I'm going to orphan kdesvn as I no longer use it. It needs updating:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1519347
Let me know if you are interested in taking it over.
--
Orion Poplawski
Manager of NWRA Technical Systems 720-772-5637
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX:
# F30 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2019-04-22
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Hi folks! We have 6 proposed Final blockers and 4 proposed Final
freeze exceptions to review, so let's have a Fedora 30 blocker review
meeting on Monday! I'm aware it's a
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting on Monday. It's been a
few weeks since we met, but Monday is a vacation in a lot of places so
we'd be missing people. We can definitely meet the following week. If
you're aware of anything important we have to discuss this week, please
do reply to
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
48 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-06b243cced
guacamole-server-1.0.0-1.el6
28 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-62f9745b71
drupal7-7.65-1.el6
9
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
247 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3c9292b62d
condor-8.6.11-1.el7
54 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-f8311ec8a2
tor-0.3.5.8-1.el7
48
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1696928
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Locale-SubCountry-2.05 |perl-Locale-SubCountry-2.05
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1696882
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.9 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701173
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Inline-C-0.80-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701202
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Mail-JMAPTalk-0.13-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1700166
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.22-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701403
Bug ID: 1701403
Summary: perl-Mojolicious-8.14 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Mojolicious
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701173
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Inline-C-0.80-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701202
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Mail-JMAPTalk-0.13-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1700166
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.22-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1696882
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.9 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1696928
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Locale-SubCountry-2.05 |perl-Locale-SubCountry-2.05
Coming to you a day early due to the holiday tomorrow. Final freeze is
in effect. Go/No-Go meeting is next Thursday.
Action summary
Accepted blockers
-
1. gdm - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1693409
ACTION: halfline to investigate and identify
Hello everyone,
I'm having issue with one of my COPR project builds[0]. The project has
a few UTF-8 tests which are failing[1] but the same `src.rpm`[2] which
is failing on F30 is building fine on F29. Also, I'm able to build the
package in F30 VM (without a mock involved).
I've already had an
Dear all,
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-1 for the Fedora 30
Release Readiness meeting. This meeting will be held on Thursday,
2018-04-25 at 19:00 UTC.
We will meet to make sure we are coordinated and ready for the release
of Fedora 30. Please note that this meeting will be held
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699433
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701173
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701202
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1700644
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
Dear all,
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-1 for the Fedora 30
Release Readiness meeting. This meeting will be held on Thursday,
2018-04-25 at 19:00 UTC.
We will meet to make sure we are coordinated and ready for the release
of Fedora 30. Please note that this meeting will be held
Dear all,
The Go/No-Go meeting for the Fedora 30 release will be held on
Thursday, 2019-04-25 at 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1. For more
information, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Go_No_Go_Meeting
View the meeting on Fedocal at:
Missing expected images:
Atomichost raw-xz x86_64
Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 3/137 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 387113 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_selinux
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/387113
ID: 387136 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
Missing expected images:
Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
Atomichost raw-xz x86_64
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
7 of 47 required tests failed, 4 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could
I'm working on packaging PySide2 for Fedora[1] and have a couple of
questions...
*** Also, I could use an experienced python packager to do the review! ***
1. Should the %python_provide macro be applied to python--devel
packages? Or just for the main python module package?
2. Do I need to
On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 10:22:27 +0200
Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mi, 17.04.19 11:29, Japheth Cleaver (clea...@terabithia.org) wrote:
> > This seems like a false dichotomy, no? Surely, things like this are
> > a possibility:
> >
OLD: Fedora-30-20190416.n.0
NEW: Fedora-30-20190418.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 73
Downgraded packages: 20
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
> "LP" == Lennart Poettering writes:
LP> Yes it is. But so is rngd afaik?
The software isn't exclusive to any particular architecture, though it
may of course have different sources of entropy on different
architectures.
- J<
___
devel mailing
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190417.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190418.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 75
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 7.27 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Hi All,
I recently bought a 2nd hand MX5000 keyboard, which has a builtin LCD
panel. So now I would like to add MX5000 support to the Fedora lcdproc
packages.
