Re: Fedora 31 Self-Contained Change proposal: Limit Scriptlet Usage of core packages

Wonderful. Is there some tracker covering the issues/packages? I was recently looking into filesystem: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306489#c7 Vít Dne 01. 07. 19 v 22:26 Ben Cotton napsal(a): > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/LimitScriptletUsage > > == Summary == >

MPFR 4

Is anything happening with introducing MPFR 4 into Fedora? I found these: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/mpfr-4.0.0 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1537252 but they indicate that efforts to update have come to a halt. I ask because I have had to patch 2 of my packages to

Fedora Rawhide-20190701.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 1 of 47 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 14/145 (x86_64), 1/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test not failed in

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity Team (weekly)

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Modularity Team (weekly) on 2019-07-02 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Meeting of the Modularity Team. More information available at: [Modularity Team

Fedora updates-20190702.1 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/2 (x86_64) ID: 417690 Test: x86_64 AtomicHost-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/417690 Passed openQA tests: 1/2 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose:

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2019-07-02 - 95% PASS

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/07/02/report-389-ds-base-1.4.1.4-20190701git4661c79.fc30.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190701.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190629.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190701.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:7 Dropped images: 6 Added packages: 5 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 111 Downgraded packages: 1 Size of added packages: 12.35 MiB Size of dropped packages:0

[Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Rawhide 20190701.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 31 Rawhide 20190701.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: Fedora 31 Self-Contained Change proposal: Limit Scriptlet Usage of core packages

On Mon, 2019-07-01 at 17:03 -0400, Robbie Harwood wrote: > Ben Cotton writes: > > > == Detailed Description == > > > > Currently we know how to make an installable OS with packages that > > doesn't require the use of scriptlets, indeed rpm-ostree and others > > have already done this on a

Re: Fedora 31 Self-Contained Change proposal: Limit Scriptlet Usage of core packages

Ben Cotton writes: > == Detailed Description == > > Currently we know how to make an installable OS with packages that > doesn't require the use of scriptlets, indeed rpm-ostree and others > have already done this on a significantly bigger scale. So we plan to > remove direct scriptlets from

Fedora 31 Self-Contained Change proposal: Limit Scriptlet Usage of core packages

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/LimitScriptletUsage == Summary == Remove direct scriptlet calls from "core packages" (those that are used to build minimal container image). The packages can still affect changes during installation by placing files in the correct locations to trigger

Fedora 31 Self-Contained Change proposal: Limit Scriptlet Usage of core packages

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/LimitScriptletUsage == Summary == Remove direct scriptlet calls from "core packages" (those that are used to build minimal container image). The packages can still affect changes during installation by placing files in the correct locations to trigger

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal: Python means Python3

On Monday, 1 July 2019 18.59.42 WEST Björn Persson wrote: > Porting a Python 2 program to Python 3 is not like switching to another > version of GCC. It's more like converting a C program into C++ – and > even then, my gut feeling is that the minimal changes necessary to turn > a typical C program

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal: Python means Python3

On 01. 07. 19 16:21, Peter Robinson wrote: On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 2:34 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: On 28. 06. 19 0:51, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On Thu, 27 Jun 2019 at 18:49, Neal Gompa mailto:ngomp...@gmail.com>> wrote: > What about postponing this change to F32? I'd prefer python2

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal: Python means Python3

Gerald Henriksen wrote: > Nobody trying to compile a C program expects to have to use gcc9, they > just expect to type in gcc. Despite all its flaws, C is pretty good at backwards-compatibility. A valid C99 program can be expected to work unchanged as C11. (A correct, standard-compliant C

Added simple 3D game to wdune opengl_examples subpackage

Hi, I added the VRML97 based "Tux warbird" 3D game to the white_dune opengl_examples subpackage. This adds C++ code to the VRML-Script nodes in a way that makes it possible to still use warbird.wrl in a VRML97 browser like FreeWRL or (webgl based) firefox. The resulting interactive binary only

Orphaned packages looking for maintainers

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal: Python means Python3

On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 2:34 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 28. 06. 19 0:51, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 27 Jun 2019 at 18:49, Neal Gompa > > wrote: > > > > > > > What about postponing this change to F32? I'd prefer python2 to be > > >

Orphaned packages looking for maintainers

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

[Bug 1725729] Upgrade perl-Cookie-Baker to 0.11

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1725729 Ralf Corsepius changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

[EPEL-devel] Update on EPEL-8 Status

# Update on EPEL-8 Status ## Why is EPEL-8 Taking So Long (tl;dr:) 1. Getting koji to work smoothly with modules has been hard. A multi-level fix has had to be worked to get it working in staging. * Needed a way to split out default modules to deal with koji merge options.

