https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/05/24/report-389-ds-base-1.4.0.22-1.fc29.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 6:33 PM Christopher wrote:
>
> Do these compose reports need to spam devel@ ?
> I don't think most packagers are involved in composes, and it's hard
> to follow devel@ when it's so busy. It's already cross-posting to
> test@, that should be enough... perhaps there can be a
Do these compose reports need to spam devel@ ?
I don't think most packagers are involved in composes, and it's hard
to follow devel@ when it's so busy. It's already cross-posting to
test@, that should be enough... perhaps there can be a composes@ list
for these? Then folks can opt in.
On Thu, May
On Thu, 2019-05-23 at 17:17 -0400, Christopher wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 7:18 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 23. 05. 19 1:15, Christopher wrote:
> > > Is there ever going to be a replacement for the old pkgdb "Take"
> > > button to take over orphaned packages?
> > > The current process of
Missing expected images:
Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
Atomichost raw-xz x86_64
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
3 of 47 required tests failed, 4 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 11/146 (x86_64), 3/24
Missing expected images:
Atomichost raw-xz x86_64
Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
Missing expected images:
Atomichost raw-xz x86_64
Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 7:18 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 23. 05. 19 1:15, Christopher wrote:
> > Is there ever going to be a replacement for the old pkgdb "Take"
> > button to take over orphaned packages?
> > The current process of submitting a releng ticket, and waiting for
> > somebody to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1713499
Bug ID: 1713499
Summary: perl-Mojolicious-8.17 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Mojolicious
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1710585
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
281 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3c9292b62d
condor-8.6.11-1.el7
89 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-f8311ec8a2
tor-0.3.5.8-1.el7
57
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1705666
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1713481
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Skipping the scratch build because an SRPM could not be built: ['git', 'clone',
'https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/perl-SQL-Shell.git',
'/var/tmp/thn-b_9_ute0'] returned 128:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1713481
Bug ID: 1713481
Summary: perl-SQL-Shell-1.16 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-SQL-Shell
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Thu, 2019-05-23 at 12:13 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 7:24 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 2:54 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DisableRootPasswordLoginInSshd
> > >
> > > == Summary ==
> > > The upstream
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50372
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1712905
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.04-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1712909
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Module-CoreList-5.20190522-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1708964
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.04-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711460
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.04-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711460
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #10 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1712802
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1712909
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1708964
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #16 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1712905
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.04-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1709725
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Log-Report-1.28-1.fc31 |perl-Log-Report-1.28-1.fc31
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 7:58 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On 5/23/19 3:22 AM, Brian (bex) Exelbierd wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > What is now sending fedmsg events when a new package is added to
> > Fedora? Amongst other thigns, we have a badge that isn't being
> > awarded and I can't even figure out how
On 5/23/19 3:22 AM, Brian (bex) Exelbierd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What is now sending fedmsg events when a new package is added to
> Fedora? Amongst other thigns, we have a badge that isn't being
> awarded and I can't even figure out how to easily audit to catch it
> up.
Should be:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1709868
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Devel-PatchPerl-1.60-1 |perl-Devel-PatchPerl-1.60-1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1709725
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1520948
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
This is a wrong email to write such a request.
On Thu, 2019-05-23 at 12:51 -0400, xtify wrote:
>
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
^^ This is the one you
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 7:24 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 2:54 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DisableRootPasswordLoginInSshd
> >
> > == Summary ==
> > The upstream OpenSSH disabled password logins for root back in 2015.
> > The
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines:
On 5/23/19 10:24 AM, stan via devel wrote:
On Mon, 20 May 2019 14:33:57 -0400
Przemek Klosowski via devel wrote:
Right, but it's just a stepping stone to a world with universal
authentication, and granular authorization based on credentials from
that universal authentication.
I hope that
On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 9:37 AM Didier Fabert
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It's a little off topic, but where your fedora_active_user.py script
> come from ?
>
> I have the same problem and according to the
> Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers[1], the "official" repo is
> on github[2].
>
>
That's
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 3:22 PM Tomas Tomecek wrote:
>
> This is still on my backlog, ideally, to also add python2 support and
> add it to epel7. Miro was so nice and fixed the package in rawhide so
> it works with python3.
Why add python2 support? epel7 has python3 support nowadays.
> Feel
On Mon, 20 May 2019 14:33:57 -0400
Przemek Klosowski via devel wrote:
> Right, but it's just a stepping stone to a world with universal
> authentication, and granular authorization based on credentials from
> that universal authentication.
I hope that world never arrives. That would be
This is still on my backlog, ideally, to also add python2 support and
add it to epel7. Miro was so nice and fixed the package in rawhide so
it works with python3.
Feel free to open pull requests via
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-urwid, all the help is very
welcome! Feel free to drop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1713173
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
Hi,
What is now sending fedmsg events when a new package is added to
Fedora? Amongst other thigns, we have a badge that isn't being
awarded and I can't even figure out how to easily audit to catch it
up.
thanks,
bex
--
Brian "bex" Exelbierd (he/him/his)
Fedora Community Action & Impact
On Thu, May 23, 2019, 01:31 Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-05-22 at 23:56 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > If nobody claims the package within the next two weeks, we will
> > orphan
> > it again, setting it on its course towards retirement in about two
> > months.
>
> Why ? IMHO if package
On Thu, May 23, 2019, 01:01 Christopher wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 5:56 PM Fabio Valentini
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello packagers,
> >
> > The Stewardship SIG is currently providing only bare-minimum
> > maintenance for the glassfish-jsp package, and none of our packages
> > depend on it. So,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1713020
--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar ---
*** Bug 1713019 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1713019
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1713020
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
46 matches
Mail list logo