This requires libmx5000 which is part of mx5000-tools, so I've packaged\
this up, review request here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699433
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from
On 09/04/19 06:31, Jerry James wrote:
>
> That's as far as I've gotten. I haven't looked at coin-or-Bonmin,
> coin-or-Couenne, coin-or-Dip, or coin-or-OS yet. Let me know if you
> would like to see all these changes first, or proceed with what you have
> planned first.
>
> Regards,
> --
>
On Wed, 2019-04-17 at 10:55 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 17, 2019 4:38:18 AM EDT Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Di, 16.04.19 09:06, Adam Williamson (adamw...@fedoraproject.org) wrote:
> >
> >
> > > > I think all of these are good ideas. "No udev-settle" seems like a
> > > >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701202
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Mail-JMAPTalk-0.13-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-6859bb66b0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701202
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Mail-JMAPTalk-0.13-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-193b3423bf
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701202
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Mail-JMAPTalk-0.13-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-1187a13349
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701202
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701173
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Inline-C-0.80-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-941b1e4711
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701202
Bug ID: 1701202
Summary: perl-Mail-JMAPTalk-0.13 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Mail-JMAPTalk
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701173
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Inline-C-0.80-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-546fda922d
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701173
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Inline-C-0.80-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-a0cd8ee6f3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701173
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701173
Bug ID: 1701173
Summary: perl-Inline-C-0.80 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Inline-C
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Dne 17. 04. 19 v 17:21 Adam Williamson napsal(a):
> On Wed, 2019-04-17 at 08:56 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> There are some sites which let you PXE boot Linux distros over the
>> internet (https://netboot.xyz/ being the most notable).
> Surely the most notable for Fedora is
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 10:55:58AM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 17, 2019 4:38:18 AM EDT Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Di, 16.04.19 09:06, Adam Williamson (adamw...@fedoraproject.org) wrote:
> >
> >
> > > > I think all of these are good ideas. "No udev-settle" seems like a
>
On Mi, 17.04.19 15:25, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-04-17 at 15:14 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > Many have tried to convince upstream about this. If anyone here has
> > influence,
> > please try.
>
> If upstream is currently resistant, what about turning rngd into a
>
On Mi, 17.04.19 16:05, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 11:36 AM Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> >
> > Yeah, all that stuff is stuff the kernel could do better on its
> > own. If the CPU jitter stuff or the TPM stuff is a good idea, then why
> > not add that
On Mi, 17.04.19 15:14, Steve Grubb (sgr...@redhat.com) wrote:
> #!/bin/sh
>
> while [ 1 ]
> do
> /bin/cat /proc/sys/kernel/random/entropy_avail
> sleep 1
> done
>
> Then in another:
>
> cat /dev/random >/dev/null
>
> After a couple seconds, hit ctl-c to kill cat. Watch what
On Mi, 17.04.19 11:29, Japheth Cleaver (clea...@terabithia.org) wrote:
> On 4/17/2019 10:36 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Mi, 17.04.19 10:55, Steve Grubb (sgr...@redhat.com) wrote:
> >
> > > On Wednesday, April 17, 2019 4:38:18 AM EDT Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > > rngd runs as regular
On Mi, 17.04.19 13:01, Jason L Tibbitts III (ti...@math.uh.edu) wrote:
> > "LP" == Lennart Poettering writes:
>
> LP> That's not true anymore. There's a kernel compile time option now
> LP> for that in CONFIG_RANDOM_TRUST_CPU=y. And yes, the Fedora kernel
> LP> sets that since a while.
>
>
On 17. 04. 19 19:19, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2019-04-17 at 17:54 +0100, Luke Hinds wrote:
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 5:34 PM Luke Hinds wrote:
Apologies if not the correct, list , I was not sure if I should post here
or to python-devel
I would like to use setuptools within a python3.7
54 matches
Mail list logo
