https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1659954
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1659954
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1659956
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1659955
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Config-Perl-V-0.31-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-183c47607d
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1659955
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Config-Perl-V-0.31-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-20508db6b3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1659955
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2018/12/19/report-389-ds-base-1.4.0.20-20181219git00c3b7a.fc29.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
> "ZJ" == Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes:
ZJ> I think it's pretty clear: all the standard invocations of
ZJ> scriptlets that have by replaced by transfiletriggers will be
ZJ> removed, along with the whole %post/%postun sections if its the only
ZJ> thing in them.
I do think it would be
I would take over doclifter.
Miro Hrončok writes:
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
>
Hi list,
I have discovered a very weird problem with the package bear on
apps.fedoraproject.org: it got somehow mixed with the (completely
unrelated) packages erlang-bear, bear-devel and bear-factory.
A little bit of background:
- bear is a new package (for which I am the maintainer)
-
On Tue, 2018-12-18 at 15:16 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 3:10 PM Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, (sorry for duplicates I sent from wrong email before)
> >
> > Nothing happened last week .
> >
> > Can you add me to https://pagure.io/FedoraReview/ and to
> >
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 3:10 PM Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> Hi, (sorry for duplicates I sent from wrong email before)
>
> Nothing happened last week .
>
> Can you add me to https://pagure.io/FedoraReview/ and to
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fedora-review please .
>
> My fas user is sergiomb ,
Hi, (sorry for duplicates I sent from wrong email before)
Nothing happened last week .
Can you add me to https://pagure.io/FedoraReview/ and to
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fedora-review please .
My fas user is sergiomb , people want revert mock configurations of
RPMFusion because is not
On Tue, 18 Dec 2018, Cătălin George Feștilă wrote:
I try to install gyachi.x86_64 but I got errors.
A full search gives just some packages, I don't know if this is a bug
or a repo limited area. see my output.
root@desk mythcat]# dnf install gyachi.x86_64
Last metadata expiration check: 0:16:07
I try to install gyachi.x86_64 but I got errors.
A full search gives just some packages, I don't know if this is a bug
or a repo limited area. see my output.
root@desk mythcat]# dnf install gyachi.x86_64
Last metadata expiration check: 0:16:07 ago on Tue 18 Dec 2018 07:33:15 PM EET.
Error:
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Co on 2018-12-19 from 18:00:00 to 19:00:00 GMT
At freenode@fedora-meeting
The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting. Agenda is in the
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/4084 its an issue that has existed for
nearly a decade and not been solved. Time was not taken to fixing it
after we disabled installing multilib by default as there was no
reports of it for years.
Dennis
El mié, 12-12-2018 a las 11:32 +0100, Florian Weimer
El vie, 14-12-2018 a las 20:33 +0100, Igor Gnatenko escribió:
> Hello folks,
>
> for long time we have problem if you have some arch-specific
> BuildRequires, you still get one src.rpm from one of arches (not sure
> how koji chooses that one) which might not work for your
> architecture.
>
> For
=
#fedora-meeting-1: FESCO (2018-12-17)
=
Meeting started by maxamillion at 15:05:25 UTC. The full logs are
available at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-12-17/fesco.2018-12-17-15.05.log.html
.
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 11:31:46AM -0800, Japheth Cleaver wrote:
> On 12/12/2018 2:20 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> >https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RemoveObsoleteScriptlets
> >
> >== Summary ==
> >Remove scriptlets which are not needed anymore (ldconfig,
> >gtk-update-icon-cache, etc.).
> >
>
This is a reminder that with most people on the steering committee not
being around that there will be no meetings until 2019-01-09
--
Stephen J Smoogen.
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1659954
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Upgrade |Upgrade
Obviously, this should be for today, 2018-12-18.
On Tue, 2018-12-18 at 15:54 +0100, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> (Sorry for sending this so late.)
>
> Find below a list of topics which are planned to be discussed in the
> Fedora Modularity Working Group meeting on Tuesday at 15:00 UTC in
>
(Sorry for sending this so late.)
Find below a list of topics which are planned to be discussed in the
Fedora Modularity Working Group meeting on Tuesday at 15:00 UTC in
#fedora-meeting-3 on irc.freenode.net.
To find out when this is in your local time zone, check the Fedora
Calendar (if you've
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 01:13:05PM +, Dave Love wrote:
> Miro Hrončok writes:
>
> > On 18. 12. 18 11:22, Dave Love wrote:
> >>> loveshack: makedepf90
> >>
> >> I don't think that's the case now. dl_poly used it, but I've removed
> >> the dependency and I wonder why it's showing up with a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1659476
Ralf Corsepius changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
Miro Hrončok writes:
> On 18. 12. 18 11:22, Dave Love wrote:
>>> loveshack: makedepf90
>>
>> I don't think that's the case now. dl_poly used it, but I've removed
>> the dependency and I wonder why it's showing up with a threat (I assume)
>> to remove dl_poly.
>
> Indeed:
>
> Depending on:
On Tuesday, 18 December 2018 at 11:29, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 18. 12. 18 11:22, Dave Love wrote:
> > > loveshack: makedepf90
> >
> > I don't think that's the case now. dl_poly used it, but I've removed
> > the dependency and I wonder why it's showing up with a threat (I assume)
> > to remove
On 18. 12. 18 11:22, Dave Love wrote:
loveshack: makedepf90
I don't think that's the case now. dl_poly used it, but I've removed
the dependency and I wonder why it's showing up with a threat (I assume)
to remove dl_poly.
Indeed:
Depending on: makedepf90 (1), status change: 2017-10-06 (62
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1659953
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
30.11.2018, 01:58, "Matthew Miller" :
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 04:57:33PM +0300, Andrey Ponomarenko wrote:
>> https://github.com/linuxhw/hw-probe (various packages are available:
>> AppImage, Snap, Flatpak, Docker, RPM, etc.). The tool is intended to
>
> Have you considered packaging this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1659953
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
32 matches
Mail list logo
