 2 2018. The outage will begin on 2 December at 0:00 UTC and end on 2 December at 12:00 UTC. For more information on Bugzilla 5, see:

Re: Is Fedora 27 EOL?

* Ben Cotton: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 10:20 AM Mohan Boddu wrote: >> >> The 27 EOL should be tomorrow. >> >> The n release gets EOL'ed 4 weeks after n+2 release. >> > The policy on the wiki[1] says "one month", which is fairly ambiguous. > I'll update that to say "four weeks", which is what we

Re: Is Fedora 27 EOL?

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 10:20 AM Mohan Boddu wrote: > > The 27 EOL should be tomorrow. > > The n release gets EOL'ed 4 weeks after n+2 release. > The policy on the wiki[1] says "one month", which is fairly ambiguous. I'll update that to say "four weeks", which is what we mean, but is not the

Re: Fedora 30 System-Wide Change Proposal: GnuPG2 as default GPG implementation

On Mon, 2018-11-26 at 09:59 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GnuPG2_as_default_GPG_implemen > tation > > == Summary == > The /usr/bin/gpg path representing the main GPG implementation will > now use GnuPG 2 instead of GnuPG 1. I, as the primary maintainer of the

[389-devel] please review: PR 50043 - dsctl db2index fails when no attributes are specified

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50043 ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html

Re: Is Fedora 27 EOL?

The 27 EOL should be tomorrow. The n release gets EOL'ed 4 weeks after n+2 release. But I am not sure why fedpkg is rejecting the push. On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 10:06 AM Ben Cotton wrote: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 9:48 AM John Florian > wrote: > > > > At the very least, I don't recall seeing

Re: Last dbus upgrade issues

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 15:57:25 +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: 4) not able to start gdm (because dbus was not running) blocks any local login. Simple after such crash it is not possible to open or switch to any local consoles!!! I was able to login to a shell, so this one might be

REMINDER: Fedora 27 End of Life on 2018-Nov-30

I apologize for the short notice. As a reminder, Fedora 27 reaches End of Life on Friday, 30 November 2018. On this date, we will close all the Fedora 27 bugs which remain open[1]. [1]

Re: Is Fedora 27 EOL?

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 9:48 AM John Florian wrote: > > At the very least, I don't recall seeing the announcement that it will > be EOL in ~30 days. That's my fault. I missed my reminder to send it. I apologize for the short notice. -- Ben Cotton Fedora Program Manager

Re: CC-BY-SA-4.0

On 11/23/18 7:08 AM, Carmen Bianca Bakker wrote: > I am currently packaging a program whose README and documentation is > licensed under CC-BY-SA-4.0. However, > only lists CC-BY-SA as > meaning version 3.0 of that licence. > > Is CC-BY-SA-4.0 a

Fedora 30 System-Wide Change Proposal: GnuPG2 as default GPG implementation

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GnuPG2_as_default_GPG_implementation == Summary == The /usr/bin/gpg path representing the main GPG implementation will now use GnuPG 2 instead of GnuPG 1. == Owner == * Name: [[User:ignatenkobrain|Igor Gnatenko]], [[User:till|Till Maas]], [[User:ngompa|Neal

Fedora 30 System-Wide Change Proposal: GnuPG2 as default GPG implementation

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GnuPG2_as_default_GPG_implementation == Summary == The /usr/bin/gpg path representing the main GPG implementation will now use GnuPG 2 instead of GnuPG 1. == Owner == * Name: [[User:ignatenkobrain|Igor Gnatenko]], [[User:till|Till Maas]], [[User:ngompa|Neal

Re: Last dbus upgrade issues

On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 15:19, Tom Gundersen wrote: [..] >>> What Fedora version? Ideally provide specific rpm versions. >>> dbus-in-F29 != dbus-in-F30 now. >> >> I’m talking about F30 recent change in which has been implemented switch to >> dubs-broker. > > Thanks for the report, and sorry for

Re: Is Fedora 27 EOL?

On 11/26/18 9:40 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: There has been no EOL announcement, my guess for the EOL data (2018-11-30) has not passed yet At the very least, I don't recall seeing the announcement that it will be EOL in ~30 days. ___ devel mailing

Is Fedora 27 EOL?