Lines disordered in mock's build.log

Hello, I've noticed that last couple of weeks, I see disordered lines in mock's build.log. This happens constantly in local mock, copr and Koji. Example: 25/41 Test #25: List_test Passed0.01 sec Start 26: Particle_test 26/41 Test #26: Particle_test

Final reminder: F31 System-Wide Change and Change requiring mass rebuild due tomorrow

If you have a Change proposal that requires a mass rebuild or are categorized as a system-wide change, those proposals must be submitted (i.e. in ChangeReadyForWrangler category) tomorrow, 2 July. Self-contained change proposals are due on 23 July. For more development milestones in the F31

Final reminder: F31 System-Wide Change and Change requiring mass rebuild due tomorrow

If you have a Change proposal that requires a mass rebuild or are categorized as a system-wide change, those proposals must be submitted (i.e. in ChangeReadyForWrangler category) tomorrow, 2 July. Self-contained change proposals are due on 23 July. For more development milestones in the F31

Packit-as-a-Service is now live!

We are happy to announce the availability of Packit-as-a-Service [1], a GitHub App, which utilizes the Packit project [2]. Using the Packit service in your upstream projects helps you continuously ensure that your projects work in Fedora OS. Just add one config file [3] to your repository, along

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal: Python means Python3

On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 09:44:35AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 01. 07. 19 9:02, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > >>>On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 5:59 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > >>> wrote: > What about postponing this change to F32? > > > >I'm now convinced postponing is not

[Bug 1725729] Upgrade perl-Cookie-Baker to 0.11

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1725729 --- Comment #1 from Ralf Corsepius --- perl-Cookie-Baker-0.11 packages were pushed in bodhi several days ago: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-c80993956f https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-a26b73f6d5 I

[Bug 1725729] New: Upgrade perl-Cookie-Baker to 0.11

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1725729 Bug ID: 1725729 Summary: Upgrade perl-Cookie-Baker to 0.11 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Cookie-Baker Assignee: rc040...@freenet.de

[Bug 1725523] perl-Test-Compile-2.1.1 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1725523 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

Re: glibc-headers troubles with rawhide on ARM

* Olivier Fourdan: > Last Friday, I tried to update the xorg-x11-server package, everything > went well on F30 but the compilation failed on ARM because of a > missing header `sys/io.h`: > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/2196/35892196/build.log > > ``` > BUILDSTDERR:

Re: glibc-headers troubles with rawhide on ARM

Hi, On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 11:12 AM Olivier Fourdan wrote: > > Hi, > > Last Friday, I tried to update the xorg-x11-server package, everything > went well on F30 but the compilation failed on ARM because of a > missing header `sys/io.h`: > >

glibc-headers troubles with rawhide on ARM

Hi, Last Friday, I tried to update the xorg-x11-server package, everything went well on F30 but the compilation failed on ARM because of a missing header `sys/io.h`: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/2196/35892196/build.log ``` BUILDSTDERR:

[Bug 1725474] perl-Pod-Simple-3.39 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1725474 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

Unresponsive maintainer: rmarko

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1725650 Anyone know how to contact Richard? I tried the FAS address a couple of weeks ago or so, but still no response. Also seems that his last login was almost a year ago. -- Ernestas Kulik Associate Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems (Core

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal: Python means Python3

On 01. 07. 19 9:02, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 5:59 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: What about postponing this change to F32? I'm now convinced postponing is not appropriate. In the meantime, I decided to ask some non-developers (biologists actually)

[Bug 1725351] perl-PDF-API2-2.034 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1725351 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal: Python means Python3

> >On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 5:59 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > wrote: > >>What about postponing this change to F32? I'm now convinced postponing is not appropriate. In the meantime, I decided to ask some non-developers (biologists actually) for their opinion, and the majority favours having

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal: gawk 5.0.1

Yes, the patches dealing with this would be used in Fedora. Jakub On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 07:25:59AM -0500, Justin Forbes wrote: > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 9:38 AM Ben Cotton wrote: > > > The introduction of namespaces may break some scripts written for > > gawk 4.2.1 due to different variable