https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1724012
--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1587576
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1587576=edit
[patch] Update to 3.0.2 (#1724012)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1724012
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ack-3.0.1 is available |ack-3.0.2 is available
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
7 of 47 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 23/147 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Rawhide-20190703.n.0):
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190703.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190704.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:4
Dropped images: 7
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 217
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 82.86 KiB
Size of dropped packages
On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 8:25 AM Gerald Henriksen wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Jul 2019 21:47:44 +0800, you wrote:
>
> >yeah i agree .. my exp dealing with the tools highlights one tricky
> problem
> >we might face -> avoiding statically / bundled dependencies , while on the
> >same time getting all the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1723904
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-FFI-CheckLib-0.25-1.fc |perl-FFI-CheckLib-0.25-1.fc
Hi all,
I've been re-deploying my home ldap server with the cli today and ... wow. DS
1.4.x compared to 1.3.x to administer is like a new product. It's unbelievable
how easy it is to do ... everything. New backends, exports, imports, plugins
... you name it. It's really looking like "the ldap
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/07/05/report-389-ds-base-1.4.1.4-20190704gitc2650f0.fc30.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 31 Rawhide 20190704.n.1. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
15 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-12f1eb1b1f
tomcat-7.0.94-1.el6
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing
davix-0.7.4-1.el6
Details about builds:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1723904
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50484
Found after doing production deployment of 389 in container. Likely there are
more to come as I add replicas!
--
Sincerely,
William
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On Thu, 4 Jul 2019 21:47:44 +0800, you wrote:
>yeah i agree .. my exp dealing with the tools highlights one tricky problem
>we might face -> avoiding statically / bundled dependencies , while on the
>same time getting all the tools to work .. most of them locks to specific
>dependency version,
On Thu, 2019-07-04 at 13:15 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I've submitted 100s of update but never seen test gating status "waiting"
> and "ignored"
>
> What is the meaning?
'ignored' would mean there are no relevant gating tests, I think.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw
I've submitted 100s of update but never seen test gating status "waiting"
and "ignored"
What is the meaning?
Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hello Chris,
Thanks for bringing this topic and sorry for the late reply.
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 10:20 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This is not a formal proposal, this is for discussion and identifying
> liabilities. This email has an x86 GRUB bias only because that's the
> bootloader
Hi,
I just submit po4a-0.56 to rawhide, po4a don't have any so-name bump
but is wildly used , so some attention is advised .
Thanks
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Thu, 2019-07-04 at 09:03 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-07-04 at 11:38 +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> > OK, let's talk about concrete package: crypto-policies needs to run
> > update-crypto-policies --no-check >/dev/null
> >
> > It currently does it in %post.
> >
> > It could do it
On Thu, 2019-07-04 at 11:38 +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote:
>
> OK, let's talk about concrete package: crypto-policies needs to run
> update-crypto-policies --no-check >/dev/null
>
> It currently does it in %post.
>
> It could do it in %posttrans - that would be one option.
Presumably only if no
On Thu, 4 Jul 2019 12:41:26 +0800, you wrote:
>Currently my idea on this SIG would be:
>1 - packaging data engineering related softwares into Fedora, and make them
>easy to install, covering from workflow tools (eg: airflow, luigi), data
>processing engines (eg: apache spark, flink),
On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 7:45 PM Ankur Sinha wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 12:41:26 +0800, Mohd Izhar Firdaus Ismail wrote:
> > Hi all,
>
> Hello!
>
> Long time no see!!
>
yeah its been a while ^^
>
> > I'm wondering if there are people who are working on data engineering is
> > interested in
On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 02:42:15PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
>
> > We know that cgroupv2 already (and for a long time...) works better
> > than v1, so I'd rather make the switch unconditional, using the usual
> > phrasing of "In the unlikely case catastrophic
* Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
> We know that cgroupv2 already (and for a long time...) works better
> than v1, so I'd rather make the switch unconditional, using the usual
> phrasing of "In the unlikely case catastrophic problems are discovered
> with v2, the default will be reverted to v1.".
Hello!
Science, like Free/Open Source software should be open for all to use,
modify, explore, learn, and share. This is especially important to
ensure that the results from scientific work are not merely limited to
"academia", but are easily understandable by people in other walks of
life also.
On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 12:41:26 +0800, Mohd Izhar Firdaus Ismail wrote:
> Hi all,
Hello!
Long time no see!!
> I'm wondering if there are people who are working on data engineering is
> interested in working on a SIG focusing on DE.
>
> Currently my idea on this SIG would be:
> 1 - packaging
FYI, I have put together a Change proposal for this work, which you
may have seen announced [1].
On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 at 09:35, José Abílio Matos wrote:
>
> On Sunday, 16 June 2019 03.09.41 WEST Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
> > Hi R-interested packagers and others,
> >
> > So now the question
On Mon, 2019-07-01 at 17:18 -0400, James Antill wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-07-01 at 17:03 -0400, Robbie Harwood wrote:
> > Ben Cotton writes:
> >
> > > == Detailed Description ==
> > >
> > > Currently we know how to make an installable OS with packages
> > > that
> > > doesn't require the use of
On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 04:23:24PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CGroupsV2
>
> == Summary ==
> The kernel has had some support for CgroupsV2 for some time, and yet
> no one has used it because it is not on by default. There are lots of
> new features and fixes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1726845
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
29 matches
Mail list logo