There has been no EOL announcement, my guess for the EOL data (2018-11-30) has not passed yet, but I get this when pushing to src.fedoraproject.org: remote: Running hooks for rpms/glibc remote: Branch refs/heads/f27 is unsupported remote: Denied push for ref 'refs/heads/f27' for user 'fweimer'

[Bug 1653174] Upgrade perl-ExtUtils-F77 to 1.21

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1653174 Orion Poplawski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

Re: Last dbus upgrade issues

Hi Tomasz, On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 11:36 AM Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > On Sun, 25 Nov 2018 at 11:19, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < > zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > >> On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 02:36:31AM +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: >> > After last dbus upgrade gdm found that is not able to start. >>

Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2018-11-26)

(Apologies for the late notice -- I forgot to do this before the long holiday weekend.) Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 onirc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at

Re: nsswitch.conf: list of module packages that enables themselves

On 11/26/18 2:21 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 8:16 AM Pavel Březina wrote: This e-mail is long so I just put the question here before explanation: Do you know about any package that installs an nsswitch.conf module and automatically enables it in /etc/nsswitch.conf?

Re: nsswitch.conf: list of module packages that enables themselves

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 8:16 AM Pavel Březina wrote: > > This e-mail is long so I just put the question here before explanation: > > Do you know about any package that installs an nsswitch.conf module and > automatically enables it in /etc/nsswitch.conf? So far I have two > packages - nss-mdns

nsswitch.conf: list of module packages that enables themselves

This e-mail is long so I just put the question here before explanation: Do you know about any package that installs an nsswitch.conf module and automatically enables it in /etc/nsswitch.conf? So far I have two packages - nss-mdns and systemd. Why? As you might have noticed, in Fedora 28 we

Re: fedora-rawhide-kernel-nodebug is not getting updates

On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 7:47 AM Dan Horák wrote: > > On Fri, 23 Nov 2018 14:28:46 +0100 > Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > > Does anybody know why? > > > > Last kernel available there is 2 weeks old. > > > > https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/rawhide-kernel-nodebug/x86_64/ > > I've already pinged

Re: Last dbus upgrade issues

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 12:57:34 +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: 4) Nevertheless my system ended up with *not enabled* dbus-broker. If it was caused by upgrade over rpm it clear sign that dnf is not fully compliant with upgrade semantics implemented in rpm. This will cause more issues in the

Re: Broken EPEL updates due to Centos 7.6 delay?

On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 01:03, Christopher wrote: > > Anybody know what's going on with Centos 7.6-1810? > Some packages in EPEL depend on it, but it is apparently not yet available. > This discrepancy is breaking yum updates for me. > This isn't a Fedora development issue. Please refer this to

Re: Last dbus upgrade issues

On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 07:04, David Herrmann wrote: [..] > > Other problem is that dnf and rpm are executing batch of packages > > scriplets not the same order with other operations. Breaking rpm > > semantics by dnf is kind of asking for troubles. > > Thanks a lot for the report. We tested this

Re: Fedora Lifecycles: imagine longer-term possibilities

On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 5:12 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2018, 16:43 Brian (bex) Exelbierd > >> On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 6:43 PM Jiri Eischmann wrote: >> > >> > Gerald Henriksen píše v Čt 15. 11. 2018 v 10:22 -0500: >> > > On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 14:38:12 +0100, you wrote: >> > > >>

new maintainer needed: vpnc-script

Hi, I'm the main contact point for vpnc-script (used by vpnc and openconnect VPN), however I no longer spend time in maintaining it. If someone would like to pick it up, please let me know. The main outstanding issue on that package is: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648108

Re: How much is dnf's minimum memory requirement?

On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 05:53:21PM +0100, Benjamin Kircher wrote: > What are dnf’s minimum memory requirements? I think "creeping upwards" is a fair description. We have occasionally seen trouble with virt-builder and virt-customize which are using a smallish virtual machine. In Fedora 28+ I

Re: Last dbus upgrade issues

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 5:57 AM David Herrmann wrote: > > Hi > > On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 10:53 PM Tomasz Kłoczko > wrote: > > > > On Sun, 25 Nov 2018 at 11:35, Tomasz Kłoczko > > wrote: > > [..] > > > I’m talking about F30 recent change in which has been implemented switch > > > to

[Bug 1653176] Upgrade perl-Imager to 1.007

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1653176 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

Re: Container updates available in bodhi

On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 at 16:37, Ken Dreyer wrote: > On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 6:09 AM Clement Verna > wrote: > > > > On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 at 13:55, Petr Pisar wrote: > >> And unrelated question: The koji build NVR does not contain dist-git > >> name space. Does that mean there will be race

  1   2   >